A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Implementation of BREASTChoice, a Multilevel Breast Reconstruction Decision Support Tool With Personalized Risk Predictiona.

OBJECTIVE: To implement the BREASTChoice decision tool into the electronic health record and evaluate its effectiveness. BACKGROUND: BREASTChoice, is a multilevel decision tool that: 1) educates patients about breast reconstruction; 2) estimates personalized risk of complications; 3) clarifies patient preferences; and 4) informs clinicians about patients' risk and preferences. METHODS: A multisite randomized controlled trial enrolled adult women with stage 0-III breast malignancy undergoing mastectomy. Participants were randomized to BREASTChoice or a control website. A survey assessed knowledge, preferences, decisional conflict, shared decision-making, preferred treatment, and usability. We conducted intent-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol (PP) analyses (those randomized to BREASTChoice who accessed the tool), and stratified analyses. RESULTS: 23/25 eligible clinicians enrolled. 369/761 (48%) contacted patients enrolled and were randomized. Patients' average age was 51 years; 15% were older than 65. BREASTChoice participants had higher knowledge than control participants (ITT: mean 70.6 vs. 67.4, P=0.08; PP: mean 71.4 vs. 67.4, P=0.03), especially when stratified by site (ITT: P=0.04, PP: P=0.01), age (ITT: P=0.04, PP: P=0.02), and race (ITT: P=0.04, PP: P=0.01). BREASTChoice did not improve decisional conflict, match between preferences and treatment, or shared decision-making. In PP analyses, fewer high-risk patients using BREASTChoice chose reconstruction. BREASTChoice had high usability. CONCLUSIONS: BREASTChoice is a novel decision tool incorporating risk prediction, patient education, and clinician engagement. Patients using BREASTChoice had higher knowledge; older adults and those from racially minoritized backgrounds especially benefitted. There was no impact on other decision outcomes. Future studies should overcome implementation barriers and specifically examine decision outcomes among high-risk patients.

A Consensus Definition and Classification System of Oncoplastic Surgery Developed by the American Society of Breast Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Several definitions of oncoplastic surgery have been reported in the literature. In an effort to facilitate communication regarding oncoplastic surgery to patients, trainees, and among colleagues, the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS) aimed to create a consensus definition and classification system for oncoplastic surgery. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search for oncoplastic surgery definitions using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Following this, a consensus definition and classification system was created by the ASBrS. RESULTS: Overall, 30 articles defining oncoplastic surgery were identified, with several articles contradicting each other. The ASBrS definition for oncoplastic surgery defines this set of breast-conserving operations using volume displacement and volume replacement principles as: "Breast conservation surgery incorporating an oncologic partial mastectomy with ipsilateral defect repair using volume displacement or volume replacement techniques with contralateral symmetry surgery as appropriate". Volume displacement is defined as closing the lumpectomy defect and redistributing the resection volume over the preserved breast, and is divided into two levels: level 1 (< 20%) and level 2 (20-50%). Volume replacement includes those situations when volume is added using flaps or implants to correct the partial mastectomy defect. CONCLUSION: The ASBrS oncoplastic surgery definition and classification system provides language to facilitate discussion and teaching of oncoplastic surgery among breast surgeons, trainees, and patients.

Trends in Lumpectomy and Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in the US, 2011-2016.

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic breast surgery aims to optimize efficacy of surgical resection and cosmesis to maximize patient satisfaction; however, despite the benefits, oncoplastic techniques have not been widely adopted in the US. This study examined trends in the incidence of lumpectomy (partial mastectomy) with or without oncoplastic techniques from 2011 to 2016. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of claims from the Optum Clinformatics database (January 2010-March 2017). Female patients with no history of breast surgery in the prior year were categorized into three independent cohorts: isolated lumpectomy (Lx), lumpectomy with tissue transfer (LxTT), or lumpectomy with mammaplasty and/or mastopexy (LxMM). Oncoplastic techniques (in cohorts two and three) were performed at either time of the initial lumpectomy or during 90-day follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 19,253 patients met the inclusion criteria (91.1% Lx, 5.2% LxTT, and 3.7% LxMM). Significantly fewer patients with Lx had a family history of breast cancer compared with patients with oncoplastic techniques (26.4% vs. 33.7% and 37.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). The incidence of Lx declined significantly from 2011 (92.9%) to 2016 (88.1%), while LxTT and LxMM increased from 4.2 to 7.2% and 2.8 to 4.7%, respectively (both p < 0.001). The greatest utilization of oncoplastic techniques was observed in the Pacific census division (19.2%), while lowest utilization was in the East South Central division (3.2%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While increased adoption of oncoplastic techniques was observed, the compound annual growth rate remained below 10% and varied significantly by region. Further adoption of oncoplastic techniques is necessary to improve cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction following breast-conserving surgery.

