How did we rapidly implement a convalescent plasma program?

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of convalescent plasma as a possible treatment has been explored. Here we describe our experience as the first U.S. organization creating a COVID-19 convalescent plasma program to support its use through the single-patient emergency investigational new drug, the National Expanded Access Program, and multiple randomized controlled trials. Within weeks, we were able to distribute more than 8000 products, scale up collections to more than 4000 units per week, meet hospital demand, and support randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of convalescent plasma treatment. This was through strategic planning; redeployment of staff; and active engagement of hospital, community, and public health partners. Our partners helped with donor recruitment, testing, patient advocacy, and patient availability. The program will continue to evolve as we learn more about optimizing the product. Remaining issues to be resolved are antibody titers, dose, and at what stage of disease to transfuse.

A dual strategy to optimize hematopoietic progenitor cell collections: validation of a simple prediction algorithm and use of collect flow rates guided by mononuclear cell count.

BACKGROUND: Previous prediction algorithms to achieve target CD34+ goals have not been widely adopted, with many centers still using a set volume to process for hematopoietic progenitor cell collections. This may be because previous algorithms are challenging to implement. Additionally, no study has yet examined the utility of adjusting the collect flow rate (CFR) based on the donor's preprocedure total mononuclear cell (MNC) count, which correlates with CD34+ yield. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of mobilized allogeneic donors collected using MNC (COBE Spectra, Terumo BCT) or continuous mononuclear cell collection (CMNC) (Spectra Optia, Terumo BCT) procedures, we validated a one-step prediction algorithm to achieve the target CD34+ product dose (Appendix S1, available as supporting information in the online version of this paper). The COBE Spectra MNC Collect Flow Tool (Appendix S2, available as supporting information in the online version of this paper) was used to select the collect flow rate for both MNC and CMNC procedures. Procedural collection efficiency (CE) was compared to that of historical procedures utilizing fixed CFRs (1.0-1.5 mL/min). RESULTS: Ninety-three percent of collections achieved the target CD34+ goal using our algorithm-calculated process volumes. The remaining 7% of cases had CEs lower than the algorithm CE (0.40), and thus were below goal. Second, an MNC-based CFR improved MNC and CD34+ CEs in patients with higher MNC counts compared to our historical controls. CONCLUSION: We validated that this simple, single-step prediction algorithm achieves the target CD34+ goal in most HPC collections. Secondly, we showed that an MNC-based CFR for hematopoietic progenitor cell collections improves CE at higher MNCs; this may be preferable to a WBC-based CFR because of variability of MNC counts at a given WBC count.

Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study.

The BD FACSVia™ System features novel designs in hardware, software, and instrument QC. We compared the performance of the BD FACSVia System using the BD Leucocount™ kit with the BD FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer. Leucoreduced platelet (PLT, n = 252) and red blood cell (RBC, n = 278) specimens were enrolled at four sites. Each specimen was stained in four tubes using the BD Leucocount kit reagents and acquired on the two systems. BD Leucocount Control cells (high and low) were used to evaluate the inter-site reproducibility on the BD FACSVia System at three sites over 20 days. Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to determine the WBC absolute counts on the BD FACSVia System vs. the BD FACSCalibur system. Assay accuracy for the range of 0-350 WBCs/µl was adequate. For samples with <25 WBCs/µl, the bias with 95% limits of agreement was 0.136 (-1.897 to 2.169) WBC/µl for PLTs (n = 184) and 0.170 (-2.025 to 2.365) WBC/µl for RBCs (n = 193). For inter-site reproducibility, the CV% was 6.46% (upper 95% CI 7.16%) for the PLT high control and 9.49% (10.52%) for the PLT low control. The CV% was 7.51% (8.32%) for the RBC high control and 10.76% (11.92%) for the RBC low control. The BD FACSVia System reported equivalent results of WBC absolute counts for leucoreduced PLT and RBC samples compared to the BD FACSCalibur system. The inter-laboratory reproducibility of the BD FACSVia System met study specifications. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of ISAC.