Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
Br J Dermatol ; 188(5): 618-627, 2023 04 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36763783

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Real-world data evaluating effectiveness and persistence of systemic therapies for patients with psoriasis are limited. Objectives To determine the effectiveness and persistence of acitretin, ciclosporin, fumaric acid esters (FAEs) and methotrexate in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: Data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR), a prospective, multicentre pharmacovigilance register of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving biologic and/or conventional systemic therapies, were analysed. Eligible patients were ≥ 16 years of age receiving a first course of acitretin, ciclosporin, FAEs or methotrexate between 2007 and 2021 with ≥ 6 months' follow-up. Effectiveness was defined as achieving absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (aPASI) ≤ 2 reported ≥ 4 weeks after treatment start date until date of cessation. To identify baseline clinical variables associated with treatment effectiveness, we used multivariable logistic regression models estimating the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of achieving aPASI ≤ 2. To describe drug persistence associated with ineffectiveness, occurrence of adverse events or other reasons for discontinuation, survival estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using a flexible parametric model. Results were obtained using multiple imputed data. RESULTS: In total, 5430 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, 1023 (19%) patients were receiving acitretin, 1401 (26%) patients were on ciclosporin, 347 (6%) patients were on FAEs, and 2659 (49%) patients were receiving methotrexate at registration. The proportion of patients who achieved aPASI ≤ 2 was lower for those treated with acitretin [n = 118 (21%)] compared with those receiving ciclosporin [n = 233 (34%)], FAEs [n = 43 (29%)] and methotrexate [n = 372 (32%)]. Factors associated with ineffectiveness included prior experience to previous nonbiologic systemic therapies (acitretin) (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.96), male sex (methotrexate) (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46-0.74), comorbidities (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.97) and alcohol consumption (≤ 14 units per week) (ciclosporin) (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.98). Persistence associated with all reasons for discontinuation showed better survival for methotrexate compared with acitretin, ciclosporin and FAEs cohorts at 12 months [survival estimate 46.1 (95% CI 44.0-48.3), 31.9 (95% CI 29.4-34.7), 30.0 (95% CI 27.5-32.4) and 35.0 (95% CI 29.9-40.9), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: The real-world effectiveness and persistence of acitretin, ciclosporin, FAEs and methotrexate were generally low. Previous nonbiologic systemic therapies, male sex, comorbidities and alcohol consumption were risk factors associated with treatment ineffectiveness.


Assuntos
Fármacos Dermatológicos , Psoríase , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Acitretina/efeitos adversos , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Fumaratos/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/induzido quimicamente , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 3: CD001976, 2019 03 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30839103

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Guttate psoriasis is a distinctive acute form of psoriasis which characteristically occurs in children and young adults. It is closely associated with preceding streptococcal sore throat or tonsillitis. Some authorities have claimed that ordinary (chronic plaque) psoriasis may also be made worse by infection at distant sites. Although many dermatologists have recommended using antibiotics for guttate psoriasis in particular, it is not clear whether they influence the course of either form of psoriasis. Some dermatologists have also recommended tonsillectomy for psoriasis in patients with recurrent streptococcal sore throat. OBJECTIVES: To assess the evidence for effectiveness of antistreptococcal interventions including antibiotics and tonsillectomy in the management of acute guttate and chronic plaque psoriasis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register (Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 1999), Medline (1966- September 1999), Embase (1988-September 1999), the Salford Database of Psoriasis Trials (to November 1999) and the European Dermato-Epidemiology Network (EDEN) Psoriasis Trials Database (to November 1999) for terms [STREPTOCOCC* or ANTIBIOTIC* or TONSIL*] and PSORIASIS using the Cochrane Skin Group search strategy. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of one or more antistreptococcal interventions in patients with guttate or chronic plaque psoriasis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently examined each retrieved trial for eligibility and quality. MAIN RESULTS: The one eligible trial we identified compared the use of two oral antibiotic schedules in 20 psoriasis patients, predominantly of guttate type, who had evidence of beta-haemolytic streptococcal colonisation. Either rifampicin or placebo was added to the end of a standard course of antistreptococcal antibiotic (phenoxymethylpenicillin or erythromycin). No patient in either arm of the study improved during the observation period.No randomised trials of tonsillectomy for psoriasis were identified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although it is well known that guttate psoriasis may be precipitated by streptococcal infection, there is no firm evidence to support the use of antibiotics either in the management of established guttate psoriasis or in preventing the development of guttate psoriasis following streptococcal sore throat.Although both antibiotics and tonsillectomy have frequently been advocated for patients with recurrent guttate psoriasis or chronic plaque psoriasis, there is to date no good evidence that either intervention is beneficial.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/terapia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Tonsilectomia , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Psoríase/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/complicações , Tonsilite/complicações
4.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 4: CD001213, 2019 04 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30964200

