Physician-Specific Utilization of an Electronic Best Practice Alert for Pediatric Sepsis in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Early recognition of sepsis remains a critical goal in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Although this has led to the development of best practice alerts (BPAs) to facilitate screening and bundled care, research on how individual physicians interact with sepsis alerts and protocols is limited. This study aims to identify common reasons for acceptance and rejection of a sepsis BPA by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians and understand how the BPA affects physician management of patients with suspected sepsis. METHODS: This is a qualitative study of PEM physicians in a quaternary-care children's hospital. Data were collected through semistructured interviews and analyzed through an iterative coding process until thematic saturation was achieved. Member checking was completed to ensure trustworthiness. Thematic analysis of PEM physicians' rejection reasons in the electronic health record was used to categorize their responses and calculate each theme's frequency. RESULTS: Twenty-two physicians participated in this study. Seven physicians (32%) relied solely on patient characteristics when deciding to accept the BPA, whereas the remaining physicians considered nonpatient factors specific to the ED environment, individualized practice patterns, and BPA design. Eleven principal reasons for BPA rejection were derived from 1406 electronic health record responses, with clinical appearance not consistent with shock being the most common. Physicians identified the BPA's configuration and incomplete understanding of the BPA as the biggest barriers to utilization and provided strategies to improve the BPA screening process and streamline sepsis care. Physicians emphasized the need for further BPA education for physicians and triage staff and improved transparency of the alert. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians consider patient and nonpatient factors when responding to the BPA. Improved BPA functionality combined with measures to enhance screening, optimize sepsis management, and educate ED providers on the BPA may increase satisfaction with the alert and promote more effective utilization when it fires.

A Traumatic Quinceañera: Acute Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome in an Adolescent Girl.

ABSTRACT: A 15-year-old girl presented with 3 days of progressive abdominal distention, pain, and bilious hematemesis. Her symptoms began after her quinceañera, during which she wore a tight corset. On examination, she was thin and had significant abdominal distention and pain. A computed tomography revealed a massively dilated stomach and proximal duodenum to the region of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) with distal decompression. An upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopy demonstrated marked dilation of the stomach through the mid third portion of the duodenum with distal decompression and an associated linear compression on her duodenal wall. We believe that she developed acute SMA syndrome. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome is a partial bowel obstruction caused when the third portion of the duodenum is compressed as it passes between the SMA and the aorta. Although the SMA syndrome is most commonly described as a condition associated with chronic, severe weight loss resulting in a narrowing of the SMA to aorta angle and subsequent duodenal compression, it can present acutely from causes such as a postoperative complication, blunt trauma, or external compression. Previously described acute SMA syndrome from external compression has been the result of medically necessary causes, such as body casting. In this case, the tight gown was likely the inciting factor for her development of SMA syndrome; however, she was placed at high risk for the condition by being underweight at baseline and experiencing food restriction for several days preceding her quinceañera. She was treated conservatively with nasogastric decompression and parenteral nutrition, and has since completely recovered.

The Effect of a Primary Care Provider Incentive Program on Pediatric Emergency Medicine Visits.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to analyze the effect of a financial incentive program targeting primary care providers (PCPs) with the goal of decreasing emergency department (ED) utilization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis in a single health maintenance organization comparing ED visit/1000 member-months before and after the physician incentive program in 2009. We compared the median ED visit rate between physicians who did (PIP) and did not participate (non-PIP) from 2009 to 2012. We used 2008 data as a baseline study period to compare the ED visit rate between PIP and non-PIP providers to detect any inherent difference between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 1376 PCPs were enrolled. A total of US $18,290,817 was spent in total on incentives. Overall, the median ED visit rate for all providers was statistically significantly lower during the study period (baseline period, study period: 56.36 ED visits/1000 member-months vs 45.82, respectively, P < 0.001). During the baseline period in our fully adjusted linear regression for degree, specialty, education, and board status, PIP versus non-PIP visits were not statistically significantly different (P = 0.17). During the study period in our fully adjusted model, we found that PIP had statistically significant fewer ED visits compared with non-PIP (P = 0.02). In a subgroup analysis of providers who did and did not receive an incentive payment, in the fully adjusted linear regression, providers who received any payment had statistically significant fewer ED visits/1000 member-months (P < 0.001). In addition, we found in the fully adjusted analysis that those providers who received at least 1 incentive payment for meeting after-hours criteria had statistically significantly fewer ED visits/1000 member-months (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A financial incentive program to provide PCPs with specific targets and goals to decrease pediatric ED utilization can decrease ED visits.

Cost-effectiveness and Improved Parent and Provider Satisfaction With Outpatient Management of Pediatric Oncology Patients, With Low-risk Fever and Neutropenia.

On the basis of significant evidence for safety, the international pediatric fever and neutropenia committee recommends the identification and management of patients with "low-risk fever and neutropenia" (LRFN), outpatient with oral antibiotics, instead of traditional inpatient management. The aim of our study was to compare the cost-per-patient with these 2 strategies, and to evaluate parent and provider satisfaction with the outpatient management of LRFN. Between March 2016 and February 2017, 17 LRFN patients (median absolute neutrophil count, 90/µL) were managed at a single institution, per new guidelines. Fifteen patients were discharged on presentation or at 24 to 48 hours postadmission on oral levofloxacin, and 2 were inadvertently admitted off protocol. The mean cost of management for the postimplementation cohort was compared with a historic preimplementation control group. Satisfaction surveys were completed by parents and health care providers of LRFN patients. The mean total cost of an LRFN episode was $12,500 per patient preimplementation and $6168 postimplementation, a decrease of $6332 (51%) per patient. All parents surveyed found outpatient follow-up easy; most (12/14) parents and all (16/16) providers preferred outpatient management. Outpatient management of LRFN patients was less costly, and was preferred by a majority of parents and all health care providers, compared with traditional inpatient management.

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Online Curriculum Improves Resident Knowledge Scores, But Will They Use It?

OBJECTIVE: Shift work on a pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) rotation makes didactic scheduling difficult, thereby limiting teaching opportunities. These constraints make this rotation an ideal setting to supplement resident education with an online curriculum. We aimed to determine if implementation of an online curriculum during a resident PEM rotation improves posttest performance and increases satisfaction with resident educational experience. METHODS: This was a prospective before/after study of pediatric and emergency medicine residents on a 1-month rotation in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department. A curriculum was developed consisting of 17 online modules. In the first 5 months of the study, 42 control residents received traditional bedside teaching. In the last 12 months, 80 intervention residents completed at least 8 modules during their rotation. Both groups completed a pretest at rotation start and a posttest and end-of-rotation survey at rotation end. RESULTS: Control group pretest and posttest scores were not significantly different. In the intervention group, posttest scores were significantly increased compared with pretest scores (68 vs 59, P < 0.01). A low percentage of residents completed the study. Only 42% of the 189 residents enrolled in the intervention group completed the posttest and 28% completed the survey. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing an online PEM curriculum significantly improved knowledge. As residency programs face new duty hour requirements, online curricula may provide an effective way to supplement teaching. However, to capitalize on this self-directed curriculum, the low participation rates in this study suggest we must first determine and establish ways to overcome barriers to online learning.

Improving Pediatric Emergency Care by Implementing an Eligible Learner Endotracheal Intubation Policy.

OBJECTIVES: Although endotracheal intubations (ETIs) are high-risk, low-frequency events, there are no nationally accepted training pathways or measures to ensure ETI competence for emergency department (ED) providers. Our objective was to determine whether implementation of an eligible learner ETI policy (ELETIP) led to improved first ETI attempt success rates and decreased immediate airway-related complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional before-and-after study of outcomes after ELETIP implementation. The primary outcome was proportion of successful first ETI attempts; secondary outcomes were number of intubation attempts, time to intubation, need to call anesthesia for intubation, and airway-related complications. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety patients were included (median age, 1.3 y; range, 1 day-24.7 y): 219 (56%) and 171 (44%) in the pre- and post-ELETIP periods, respectively. First successful ETI attempts increased from 65.1% to 75.7% (odds ratio [OR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.62). Secondary outcomes included mean number of intubation attempts (1.6-1.4, P = 0.01), time to intubation (5.6-4.9 minutes, P = 0.07), anesthesia intubations in the ED (5.9%-2.9%; OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.17-1.37), and intubation-related complications (32%-25.7%; OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.47-1.15). CONCLUSIONS: An ELETIP is effective in improving ED care by increasing first ETI attempt success rates while decreasing overall intubation attempts. Physicians and physician learners with anesthesia training for critical airway management training have high ETI attempt success rates. Airway management training is essential to physician education and airway management skills for improving outcomes.

Pediatric Meckel's Diverticulum: Report of 208 Cases and Review of the Literature.

We report a review of 208 cases of Meckel's diverticulum among pediatric patients from one single institution. One of the aims of this report is to highlight the different diagnostic modalities of Meckel's diverticulum since a majority of cases is undiagnosed prior to surgery. Our review shows 58 cases containing gastric and/or pancreatic heterotopic tissue, including two unique cases. The first case reported is a desmoid tumor arising at the tip of diverticulum, a case that, to our knowledge, has not been previously reported. The second case involves a female patient appearing with an acute abdomen thought to be appendicitis, instead surgery revealed a diverticulum arising from the ileum. The cause of acute abdomen was due to gonococcal infection. In conclusion, we hope that this large series of Meckel's cases will enrich our readers on the differential diagnosis and preoperative diagnostic techniques of Meckels' diverticulum.

Resuscitation Bundle in Pediatric Shock Decreases Acute Kidney Injury and Improves Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of an early emergency department (ED) protocol-driven resuscitation (septic shock protocol [SSP]) on the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective pediatric cohort with clinical sepsis admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) from the ED before (2009, PRE) and after (2010, POST) implementation of the SSP. AKI was defined by pRIFLE (pediatric version of the Risk of renal dysfunction; Injury to kidney; Failure of kidney function; Loss of kidney function, End-stage renal disease creatinine criteria). RESULTS: A total of 202 patients (PRE, n = 98; POST, n = 104) were included (53% male, mean age 7.7 ± 5.6 years, mean Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction [PELOD] 8.9 ± 12.7, mean Pediatric Risk of Mortality score 5.3 ± 13.9). There were no differences in demographics or illness severity between the PRE and POST groups. POST was associated with decreased AKI (54% vs 29%, P < .001), renal-replacement therapy (4 vs 0, P = .04), PICU, and hospital lengths of stay (LOS) (1.9 ± 2.3 vs 4.5 ± 7.6, P < .01; 6.3 ± 5.1 vs 15.3 ± 16.9, P < .001, respectively), and mortality (10% vs 3%, P = .037). The SSP was independently associated with decreased AKI when we controlled for age, sex, and PELOD (OR 0.27, CI 0.13-0.56). In multivariate analyses, the SSP was independently associated with shorter PICU and hospital LOS when we controlled for AKI and PELOD (P = .02, P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: A protocol-driven implementation of a resuscitation bundle in the pediatric ED decreased AKI and need for renal-replacement therapy, as well as PICU and hospital LOS and mortality.

A novel briefing checklist at shift handoff in an emergency department improves situational awareness and safety event identification.

OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) shift handoffs are sources of potential medical error, delays in care, and medicolegal liabilities. Few handoff studies exist in the ED literature. We aimed to describe the implementation of a standardized checklist for improving situational awareness during physician handoffs in a pediatric ED. METHODS: This is a descriptive observational study in a large academic pediatric ED. Checklists were evaluated for rates of use, completion, and identification of potential safety events. We defined a complete checklist as 80% or more of items checked. A user perception survey was used. After 1 year, all checklist users (residents, fellows, faculty, and charge nurses with ED experience before and after checklist implementation) were anonymously surveyed to assess the checklist's usability, perceived contributions to Institute of Medicine quality domains, and situational awareness. The electronically administered survey used Likert frequency scales. RESULTS: Of 732 handoffs, 98% used the checklist, and 89% were complete. A mean of 1.7 potential safety events were identified per handoff. The most frequent potential safety events were identification of intensive care unit-level patients in the ED (48%), equipment problems (46%), staffing issues (21%), and intensive care unit-level patients in transport (16%). Eighty-one subjects (88%) responded to the survey. The users agreed that the checklist promoted better communication, safety, efficiency, effective care, and situational awareness. CONCLUSIONS: The Physician Active Shift Signout in the Emergency Department briefing checklist was used often and at a high completion rate, frequently identifying potential safety events. The users found that it improved the quality of care and team communication. Future studies on outcomes and processes are needed.

An overview and study of beneficiaries' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of the medicare part d benefit.

PURPOSE: Medicare beneficiaries' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions (KAP) of the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit have been under evaluation since the 2006 inception of the Part D benefit. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to examine beneficiaries' satisfaction with their Medicare Part D prescription drug plan, knowledge of the coverage gap, attitudes about the relative importance of certain insurance parameters, and overall perceptions of the Part D benefit. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive study design. SETTING: Thirteen outreach events targeting Medicare beneficiaries in northern California during the 2012 open-enrollment period. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 576 Medicare beneficiaries. INTERVENTIONS: Beneficiaries were asked questions related to their KAP of the Part D benefit as part of a plan to evaluate their need for assistance. Sociodemographic data were collected via a standardized survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identify variances in KAP related to beneficiary sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of beneficiaries claimed to be "very" or "extremely" satisfied with Part D, yet only 40.3% of those with a prescription drug plan (PDP) rated their plan as "very good" or "excellent." Those automatically enrolled into their plan by Medicare were significantly less satisfied with their plan (P = 0.048). Almost three in four recipients not receiving Medicare subsidies have heard of the gap in prescription drug coverage, i.e., the "donut hole." Additionally, there were significant racial disparities in knowledge of the gap. Only 62.7% of beneficiaries indicated that "total out-of-pocket cost during the year" was the most important plan characteristic for them. CONCLUSIONS: An understanding of beneficiaries' attitudes may help explain suboptimal Part D plan selection. Moreover, evaluating beneficiaries' knowledge of the Part D benefit can assist advocacy groups in creating educational materials to better assist this vulnerable population in choosing an appropriate plan.

Comparison of primary physician patterns of and attitudes on emergency department use.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare physician viewpoints and clinic patterns between primary care providers (PCPs) with high patient emergency department (ED) use (HU) and PCPs with low patient ED use (LU). METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods descriptive study of quantitative and qualitative data of 22 practices. We compared admission rates, American Academy of Pediatrics guideline adherence, efficiency, medical complexity, and patient satisfaction. Primary care provider interviews regarding ED use practices and perspectives were coded and inductively analyzed using Atlas 6.0 for themes. RESULTS: Compared with LU, the HU group had a higher admission rate (92 vs 41 admissions per 1000 members, P = 0.005), lower scores in adherence to American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines, and higher scores in satisfaction overall. There were no significant differences in efficiency, medical complexity, PCP communications, timeliness for appointment, satisfaction with after-hour care or likelihood of PCP referral. All PCPs described the EDs' purpose as for things they "cannot handle." The LU group was more likely to identify the ED for emergencies, whereas the HU group had a broader, more ambiguous definition of what they "cannot handle," with parental anxiety identified as a significant factor. In addition, the LU group recognized the need for more parental education about ED use. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care providers with low patient ED use were more likely to describe the EDs' purpose as being for emergencies and to recognize a need for more parental education about the use of the ED. All physicians struggled with reassuring parents.

Test characteristics of an automated age- and temperature-adjusted tachycardia alert in pediatric septic shock.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to create and analyze the performance of an automated triage tool alerting triage nursing staff and physicians to an abnormal heart rate consistent with septic shock in a pediatric emergency department. METHODS: A computerized best-practice alert (BPA) triage system corrected heart rate for temperature (5 beats per minute for each 1°F above 100°F or 9.6-10 beats per minute for each 1°C > 36°C) and alarmed on tachycardia. If patients appeared ill and/or had medical comorbidities predisposing them to sepsis, a "shock protocol" was activated. Sensitivity was calculated for patients clinically diagnosed with shock during the study period. RESULTS: During the study period (February to August 2010), the BPA was triggered in 4552 (11.5%) of 39,697 visits. Mean age was 5.4 years (range, 18 days to 18 years); 53% were female. The tool was 81% sensitive in identifying the 210 patients with shock. Missed patients were more likely to be previously healthy (odds ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-6.2), younger (5.7 vs 8.7 years, P = 0.004), and less likely to have a malignancy (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.8). The tool was 89% specific; positive and negative predictive values were 4% and 99.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The BPA-automated sensitive triage tool, based solely on initial temperature and heart rate, led to the identification of most children with septic shock, even before clinical acumen and laboratory values were incorporated into the diagnostic algorithm.

The intervention of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in homeostasis of human retinal pigment epithelial cells: a review.

The health and activity of photoreceptors and Bruch's membrane are promoted by the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), which is essential for normal vision. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) are examples of retinopathies that result in vision loss. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process in which epithelial cells transform into mesenchymal cells as a result of a faulty microenvironment, and it is associated with the oculopathies stated above. Cell differentiation, autophagy, growth factors (GFs), the blood-retinal barrier (BRB), and other complicated signaling pathways all contribute to proper morphology, and their disruption by harmful compounds has an impact on RPE function. The inducer and suppressor of EMT in RPE, on the other hand, are unknown. The current article reviews the experimental research investigations, suggested that certain modulators like glucosamine (Glc-N) and bradykinin (BK) suppress the TGFß signaling pathway and that other variables like oxidative stress triggered EMT, which is not found in normal RPE homeostasis. Finding molecular targets and treatments to prevent and restore RPE function, as well as understanding how EMT regulators affect RPE degeneration, are therefore crucial.

Lessons learned from value-based pediatric appendectomy care: A shared savings pilot model.

PURPOSE: We aim to assess the healthcare value achieved from a shared savings program for pediatric appendectomy. METHODS: All appendectomy patients covered by our health plan were included. Quality targets were 15% reduction in time to surgery, length of stay, readmission rate, and patient satisfaction. Quality targets and costs for an appendectomy episode in two 6-month performance periods (PP1, PP2) were compared to baseline. RESULTS: 640 patients were included (baseline:317, PP1:167, PP2:156). No quality targets were met in PP1. Two quality targets were met during PP2: readmission rate (-57%) and patient satisfaction. No savings were realized because the cost reduction threshold (-9%) was not met during PP1 (+1.7%) or PP2 (-0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Payer-provider partnerships can be a platform for testing value-based reimbursement models. Setting achievable targets, identifying affectable quality metrics, considering case mix index, and allowing sufficient time for interventions to generate cost savings should be considered in future programs.

Pediatric Septic Shock Collaborative Improves Emergency Department Sepsis Care in Children.

OBJECTIVES: The pediatric emergency department (ED)-based Pediatric Septic Shock Collaborative (PSSC) aimed to improve mortality and key care processes among children with presumed septic shock. METHODS: This was a multicenter learning and improvement collaborative of 19 pediatric EDs from November 2013 to May 2016 with shared screening and patient identification recommendations, bundles of care, and educational materials. Process metrics included minutes to initial vital sign assessment and to first and third fluid bolus and antibiotic administration. Outcomes included 3- and 30-day all-cause in-hospital mortality, hospital and ICU lengths of stay, hours on increased ventilation (including new and increases from chronic baseline in invasive and noninvasive ventilation), and hours on vasoactive agent support. Analysis used statistical process control charts and included both the overall sample and an ICU subgroup. RESULTS: Process improvements were noted in timely vital sign assessment and receipt of antibiotics in the overall group. Timely first bolus and antibiotics improved in the ICU subgroup. There was a decrease in 30-day all-cause in-hospital mortality in the overall sample. CONCLUSIONS: A multicenter pediatric ED improvement collaborative showed improvement in key processes for early sepsis management and demonstrated that a bundled quality improvement-focused approach to sepsis management can be effective in improving care.

Effect of a triage team on length of stay in a pediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the impact of a triage team on patient length of stay (LOS) overall and by patient acuity in a pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in which existing ED staffing was reallocated to include a triage team. The study was conducted in an urban children's ED Monday through Friday, from 6:00 P.M. to 2:00 A.M., for 4 weeks in February 2008. Twenty study periods were randomized according to the absence or presence of a triage team (physician, nurse, and nurse assistant) that initiated evaluations of nonurgent and urgent patients. We compared patient LOS between study periods with and without triage teams, using generalized estimating equations to allow for the clustering of effects by day. RESULTS: Of the 1726 patients, 843 were seen during nontriage team times and 883 during triage team times. Overall, there was a 21-minute decrease in LOS during triage team times compared with nontriage team times, but this was not statistically significant. Stratifying by patient acuity level, LOS was significantly decreased during triage team times for nonurgent (25 minutes, P = 0.001) and urgent patients (50 minutes, P = 0.047) but prolonged for emergent patients (79 minutes, P = 0.019) and unchanged for critically ill patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, although we did not find a statistically significant decrease in the LOS with the use of a dedicated triage team, we did find statistically significant decreases in the stratified analysis for urgent, nonurgent patient, and discharged patients. An important reason statistical significance may not have been reached in this study may have been our hospital's current staffing model, and therefore, the use of a triage team as additional staffing versus reallocation of existing staffing may depend on an institution's current level of staffing and its ability to meet patient demand.

