Identifying the facilitators and barriers to implementation of renal tumour biopsy in the diagnostic pathway for small renal masses.

OBJECTIVES: To understand the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of renal tumour biopsy (RTB) in the diagnostic pathway for renal tumours in England. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants consisted of patients who had a renal tumour diagnosed and/or treated at one of five tertiary centres in England, healthcare professionals involved in the direct care of patients diagnosed with renal tumours, and clinical service managers and commissioners. The study employed a mixed-methods research methodology consisting of individual interviews and an on-line survey that explored the types of facilitators and barriers individuals perceived and experienced and the frequency in which these were reported. A public dissemination event took place following the completion of data collection; to facilitate discussion of potential solutions to implementing RTB. RESULTS: There were 50 participant interviews (23 patients, 22 clinicians, and five health service commissioners/operations managers). The patient on-line survey received 52 responses, and the clinician survey received 22 responses. Patients most frequently reported influences in choosing whether to undergo RTB pertained to wanting to know the diagnosis of their kidney mass (40%), the advice or information provided by healthcare professionals (40%), and not wishing to delay treatment (23%). Clinicians most frequently reported barriers to recommending RTB related to their uncertainty of diagnostic accuracy (56%), availability of appointments or hospital beds (52%), concerns of risk of bleeding (44%), risk of seeding (41%), and delays in meeting national cancer pathway targets (41%). The dissemination event was attended by 18 participants (seven patients and 11 clinicians). Suggestions to improve implementation included reducing variation and promotion of standardisation of practice by a consensus statement, increasing the evidence base (clinicians) and improved communication by developing better patient aids such as videos and diagrams (patients and clinicians). CONCLUSION: Implementation of RTB may be dependent on the quality of information provided, its format and perceived reliability of the information. Increased utilisation of RTB may be improved by development of a consensus statement on the role of biopsy, with patients expressing a preference for alternative information aids such as patient videos.

Renal mass biopsy - a practical and clinicopathologically relevant approach to diagnosis.

Advancements in imaging modalities have increased the frequency of renal mass discovery. Imaging has typically been considered sufficient to guide management for a large proportion of these tumours, but renal mass biopsies (RMBs) have an increasing role in determining malignancy and can be a valuable tool for preventing unnecessary surgery in patients with benign tumours. A structured approach should be used to help to navigate the expanding repertoire of renal tumours, many of which are molecularly defined. In terms of tumour subtyping, the pathologist's strategy should focus on stratifying patients into clinically different prognostic groups according to our current knowledge of tumour behaviour, including benign, low-grade or indolent, intermediate malignant or highly aggressive. Crucial pathological features and morphological mimicry of tumours can alter the tumour's prognostic group. Thus, pathologists and urologists can use RMB to select patients with tumours at a reduced risk of progression, which can be safely managed with active surveillance within a tailored imaging schedule, versus tumours for which ablation or surgical intervention is indicated. RMB is also crucial in the oncological setting to distinguish between different high-grade tumours and guide tailored management strategies.

An effective day case treatment combination for refractory neuropathic mixed incontinence

OBJECTIVE: Women with drug refractory neurogenic mixed incontinence (NMI) have limited minimally invasive treatment options and require reconstructive surgery. We examined efficacy of a combination of day case intradetrusor (ID) botulinum toxin (BTX-A) bladder injections and transobturator (TOT) or tension free vaginal tape (TVT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven women who are pharmacotherapy intolerant or who have drug refractory NMI were treated. Two opted for open surgery and the remaining 9 received 1000 units of Dysport diluted in 30 mL saline cystoscopically at 30 ID sites followed by TOT in 6 or TVT in 3 as a day case combination treatment. Patient demographics, pre and post treatment videocystometrogram (VCMG), pad test and International Committee on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) scores were recorded. At 6 weeks (repeat ICIQ, pad test and patient satisfaction), at 3 and 12 months (VCMG) and 'current' (ICIQ and patient satisfaction) was recorded. RESULTS: The mean age was 56.7 years (range 41 to 78) with a mean follow up of 19.1 months (range 7 to 33). All women were continent at 3 and 12 months. Quality of life (ICIQ scores) improved at 6 weeks (p > 0.001) and remained stable up to the last follow up (p > 0.001). Eight women have stopped using pads. At 3 months, there was significant improvement in MDP (p > 0.014) and MCC (p = 0.002). Anticholinergics were discontinued in 7 with global high satisfaction with the treatment BTX-A injections were repeated in 4 (mean 13.5 months). CONCLUSION: Anticholinergic refractory women with NMI can be effectively treated as a day case with combination of ID BTX-A injections and TVT or TOT.