Axillary Management: How Much Is Too Much?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the current management of the axilla in breast cancer. RECENT FINDINGS: Axillary dissection is no longer indicated in patients with clinically node-negative axilla with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes following upfront surgery or in patients with clinically node-negative axilla following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast cancer has evolved away from routine axillary clearance to the less invasive sentinel lymph node biopsy to now complete omission of axillary sampling in select patients. We will review the most salient evidence that has shaped these practice changes over the last three decades. Current practice controversies are especially relevant for elderly populations and those receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Ongoing clinical trials will provide data to further guide breast cancer surgical management.

The survival benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab with or without chemotherapy in the management of small (T1mic, T1a, T1b, T1c), node negative HER2+ breast cancer.

There is limited data regarding the added benefit of adjuvant systemic therapy in the management of small, node-negative, HER2+ breast cancer. In a multi-institutional retrospective analysis using the American Society of Clinical Oncology CancerLinQ database, we compared survival outcomes among T1a-c N0 HER2+ patients diagnosed between 2010 to 2021 who received locoregional therapy alone or in combination with adjuvant trastuzumab (+/- chemotherapy). Primary outcomes were invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and overall survival (OS). Of the 1,184 patients, 436 received locoregional therapy alone. We found a statistically significant improvement in iDFS (HR 0.73, P = 0.003) and OS (HR 0.63, P = 0.023) on univariate analysis with adjuvant trastuzumab with or without chemotherapy which remained statistically significant on multivariate analysis. Three-arm univariate analysis found that iDFS was significantly improved with trastuzumab monotherapy (P = 0.003) and combination therapy (P = 0.027) compared to observation. Subgroup data suggests that T1b/c tumors derive the greatest benefit.

Real-world treatment patterns of adjuvant endocrine therapy and ovarian suppression in premenopausal HR+/HER2+ breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) premenopausal breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. Moreover, the benefit and clinical indications of ovarian suppression (OS) is poorly elucidated. We described real-world patterns surrounding choice of ET and clinicopathologic features which predicted treatment with OS in a contemporary cohort of premenopausal women with HR+/HER2+ BC. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included premenopausal patients with nonmetastatic HR+/HER2+ BC from the CancerLinQ Discovery database from January 2010 to May 2020. Women were less than 50 years and received chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy, and ET. They were categorized into 1 of 4 groups based on type of ET prescribed at initiation: aromatase inhibitor (AI) + OS, OS, tamoxifen + OS, or tamoxifen. Multivariable logistic regression assessed associations between clinicopathologic features and OS use. RESULTS: Out of 360,540 patients with BC, 937 were included. The majority (n = 818, 87%) were prescribed tamoxifen, whereas 4 (0.4%), 50 (5.3%), and 65 (6.9%) received OS, tamoxifen + OS and AI + OS, respectively. No clinicopathologic features predicted OS use apart from age; patients <35 years were more likely to receive OS compared with those ≥35 years (odds ratio 2.33, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first real-world study evaluating ET treatment patterns in HR+/HER2+ premenopausal BC. OS use was uncommon and the majority received tamoxifen as the preferred ET regardless of most clinicopathologic risk factors. Additional research is needed to optimize ET decisions in young women with this distinct BC subtype.