RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the practice of quality assurance (QA) for capillary blood glucose monitoring (CBGM) in health-care facilities. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Descriptive survey data were collected from a purposive sample of 378 health-care providers, who use CBGM and direct CBGM QA programs, from acute- and chronic-care facilities in 47 states. Subjects completed a 36-item multiple-choice survey about QA practices for CBGM by providers. RESULTS: Only 53.4% of respondents reported a multidisciplinary advisory group to assist in decision making for the CBGM program. Almost one-third reported no clinical laboratory involvement in their QA program. Over 70% of respondents reported inclusion of all clinical areas in the CBGM program. Comparison of results of the same patient sample by laboratory reference method and CBGM system was done routinely by only 43.6% of respondents. Scheduled proficiency testing was reported by 33.4%. Only 5.8% of respondents reported the coexistence of a CBGM advisory group, full participation of the laboratory, and quarterly proficiency testing. Over 50% of respondents reported a patient charge for CBGM. CONCLUSIONS: When survey results are compared with regulatory and accreditation standards, it is evident that a wide gap exists. Resources to bridge this gap may be scarce in many facilities. Further research is needed to determine minimal QA standards for CBGM that provide for optimal patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Glicemia/análise , Monitorização Fisiológica/normas , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/normas , Diabetes Mellitus/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus/reabilitação , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Sociedades Científicas , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Forty-nine healthy subjects (Group I), 24 patients with benign lung diseases (Group II) and 48 patients surgically treated for lung cancer (Group III): 28 with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 20 with adenocarcinoma (adenoca), were tested for the presence of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), cancer antigen CA 125 and antigen CA 15.3. The four markers were measured in the serum of the patients of the three groups and in the cytosol extract of tumoral and peritumoral tissues of Group III subjects. The mean levels of serum CEA and TPA were significantly higher in squamous cell carcinoma and in adenocarcinoma patients than in normal subjects. In benign lung disease serum CEA was equal and TPA slightly higher than in normal subjects. CA 125 was higher in the serum of patients with malignant diseases compared to normal or benign lung diseases but this difference was not statistically significant. Serum CA 15.3 levels were similar in all subjects studied. CA 125 in squamous cell carcinoma cytosol was much higher than in peritumoral cytosol whereas the other three markers were not significantly different in tumor cytosol or peritumoral cytosol. A direct correlation between serum and cytosol values was observed for CEA, but not for the other markers. The levels of the four markers in serum and cytosol did not correlate with the stage or grade of the tumors.