Relation of T-wave alternans to mortality and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome from the MERLIN-TIMI 36 trial of ranolazine versus placebo.

We explored the utility of T-wave alternans (TWA) in predicting mortality in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS). Maximum TWA was calculated using Modified Moving Average method from continuous electrocardiographic recordings in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <40% and ventricular tachycardia (VT) ≥4 beats during index hospitalization or sudden cardiac death during the follow-up year and age- and sex-matched controls in the Metabolic Efficiency with Ranolazine for Less Ischemia in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (MERLIN-TIMI) 36 trial. All patients received standard therapy for NSTEACS plus ranolazine (n = 109) or placebo (n = 101). Median follow-up was 1 year. Baseline clinical characteristics did not differ between patients with elevated TWA (≥47 µV) compared with lower levels. Patients with TWA ≥47 µV at admission had increased risk of total mortality (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 2.35, p = 0.04) during follow-up and VT ≥4 beats (ORadj 2.70, p = 0.01) during hospitalization with a trend toward increased cardiovascular death risk (ORadj 2.18, p = 0.07) during follow-up. In patients receiving placebo, TWA ≥47 µV on day 6 was associated with increased risk of total mortality (OR 4.12, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 13.64, p = 0.02) and cardiovascular death (OR 4.73, p = 0.01) during follow-up. No deaths occurred among patients with TWA ≥47 µV assigned to ranolazine. In conclusion, in patients with NSTEACS and left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, TWA ≥47 µV early after admission is associated with increased risk of mortality at 1 year and with nonsustained VT during hospitalization. TWA may be useful in risk estimation in patients with NSTEACS. The possibility that TWA may serve as a therapeutic target deserves further exploration.

Low doses of ranolazine and dronedarone in combination exert potent protection against atrial fibrillation and vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias during acute myocardial ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease carries dual risk for atrial tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether low-dose ranolazine and/or dronedarone can protect against vulnerability to atrial fibrillation (AF) and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. METHODS: In chloralose-anesthetized, open-chest Yorkshire pigs (n = 15), the proximal segment of left circumflex (LCx) coronary artery was occluded to reduce flow by 75%. An electrode catheter was positioned on the left atrial appendage to measure AF threshold (AFT) before and during LCx coronary artery stenosis before and at 1 hour after dronedarone (0.5 mg/kg intravenous bolus over 5 minutes) and/or ranolazine administration (0.6 mg/kg intravenous bolus followed by 0.035 mg/kg/min). RESULTS: Before drug administration, LCx coronary artery stenosis lowered AFT from 25.2 ± 1.7 mA control (mean ± SEM) to 4.9 ± 1.0 mA baseline (P<.01). At the low doses, neither ranolazine (plasma concentration 2.4 ± 0.6 µM) nor dronedarone (plasma concentration 20.9 ± 3.5 nM) alone blunted the ischemia-induced reduction in AFT but were effective together (from 25.2 ± 1.7 mA control to 22.0 ± 3.0 mA during stenosis; P = not significant). AF duration (P<.03) and AF inducibility (P = .012) were reduced by ranolazine and dronedarone together but not by either drug alone. Concurrently, combined but not separate administration blunted the ischemia-induced surge in T-wave heterogeneity, a marker of risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias (from 43.1 ± 11.1 µV control to 149.7 ± 15.1 µV during stenosis, P<.001, compared to 61.7 ± 13.7 µV control to 83.7 ± 15.8 µV during stenosis, P = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Combined administration of low doses of ranolazine and dronedarone exerts a potent antiarrhythmic action on ischemia-induced vulnerability to AF and ventricular tachyarrhythmias due to direct effects on myocardial electrical properties.

Inhibition of I(f) in the atrioventricular node as a mechanism for dronedarone's reduction in ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: In clinical trials, dronedarone lowers ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AF). This agent was recently demonstrated to inhibit If in the sinoatrial node. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether dronedarone inhibits If at the atrioventricular (AV) node to reduce ventricular rate during AF by slowing conduction at the AV node. METHODS: We studied the effects of dronedarone (1.0 mg/kg IV bolus) before and after administration of the If inhibitor ivabradine (0.5 mg/kg IV). Ventricular rate, mean arterial pressure, dominant frequency of AF, PR and QT intervals, and atrial (AERP) and ventricular effective refractory periods (VERP) were measured during atrial pacing at 150 bpm in an anesthetized pig model of AF induced by intrapericardial acetylcholine and burst pacing. RESULTS: Dronedarone reduced ventricular rate during AF by 22.1% (from 213 ± 11.1 bpm to 166 ± 8.3 bpm, P = .01) and increased PR interval by 8.7% (from 173 ± 5.6 ms to 188 ± 5.2 ms, P = .001), QT interval by 3.3% (from 272 ± 6.2 ms to 281 ± 4.9 ms, P = .05), and AERP and VERP by 6.2% and 11.7%, respectively. All other parameters remained unchanged. Dronedarone plasma levels were low (29 ± 4 nM), and concentration in tissue was 15- to 21-fold higher than in plasma. Ivabradine reduced ventricular rate during AF by 39.5% (from 200 ± 14.6 bpm to 121 ± 20.1 bpm, P = .005) and increased PR interval by 20.4% (from 157 ± 9.5 ms to 189 ± 7.4 ms, P <.05). Administration of dronedarone after ivabradine did not further alter these endpoints. CONCLUSION: Dronedarone, which is concentrated in myocardial tissue, reduces ventricular rate during AF by slowing AV conduction. Absence of this effect after ivabradine administration implicates If inhibition as a mechanism.