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Guttate psoriasis is a distinctive acute form of psoriasis which characteristically occurs in children and young adults. Very little specific evidence-based guidance is available in standard texts to help make rational decisions about treatment options. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of treatments for guttate psoriasis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register (Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 1999), Medline (1966- September 1999), Embase (1988-September 1999), Salford Database of Psoriasis Trials (to November 1999) and European Dermato-Epidemiology Network (EDEN) Psoriasis Trials Database (to November 1999) for terms GUTTATE and PSORIASIS. We also searched 100 unselected RCTs of psoriasis therapy and all 112 RCTs of phototherapy for psoriasis in the Salford Database of Psoriasis Trials for separate stratification for guttate psoriasis. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials in which patients with acute guttate psoriasis were randomised to different treatments, except those trials examining antistreptococcal interventions which are addressed in a separate Cochrane review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility and quality. MAIN RESULTS: No published report could be found to support or to challenge current commonly used methods of management.Only one trial which met the selection criteria was identified. In this small study of 21 hospitalised patients with guttate psoriasis, intravenous infusion of an n-3 fatty acid rich lipid emulsion was compared with placebo emulsion containing n-6 fatty acids. The n-3 preparation appeared to be of some benefit for patients with guttate psoriasis. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no firm evidence on which to base treatment of acute guttate psoriasis. Studies comparing standard treatment modalities, including phototherapy and topical regimens, are required to enable informed decisions on treatment choices to be made.

6.
J Invest Dermatol ; 137(8): 1646-1654, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28457908

RESUMO

Multiple biologic treatments are licensed for psoriasis. The lack of head-to-head randomized controlled trials makes choosing between them difficult for patients, clinicians, and guideline developers. To establish their relative efficacy and tolerability, we searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials of licensed biologic treatments for skin psoriasis. We performed a network meta-analysis to identify direct and indirect evidence comparing biologics with one another, methotrexate, or placebo. We combined this with hierarchical cluster analysis to consider multiple outcomes related to efficacy and tolerability in combination for each treatment. Study quality, heterogeneity, and inconsistency were evaluated. Direct comparisons from 41 randomized controlled trials (20,561 participants) were included. All included biologics were efficacious compared with placebo or methotrexate at 3-4 months. Overall, cluster analysis showed adalimumab, secukinumab, and ustekinumab were comparable in terms of high efficacy and tolerability. Ixekizumab and infliximab were differentiated by very high efficacy but poorer tolerability. The lack of longer term controlled data limited our analysis to short-term outcomes. Trial performance may not equate to real-world performance, and so results need to be considered alongside real-world, long-term safety and effectiveness data. These data suggest that it is possible to discriminate between biologics to inform clinical practice and decision making (PROSPERO 2015:CRD42015017538).


Assuntos
Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Metanálise em Rede
7.
J Invest Dermatol ; 136(8): 1584-1591, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27085754

RESUMO

A comprehensive evaluation of the risk of serious infections in biologic therapies for psoriasis is lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies reporting serious infections in people taking any licensed biologic therapy for psoriasis compared with those taking placebo, nonbiologic therapy, or other biologic therapies. The quality of the studies was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. No significant heterogeneity was detected in data from 32 RCTs (n = 13,359 participants) and one cohort study (n = 4,993 participants). In adults, low- to very-low-quality RCT data showed no significant difference between any biologic therapy and placebo at weeks 12-16 (overall pooled Peto odds ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.36-1.41) and weeks 20-30 (odds ratio = 2.27, 95% confidence interval = 0.45-11.49). No significant differences were found in any of the other comparisons in underpowered RCT data. Prospective cohort study data of low quality suggests that only adalimumab (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR] = 2.52, 95% confidence interval = 1.47-4.32) was associated with a significantly higher risk of serious infection compared with retinoid and/or phototherapy in adults. No association between biologic therapies and serious infections in patients with psoriasis who were eligible for RCTs was detected. Further observational studies are needed to inform the uncertainty around this risk in the real world.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Infecções/complicações , Psoríase/complicações , Psoríase/terapia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Terapia Biológica , Humanos , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Razão de Chances , Fototerapia/métodos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Retinoides/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico
9.
J Invest Dermatol ; 135(11): 2632-2640, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26053050

