The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS): A Three-Factor Model of Psychopathology in Marginally Housed Persons with Substance Dependence and Psychiatric Illness.

Rates of psychopathology are elevated in marginalized and unstably housed persons, underscoring the need for applicable clinical measures for these populations. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a clinical instrument principally developed for use in schizophrenia to identify the presence and severity of psychopathology symptoms. The current study investigates whether a reliable and valid PANSS factor structure emerges in a marginally housed, heterogeneous sample recruited from the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver where substance use disorders and psychiatric illness are pervasive. Participants (n = 270) underwent structured clinical assessments including the PANSS and then were randomly assigned to either exploratory (EFA) or confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) subsamples. EFA pointed to a novel three factor PANSS. This solution was supported by CFA. All retained items (28 out of 30) load significantly upon hypothesized factors and model goodness of fit analyses are in the acceptable to good range. Each of the three first-order factor constructs, labeled Psychosis/Disorganized, Negative Symptoms/Hostility, and Insight/Awareness, contributed significantly to measurement of a higher-order psychopathology construct. Further, the latent structure of this 3-factor solution appears temporally consistent over one-year. This PANSS factor structure appears valid and reliable for use in persons with multimorbidity, including substance use disorders. The structure is somewhat distinct from existing solutions likely due to the unique characteristics of this marginally housed sample.

Neurocognitive profiles of marginally housed persons with comorbid substance dependence, viral infection, and psychiatric illness.

INTRODUCTION: Individuals living in single-room occupancy (SRO) hotels constitute a socially marginalized group with exposure to multiple factors with adverse effects on neurocognition, including substance use, viral infection, psychiatric illness, and brain injury. Consequently, marked heterogeneity in neurocognitive functioning is observed. This study aimed to identify and describe distinct neurocognitive profiles within a marginally housed sample. METHOD: Two hundred and forty-nine (N = 249) SRO hotel residents (mean age = 43.5 years) were recruited. A battery of tests assessed neurocognition across six domains: premorbid IQ, verbal memory, attention, inhibition, mental flexibility, and decision making. Clinical examinations collected information pertaining to substance use and psychiatric diagnoses, viral infection, psychiatric symptoms, risk behaviors, and everyday functioning. Cluster analysis was used to identify subgroups of individuals with similar neurocognitive profiles and was supplemented with a discriminant function analysis. Analyses of variance and chi-square tests were used to validate the derived clusters on key clinical and functional variables. RESULTS: A three-cluster solution was found to be optimal. Cluster 1 (n = 59) presented as overall higher functioning, whereas Cluster 3 (n = 87) exhibited overall lower functioning with a relative strength in decision-making skills. Cluster 2 (n = 103) was characterized by neurocognitive abilities that generally bisected the performance of the other groups, but with a relative weakness in decision-making skills. Discriminant function analysis indicated the six neurocognitive variables comprised two underlying dimensions that accounted for between-group variance. Clusters meaningfully differed on demographics, substance use, viral exposure, psychiatric symptoms, neurological soft signs, and risk behavior. CONCLUSION: Neurocognitive functioning provides the basis for identifying meaningful subgroups of marginally housed individuals, which can be reliably differentiated on key variables. This approach facilitates an understanding of the neurocognitive dysfunction and associated vulnerabilities of marginalized persons and ultimately may elucidate intervention targets.