Dopaminergic denervation using [123I]-FPCIT and pain in Parkinson's disease: a correlation study.

In patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), abnormal activations of nociceptive brain areas and lowered pain thresholds were reported, probably reflecting a central modification of pain processing. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible correlation between the striatal and extrastriatal dopaminergic system and pain threshold in PD patients. We included 25 PD patients with various intensities of central pain (visual analog scale). Subjective pain threshold (thermotest) and a motor examination (UPDRS III) were performed. Patients underwent SPECT imaging with [123I]-FP-CIT. We analyzed the correlation between [123I]-FP-CIT binding and subjective pain threshold, using a simple linear regression model for striatal uptake and a voxel-based approach for extrastriatal uptake. The covariables were age, sex, duration of PD, and UPDRS motor score. A pain matrix mask was also used to identify clusters in relation with pain matrix. Striatal analysis revealed that [123I]-FP-CIT binding was negatively correlated with age (p = 0.02), duration of PD (p = 0.0002) and UPDRS motor score (p = 0.006), but no correlation with pain threshold was observed. The extrastriatal analysis showed a positive correlation between [123I]-FP-CIT binding and subjective heat pain threshold for the left posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) (p < 0.001) and negative correlations for the right secondary visual cortex (p < 0.001) and left insula (p < 0.001). When applying the pain matrix mask, correlations remained significant only in the left PCC and the left insula. We suggest that pain perception abnormalities in PD are not directly related to striatal dopaminergic dysfunction. Painful sensations may be related to extrastriatal monoaminergic systems.

Emerging analgesic drugs for Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Pain affects between 40 and 85% of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. It is a frequently disabling and overlooked feature, which can significantly reduce health-related quality of life. Unfortunately, there are no universally recommended treatments for this condition. AREAS COVERED: Evidence about the efficacy and safety of available analgesic treatments is summarized in this review. Potential targets for upcoming therapies are then discussed in light of what is currently known about the physiopathology of pain in PD. Protocols for efficacy and safety assessment of novel analgesic therapies are discussed. Finally, critical aspects of study protocol design such as patient selection or outcomes to be evaluated are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Preliminary results indicate that duloxetine, cranial electrotherapy stimulation, rotigotine, subthalamic or pallidum nuclei stimulation or lesion or levodopa could be effective for treating pain in PD. Similarly, some case reports indicate that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or apomorphine could be effective for relieving painful off-period dystonia. Clinical trials with rTMS or oxycodone/naloxone prolonged-release tablets for neuropathic pain or botulinum toxin for off-period dystonia are underway. Success of clinical trials about analgesic strategies in PD will depend on the selection of the right PD population to be treated, according to the type of pain, and the proper selection of study outcomes and follow-up of international recommendations.

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus improves pain in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: In Parkinson's disease (PD), chronic pain is a common symptom which markedly affects the quality of life. Some physiological arguments proposed that Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus (STN-DBS) could improve pain in PD. METHODS: We investigated in 58 PD patients the effect of STN-DBS on pain using the short McGill Pain Questionnaire and other pain parameters such as the Bodily discomfort subscore of the Parkinson's disease Questionnaire 39 and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale section II (UPDRS II) item 17. RESULTS: All pain scores were significantly improved 12 months after STN-DBS. This improvement was not correlated with motor improvement, depression scores or L-Dopa reduction. CONCLUSIONS: STN-DBS induced a substantial beneficial effect on pain in PD, independently of its motor effects and mood status of patients.