RESUMO

Drug survival reflects a drug's effectiveness, safety, and tolerability. We assessed the drug survival of biologics used to treat psoriasis in a prospective national pharmacovigilance cohort (British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)). The survival rates of the first course of biologics for 3,523 biologic-naive patients with chronic plaque psoriasis were compared using survival analysis techniques and predictors of discontinuation analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Data for patients on adalimumab (n=1,879), etanercept (n=1,098), infliximab (n=96), and ustekinumab (n=450) were available. The overall survival rate in the first year was 77%, falling to 53% in the third year. Multivariate analysis showed that female gender (hazard ratio (HR) 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09-1.37), being a current smoker (HR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03-1.38), and a higher baseline dermatology life quality index (HR 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.02) were predictors of discontinuation. Presence of psoriatic arthritis (HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71-0.96) was a predictor for drug survival. As compared with adalimumab, patients on etanercept (HR 1.63; 95% CI: 1.45-1.84) or infliximab (HR 1.56; 95% CI: 1.16-2.09) were more likely to discontinue therapy, whereas patients on ustekinumab were more likely to persist (HR 0.48; 95% CI: 0.37-0.62). After accounting for relevant covariates, ustekinumab had the highest first-course drug survival. The results of this study will aid clinical decision making when choosing biologic therapy for psoriasis patients.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/administração & dosagem , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Psoríase/diagnóstico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Adalimumab/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Produtos Biológicos/farmacocinética , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Dermatologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Etanercepte/administração & dosagem , Etanercepte/farmacocinética , Feminino , Humanos , Infliximab/administração & dosagem , Infliximab/farmacocinética , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Sociedades Médicas , Ustekinumab/administração & dosagem , Ustekinumab/farmacocinética
10.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng ; 49(8): 852-8, 2002 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12148824

RESUMO

The continuous respiration olfactometer (CRO) was designed as a respiration-synchronous method for delivering odorants during recordings of brain electrical activity, providing control and monitoring of the timing of the delivery as well as the quantities of odorant involved. The CRO incorporates a purpose-built electronic system designed with very specific temporal and quantitative characteristics, and is composed of four main parts: the respiratory monitoring apparatus, the odorant/air delivery system, the serial interface device and the respiratory monitoring software. Tests were undertaken to determine the performance of the system with reference to the accuracy and precision of timing and control of odorant delivery. Tests were also undertaken to determine the effects of variations in natural respiration between subjects on the capability of the respiratory monitoring system, using a group of 50 subjects, to test the success of a variable gain control to optimize the range of the digitized respiratory output. The delivery system was able to provide information concerning quantities of air or odorant delivered, and the stimulus timing information required for integration with neurophysiological recording techniques.


Assuntos
1-Butanol/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos/instrumentação , Limiar Sensorial/fisiologia , Olfato/fisiologia , Adulto , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos/métodos , Eletroencefalografia , Desenho de Equipamento , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Potenciais Evocados/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Odorantes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Respiração , Fenômenos Fisiológicos Respiratórios , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Estimulação Química
12.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 47(2 Suppl): S165-7, 2002 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12140451

RESUMO

The use of cyclosporin in the transplant setting is associated with a small but significantly increased risk of the development of lymphoproliferative disorders. These are predominantly but not always related to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. We report a cutaneous CD30(+) T-cell lymphoma in a patient with atopic eczema during low-dose cyclosporin monotherapy. There was no evidence of EBV DNA transcripts in the tumor tissue as assessed by in situ hybridization. The tumors resolved when cyclosporin therapy was stopped and have not recurred. There are a few reports of primary cutaneous lymphoma in transplant patients. This is the first report to our knowledge of cutaneous lymphoma in a patient treated with low-dose cyclosporin monotherapy. Although this finding may be coincidental, we believe this case highlights the small lymphoproliferative risk associated with cyclosporin.


Assuntos
Ciclosporina/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efeitos adversos , Linfoma Cutâneo de Células T/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Cutâneas/induzido quimicamente , Adulto , Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Linfoma Cutâneo de Células T/patologia , Masculino , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA