Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Hosp Infect ; 97(1): 74-78, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28526270

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most frequent nosocomial infection in geriatric units. An understanding of risk factors for infection may help to identify prevention strategies. AIM: Identification of the risk factors for UTI in elderly patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of three prospective cohorts. All hospitalized patients present in, or admitted to, a geriatric unit from June 1st to June 28th, for the years 2009, 2012, and 2015 were included and followed until discharge or until June 30th of the year concerned. For each patient, type and dates of stay, type and dates of catheter, risk factors, and nosocomial UTI (NUTI) data were collected. Univariate and multivariate (Cox model) analyses were made using SPSS software. FINDINGS: A total of 4669 patients were included and were followed for a total of 83,068 days. There were 189 NUTIs (4.0% patients). NUTIs were significantly more frequent among female patients, in rehabilitation units, in immunosuppressed patients, among those with acute retention, post-void residual, history of urinary tract infection in the previous six months, and in case of dependency. NUTIs were significantly more frequent among those who had a catheter (Z-test, P < 0.001). NUTIs were more frequent among patients with intermittent, indwelling, or suprapubic catheters. They were also more frequent in acute/subacute care or rehabilitation units, in women, in immunosuppressed patients, and in those with a history of previous UTI; they were less frequent in dementia patients. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of NUTI is an important issue in both catheterized and non-catheterized patients; prevention programmes should be widened to include non-catheterized patients.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos , Hospitais , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Masculino , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 63(3): 281-8, 2006 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16650504

RESUMO

Tests were performed under working practice conditions to measure the tolerance and acceptability of commercially available hand rubs with proven efficacy. The products were compared with those in current use at the Hospices Civils de Lyon for surgical hand disinfection (Sterillium) and hygienic hand disinfection (Purell) to obtain information for public sector purchases. The 12 test products were Alcogel H, Assanis Pro, Clinogel, Dermalcool, Manugel Plus, Manugel Plus NPC, Manurub Liquid, Manurub Gel, Purell 85, Spitacid, Spitagel and Sterillium Gel. They were tested from mid-November to mid-April over four periods of three weeks, separated by two-week intervals during which the customary product was re-introduced. Participation of hospital wards and theatres was voluntary. Skin dryness and irritation were scored before and after each test period. Acceptability and ease of use were assessed by means of a questionnaire. Among the eight surgical hand rubs, only Manurub Liquid, Manurub Gel and Manugel Plus NPC did not cause significantly more dryness and irritation than Sterillium. For the 10 hygienic hand rubs, differences were noted depending upon the test period. Overall, Assanis Pro, Clinogel, Purell 85 and Sterillium Gel did not cause significantly more dryness and irritation than Purell. However, over the (colder) first three test periods, Assanis Pro and Sterillium Gel caused more irritation and Purell 85 caused more dryness than Purell. Responses to the questionnaires on acceptability indicated that users preferred their customary hand rubs (Sterillium and Purell). As these field tests involving many participants did not identify any superior products, previous purchase orders were renewed.


Assuntos
Álcoois/efeitos adversos , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/efeitos adversos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Desinfetantes/efeitos adversos , Desinfecção das Mãos , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Álcoois/uso terapêutico , Desinfetantes/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , França , Humanos
3.
J Hosp Infect ; 90(3): 240-7, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25799483

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Controlling urinary tract infections (UTIs) associated with intermittent catheterization in geriatric patients. AIM: After a local epidemiological study identified high rates of UTI, a multi-disciplinary working group implemented and evaluated corrective measures. METHODS: In 2009, a one-month prospective study measured the incidence of UTI, controlled for risk factors and exposure, in six geriatric hospitals. In 2010, a self-administered questionnaire on practices was administered to physicians and nurses working in these geriatric units. In 2011, the working group developed a multi-modal programme to: improve understanding of micturition, measurement of bladder volume and indications for catheter drainage; limit available medical devices; and improve prescription and traceability procedures. Detailed training was provided to all personnel on all sites. The epidemiological study was repeated in 2012 to assess the impact of the programme. FINDINGS: Over 1500 patients were included in the 2009 study. The incidence of acquired infection was 4.8%. The infection rate was higher in patients with intermittent catheters than in patients with indwelling catheters (29.7 vs 9.9 UTI per 100 patients, P = 0.1013) which contradicts the literature. In 2010, the 269 responses to the questionnaire showed that staff did not consider catheterization to place patients at risk of infection, staff had poor knowledge of the recommended indications and techniques, and the equipment varied widely between units. Following implementation of the programme, the study was repeated in 2012 with over 1500 patients. The frequency of UTI in patients with intermittent catheters fell to rates in the published literature. CONCLUSION: Multi-modal programmes are an effective means to control UTI.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Uretral Intermitente/efeitos adversos , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cateteres de Demora/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/etiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/terapia , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Geriatria/métodos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Bexiga Urinária/microbiologia , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Infecções Urinárias/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA