MR enterography grading of pediatric ileocolonic Crohn disease activity based on a single bowel segment.

BACKGROUND: Ileocolonoscopy with histology has been considered the gold standard for Crohn disease (CD) diagnosis and monitoring. Over the last years, magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) has become more and more popular, representing a valid non-invasive technique. OBJECTIVE: To propose a simplified MRE score, the pediatric CD magnetic resonance index (PCDMRI), based only on the most affected bowel segment, to grade active inflammation in children with CD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two radiologists retrospectively evaluated MRE images of children with histopathology-proven CD. The PCDMRI was based on six mural and perimural variables assessed for the most affected bowel segment (chosen by visual inspection of the key bowel wall imaging findings associated with active inflammation), and five extramural per-examination features. Correlation analysis was performed between both the PCDMRI and the MRE global score (based on all the affected segments) and the pediatric clinical disease activity index (PCDAI), the simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD), serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (fC). Inter-reader reproducibility of the scoring system was estimated. Agreement on disease location between MRE and ileocolonoscopy was evaluated. RESULTS: The study involved 42 children for a total of 80 MRE. PCDMRI and global score positively correlated with PCDAI, SES-CD, CRP and fC. Inter-reader reproducibility was 91%. Agreement on disease location was substantial. CONCLUSION: The PCDMRI and the global score resulted equally correlated with the PCDAI, suggesting a high impact of the most affected segment on symptoms. The PDCMRI may be a useful non-invasive tool for a rapid and reproducible grading of the disease activity in children with ileocolonic CD.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of the Peritoneum: A Series of 3 Cases.

In the presence of peritoneal disease, patients often should undergo biopsy of the peritoneum for acquiring a specific pathologic diagnosis. Ultrasound is ideal for guiding peritoneal biopsy, although in some situations, it can be technically challenging. The addition of a contrast agent can improve the visualization of lesions and adjacent organs, providing radiologists increased confidence. A contrast agent can identify perfused areas within the target lesion, improving diagnostic accuracy. We present 3 cases of contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided peritoneal biopsy. In all cases, we gained a specific diagnosis. No immediate or delayed complications occurred. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy proved to be a simple, safe, and accurate diagnostic method.

Lean body weight versus total body weight to calculate the iodinated contrast media volume in abdominal CT: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Iodinated contrast media (ICM) could be more appropriately dosed on patient lean body weight (LBW) than on total body weight (TBW). METHODS: After Ethics Committee approval, trial registration NCT03384979, patients aged ≥ 18 years scheduled for multiphasic abdominal CT were randomised for ICM dose to LBW group (0.63 gI/kg of LBW) or TBW group (0.44 gI/kg of TBW). Abdominal 64-row CT was performed using 120 kVp, 100-200 mAs, rotation time 0.5 s, pitch 1, Iopamidol (370 mgI/mL), and flow rate 3 mL/s. Levene, Mann-Whitney U, and χ2 tests were used. The primary endpoint was liver contrast enhancement (LCE). RESULTS: Of 335 enrolled patients, 17 were screening failures; 44 dropped out after randomisation; 274 patients were analysed (133 LBW group, 141 TBW group). The median age of LBW group (66 years) was slightly lower than that of TBW group (70 years). Although the median ICM-injected volume was comparable between groups, its variability was larger in the former (interquartile range 27 mL versus 21 mL, p = 0.01). The same was for unenhanced liver density (IQR 10 versus 7 HU) (p = 0.02). Median LCE was 40 (35-46) HU in the LBW group and 40 (35-44) HU in the TBW group, without significant difference for median (p = 0.41) and variability (p = 0.23). Suboptimal LCE (< 40 HU) was found in 64/133 (48%) patients in the LBW group and 69/141 (49%) in the TBW group, but no examination needed repeating. CONCLUSIONS: The calculation of the ICM volume to be administered for abdominal CT based on the LBW does not imply a more consistent LCE.