Improving recognition and management of children with complicated severe acute malnutrition at a tertiary referral hospital in Malawi: a quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is common in low-income countries and is associated with high mortality in young children. OBJECTIVE: To improve recognition and management of SAM in a tertiary hospital in Malawi. METHODS: The impact of multifaceted quality improvement interventions in process measures pertaining to the identification and management of SAM was assessed. Interventions included focused training for clinical staff, reporting process measures to staff, and mobile phone-based group messaging for enhanced communication. This initiative focused on children aged 6-36 months admitted to Kamuzu Central Hospital in Malawi from September 2019 to March 2020. Before-after comparisons were made with baseline data from the year before, and process measures within this intervention period which included three plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles were compared. RESULTS: During the intervention period, 418 children had SAM and in-hospital mortality was 10.8%, which was not significantly different from the baseline period. Compared with the baseline period, there was significant improvement in the documentation of full anthropometrics on admission, blood glucose test within 24 hours of admission and HIV testing results by discharge. During the intervention period, amidst increasing patient census with each PDSA cycle, three process measures were maintained (documentation of full anthropometrics, determination of nutritional status and HIV testing results), and there was significant improvement in blood glucose documentation. CONCLUSION: Significant improvement in key quality measures represents early progress towards the larger goal of improving patient outcomes, most notably mortality, in children admitted with SAM.

The Standardisation of handoffs in a large academic paediatric emergency department using I-PASS.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the American College of Emergency Physicians and American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations for standardised handoffs in the emergency department (ED), few EDs have an established tool. Our aim was to improve the quality of handoffs in the ED by establishing compliance with the I-PASS handoff tool. METHODS: This is a quality improvement (QI) initiative to standardise handoffs in a large academic paediatric ED. Following review of the literature and focus groups with key stakeholders, I-PASS was selected and modified to fit departmental needs. Implementation throughPlan-Do-Study-Act cycles included the development of educational materials, reminders and real-time feedback. Required use of I-PASS during designated team sign-out began in June 2016. Compliance with the handoff tool and handoff deficiencies was measured through observations by faculty trained in I-PASS. As a balancing measure, time to complete handoff was monitored and compared with preintervention data. RESULTS: Compliance with I-PASS reached 80% within 6 months, 100% within 7 months and sustained at 100% during the remainder of the study period. The average percent of omissions of crucial information per handoff declined to 8.3%, which was a 53% decrease. Average percentage of tangential information and miscommunications per handoff did not show a decline. The average handoff took 20 min, which did not differ from the preintervention time. Survey results demonstrated a perceived improvement in patient safety through closed-loop communication, clear action lists and contingency planning and proper patient acuity identification. CONCLUSIONS: I-PASS is applicable in the ED and can be successfully implemented through QI methodology contributing to an overall culture of safety.

Outside the box and into thick air: implementation of an exterior mobile pediatric emergency response team for North American H1N1 (swine) influenza virus in Houston, Texas.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We describe the implementation of a mobile pediatric emergency response team for mildly ill children with influenza-like illnesses during the H1N1 swine influenza outbreak. METHODS: This was a descriptive quality improvement study conducted in the Texas Children's Hospital (Houston, TX) pediatric emergency department (ED), covered, open-air parking lot from May 1, 2009, to May 7, 2009. Children aged 18 years or younger were screened for viral respiratory symptoms and sent to designated areas of the ED according to level of acuity, possibility of influenza-like illness, and the anticipated need for laboratory evaluation. RESULTS: The mobile pediatric emergency response team experienced 18% of the total ED volume, or a median of 48 patients daily, peaking at 83 patients treated on May 3, 2009. Although few children had positive rapid influenza assay results and the morbidity of disease in the community appeared to be minimal for the majority of children, anxiety about pandemic influenza drove a large number of ED visits, necessitating an increase in surge capacity. Surge capacity was augmented both through utilization of existing institutional resources and by creating a novel area in which to treat patients with potential airborne pathogens. Infection control procedures and patient safety were also maximized through patient cohorting and adaptation of social distancing measures to the ED setting. CONCLUSION: The mobile pediatric emergency response team and screening and triage algorithms were able to safely and effectively identify a group of low-acuity patients who could be rapidly evaluated and discharged, alleviating ED volume and potentially preventing transmission of H1N1 influenza.