Complications After Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Expander-Implant Reconstruction: Effects of Radiation Therapy on the Stages of Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Many patients undergoing total-skin sparing mastectomy (TSSM) and 2-staged expander-implant (TE-I) reconstruction require postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). Additionally, many patients undergoing TSSM for recurrent cancer have a history of lumpectomy and radiation therapy (XRT). Few studies have looked at the impact of XRT on the stages of TE-I reconstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing TSSM and immediate TE-I reconstruction between 2006 and 2013 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Rates of TE-I loss and severe infection requiring intravenous antibiotics were compared in patients with prior XRT (85 cases) and PMRT (133 cases). Complications were divided by stage of reconstruction: first stage (TSSM and TE placement) and second stage (TE-I exchange). RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 2.5 years. Patients with prior XRT had more complications after the first stage of reconstruction than the second (TE-I loss: 15% vs 5%, P = 0.03; infection: 20% vs 8%, P = 0.04). Patients receiving PMRT had low complication rates after the first stage, when they had not yet received radiation (TE-I loss: 2%; infection: 5%). However, complication rates after TE-I exchange (TE-I loss, 18%; infection, 31%) were significantly higher, and nearly 4-fold higher than patients with prior XRT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with prior XRT are at high risk for complications after the first stage of TE-I reconstruction after TSSM; however, the risk of complications at the second stage is comparable to patients without radiation exposure and significantly lower than patients receiving PMRT. Patients receiving radiation therapy should be given appropriate preoperative counseling regarding their risks.

Expanding the Indications for Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Is It Safe for Patients with Locally Advanced Disease?

BACKGROUND: Indications for total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM) continue to expand. Although initially used only for early-stage breast cancer, TSSM currently is offered in many centers to patients with locally advanced disease. However, despite this practice change, limited data on oncologic outcomes in this population have been reported. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of all patients undergoing TSSM and immediate reconstruction from 2005 to 2013 was performed. The outcomes for patients with stage 2b and stage 3 cancer were included in the analysis. The primary outcomes included the development of locoregional or distant recurrences. RESULTS: Of 753 patients undergoing TSSM, 139 (18 %) presented with locally advanced disease. Of these 139 patients, 25 (18 %) had stage 2b disease, and 114 (82 %) had stage 3 disease. Most of the patients (97 %) received chemotherapy (77 % neoadjuvant, 20 % adjuvant), whereas 3 % received adjuvant hormonal therapy alone. Of the neoadjuvant patients, 13 (12 %) had a pathologic complete response (pCR) to treatment. During a mean follow-up period of 41 months (range 4-111 months), seven patients (5 %) had a local recurrence, 21 patients (15.1 %) had a distant recurrence, and three patients (2.2 %) had simultaneous local and distant recurrences. None of the local recurrences occurred in the preserved nipple-areolar complex skin. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with locally advanced breast cancer are most at risk for distant rather than local recurrence, even after TSSM. When used in conjunction with appropriate multimodal therapy, TSSM is not associated with an increased risk for local recurrence in this population, even in the setting of low pCR rates.

Comparison of Mammographic Findings Following Oncoplastic Mammoplasty and Lumpectomy Without Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of lumpectomy defects with reduction mammoplasty techniques can improve aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction. However, one concern with the substantial tissue rearrangement required is the possible difficulty with mammographic follow up and/or increased recommendations for future biopsies. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 49 patients who underwent oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty between 2001 and 2009 who were age-matched to patients who underwent lumpectomy without reconstruction. Mammography reports at 6 months, 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively were reviewed for predominant findings, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System final assessments, and recommendations for biopsy. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in abnormal mammographic findings prompting biopsy between the two cohorts at 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years postoperatively (p > 0.05). Biopsy rates over the 5-year period did not differ significantly between the two cohorts [9 (18 %) lumpectomy cohort, 12 (24 %) oncoplastic cohort, p = 0.46]. Overall cancer-to-biopsy ratio was 33 % in the lumpectomy cohort and 42 % in the oncoplastic cohort (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Although substantial tissue rearrangement is performed at the time of oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty, our results reveal no increased incidence of postoperative mammographic abnormalities or unnecessary biopsies compared to lumpectomy alone. This demonstrates that fear of increasing mammographic abnormalities and biopsies after reduction mammoplasty is unfounded and should not prevent utilization of this technique if it can optimize cosmetic outcomes and extend the option of breast conservation.

