Management of the Rectal Stump after Subtotal Colectomy Operations for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Immunologic Therapy: A Two-Centre Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often requires surgical resection, such as subtotal colectomy operations to alleviate symptoms. However, IBD also has an inherently increased risk of colorectal dysplasia and cancer. Despite the well-accepted surveillance guidelines for IBD patients with an intact colon, contemporaneous decision-making models on rectal stump surveillance is sparse. This study looks at the fate of rectal stumps in IBD patients following subtotal colectomy. METHODS: This is a two-centre retrospective observational cohort study. Patients were identified from NHS Grampian and NHS Highland surgical IBD databases. Patients that had subtotal colectomy between January 01, 2010 and December 31, 2017 were included with the follow-up end date on April 1, 2021. Socio-demographics, diagnosis, medical and surgical management data were collected from electronic records. RESULTS: Of 250 patients who had subtotal colectomy procedures, only one developed a cancer in their rectal stump (0.4%) over a median follow-up of 80 months. A higher than expected 72% of patients had ongoing symptoms from their rectal stumps. Surveillance was varied and inconsistent. However, no surveillance, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or MRI identified dysplastic or neoplastic disease. CONCLUSION: Based on our results, we estimate that the prevalence of rectal cancer is lower than previously reported. Surveillance strategy of rectal stump varied as no current guidelines exist and hence is an important area for future study. Given the relatively low frequency of rectal cancer in these patients, and the low level of evidence available in this field, we would propose a registry-based approach to answering this important clinical question.

Pathological response post neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer is an independent predictor of survival.

AIM: Neoadjuvant treatment (NaT) for locally advanced rectal cancer prior to surgery has led to improved outcomes. However, the relationship between pathological response to NaT and survival is not entirely clear. The aim of this study was to assess the degree of pathological response to NaT on survival outcomes. METHODS: Clinical and pathological data were collected from a prospectively maintained pathology database between 2005 and 2017. The primary outcome was the overall survival based on pathological response categorized as complete, good partial, partial and minimal. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify variables predictive of survival. Cox proportional hazard ratios were used for survival. RESULTS: A total of 596 patients had surgery following NaT for locally advanced rectal cancer. The median follow-up was 4.57 years (interquartile range 2.21-8.15 years). The overall survival for complete pathological response was 75.6% vs. 37.3% for minimal response (P < 0.001). The overall survival at the end of the study in the good partial vs. partial response groups was 58.9% vs. 39% (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the degree of pathological response remains an independent variable for overall and disease-specific survival across all categories. DISCUSSION: In addition to other pathological variables, the degree of pathological response to NaT is an independent predictor for survival outcomes. Future verification of these findings elsewhere could support NaT response being used for adjuvant therapy decision making.

Screen detection is a survival predictor independent of pathological grade in colorectal cancer. A prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with screened detected colorectal cancer (CRC) have a better survival than patients referred with symptoms. This may be because of cancers being identified in a younger population and at an earlier stage. In this study, we assess whether screened detected CRC has an improved outcome after controlling for key pathological and patient factors known to influence prognosis. METHOD: This is a cohort study of all CRC patients diagnosed in NHS Grampian. Patients aged 51-75 years old between June 2007 and July 2017 were included. Data were obtained from a prospectively maintained regional pathology database and outcomes from ISD records. All-cause mortality rates at 1 and 5 years were examined. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate the effect of screening status, age, gender, Duke stage, tumour location, extramural venous invasion (EMVI) status and lymph node ratio (LNR) on overall survival. RESULTS: Of 1618 CRC cases, 449 (27.8%) were screened and 1169 (72.2%) were symptomatic. Screened CRC patients had improved survival compared to non-screened CRC at 1 year (88.9% vs 83.9% p < 0.001) and 5-years (42.5% vs 36.2%; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis of patients who had no neoadjuvant therapy (n = 1272), screening had better survival (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.44-0.74; p < 0.001). EMVI (HR 2.22; CI 1.76 to 2.79; p < 0.001) and tumour location were found to affect outcome. CONCLUSION: Patients referred through screening had improved survival compared with symptomatic patients. Further research could be targeted to determine if screened CRC cases are pathologically different to symptomatic cancers or if the screening cohort is inherently more healthy.

Is Liver Ultrasound Useful as Part of the Surveillance Strategy following Potentially Curative Colorectal Cancer Resection?

