RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Only a fraction of patients with metastatic melanoma derive durable benefit from approved treatments. The clinical impact of personalized medicine strategies for melanoma, apart from BRAF, NRAS, or CKIT targeting, has rarely been reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By means of the Group of Cutaneous Oncology of the French Society of Dermatology, we retrospectively included all patients with advanced melanoma aged 18 years and older for whom molecular testing identified one or more actionable molecular alterations and who accordingly received molecularly matched therapy. We excluded patients with only BRAF, NRAS, or CKIT alterations and patients who received molecularly matched therapy for less than 15 days. RESULTS: We included 26 patients with a median follow-up of 8 months (1-54), a median age of 63 years (24-89), and a sex ratio of 2.7. These patients had been heavily pretreated, and 64% had elevated LDH levels. The disease control rate was 38%, with 4 cases of partial response (overall response rate: 15%) and 6 of stable disease for at least 6 months. The median duration of treatment was 3.1 months (0.9-13.5). Among patients with disease control, the median duration of control was 6.6 months (2.6-13.5) and 3 cases were ongoing at the end of the study. Patients with controlled disease had GNA11, MAP2K1, FYCO1-RAF1, HRAS, ATM, CCND1, MDM2/CDK4, and CDKN2A/NRAS alterations. CONCLUSIONS: High-throughput sequencing followed by matched targeted therapy is a promising approach for patients with advanced melanoma refractory to approved treatments.
RESUMO
Background: Oncogenic fusions of neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3 genes have been found in different types of solid tumors. The treatment of patients with TRK fusion cancer with a first-generation TRK inhibitor (such as larotrectinib or entrectinib) is associated with high response rates (>75%), regardless of tumor histology and presence of metastases. Due to the efficacy of TRK inhibitor therapy of larotrectinib and entrectinib, it is clinically important to identify patients accurately and efficiently with TRK fusion cancer. In this retrospective study, we provide unique data on the incidence of oncogenic NTRK gene fusions in patients with brain metastases (BM) and gliomas. Methods: 140 samples fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE) of adult patients (59 of gliomas [17 of WHO grade II, 20 of WHO grade III and 22 glioblastomas] and 81 of brain metastasis (BM) of different primary tumors) are analyzed. Identification of NTRK gene fusions is performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology using Focus RNA assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Results: We identified an ETV6 (5)::NTRK3 (15) fusion event using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) in one of 59 glioma patient with oligodendroglioma-grade II, IDH-mutated and 1p19q co-deleted at incidence of 1.69%. Five additional patients harboring TMPRSS (2)::ERG (4) were identified in pancreatic carcinoma brain metastasis (BM), prostatic carcinoma BM, endometrium BM and oligodendroglioma (grade II), IDH-mutated and 1p19q co-deleted. A FGFR3 (17)::TACC3 (11) fusion was identified in one carcinoma breast BM. Aberrant splicing to produce EGFR exons 2-7 skipping mRNA, and MET exon 14 skipping mRNA were identified in glioblastoma and pancreas carcinoma BM, respectively. Conclusions: This study provides data on the incidence of NTRK gene fusions in brain tumors, which could strongly support the relevance of innovative clinical trials with specific targeted therapies (larotrectinib, entrectinib) in this population of patients. FGFR3 (17)::TACC3 (11) rearrangement was detected in breast carcinoma BM with the possibility of using some specific targeted therapies and TMPRSS (2)::ERG (4) rearrangements occur in a subset of patients with, prostatic carcinoma BM, endometrium BM, and oligodendroglioma (grade II), IDH-mutated and 1p19q co-deleted, where there are yet no approved ERG-directed therapies.