Outcomes Following Oncoplastic Reduction Mammoplasty: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of partial mastectomy defects with oncoplastic approaches has become increasingly popular as a strategy for improving aesthetic outcomes and extending the option of breast conservation therapy. However, interpretation of reported oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications has been challenging because of limited data and significant variability in surgical technique and degree of tissue rearrangement. METHODS: Studies describing oncoplastic mammoplasty or partial mastectomy reconstruction were identified from the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Only studies reporting the use of oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty techniques with significant breast parenchymal rearrangement were included for analysis. Primary outcomes assessed were postoperative complications and oncologic outcomes, including local recurrence rates and need for re-excision or completion mastectomy. RESULTS: Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria, representing 1324 oncoplastic cases. Reported follow-up ranged from 20 to 73 months. Of the 12 studies with at least 2 years' mean/median follow-up, the pooled local-regional recurrence rate was 3.1%. Fifteen articles reported re-excision and completion mastectomy rates (3.5% and 3.7%, respectively). Twelve articles reported postoperative complications. Overall, 4.6% of patients had wound dehiscence, 4.3% developed fat necrosis, 2.8% developed an infection, 0.9% had either partial or total nipple necrosis, and 0.6% had seromas. CONCLUSIONS: Partial mastectomy reconstruction with oncoplastic reduction techniques is associated with high rates of successful breast conservation and low rates of required re-excisions, likely due to the ability to take wide tumor margins without compromising aesthetic outcome. Future studies should consistently report complications, recurrences, and patient-reported outcomes to improve our ability to evaluate the use of this technique.

Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Defining the Effects of Coverage Technique on Nipple/Areola Preservation.

BACKGROUND: Total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM) has become increasingly frequent in recent years, as inclusion criteria continue to expand. Options for tissue expander coverage in these patients include complete submuscular tissue expander coverage and acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-assisted coverage. This study compares both techniques with regard to relevant outcomes, during a recent 1-year period at our institution. METHODS: All women undergoing TSSM and immediate expander placement between January 2012 and January 2013 were prospectively tracked. Patient demographics, expander coverage type, adjuvant treatment, length and characteristics of expansion, and incidence of complications were analyzed. RESULTS: In 1 year, 127 patients underwent TSSM on 202 breasts. Overall, 113 expanders underwent submuscular coverage, and 89 underwent ADM-assisted coverage. Mean intraoperative fill volume was 52 mL in the submuscular cohort and 205 mL in the ADM cohort (P = 0.0001). Mean tissue expander size was 404 mL in the submuscular cohort and 454 mL in the ADM cohort (P = 0.0002). χ analysis demonstrated no differences between the cohorts in incidence of complications, including partial/complete nipple necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: The use of ADM for expander coverage after TSSM allowed for greater initial expander fill. With large and ptotic breasts, this allows for reduced incidence of skin folds in the preserved breast skin pocket, and greater control over final nipple position, as the amount of loose, mobile skin is reduced by the greater initial fill. The safety profile of ADM use after TSSM is equivalent to that of submuscular coverage, with no differences in partial or complete nipple necrosis.

Tumor Involvement of the Nipple in Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy: Strategies for Management.