BACKGROUND: Optimal surveillance monitoring following curative resection of colorectal cancer remains unclear. Guidelines recommend computed tomography (CT)-based imaging for the initial 3 years following surgical intervention due to the high rates of local and distant recurrence. However, there is currently limited supporting evidence for this strategy. Our current follow-up practice is to offer annual interval abdominal ultrasound and abdominal/pelvis CT scans starting at 6 and 12 months with the sequence of radiological follow-up remaining at the discretion of each clinician. We aim to establish the additional diagnostic benefit of abdominal ultrasound to CT scans in colorectal cancer surveillance follow-up. METHODS: All patients who underwent colorectal resection with curative intent in our region during a single year were included. Patients were detected from a prospectively collected pathology database and supplemented retrospectively with patient demographics, imaging reports, and mortality data. RESULTS: A total of 243 patients (male n = 135, 55.6%) were included. There was a mortality rate of 31.3% over the study period. Patients who received abdominal ultrasound as their initial imaging modality (n = 64, 26.3%) were significantly older, had less severe disease, and a significantly lower mortality rate when compared to CT -patients (n = 148, 60.9%). All patients with new hepatic disease detected by ultrasound scans had their management discussed in multi-disciplinary team meetings before their next scheduled CT. CONCLUSION: In an era where cross-sectional imaging of colorectal cancer is commonplace, abdominal ultrasound offers additional benefit to CT as a postoperative imaging adjunct for the detection of hepatic disease recurrence.

Can Haematology Blood Tests at Time of Diagnosis Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?

BACKGROUND: Outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer are improved by neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection. Some patients respond completely to preoperative treatment. Therefore, predicting the pathological response to preoperative therapy is of clinical importance. Accurate prediction would allow for tailored approaches to neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: All patients undergoing resection of rectal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy between 2006 and 2015 were included in this cohort study. Patients were identified from a prospectively collected database and data were supplemented retrospectively with full blood count at diagnosis. Specimens resected following neoadjuvant therapy were graded according to pathological response. Follow-up data was obtained from the national registry. The primary outcome was complete pathological response. RESULTS: Of 330 patients, 71 (21.5%) responded completely to preoperative therapy. Median age was 66 and 65% were male (n = 215). White cell count (WCC) was the most predictive marker, for predicting pCR; area under the curve (AUC) 0.666. This was higher than neutrophil/platelet ratio (AUC 0.652) or neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios (AUC = 0.437). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed those patients with WCC > 8 had poorer survival than those with WCC < 8 (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Routinely collected haematology samples at the point of diagnosis can assist in predicting for complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. Although novel biomarkers will have a greater predictive value, this clinically available value test could help to assist in risk stratification of patients using routinely collected laboratory tests.

Reducing the use of inappropriate coagulation testing in emergency general surgical patients.

Background and aims Indiscriminate coagulation testing in emergency general surgical patients can lead to inappropriate delay in surgery, cause unnecessary concern and is associated with significant cost. The British Committee for Standards in Haematology recommends against coagulation testing to predict peri-operative bleeding risk in unselected patients. Our aim was to assess the appropriateness of coagulation tests performed in emergency general surgical patients and evaluate the effect of a series of educational interventions on clinical practice. Methods and results Appropriate indications for performing coagulation testing included a positive bleeding history, the presence of liver disease/cholestasis, sepsis or use of anticoagulants. Initial data on 142 patients were collected over 2 weeks of receiving. Following analysis, indications for appropriate coagulation testing were highlighted and data were collected on a further 190 patients. Comparing the audit cycles, we observed a decrease in the proportion of patients who underwent routine testing (49.3% vs 32.6%; p = 0.002) and inappropriate testing (67% of tests vs 34% of tests; p < 0.001). Despite being highlighted, there was no evidence of improved documentation of bleeding histories on admission. Conclusions This observational study suggests that simple educational messages can reduce the inappropriate use of coagulation screening tests in general surgical emergencies. This seems to result from clarification of the appropriate surgical indications for coagulation testing in this group.

A systematic review of the impact of post-operative oral fluid intake on ileus following elective colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Ileus (delayed return of bowel function after surgery) is one of the highest priority research questions in modern day colorectal practice. Current Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidance either does not include a specific recommendation for volume of postoperative oral fluids/foodstuffs or suggests ad-lib fluids. It is unclear if the volume of intake affects ileus rates. This systematic review aimed to determine the optimal fluid volume for patients to consume day one after elective colorectal surgery. METHODS: The literature was searched across seven databases, September 23, 2020. Randomised controlled trials of adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery, comparing oral intake postoperatively were eligible for inclusion. Two blinded reviewers assessed papers with disagreements resolved by a third independent reviewer. Main outcomes were 'resolution of postoperative ileus' and 'length of hospital stay'. Secondary outcomes included vomiting, mortality and complications. RESULTS: Of 2175 screened papers, eight were eligible for inclusion. All studies gave a clear liquid diet postoperatively. The comparison groups followed a traditional nil-by-mouth approach. All studies showed a minor reduction in postoperative ileus and hospital stay in the intervention group, but we are unable to determine the optimal postoperative oral fluid volume. The low number and poor quality of studies was a significant limitation. None of the trials were conducted within an ERAS protocol: only 883 patients were included in total. CONCLUSIONS: From the current literature it is unclear how postoperative oral fluid volume intake affects gastrointestinal function and ileus in elective colorectal surgical patients. This remains an important area for further research.

