Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the DSM-5 Dissociative Symptoms Severity Scale-Child Form.

The goal of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition) Dissociative Symptoms Severity Scale-Child Form. The scale was prepared by translating and then back-translating the DSM-5 Dissociative Symptoms Severity Scale. The study groups included one group of 30 patients diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder who were treated in a child and adolescent psychiatry unit and another group of 83 healthy volunteers from middle and high schools in the community. For assessment, the Adolescent Dissociative Experiences Scale (ADES) was used in addition to the DSM-5 Dissociative Symptoms Severity Scale. Regarding the reliability of the DSM-5 Dissociative Symptoms Severity Scale, Cronbach's alpha was .824 and item-total score correlation coefficients were between .464 and .648. The test-retest correlation coefficient was calculated to be r = .784. In terms of construct validity, one factor accounted for 45.2% of the variance. Furthermore, in terms of concurrent validity, the scale showed a high correlation with the ADES. In conclusion, the Turkish version of the DSM-5 Dissociative Symptoms Severity Scale-Child Form is a valid and reliable tool for both clinical practice and research.

Reliability and Validity of the Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview and Scale-Full Prospective in Its Turkish Translation.

Editors' Note: The Editors would like to address issues related to the acceptance of this manuscript. The original manuscript referenced the study tool as the Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview Scale-Prospective (BPSS-P). After the manuscript's initial acceptance, the authors requested a revision of the tool name to Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview Scale-Full Perspective (BPSS-FP). When this request was made, the original acceptance was rescinded, and the authors were asked to formally revise and resubmit the manuscript with an explanation for the change. This revision and subsequent review led to the final acceptance of the manuscript. The authors have assured us that the tool used in the manuscript was the BPSS-FP (version 5) as opposed to abbreviated forms of this tool that are also used in research (e.g., Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Scale-Abbreviated Screen for Patients (BPSS-AS-P). Background: No scale exists to assess patients at-risk for bipolar disorder (BD) in Turkey. We aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Interview and Scale-Full Prospective (BPSS-FP). Method: Psychiatric service users aged 11-18 years old were interviewed using the BPSS-FP translated into Turkish and the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. Youth with major depressive disorder (MDD, n = 63), bipolar-spectrum disorder (n = 47), and healthy controls (n = 122) were included. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess internal consistency. The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) were administered to test convergent/discriminant validity. Discriminant validity was further tested using one-way ANOVA and "receiver operating characteristic" (ROC) curves. Inter-rater reliability was tested using correlation coefficients. Findings: Across 232 youth, Cronbach's alpha values were 0.932 for the BPSS-FP total score, 0.878 for the Mania Symptom Index, 0.887 for the Depression Symptom Index, and 0.797 for the General Symptom Index. Correlation coefficients for inter-rater reliability were high for the Mania Symptom Index (r = 0.989), Depression Symptom Index (r = 0.973), and General Symptom Index (r = 0.981). There were high correlations between the BPSS-FP Mania Symptom Index subscore and YMRS (r = 0.732), and the BPSS-FP Depression Symptom Index subscore and CDRS-R (r = 0.754), whereas cross-polarity correlations were non-significant. ROC analysis cut-off value was ≥21 for the BPSS-FP Mania Symptom Index between patients with BD and MDD (specificity = 85.7%, sensitivity = 78.7%). Conclusion: The Turkish version of the BPSS-FP has good psychometric properties and can be used in research. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the predictive value of the BPSS-FP.

[Reliability and Validity Study of the Turkish Version of Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Scale]. / Bipolar Prodrom Belirti Tarama Ölçegi Türkçe Formunun Güvenilirligi ve Geçerliligi.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Scale. METHOD: The study was carried out with subjects who participated the study on the epidemiology of bipolar disorder among the students in the 1st grade of Celal Bayar University. The sample consisted of 30 volunteers diagnosed as bipolar disorder and 122 healthy controls. For concurrent validity, Hypomania Checklist-32-Revised was used. In the statistical analysis, internal consistency coefficient, item-total score correlation coefficients, exploratory factor analysis, correlation with concurrent scale and ROC curve were calculated. RESULTS: Translation into Turkish and back-translation into English of were performed and thus the semantic harmony of the scale was obtained. In the internal consistency, Cronbach alpha coefficient was between 0,969-0,979 and item-total score correlations were between 0,767-0,929 and 0,725-0,890. In factor analysis, for the severity subscale a one-factor solution representing 78,9% of the variance and for the frequency subscale one-factor solution representing 71,7% of the solution are obtained. Correlation of Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Scale with Hypomania Checklist-32-Revised was r=0,513 and 0,530. In the ROC analysis, area under the curve was 0,977 and 0,999. The scale discriminates well between the bipolar group and healthy control group. CONCLUSION: Bipolar Prodrome Symptom Scale developed for screening hypomania is reported to be reliable and valid in Turkish.

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version for DSM-5 Level 2 Anger Scale (Child Form for Children Aged 11-17 Years and Parent Form for Children Aged 6-17 Years).

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) Level 2 Anger Scale. METHODS: The scale was prepared by translation and back translation of DSM-5 Level 2 Anger Scale. Study groups consisted of a clinical sample of cases diagnosed with depressive disorder and treated in a child and adolescent psychiatry unit and a community sample. The study was continued with 218 children and 160 parents. In the assessment process, child and parent forms of DSM-5 Level 2 Anger Scale and Children's Depression Inventory and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Parent Form were used. RESULTS: In the reliability analyses, the Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficient values were found very high regarding child and parent forms. Item-total score correlation coefficients were high and very high, respectively, for child and parent forms indicating a statistical significance. As for construct validity, one factor was maintained for each form and was found to be consistent with the original form of the scale. As for concurrent validity, the child form of the scale showed significant correlation with Children's Depression Inventory, while the parent form showed significant correlation with Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Parent Form. CONCLUSION: It was found that the Turkish version of DSM-5 Level 2 Anger Scale could be utilized as a valid and reliable tool both in clinical practice and for research purposes.

A multinational study to pilot the modified Hypomania Checklist (mHCL) in the assessment of mixed depression.

BACKGROUND: Mixed depression is a common, dimensional phenomenon that is increasingly recognized in unipolar and bipolar disorders. We piloted a modified version of the Hypomania Checklist (mHCL-32) to assess the prevalence and clinical correlates of concurrent manic (hypo) symptoms in depressed patients. METHODS: The mHCL-32, Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-24) were utilized in the assessment of unipolar (UP=61) and bipolar (BP=44) patients with an index major depressive episode confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Differential mHLC-32 item endorsement was compared between UP and BP. Correlation analyses assessed the association of symptom dimensions measured by mHCL-32, YMRS and HAMD-24. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between mood groups in the mean mHCL-32 and YMRS scores. Individual mHLC-32 items of increased libido, quarrels, and caffeine intake were endorsed more in BP vs. UP patients. The mHCL-32 active-elevated subscale score was positively correlated with the YMRS in BP patients and negatively correlated with HAMD-24 in UP patients. Conversely, the mHCL-32 irritable-risk taking subscale score was positively correlated with HAMD-24 in BP and with YMRS in UP patients. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size and cross-sectional design. CONCLUSION: Modifying the HCL to screen for (hypo) manic symptoms in major depression may have utility in identifying mixed symptoms in both bipolar vs. unipolar depression. Further research is encouraged to quantify mixed symptoms with standardized assessments.