Direct-acting antivirals used in HCV-related liver disease do not affect thyroid function and autoimmunity.

PURPOSE: It is well known that interferon-α (IFN-α), used for long time as the main therapy for HCV-related disease, induces thyroid alterations, but the impact of the new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) on thyroid is not established. Aim of this prospective study was to evaluate if DAAs therapy may induce thyroid alterations. METHODS: A total of 113 HCV patients, subdivided at the time of the enrollment in naïve group (n = 64) and in IFN-α group (n = 49) previously treated with pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin, were evaluated for thyroid function and autoimmunity before and after 20-32 weeks of DAAs. RESULTS: Before starting DAAs, a total of 8/113 (7.1%) patients showed Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) all belonging to IFN-α group (8/49, 16.3%), while no HT cases were found in the naïve group. Overall, 7/113 (6.2%) patients were hypothyroid: 3/64 (4.7%) belonging to naïve group and 4/49 (8.2%) to IFN-α group. Furthermore, a total of 8/113 patients (7.1%) showed subclinical hyperthyroidism: 2/64 (3.1%) were from naïve group and 6/49 (12.2%) from IFN-α group. Interestingly, after DAAs therapy, no new cases of HT, hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism was found in all series, while 6/11 (54.5%) patients with non-autoimmune subclinical thyroid dysfunction became euthyroid. Finally, the only association between viral genotypes and thyroid alterations was genotype 1 and hypothyroidism. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports evidence that DAAs have a limited or missing influence on thyroid in patients with HCV-related diseases. Moreover, it provides preliminary evidence that subclinical non-autoimmune thyroid dysfunction may improve after HCV infection resolution obtained by DAAs.

Azathioprine for prevention of clinical recurrence in Crohn's disease patients with severe endoscopic recurrence: an IG-IBD randomized double-blind trial.

OBJECTIVE: The recurrence of Crohn's Disease after ileo-colonic resection is a crucial issue. Severe endoscopic lesions increase the risk of developing early symptoms. Prevention and treatment of post-operative Endoscopic Recurrence (ER) have been studied with conflicting results. We compare effi cacy of azathioprine (AZA) vs. high-dose 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in preventing clinical recurrence and treating severe post-operative ER. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a 1-year multicenter randomized double-blind double-dummy trial. Primary end-points were endoscopic improvement and therapeutic failure (clinical recurrence or drug discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or adverse events) 12 months after randomization. We also performed a post-trial analysis on symptomatic and endoscopic outcomes 10 years after the beginning of the trial, with a median follow-up of 60 months. RESULTS: Therapeutic failure occurred in 8 patients (17.4%) within 12 months from randomization, with no significant difference between patients treated with 5-ASA (20.8%, 5 patients) and those with AZA (13.6%, 3 patients). Therapeutic failure was due to clinical recurrence in the 5-ASA group and to adverse events in the AZA group. Endoscopic improvement at 12 months was observed in 8 patients, 2 (11.8%) in the 5-ASA group and 6 (30%) in the AZA group. No serious adverse event was recorded. At the post-trial analysis (median follow-up 60 months), 47.8% (22/46) of patients experienced clinical recurrence: 54.2% (13/24) in the 5-ASA group and 40.9% (9/22) in the AZA group, p=0.546. Patients treated with AZA had lower risk of drug escalation. Clinical recurrence was associated with smoking (p=0.031) and previous surgery (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our trial indicates that there was no difference in terms of treatment failure between 5-ASA and AZA in patients with severe ER. The main limit of AZA is its less favorable safety profile.

A phase 1 open-label trial shows that smad7 antisense oligonucleotide (GED0301) does not increase the risk of small bowel strictures in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: In Crohn's disease (CD), knockdown of Smad7, an inhibitor of Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-ß1 activity, with a specific antisense oligonucleotide (GED0301) seems to be safe and tolerable and associates with TGF-ß1-mediated suppression of inflammatory pathways. AIM: Since TGF-ß1 has pro-fibrogenic effects in many organs, we evaluated whether GED0301 treatment associates with the formation of small bowel strictures. METHODS: Fifteen patients with active, inflammatory CD, receiving oral GED0301 once daily for 7 days, were monitored for the formation of small bowel strictures by Small Intestine Contrast Ultrasonography (SICUS). Serum basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and human chitinase 3-like 1 (also known as YKL-40), two markers of CD-related intestinal strictures, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) and tissue inhibitor 1 of MMPs (TIMP1) were analysed at day 0 and day 180 by ELISA. Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) changes were also monitored. RESULTS: Fourteen patients completed the 6-month study; the remaining underwent intestinal resection for a severe relapse not responsive to medical treatment. No patient developed small bowel stricture and none experienced obstructive symptoms during the study period. GED0301 treatment induced no significant change in the circulating levels of bFGF, YKL-40, MMPs and TIMP1. Seven of 12 patients who reached clinical remission following GED0301 treatment maintained a CDAI < 150 at day 180. CONCLUSION: Short-term treatment of patients with Crohn's disease using GED0301 is not associated with the development of small bowel stricture, thus reinforcing the concept that this drug is safe at least at early time points.

Efficacy and safety of infliximab and adalimumab in Crohn's disease: a single centre study.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab and adalimumab are highly effective in Crohn's Disease (CD). This is supported by clinical trials and open-label studies using either infliximab or adalimumab, thus not allowing a proper comparison between these anti-TNFs in CD. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab and adalimumab in active CD. METHODS: In a longitudinal study, CD patients with indication for anti-TNFs were treated with infliximab or adalimumab. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were treated with infliximab (n = 44) or adalimumab (n = 49). In the infliximab group, the induction was completed by 77.3% of patients, due to no response (n = 2), delayed hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) or infusion reactions (n = 8). Maintenance with infliximab was completed by 60% of patients, due to clinical worsening or loss of efficacy (n = 5), DHR or infusion reactions (n = 5). In the adalimumab group, all patients completed the induction, while maintenance was completed by 67% of patients, due to clinical worsening or loss of efficacy (n = 8), DHR (n = 1), other causes (n = 7). In both groups, the CDAI significantly reduced at baseline vs. each visit (P < 0.04). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis performed to evaluate the risk of steroid-free remission in patients treated with infliximab vs. adalimumab detected no differences (log-rank test P = 0.4). Cox proportional-hazards regression identified two predictors of steroid-free remission using anti-TNFs: no smokers [HR = 2.94 (1.52-5.70), P = 0.001] and non stricturing non penetrating behaviour [HR = 3.116 (1.06-9.13), P = 0.03826]. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab and adalimumab showed a similar efficacy. No smoking and non-stricturing non-penetrating behaviour were predictors of steroid-free remission.

Endoscopic vs ultrasonographic findings related to Crohn's disease recurrence: a prospective longitudinal study at 3 years.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ileocolonoscopy (IC) is the gold standard for assessing Crohn's Disease (CD) recurrence after ileo-colonic resection. In a prospective longitudinal study we compared findings related to CD recurrence when using techniques visualizing either the luminal or the extraluminal surface (IC and small bowel follow through, SBFT vs Small Intestine Contrast Ultrasonography, SICUS). METHODS: From 2003 to 2008, 25 CD patients undergoing ileo-colonic resection were enrolled. Clinical assessment (CDAI) was performed at 1, 2 and 3 years. IC was performed at 1 (n=25) and 3 years (n=15), SBFT at 2 years (n=21) and SICUS at 1 (n=25), 2 (n=21) and 3 years (n=15). Recurrence was assessed by SBFT and SICUS (bowel wall thickness, BWT) when using IC as gold standard. RESULTS: At 1 year, all patients were inactive and recurrence was detected by IC in 24/25 (96%) and by SICUS in 25/25 patients. At 2 years, 6/21 patients (29%) were active and recurrence was detected by SBFT in 12/21 (57%) and by SICUS in 21/21 patients. At 3 years, 5/15 patients (33%) were active, IC showed recurrence in 14/15 (93%), and SICUS in 15/15 patients. The endoscopic score at 1 year was higher in patients developing relapse at 2 years (n=5) than in patients maintaining remission (n=10) (median: 4, range 3-4 vs 2, range 0-3; p=0.003). The same finding was not observed by using SICUS (median BWT at 1 year: 5, range 4-7 vs 3.7, range 3.5-6; p=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Although IC and SICUS provide a different view of the bowel wall, in experienced hands SICUS provides findings compatible with endoscopic recurrence after ileo-colonic resection for CD. Discrepant findings may be observed in a low proportion of patients with minor lesions related to CD recurrence.

Non-invasive techniques for assessing postoperative recurrence in Crohn's disease.

Postoperative recurrence after ileo-colonic resection is a feature of Crohn's Disease (CD), almost 73% of patients show endoscopic recurrence at 1 year and 90% at 3 years. After surgical resection for CD, symptoms may be related to the surgical resection itself. Moreover, the development of an early severe endoscopic recurrence within 1 year represents a risk factor for early clinical recurrence. On the basis of these observations, the early detection and assessment of asymptomatic endoscopic recurrence may allow a timely and appropriate treatment of CD patients after ileo-colonic resection. At this purpose, conventional colonoscopy with ileoscopy currently represents the gold standard for assessing CD recurrence, graded according to the Rutgeerts' score. Lesions compatible with CD recurrence can be also detected by conventional radiology, including small bowel follow through and enema, both associated with a high radiation exposure. Due to the ineluctable course of CD after resection, and to the need of a proper follow up for assessing CD recurrence, several alternative, non invasive techniques have been searched in order to assess the post-operative recurrence, including: faecal alpha 1-antitrypsin clearance, faecal calprotectin, 99Tc-HMPAO scintigraphy, virtual colonoscopy, ultrasonography and, more recently, wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) and Small Intestine Contrast Ultrasonography (SICUS). Among these, current evidences suggest that in experienced hands, ultrasound examination by SICUS represents a non-invasive technique useful for assessing recurrence in CD patients under regular follow up after surgery. The same findings are suggested for WCE, although the impact risk related to the recurrence or to the surgical anastomosis itself limits the use of this non-invasive technique for assessing CD recurrence after surgery.