Sham feed or sham? A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials assessing the effect of gum chewing on gut function after elective colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: Enhanced recovery programs aim to expedite gut function after elective colorectal surgery. Early oral feeding simulates gut function but is not always feasible. Gum chewing, a form of sham feed, is an alternative. We assessed current evidence for gum chewing and gut function. STUDY DESIGN: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between 1990 and 2008 comparing gum chewing with controls/placebo were analyzed irrespective of language, blinding, or publication bias. The Jadad scale was used to assess study quality. Endpoints were time to flatus/feces, postoperative complications, and hospital stay. Random and fixed models were employed to aggregate study endpoints and assess heterogeneity. RESULTS: Six RCTs containing 256 patients were included. Significant heterogeneity was identified and random effects model was employed. Heterogeneity may be explained through variations in delivery of surgical care. Significant reductions in the time to flatus and time to feces were identified but no significant difference in hospital or in-hospital postoperative complications were found. CONCLUSIONS: Gum chewing significantly reduced time to flatus and feces; however, hospital stay and postoperative complications were not reduced. Significant study heterogeneity means that these results should be interpreted with caution.

Experience in identifying the venous drainage of the adrenal gland during laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the procedure of choice for most adrenal tumors. An important part of LA is the early identification and ligation of the adrenal veins. The venous drainage from each adrenal gland is usually via a single vein: the right vein draining into the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the left vein into the left renal vein. Although infrequent, variable venous drainage has been documented. The aim of the study was to clarify if LA identified venous drainage and its variants. Between January 1999 and January 2008, 142 consecutive patients underwent LA. Adrenal vein anatomy was documented on a prospective database. In total, 142 patients underwent 162 LA (right = 62, left = 66, bilateral = 17). All adrenal veins were identified at the time of laparoscopy. For 157 LA, the adrenal venous drainage was constant: right vein drained into the IVC and left vein drained into left renal vein. Five patients had adrenal vein variants: two right veins draining separately into IVC (n = 1), two right veins draining into the IVC and right renal vein (n = 1), and two left veins draining separately into the left renal vein (n = 3). Adrenal vein variants were present in patients with phaeochromocytomas (n = 4) or adrenocortical carcinoma (n = 1). The laparoscopic approach allowed an excellent view of the main adrenal venous anatomy. This has helped confirm the constant nature of the venous drainage and successfully identify variant adrenal veins.

Increased lymph node yield in colorectal cancer is not necessarily associated with a greater number of lymph node positive cancers.

The presence of lymph node metastasis is a key prognostic factor in colorectal cancer and lymph node yield is an important parameter in assessing the quality of histopathology reporting of colorectal cancer excision specimens. This study assesses the trend in lymph node evaluation over time in a single institution and the relationship with the identification of lymph node positive tumours. It compares the lymph node yield of a contemporary dataset compiled from the histopathology reports of 2178 patients who underwent surgery for primary colorectal cancer between 2005 and 2012 with that of a historic dataset compiled from the histopathology reports of 1038 patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer at 5 yearly intervals from 1975 to 2000. The mean lymph node yield was 14.91 in 2005 rising to 21.38 in 2012. In 2012 92.9% of all cases had at least 12 lymph nodes examined. Comparison of the mean lymph node yield and proportion of Dukes C cases shows a significant increase (Pearson correlation = 0.927, p = 0.001) in lymph node yield while there is no corresponding significant trend in the proportion of Dukes C cases (Pearson correlation =  -0.138, p = 0.745). This study shows that there is increasing yield of lymph nodes from colorectal cancer excision specimens. However, this is not necessarily associated with an increase number of lymph node positive cancers. Further risk stratifying of colorectal cancer requires consideration of other pathological parameters especially the presence of extramural venous invasion and relevant biomarkers.

Importance of the adrenal gland blood supply during laparoscopic subtotal adrenalectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic subtotal adrenalectomy (LSA) has emerged as a treatment option in the management of certain adrenal pathologies. After LSA, a satisfactory blood supply to the adrenal remnant is vital to preserve steroid function. The aim of this study was to review the adrenal blood supply with relevance to LSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The adrenal blood supply was examined in three ways: 1) a review of six previous cadaver studies looking at adrenal blood supply; 2) a review of our 164 consecutive laparoscopic adrenalectomies (LAs) (January 1999-January 2009); the details of the main adrenal veins and variants had been prospectively recorded; and 3) dissection of 4 cadaver specimens (macroscopic and histologic examination was performed). RESULTS: The six cadaver studies showed duplication or triplication of the main adrenal vein with variable frequency. Four of six studies described smaller peripheral veins surrounding the adrenal gland. The arterial supply appeared constant, with each adrenal gland supplied by up to 60 small arteries. In our series of LA, the main adrenal vein was constant. In 6 cases, the main vein was duplicated. Our cadaver dissection showed the large number of small peripheral veins and arteries surrounding the adrenal gland. Histology confirmed that these peripheral veins drained the adrenal gland. CONCLUSIONS: After LSA, a nonfunctioning adrenal remnant is unlikely due to an inadequate arterial supply. Division of the main adrenal vein appears safe, but excessive mobilization of the adrenal remnant should be avoided to prevent destruction of the peripheral veins.