Phosphine estimation in fumigated food grains using gas chromatography equipped with FPD detector.

Phosphine, as per several reports, is considered to be an ideal and effective alternative to methyl bromide (MB) fumigant, phased out globally honouring 'Montreal Protocol'. The food grains fumigated with phosphine are perceived to be residue-free; however, estimation of its residues is imperative. In the present study, the phosphine residues were estimated in grains of wheat, rice, green gram, chickpea and yellow pea fumigated with different formulations of phosphine under 7 and 10 days exposure periods at various locations in India. For efficacy studies, the conventional aluminium phosphide (AlP) tablet (56% @2 and 3 tablet/MT) and granular AlP (77.5% @1.0 and 1.5 g phosphine/m3) formulations were applied. Each treatment including untreated control was replicated thrice. The concentration was monitored every 24 h until the end of exposure periods. Food grain samples were drawn before and post fumigation following a certain waiting period for estimation of phosphine residues using gas chromatography equipped with FPD detector. Residues in fumigated food grains were observed in traces in all the experimental stacks, but below the MRL (0.1 ppm), fixed by Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC). Phosphine can be considered safe for use as an alternate fumigant in quarantine and long-term storage of food grains leaving residues below MRL.

Radiology Case of the Month:Diagnosis and Treatment of an Acquired Uterine Arteriovenous Malformation in a 26-Year-Old Woman presenting with Vaginal Bleeding.

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are a rare source of potentially life-threatening uterine bleeding, and should be suspected in patients presenting with metromenorrhagia. Histologically, AVMs are characterized as having both arterial and venous tissues without an intervening capillary network.1 The etiology may be either congenital or acquired secondary to prior uterine surgery or uterine malignancy.2 Congenital lesions are thought to result from arrested vascular development and contain a nidus of multiple feeding arteries anastomosed to multiple draining veins. In contrast, acquired lesions contain small fistulas between a single feeding artery and draining vein.4 While angiography is considered the gold standard for diagnosing AVMs, its limitations include exposure to contrast and radiation and the inability to accurately detect the degree of pelvic extension.5 As a result, ultrasound (US) with color Doppler is the imaging modality of choice in suspected AVM and can be confirmed noninvasively with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).6 Angiography remains the preferred method of imaging when there is a high index of suspicion of AVM in a patient who may potentially undergo embolization as treatment.3 Historically, the definitive treatment for AVMs has been either hysterectomy or uterine artery ligation. However, embolotherapy has become a well-recognized alternative to surgery since the first reported case in 1982.5 One of the advantages of embolotherapy is the preservation of reproductive structures. Currently, treatment for AVMs is based on the patient's desire to maintain fertility. The objective of this study was (1) to describe the diagnostic features of an AVM on Doppler ultrasound in a patient who presented with vaginal bleeding and (2) discuss the treatment and outcome of this patient using uterine artery embolization.

Sarcoidosis of the thyroid gland and spinal canal: unique localizations.

Sarcoid involvement of the thyroid gland and spinal canal are rare individual manifestations of sarcoidosis. In this article, we will describe two concurrent cases of spinal canal and thyroid sarcoid involvement. Diagnostic criteria usually include histologic identification of a non-caseating granuloma, supportive laboratory or imaging tests or both, and a compatible clinical course. Our goal is to discuss the presentations and clinical manifestations of our patients, and we will also review the literature involving sarcoid involvement of the spinal canal and thyroid. Although rare, atypical locations of sarcoid should remain suspected for those patients known to have sarcoid involvement in other organ(s) or found to have granulomatous involvement on pathology.