Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 27(7): 1998-2005, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29580658

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has the potential to enhance the effects of physiotherapy for upper limb motor recovery after stroke. Noninvasive, transcutaneous auricular branch VNS (taVNS) may have similar benefits, but this has not been evaluated in stroke recovery. We sought to determine the feasibility of taVNS delivered alongside upper limb repetitive task-specific practice after stroke and its effects on a range of outcome measures evaluating limb function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen participants at more than 3 months postischemic stroke with residual upper limb dysfunction were recruited from the community of Sheffield, United Kingdom (October-December 2016). Participants underwent 18 × 1-hour sessions over 6 weeks in which they made 30-50 repetitions of 8-10 arm movements concurrently with taVNS (NEMOS; Cerbomed, Erlangen, Germany, 25 Hz, .1-millisecond pulse width) at maximum tolerated intensity (mA). An electrocardiogram and rehabilitation outcome scores were obtained at each visit. Qualitative interviews determined the acceptability of taVNS to participants. RESULTS: Median time after stroke was 1.16 years, and baseline median/interquartile range upper limb Fugl-Meyer (UFM) score was 63 (54.5-99.5). Participants attended 92% of the planned treatment sessions. Three participants reported side effects, mainly fatigue, but all performed mean of more than 300 arm repetitions per session with no serious adverse events. There was a significant change in the UFM score with a mean increase per participant of 17.1 points (standard deviation 7.8). CONCLUSION: taVNS is feasible and well-tolerated alongside upper limb repetitive movements in poststroke rehabilitation. The motor improvements observed justify a phase 2 trial in patients with residual arm weakness.


Assuntos
Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Extremidade Superior , Estimulação do Nervo Vago , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Orelha , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paresia/etiologia , Paresia/fisiopatologia , Paresia/terapia , Satisfação do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/fisiopatologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia , Estimulação do Nervo Vago/efeitos adversos , Estimulação do Nervo Vago/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA