A new clinical score to identify children at low risk for appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Besides clinical signs and imaging, in recent years, biomarkers have proven to be a viable diagnostic resource for acute appendicitis (AA). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a clinical score including clinical signs and a combination of biomarkers to identify children with abdominal pain at low risk of AA. DESIGN/METHODS: We prospectively included children 2 to 14 years of age with abdominal pain suggestive of AA who presented to the emergency department between July 2016 and September 2017. A new score, the Pediatric Appendicitis Laboratory Score (PALabS) including clinical signs, leucocyte (WBC) and neutrophil (ANC) counts and plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) and calprotectin (CP) levels was developed and validated through secondary analyses of two distinct cohorts The validation sample included visits to a single pediatric emergency department from 2012 to 2013 and 2016 to 2017. RESULTS: The derivation sample included 278 children, 35.9% of whom had AA and the validation sample included 255 children, 49% of whom had AA. Using logistic regression, we created a 6-part score that consisted of nausea (3 points), history of focal right lower quadrant pain (4 points), ANC of ≥7500/µL (7 points), WBC of ≥10,000/µL (4 points), CRP ≥ 10.0 mg/L (2 points) and CP ≥ 0.50 ≥ ng/mL (3 points). This score exhibited a high discriminatory power (area under the curve: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.84 to 0.92) and outperformed the PAS and Kharbanda scores (area under the curve: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.71 to 0.82 and 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.77 to 0.87, respectively). A PALabS ≤6 had a sensitivity of 99.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.6-99.9), negative predictive value of 97.6% (95% CI: 87.7-99.6), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.03 (95% CI: 0.00-0.18) in the validation set. CONCLUSION: In our validation cohort of patients with acute abdominal pain, the new score can accurately predict which children are at low risk of appendicitis and could be safely managed with close observation.

Vertical cutoff methods in serum protein electrophoresis for the measurement of monoclonal protein concentrations: Which is best?

BACKGROUND: Monoclonal protein (M-protein) concentrations are measured by serum protein electrophoresis (SPE). Two methods are used for demarcating the M-protein area in the electropherogram: perpendicular drop (PD) and tangent skimming (TS). The aim of this study was tocompare both methods and to establish which is the most accurate and precise. METHODS: We studied 24 sera containing M-protein (5-44 g/L). The systematic error (SE) was evaluated in a dilution series of 12 sera. Within-day, between-day, and interobserver variability were assessed. SPE was performed by capillary and agarose gel electrophoresis. M-protein concentrations were measured using both cutoff methods. RESULTS: The PD method shows a constant SE ranged 1.00-2.27 g/L, while constant SE for TS is ranged -0.30--0.57 g/L. None of the cutoff methods or electrophoretic methods showed a proportional SE, with the exception of the TS method in capillary electrophoresis for ß-migrating M-protein. The PD method was more precise than the TS method in all three estimates of imprecision. An increased CV for concentrations < 10 g/L in between-day imprecision was observed with the TS method. Interobserver imprecision was greater for M-protein concentrations < 17 g/L for both cutoff methods (14.85%, 26.42% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being less precise, the TS method provides a more accurate measurement of M-protein concentration.