BACKGROUND: Despite a growing body of literature on oncologic and reconstructive outcomes after total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM), some questions related to this approach remain unanswered, including strategies for managing tumor involvement of the nipple while maintaining the aesthetic benefits of TSSM. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing TSSM and immediate breast reconstruction from 2005 to 2013 was reviewed. Outcomes included tumor involvement of resected nipple tissue and subsequent management, recurrences after nipple involvement, and trends in management of involved nipple tissue. RESULTS: The study included 1176 breasts in 751 patients treated with TSSM. The follow-up period was 31.3 months. The nipple-areolar complex (NAC) of 32 breasts (2.7 %) had a positive margin or involvement of nipple tissue. Of these breasts, 56 % contained invasive cancer, and 44 % had in situ disease. Management included repeat excision (11 cases, 34 % of cases), radiation of the NAC (as part of the postmastectomy breast field) without further excision (5 cases, 16 %), complete NAC removal (8 cases, 25 %), and no further treatment (8 cases, 25 %). Management by complete NAC skin excision significantly decreased during the study period (p = 0.003). The overall local recurrence rate was 6.2 %. No patients had recurrence in the preserved NAC skin. CONCLUSIONS: Despite expanding indications for TSSM, it can be performed safely with low rates of nipple involvement. Over time, tumor involvement of the nipple has been treated with re-excision or other alternative approaches to NAC removal that preserve the aesthetic benefits of total skin-sparing approaches without an early adverse impact on local recurrence.

Negative Genetic Testing Does Not Deter Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Younger Patients with Greater Family Histories of Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) correlate with adoption of total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM). We aimed to characterize patients with unilateral breast cancer who underwent TSSM with CPM or without CPM (No CPM). METHODS: We reviewed all patients with unilateral breast cancer who underwent TSSM from 2006 to 2013. Trends in CPM and genetic testing were evaluated across time. Patient characteristics and complications were compared between CPM and No CPM groups. RESULTS: We identified 591 patients (293 No CPM and 298 CPM) with median follow-up of 25 (interquartile range [IQR] 13-52) months. All patients with deleterious mutations and 58% of those who tested negative for mutations underwent CPM. In patients who tested negative for mutations, CPM was correlated with younger patient age, greater family history, and younger age of relatives diagnosed with breast/ovarian cancer. CPM was associated with an increased risk of superficial nipple necrosis (relative risk [RR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-4.0), wound breakdown (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04-2.5), and infections requiring oral antibiotics (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.16-2.2). In patients with tissue expander/implant reconstruction, CPM was associated with an increased risk of implant exposure (RR 1.95, 95% CI 1.03-3.7) but did not affect the risk of implant loss (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.56-1.48). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who choose CPM fit the profile of patients with higher risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), which may be due to polygenic risk factors that are currently under investigation. Physicians should address patients' fears of CBC, screening concerns, and the risk of complications when considering CPM.

Approaches to microvascular breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: a comparison of techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Preserving the entire breast skin envelope through total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM) techniques, in conjunction with immediate autologous reconstruction, can provide excellent aesthetic outcomes for patients. However, postoperative ischemic complications, including nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and skin flap necrosis, can negatively impact reconstructive outcomes. As a strategy for minimizing ischemic complications, we have recently begun performing 2-stage autologous reconstruction after TSSM with immediate tissue expander placement, followed by second-stage microvascular reconstruction, as an alternative to immediate autologous reconstruction. METHODS: A prospectively collected database of patients undergoing TSSM and immediate breast reconstruction was reviewed for patients who underwent microvascular reconstruction. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, those who underwent immediate microvascular reconstruction and those who had a 2-stage procedure. Outcomes for comparison included complication rates and aesthetic outcome scores based on review of postoperative photographs by blinded observers (comprised of plastic surgery attending physicians and residents). RESULTS: During the 2-year study period, there were 21 immediate microvascular reconstructions performed (14 patients) and 16 two-stage reconstructions performed (10 patients). Mean time to completion of reconstruction in the staged cohort was 11.5 months (range, 6.1-21 months). Rates of NAC necrosis were significantly higher in the immediate cohort compared to the staged cohort (29% vs 0%, P=0.03), which contributed to higher rates of unplanned operative intervention in the immediate cohort (23.8% vs 6.25%, P=0.14). There were no flap losses in either cohort. Aesthetic scores for NAC color and overall appearance were higher in the staged group compared to the immediate group (P<0.001 and P=0.1, respectively), although they were equivalent for nipple position and projection. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage microvascular reconstruction after TSSM is associated with fewer complications and improved NAC aesthetic outcomes compared to immediate autologous reconstruction. Although time to final reconstruction is longer with the staged approach, the aesthetic benefits and reduction in postoperative complications support the use of this approach to optimize outcomes.

Mattress sutures to remove unwanted convexity and concavity of the nasal tip: 12-year follow-up.

