Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 273(4): 893-8, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25971996

RESUMO

Inner ear bone malformations are one cause of profound sensorineural hearing loss. This investigation focused on those affecting the posterior labyrinth, especially enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome, which is associated with fluctuating and progressive hearing loss. The objectives of this study were to analyze the behavior of the electrical stimulation, auditory functionality and linguistic development in patients with inner ear malformations involving the posterior labyrinth. The study included ten patients undergoing cochlear implantation (cases: five with enlarged vestibular aqueduct, two with vestibular aqueduct stenosis/aplasia, and three with semicircular canal disorders). Post-implantation, data were gathered on the electrical stimulation threshold and maximum comfort levels and on the number of functioning electrodes. Evaluation of Auditory Responses to Speech (EARS) subtests were used to assess auditory functionality and language acquisition at 6, 12, and 24 months post-implantation. Results were compared with findings in a control group of 28 cochlear implantation patients without these malformations. No significant differences were found between case and control groups in electrical stimulation parameters; auditory functionality subtest scores were lower in cases than controls, although the difference was only statistically significant for some subtests. In conclusion, cochlear implantation patients with posterior labyrinth bone malformations and profound hearing loss, including those with enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome, showed no significant difference in electrical stimulation threshold with controls. Although some auditory functionality test results were lower in cases than in controls, cochlear implantation appears to be beneficial for all patients with these malformations.


Assuntos
Implante Coclear , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial , Aqueduto Vestibular/anormalidades , Adolescente , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Implante Coclear/métodos , Implante Coclear/reabilitação , Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Feminino , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/complicações , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/etiologia , Perda Auditiva Neurossensorial/cirurgia , Testes Auditivos/métodos , Humanos , Desenvolvimento da Linguagem , Masculino , Período Pós-Operatório , Canais Semicirculares/anormalidades , Canais Semicirculares/fisiopatologia , Espanha , Resultado do Tratamento , Aqueduto Vestibular/fisiopatologia
2.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 79(3): 369-73, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25613931

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study electrical stimulation, auditory functionality, and language development in patients with inner ear malformations involving the anterior labyrinth who underwent cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Reference hospital for cochlear implantation. PATIENTS: Review of 14 cases of severe hearing loss with major (common cavity deformity and cochlear hypoplasia) or minor (e.g., incomplete partition and basal turn aplasia) malformations. INTERVENTIONS: After cochlear implantation, data were gathered on the threshold (THR) and maximum comfort level (MCL) of the electrical stimulation and the number of functioning electrodes. Auditory responses to speech (EARS protocol) subtests were used to evaluate auditory functionality and language acquisition at 6, 12, and 24 months post-implantation. Tests used were: LIP profile, MTP (3, 6 and 12 words), OLD (open set test) and CLD (close set test). Results were compared with findings in a control group of 28 cochlear implantation patients without these malformations and with congenital hearing loss. RESULTS: The mean THR was 11.02µC in patients with malformations versus 3.5µC in those without, a significant difference. The THR also significantly differed between groups with major and minor malformations. Fewer functioning electrodes were used in patients with malformations. Auditory functionality scores were best in controls than in patients with malformations, who scored ≤50%, finding the lowest scores in those with major malformations. CONCLUSION: Patients with inner ear malformations undergoing cochlear implantation require greater stimuli to obtain an auditory response and have worse auditory functionality outcomes; these differences are greater in those with major versus minor malformations Nevertheless, cochlear implantation appears to be beneficial for all patients with these malformations to a greater or lesser extent.


Assuntos
Limiar Auditivo , Implantes Cocleares , Orelha Interna/anormalidades , Desenvolvimento da Linguagem , Percepção Auditiva , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Surdez/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA