RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Our goal was to provide an overview of uptake rates across vaccine types and factors associated with vaccine uptake among cancer survivor populations. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE® ALL (Wolters Kluwer), Embase (Elsevier) and CINAHL Complete (EBSCO) databases and according to PRISMA guidelines. Eligible articles were limited to those examining vaccination uptake among cancer survivors who had completed treatment, reported factors associated with uptake (e.g., barriers and facilitators), and published in English between 2011 and 2021. Two independent reviewers screened citations for inclusion and two performed data abstraction, verified by an arbiter. RESULTS: The search returned 4,215 total articles, and 271 duplicates were removed. During abstract/title screening, 212 articles were identified. Following full-text screening, 47 articles/abstracts were found to meet inclusion criteria, 16 articles/abstracts were removed, and 31 studies were included in the review. Among the 31 studies, participant age ranged from 9 years to adults of all ages. Vaccine types included: influenza (n = 18), human papillomavirus (n = 10), pneumococcal (n = 8), hepatitis A/B (n = 1), shingles (n = 1), measles (n = 1), tetanus/diphtheria (n = 1), and haemophilus influenza B (n = 1). Vaccine uptake varied greatly across studies, vaccine types, and participant populations. Factors affecting vaccination uptake included sociodemographic variables and social determinants of health, health beliefs/attitudes/knowledge, provider recommendation, and cancer treatment/clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the need for further examining factors associated with vaccine uptake, the need for clinical guidelines that specifically address vaccination among cancer survivors, and potential targets for multi-level interventions to improve vaccination rates among cancer survivor populations.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: There is a need to gain a deeper understanding of facilitators and barriers involving lifestyle behaviors among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Design: Research team explored influences (e.g., social, cultural, environmental) for healthy lifestyle behaviors (nutrition, physical activity (PA), and self-care). METHOD: One researcher conducted semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis. Demographic data were collected via survey, and descriptive statistics were generated. SETTING: Patients were recruited, and interviews conducted via Zoom or phone. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight newly diagnosed, treatment naïve breast cancer patients were interviewed, a majority were non-Hispanic White women (n=23; 82%) with invasive (n=14; 50%) breast cancer. RESULTS: Themes related to nutrition, PA, and self-care emerged, including influences (e.g., environmental, cultural, social), barriers, facilitators, and lived experiences. Most patients stressed the importance of maintaining healthy eating habits (n=23), and some were interested in understanding the relationship between nutrition and cancer (n=7). Sixteen reported sustaining their PA levels, while others (n=11) explained barriers, such as time, distance, and pain. All patients reported utilizing self-care strategies, and most reported increased engagement in self-care since being diagnosed (n=14). CONCLUSION: This study sheds light on factors influencing and hindering the adoption of healthy eating, PA, and self-care strategies among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. The findings reflect the importance of healthy lifestyle behaviors as critical areas for upstream intervention.