Nasal tip bulbosity, or convexity, has been one of the most difficult problems to correct during rhinoplasty. Excision of cartilage from the cephalic part of the lateral crus has helped. However, complete correction of the deformity is not always possible with this maneuver alone. Suture techniques have also helped to improve outcomes. Twelve years ago, the lateral crus mattress suture was introduced as a way of converting the lateral crus to a flat, straight segment with resultant correction of the convexity. Since then, this suture technique has been employed in most primary and some secondary rhinoplasties and has stood the test of time. We report our experience with this technique, including a slight modification to facilitate its application when the cartilage is unusually narrow or when the original technique is difficult to complete. In addition, the suture technique for the less concave lateral crura is redescribed. It, too, has withstood the test of time.

Total skin-sparing mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers.

BACKGROUND: Total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM) with preservation of the nipple-areolar complex skin has become increasingly accepted as an oncologically safe procedure. Oncologic outcomes after TSSM in BRCA mutation carriers have not been well-studied. METHODS: We identified 53 BRCA-positive patients who underwent bilateral TSSM for prophylactic (26 patients) or therapeutic indications (27 patients) from 2001 to 2011. Cases were age-matched (for prophylactic cases) or age- and stage-matched (for therapeutic cases) with non-BRCA-positive patients. Outcomes included tumor involvement of resected nipple tissue, the development of new breast cancers in patients who underwent risk-reducing TSSM, and local-regional recurrence in patients who underwent therapeutic TSSM. RESULTS: Outcomes from 212 TSSM procedures in 53 cases and 53 controls were analyzed. In patients undergoing TSSM for prophylactic indications, in situ cancer was found in one (1.9 %) nipple specimen in BRCA-positive patients versus two specimens (3.8 %) in the non-BRCA-positive cohort (p = 1). At a mean follow-up of 51 months, no new cancers developed in either cohort. In patients undergoing TSSM for therapeutic indications, in situ or invasive cancer was found in zero of the nipple specimens in BRCA-positive patients versus two specimens (3.7 %) in the non-BRCA-positive cohort (p = 0.49). At a mean follow-up of 37 months, there were no local-regional recurrences in the BRCA-positive cohort and 1 (3.7 %) in the non-BRCA-positive cohort. CONCLUSIONS: TSSM is an oncologically safe procedure in BRCA-positive patients. In patients undergoing TSSM as a risk-reducing strategy, 4-year follow-up demonstrates no increased risk of developing new breast cancers; longer-term follow-up is ongoing.

Total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an evolution of technique and assessment of outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM) with preservation of the breast and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) skin was developed to improve aesthetic outcomes for mastectomy. Over time, indications for TSSM broadened and our technique has evolved with a series of systematic improvements. METHODS: We reviewed all cases of TSSM with immediate breast reconstruction performed from 2005 to 2012. Patient comorbidities, treatment characteristics, postoperative complications, and outcomes were obtained prospectively and through medical chart review. Locoregional recurrences, distant recurrences, and patient survival were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: During this 8-year period, 633 patients (981 cases) underwent TSSM with median follow-up time of 29 (interquartile range 14-54) months. Immediate breast reconstruction was performed with tissue expander placement (89 %), pedicle TRAM (5 %), free flap (5 %), permanent implant (0.3 %), or latissimus flap (0.2 %). The incidences of postoperative complications decreased significantly over time. In 2012, these were down to 3.5 % for superficial nipple necrosis, 1.0 % for complete nipple necrosis, 3.0 % for minor skin flap necrosis, 4.4 % for major skin flap necrosis, 13.3 % for infections requiring oral antibiotics, 9.9 % for infections requiring intravenous antibiotics, 3.4 % for infections requiring operative intervention, and 8.5 % for expander/implant. Overall 5-year cumulative incidences of recurrence were 3.0 % (locoregional) and 4.2 % (distant), and there were no recurrences in the NAC skin. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic changes in our technique of TSSM and immediate breast reconstruction have decreased postoperative complications over time. Oncologic outcomes of locoregional and distal recurrences remain similar to skin-sparing mastectomy techniques.

Randomized trial of drain antisepsis after mastectomy and immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: In this 2-site randomized trial, we investigated the effect of antiseptic drain care on bacterial colonization of surgical drains and infection after immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction. METHODS: With IRB approval, we randomized patients undergoing bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction to drain antisepsis (treatment) for one side, with standard drain care (control) for the other. Antisepsis care included both: chlorhexidine disc dressing at drain exit site(s) and irrigation of drain bulbs twice daily with dilute sodium hypochlorite solution. Cultures were obtained from bulb fluid at 1 week and at drain removal, and from the subcutaneous drain tubing at removal. Positive cultures were defined as ≥1+ growth for fluid and >50 CFU for tubing. RESULTS: Cultures of drain bulb fluid at 1 week (the primary endpoint) were positive in 9.9 % of treatment sides (10 of 101) versus 20.8 % (21 of 101) of control sides (p = 0.02). Drain tubing cultures were positive in 0 treated drains versus 6.2 % (6 of 97) of control drains (p = 0.03). Surgical site infection occurred within 30 days in 0 antisepsis sides versus 3.8 % (4 of 104) of control sides (p = 0.13), and within 1 year in three of 104 (2.9 %) of antisepsis sides versus 6 of 104 (5.8 %) of control sides (p = 0.45). Clinical infection occurred within 1 year in 9.7 % (6 of 62) of colonized sides (tubing or fluid) versus 1.5 % (2 of 136) of noncolonized sides (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Simple and inexpensive local antiseptic interventions with a chlorhexidine disc and hypochlorite solution reduce bacterial colonization of drains, and reduced drain colonization was associated with fewer infections.

Oncoplastic mammoplasty as a strategy for reducing reconstructive complications associated with postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Given the high complication rates in patients who require radiation therapy (XRT) after mastectomy and immediate reconstruction, and the low local recurrence rates following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and breast conservation therapy, we sought to determine if using neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and oncoplastic mammoplasty as an alternative to mastectomy and immediate reconstruction is an effective strategy for reducing complication rates in the setting of XRT. A prospectively maintained data base was queried for patients who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and XRT between 2001 and 2010 and underwent either oncoplastic mammoplasty or mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Rates of postoperative complications between groups were compared using Fisher's exact test. Outcomes from 37 patients who underwent oncoplastic mammoplasty were compared to 64 patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Mean follow-up was 33 months (range 4-116 months). Rates of postoperative complications, including unplanned operative intervention for a reconstructive complication (2.7% versus 37.5%, p < 0.001), skin flap necrosis (10.8% versus 29.7%, p = 0.05), and infection (16.2% versus 35.9, p = 0.04) were significantly higher in the mastectomy group. Overall, 45.3% of patients who underwent mastectomy developed at least one breast complication, compared to 18.9% of patients who underwent oncoplastic mammoplasty (p = 0.01). If XRT is indicated after mastectomy, attempts should be made to achieve breast conservation through the use of neo-adjuvant therapy and oncoplastic surgery in order to optimize surgical outcomes. Breast conservation with oncoplastic reconstruction does not compromise oncologic outcome, but significantly reduces complications compared to postmastectomy reconstruction followed by XRT.

Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM) with preservation of the nipple-areolar complex skin has become more widely accepted. Few studies looking at outcomes after TSSM and immediate reconstruction have focused on patient-reported outcomes and trends in satisfaction over time. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of patients undergoing TSSM and immediate expander-implant reconstruction was performed. Patients completed the BREAST-Q questionnaire preoperatively and again at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Mean scores in each BREAST-Q domain were assessed at each time point. Domains were scored on a 0- to 100-point scale. RESULTS: Survey completion rate was 55%; BREAST-Q scores were calculated from responses from 28 patients. Mean overall satisfaction with breasts declined at 1 month (69.8 to 46.1, P<0.001), but then returned to baseline by 1 year. Mean scores also declined at 1 month in the psychosocial (75.7-67.4, P=0.2) and sexual (58.3-46.7, P=0.06) domains, but returned to baseline by 1 year. Mean nipple satisfaction score was 76.4 at 1 year, with 89% of patients reporting satisfaction with nipple appearance. Satisfaction with nipple position and sensation was lower, with only 56% of patients reporting satisfaction with nipple position and 40% with nipple sensation. CONCLUSIONS: After TSSM and immediate reconstruction, patient satisfaction with their breasts, as well as psychosocial and sexual well-being, returns to baseline by 1 year. Although overall nipple satisfaction is high, patients often report dissatisfaction with nipple position and sensation; appropriate preoperative counseling is important to set realistic expectations.

Sensate immediate breast reconstruction.

