Navigating nutrition and hydration care in the adult patient with short bowel syndrome.

Attending diligently to the nutrition and hydration needs of patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a key tenet of their care, both postoperatively and in the years that follow. For, without each, patients are left to themselves to navigate the nutrition consequences of SBS, including malnutrition, nutrient deficiencies, renal compromise, osteoporosis, fatigue, depression, and impaired quality of life. The intent of this review is to discuss the initial nutrition assessment, oral diet, hydration, and home nutrition support for the patient with SBS.

Dietary intake and nutritional deficiencies in patients with diabetic or idiopathic gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastroparesis can lead to food aversion, poor oral intake, and subsequent malnutrition. We characterized dietary intake and nutritional deficiencies in patients with diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. METHODS: Patients with gastroparesis on oral intake (N = 305) were enrolled in the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Gastroparesis Registry and completed diet questionnaires at 7 centers. Medical history, gastroparesis symptoms, answers to the Block Food Frequency Questionnaire, and gastric emptying scintigraphy results were analyzed. RESULTS: Caloric intake averaged 1168 ± 801 kcal/day, amounting to 58% ± 39% of daily total energy requirements (TER). A total of 194 patients (64%) reported caloric-deficient diets, defined as <60% of estimated TER. Only 5 patients (2%) followed a diet suggested for patients with gastroparesis. Deficiencies were present in several vitamins and minerals; patients with idiopathic disorders were more likely to have diets with estimated deficiencies in vitamins A, B(6), C, K, iron, potassium, and zinc than diabetic patients. Only one-third of patients were taking multivitamin supplements. More severe symptoms (bloating and constipation) were characteristic of patients who reported an energy-deficient diet. Overall, 32% of patients had nutritional consultation after the onset of gastroparesis; consultation was more likely among patients with longer duration of symptoms and more hospitalizations and patients with diabetes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that nutritional consultation increased the chances that daily TER were met (odds ratio, 1.51; P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with gastroparesis have diets deficient in calories, vitamins, and minerals. Nutritional consultation is obtained infrequently but is suggested for dietary therapy and to address nutritional deficiencies.

Enteral feeding in acute and chronic pancreatitis.

Nutrition support is an essential part of the management of acute and chronic pancreatitis. In the past, parenteral nutrition has been used to allow pancreatic rest while providing nutrition support to patients who have acute pancreatitis. Evidence from randomized, controlled trials, however, suggests that enteral nutrition is as effective as and is safer and cheaper than parenteral nutrition. Observational studies also have demonstrated a benefit in patients who have chronic pancreatitis.

Managing the Adult Patient With Short Bowel Syndrome.

Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is a malabsorptive disorder associated with significant morbidity and mortality, reduced quality of life, and high health care costs. Managing the patient with SBS requires an understanding of gastrointestinal anatomy and physiology; a dedicated multidisciplinary team; and the coordination of dietary, fluid, pharmacologic, and comorbid disease management. This article provides an overview of the current state of management of SBS, including a practical approach to optimizing the care and quality of life of the adult patient with SBS.

Nutritional considerations in the patient with gastroparesis.

Gastroparesis, or delayed gastric emptying, has many origins and can wax and wane depending on the underlying cause. Not only do the symptoms significantly alter quality of life, but the clinical consequences can also be life threatening. Once a patient develops protracted nausea and vomiting, providing adequate nutrition, hydration, and access to therapeutics such as prokinetics and antiemetics can present an exceptional challenge to clinicians. This article reviews the limited evidence available for oral nutrition, as well as enteral and parenteral nutritional support therapies. Practical strategies are provided to improve the nutritional depletion that often accompanies this debilitating condition.

Enteral feeding: the art and the science.

Enteral feeding (TEN) is the preferred method for hospitalized patients requiring nutrition support. However, real and perceived barriers to implementation exist, with gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance being the most common. The purpose of this article is to identify common GI obstacles to effective TEN and to review current practices of TEN delivery and evidence to support such practices. The article reviews the GI anatomy and physiology that affect TEN practices and also identifies related evidence on the most common GI barriers limiting effective TEN delivery. Suggested solutions are provided.

A retrospective review of the course of patients with pancreatitis discharged on jejunal feedings.

INTRODUCTION: Although parenteral nutrition (PN) has been the standard nutrition therapy in patients with pancreatitis requiring nutrition support, it is associated with a higher rate of catheter-related sepsis and gut atrophy. Research suggests enteral nutrition (EN) is possible in patients with pancreatitis without exacerbating symptoms when infused jejunally. The purpose of this study was to review the course of patients with resolving pancreatitis discharged to home on EN. METHODS: The medical records of 33 patients with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with jejunal extension (PEG-J) or nasojejunal tube (NJ) who received home EN were reviewed. The data collected included duration of EN, formula used, goal and maximum tolerated flow rates, anthropometric measures, and gastrointestinal complications. RESULTS: Ninety-seven percent of patients received a standard polymeric formula providing an average of 1845 +/- 421 kcal/d. Forty-two percent of patients took pancreatic enzyme supplements. Complications occurring in patients included nausea and vomiting (42%), feeding rate intolerance (18%), diarrhea (12%), and PEG site infection (27%). Seventy-seven percent of patients achieved nutritional goals. CONCLUSION: Standard polymeric EN seems to be safe and efficacious in the home setting for patients with resolving pancreatitis.

Nutrition support for the mechanically ventilated patient.

Nutrition support is a hotly debated topic in most intensive care units. Is enteral nutrition or TPN best? Is gastric or small-bowel feeding safer? Are specialized formulas needed? These are only some of the issues, and the fact remains that there is a paucity of clear, solid data. Folklore has become the standard of practice in many areas of medicine; it is richly found in nutrition support. We must be careful not to get caught up in the trappings of our beliefs about nutrition support. Instead, we must continue to evaluate our own practices and fine-tune our skills of clinical assessment and common sense.

Nutrition concerns for the patient with gastroparesis.

Gastroparesis is a debilitating disease that is the consequence of a variety of conditions resulting in a significant loss of quality of life. Although many cases are mild, some patients have protracted nausea and vomiting, making it difficult, if not impossible, to maintain their hydration and nutritional status. Furthermore, therapeutic levels of medications, such as prokinetic and antiemetic agents, can be difficult to achieve. The intent of this article is to provide the clinician with suggestions to improve the nutritional status of patients with gastroparesis and offer strategies to deal with the nutritional insults that arise in these unfortunate patients.