Experiences of Spanish out-of-hospital emergency workers with high levels of depression during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic had a major psychological impact on health care workers (HCWs). This study was embedded in a larger quantitative study on the mental health care of out-of-hospital HCWs in Spain. To better understand this, a qualitative study was conducted to explore the experiences, coping strategies, and influencing factors of out-of-hospital HCWs who scored high (> 25 points) on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) in a previous quantitative mental health study. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using six in-depth interviews with individuals who scored high on the depression scale and agreed to be contacted by email between May and June 2021, using the phenomenological approach. The data were analysed using Brawn and Clare's method. RESULTS: The main results findings related to four themes. The emotional impact of assuming a professional role with high self-demands and responsibilities; Factors influencing the development of negative emotions such as the cruelty of the pandemic, the helplessness in relation to health management and policy, the changing role of the professional and the relationship with society; Personal protection through coping strategies to manage negative emotions such as support from colleagues and family; Good practices for the future looking for different management strategies that can influence individuals and their personal, professional, and social relationships. CONCLUSION: The strong impact of the circumstances experienced points to the need to develop psychological support programmes that can protect people's mental health from depression during a crisis and improve the relationship between workers and their managers.

RESUMEN: ANTECEDENTES: La pandemia de COVID-19 tuvo un gran impacto psicológico en el personal sanitario. Este estudio forma parte de un estudio cuantitativo más amplio sobre la atención a la salud mental de los trabajadores sanitarios extrahospitalarios en España. Para comprenderlo mejor, se llevó a cabo un estudio cualitativo para explorar las experiencias, estrategias de afrontamiento y factores de influencia de los trabajadores extrahospitalarios que obtuvieron puntuaciones altas (> 25 puntos) en la Escala de Depresión, Ansiedad y Estrés (DASS-21) en un estudio cuantitativo previo sobre salud mental. MéTODOS: Se realizó un estudio cualitativo mediante seis entrevistas en profundidad con individuos que puntuaron alto en la escala de depresión y aceptaron ser contactados por correo electrónico entre mayo y junio de 2021, utilizando el enfoque fenomenológico. Los datos se analizaron utilizando el método de Brawn y Clare. RESULTADOS: Los principales hallazgos de los resultados se relacionaron con cuatro temas. El impacto emocional de asumir un rol profesional con altas autoexigencias y responsabilidades; Factores que influyen en el desarrollo de emociones negativas como la crueldad de la pandemia, la impotencia en relación con la gestión y la política sanitaria, el papel cambiante del profesional y la relación con la sociedad; Protección personal a través de estrategias de afrontamiento para gestionar las emociones negativas como el apoyo de los compañeros y la familia; Buenas prácticas para el futuro buscando diferentes estrategias de gestión que puedan influir en los individuos y en sus relaciones personales, profesionales y sociales. CONCLUSIóN: El fuerte impacto de las circunstancias vividas apunta a la necesidad de desarrollar programas de apoyo psicológico que puedan proteger la salud mental de las personas durante una crisis y mejorar la relación entre los trabajadores y sus jefes.

Influence of Previous Mental State on Psychological Outcomes of Spanish Out-of-Hospital Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

This study aimed to describe factors relating to the psychological distress of healthcare workers (HCWs) in Spanish out-of-hospital emergency medical services (EMS), according to the previous or non-use of psychotropic drugs or psychotherapy. A multicentre, cross-sectional descriptive study was designed. The study population were all physicians, nurses, and emergency medical technicians (EMTs) working in any Spanish out-of-hospital EMS between February and April 2021. The main outcomes were the levels of stress, anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy, assessed by DASS-21 and G-SES. Differences in levels of stress, anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy, according to sex, age, previous use of psychotropic drug or psychotherapy, work experience, professional category, type of work, and modification of working conditions were measured using the Student's t-test for independent samples, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's correlation, or 2-factor analysis of covariance. A total of 1636 HCWs were included, of whom one in three had severe mental disorders because of the pandemic. The interaction of the previous or non-use of psychotropic drugs or psychotherapy with the rest of the factors considered did not modify the levels of stress, anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy. However, HCWs with a history of psychotropic drug or psychotherapy use had a more intense negative emotional response and lower self-efficacy, regardless of their sex, professional category, type of work, or change in the working conditions. These HCWs are considered particularly vulnerable to the development or recurrence of new disorders or other comorbidities; therefore, the implementation of monitoring and follow-up strategies should be a priority.

Influence of the Cumulative Incidence of COVID-19 Cases on the Mental Health of the Spanish Out-of-Hospital Professionals.

This study aimed to analyze the psychological affectation of health professionals (HPs) of Spanish Emergency Medical Services (EMSs) according to the cumulative incidence (CI) of COVID-19 cases in the regions in which they worked. A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed, including all HPs working in any EMS of the Spanish geography between 1 February 2021 and 30 April 2021. Their level of stress, anxiety and depression (DASS-21) and the perception of self-efficacy (G-SES) were the study's main results. A 2-factor analysis of covariance was used to determine if the CI regions of COVID-19 cases determined the psychological impact on each of the studied variables. A total of 1710 HPs were included. A third presented psychological impairment classified as severe. The interaction of CI regions with the studied variables did not influence their levels of stress, anxiety, depression or self-efficacy. Women, younger HPs or those with less EMS work experience, emergency medical technicians (EMT), workers who had to modify their working conditions or those who lived with minors or dependents suffered a greater impact from the COVID-19 pandemic in certain regions. These HPs have shown high levels of stress, anxiety, depression and medium levels of self-efficacy, with similar data in the different geographical areas. Psychological support is essential to mitigate their suffering and teach them to react to adverse events.