As breast cancer therapies and associated oncologic outcomes continue to improve, greater attention has been placed on quality-of-life issues after breast cancer and breast cancer risk-reducing treatments. The loss of sensation that typically occurs after mastectomy can have significant negative psychological, sexual, and functional impact on patients after surgery. Further, injury of nerves not only leads to numbness, but can also cause chronic neuropathic pain, which can be very debilitating to affected patients. In order to minimize these impacts, there is expanding uptake of surgical approaches that preserve nerves at the time of mastectomy and reconstruct injured nerves either during mastectomy or during delayed reconstruction. These advances have been facilitated by anatomic studies investigating different variants of intercostal anatomy and better understanding the course of the nerves innervating the mastectomy skin and nipple-areolar complex (NAC). With improved knowledge of the intercostal nerve anatomy, surgeons are able to carefully preserve nerves at the time of mastectomy, thus improving sensory outcomes. Additionally, nerve reconstruction techniques have advanced, particularly with newer nerve allograft technologies, which allows for nerve reconstruction to be done both at the time of mastectomy, as well as in a delayed fashion. The focus of this article is to describe the current state of sensory preservation and immediate reinnervation at the time of mastectomy and the advances that have allowed for these new approaches.

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous drainage of breast fluid collections after mastectomy with expander-based breast reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To determine clinical outcomes of patients who underwent imaging-guided percutaneous drainage of breast fluid collections after mastectomy and breast reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed including all consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous drainage of fluid collections after mastectomy with tissue expander-based reconstruction between January 2007 and September 2012. During this period, 879 mastectomies (563 patients) with expander-based breast reconstruction were performed. Fluid collections developed in 28 patients (5%), which led to 30 imaging-guided percutaneous drainage procedures. The median follow-up time was 533 days. Patient characteristics, surgical technique, microbiology analysis, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 51.5 years (range, 30.9-69.4 y), and the median time between breast reconstruction and drainage was 35 days (range, 4-235 d). Erythema and swelling were the most common presenting symptoms. The median volume of fluid evacuated at the time of drain placement was 70 mL. Drains were left in place for a median 14 days (range, 6-34 d). Microorganisms were detected in the fluid in 12 of 30 drainage procedures, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common microorganism. No further intervention was needed in 21 of 30 drainage procedures (70%). However, surgical intervention (removal of expanders) was needed after 6 (20%) drainage procedures, and additional percutaneous drainage procedures were performed after 3 (10%) drainage procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous drainage is an effective means of treating postoperative fluid collections after expander-based breast reconstruction and can obviate the need for repeat surgery in most cases.

Feasibility of Performing Total Skin-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With Prior Circumareolar Mastopexy or Reduction Mammoplasty Incisions.

INTRODUCTION: Total skin-sparing mastectomy (TSSM) techniques with preservation of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) skin are becoming increasingly popular due to improved cosmesis without compromise in oncologic safety. However, these techniques are not routinely offered to patients who have undergone previous breast surgery involving circumareolar incisions due to concern for NAC viability. METHODS: We reviewed the outcomes of TSSM in 11 patients who underwent 21 TSSM procedures at our institution between 2008 and 2011. All patients had undergone previous breast surgery including reduction mammaplasty (7 breasts), mastopexy (4 breasts), augmentation (3 breasts), and combined mastopexy-augmentation (7 breasts). Incisions from previous breast surgery included circumareolar (11 cases) and Wise pattern (10 cases) incisions. All patients underwent TSSM through an inframammary incision followed by immediate tissue expander reconstruction and subsequent implant exchange. Patient demographics, previous breast surgery details, tumor and treatment characteristics, and postoperative complications were reviewed. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 43 years (range, 35-53 years) and mean body mass index was 24 kg/m (range, 19-32 kg/m). Mean follow-up was 10.2 months (range, 3-20 months).Indications for TSSM included prophylactic risk reduction in 10 cases, in situ cancer in 2 cases, and invasive cancer in 9 cases. Mean time from previous breast surgery to mastectomy was 6.9 years (range, 6 months-26 years). Major complications requiring operative reintervention included 1 (4.8%) case of cellulitis requiring expander removal and 2 (9.5%) cases of wound breakdown requiring operative closure. There were no complications involving the NAC. CONCLUSIONS: Total skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction can safely be performed in patients who have undergone previous breast surgery involving circumareolar incisions. Our preferred technique in this group of patients is to perform TSSM through an inframammary incision with 2-stage expander-implant reconstruction to minimize NAC ischemia and subsequent complications.