Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 77(1): 12-22, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32800842

RESUMO

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Observational studies have reported a U-shaped association between blood pressure (BP) before a hemodialysis session and death. In contrast, because a linear association between out-of-dialysis-unit BP and death has been reported, home BP may be a better target for treatment. To test the feasibility of this approach, we conducted a pilot trial of treating home versus predialysis BP in hemodialysis patients. STUDY DESIGN: A 4-month, parallel, randomized, controlled trial. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: 50 prevalent hemodialysis patients in San Francisco and Seattle. Participants were randomly assigned using 1:1 block randomization, stratified by site. INTERVENTIONS: To target home systolic BP (SBP) of 100-<140 mm Hg versus predialysis SBP of 100-<140mm Hg. Home and predialysis SBPs were ascertained every 2 weeks. Dry weight and BP medications were adjusted to reach the target SBP. OUTCOMES: Primary outcomes were feasibility, adherence, safety. and tolerability. RESULTS: 50 of 70 (71%) patients who were approached agreed to participate. All enrollees completed the study except for 1 who received a kidney transplant. In the home BP treatment group, adherence to obtaining/reporting home BP was 97.4% (and consistent over the 4 months). There was no increased frequency of high (defined as SBP>200mm Hg; 0.2% vs 0%) or low (defined as<90mm Hg; 1.8% vs 1.2%) predialysis BP readings in the home versus predialysis treatment arms, respectively. However, participants in the home BP arm had higher frequency of fatigue (32% vs 16%). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot trial demonstrates feasibility and high adherence to home BP measurement and treatment in hemodialysis patients. Larger trials to test the long-term feasibility, efficacy, and safety of home BP treatment in hemodialysis patients should be conducted. FUNDERS: National Institutes of Health, Satellite Healthcare, and Northwest Kidney Centers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT03459807.


Assuntos
Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Falência Renal Crônica , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Diálise Renal , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Determinação da Pressão Arterial/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Projetos Piloto , Prognóstico , Diálise Renal/métodos , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco/métodos
2.
PLoS One ; 12(8): e0182890, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28841707

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To identify exposure-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of individuals occupationally exposed to diesel exhaust (DE); to reveal strengths, knowledge gaps and misperceptions therein. METHODS: A Mental Models approach was used to gather information about current scientific understanding of DE exposure hazards and the ways in which exposure can be reduced. Thirty individuals in British Columbia who were regularly exposed to occupational DE were interviewed. The audio was recorded and transcribed. Data was grouped together and examined to draw out themes around DE awareness, hazard assessment and risk reduction behaviors. These themes were then compared and contrasted with existing grey and research literature in order to reveal strengths, gaps and misperceptions regarding DE exposure. RESULTS: Study participants were aware and concerned about their exposure to DE but had incomplete and sometimes incorrect understanding of exposure pathways, health effects, and effective strategies to reduce their exposures. The perceived likelihood of exposure to DE was significantly greater compared to that of other work hazards (p<0.01), whereas the difference for their perceived severity of consequences was not significant. There was no universally perceived main source of information regarding DE, and participants generally distrusted sources of information based on their past experience with the source. Most of the actions that were taken to address DE exposure fell into the area of administrative controls such as being aware of sources of DE and avoiding these sources. CONCLUSIONS: This study of the knowledge, attitude, and behavior of those occupationally exposed to DE found, most notably, that more education and training and the creation of a health effects inventory regarding DE exposure were desired.


Assuntos
Gasolina , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Exposição Ocupacional , Emissões de Veículos/toxicidade , Adulto , Colúmbia Britânica , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saúde Ocupacional
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA