Haematopoietic cell transplantation for blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm: a North American multicentre collaborative study.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is incurable with conventional therapies. Limited retrospective data have shown durable remissions after haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) [allogeneic (allo) or autologous (auto)]. We conducted a multicentre retrospective study in BPDCN patients treated with allo-HCT and auto-HCT at 8 centres in the United States and Canada. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The population consisted of 45 consecutive patients who received an allo-HCT (n = 37) or an auto-HCT (n = 8) regardless of age, pre-transplant therapies, or remission status at transplantation. Allo-HCT recipients were younger (50 (14-74) vs. 67 (45-72) years, P = 0·01) and had 1-year and 3-year OS of 68% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 49-81%] and 58% (95% CI = 38-75%), respectively. Allo-HCT in first complete remission (CR1) yielded superior 3-year OS (versus not in CR1) [74% (95% CI = 48-89%) vs. 0, P < 0·0001]. Allo-HCT outcomes were not impacted by regimen intensity [3-year OS for myeloablative conditioning = 61% (95% CI = 28-83%) vs. reduced-intensity conditioning = 55% (95% CI = 28-76%)]. One-year OS for auto-HCT recipients was 11% (95% CI = 8-50%). These results demonstrate efficacy of allo-HCT in BPDCN, especially in patients in CR1. Pertaining to auto-HCT, our results suggest lack of efficacy against BPDCN, but this observation is limited by the small sample size. Larger prospective studies are needed to better define the role of HCT in BPDCN.

Pharmacists' roles in oncology pharmacy services: Results of a global survey.

Background Oncology pharmacists are capable of providing medication therapy management (MTM) because of their level of training, practice experiences, and responsibilities. Very little data exist about their current practice, including changing roles in the multidisciplinary team, overall impact, and effects in the education of patients and healthcare professionals. Methods A 70-item survey about oncology pharmacists' activities in oral chemotherapy programs, MTM, and collaborative practice agreements (CPAs) was deployed using a web survey tool (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA), targeting pharmacist members of American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP) Hematology/Oncology Practice and Research Network (PRN). The objective of this study was to determine oncology pharmacists' activities in areas of oral chemotherapy programs, MTM, and CPAs. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to the ACCP Hematology/Oncology PRN membership. Investigational Review Board approval was obtained. Results Of the 795 members who were sent the survey, 81 members (10%) responded; 33 respondents (47%) are involved with an oral chemotherapy program; with 42% measuring outcomes of programs. Only six pharmacists (19%) have published or presented their data. A total of 28 (35%) respondents provide MTM services, with almost half (43%) of these MTM services being dictated by CPAs. A small fraction of these pharmacists (21.4%) reported conducting quality assurance evaluations of their MTM services and three pharmacists (10.7%) reported publishing their results. Those pharmacists practicing under CPAs ( n = 28) were surveyed as to activities included in their CPA. The most common activities included adjusting medication, ordering, interpreting, and monitoring lab tests, developing therapeutic plans and educating patients. Reimbursement for providing these services was uncommon: MTM (4%), oral chemotherapy program (6%), and CPA services (11%). Reported obstacles to reimbursement included lack of understanding, administrative assistance, or time with setting up reimbursement models within the institution. Conclusion Many oncology pharmacists are participating in oral chemotherapy programs, MTM, and/or CPAs and perceived barriers were identified. Increased efforts should be directed toward prospectively reporting and assessing the impact these services have on patient care.

Pretransplantation 5-azacitidine in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

We prospectively evaluated the allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients who received pretransplantation 5-azacitidine. Twenty-five patients evaluated for allogeneic HCT consult and considered medically eligible for a donor search were enrolled. Azacitidine was administered at 75 mg/m(2) for 5 to 7 days every 4 weeks until a suitable donor was found. A median of 3 (range, 0 to 6) cycles of 5-azacitidine were administered. Preallogeneic HCT responses to 5-azacitidine, based on the International Working Group criteria, were 48% partial response, 33% stable disease, and 19% progressive disease. Four patients did not proceed to allogeneic HCT. Twenty-one patients, a median age of 55 (range, 25 to 67) years, received allogeneic HCT after myeloablative pharmacokinetically targeted i.v. busulfan and fludarabine conditioning regimen. Donors were either HLA-matched related or unrelated, except for 1 mismatch unrelated donor. With a median follow-up of 30 months, 1-year relapse-free and overall survivals were 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30% to 71%) and 62% (95% CI, 38% to 79%), respectively. Preallogeneic HCT 5-azacitidine administration was well tolerated and provided reasonable disease control before allogeneic HCT. (Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00660400).

Mycophenolate mofetil versus methotrexate for prevention of graft-versus-host disease in people receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is associated with improved outcomes for people with various hematologic diseases; however, the morbidity and mortality resulting from acute and subsequently chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) pose a serious challenge to wider applicability of allo-HCT. Intravenous methotrexate in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, cyclosporine or tacrolimus, is a widely used regimen for the prophylaxis of acute GVHD, but the administration of methotrexate is associated with a number of adverse events. Mycophenolate mofetil, in combination with a calcineurin inhibitor, has been used extensively in people undergoing allo-HCT. Conflicting results regarding various clinical outcomes following allo-HCT have been observed when comparing mycophenolate mofetil-based regimens against methotrexate-based regimens for acute GVHD prophylaxis. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: to assess the effect of mycophenolate mofetil versus methotrexate for prevention of acute GVHD in people undergoing allo-HCT. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the effect of mycophenolate mofetil versus methotrexate for overall survival, prevention of chronic GVHD, incidence of relapse, treatment-related harms, nonrelapse mortality, and quality of life. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and MEDLINE from inception to March 2014. We handsearched conference abstracts from the last two meetings (2011 and 2012) of relevant societies in the field. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov, Novartis clinical trials database (www.novctrd.com), Roche clinical trial protocol registry (www.roche-trials.com), Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR), and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials for ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Two review authors independently reviewed all titles/abstracts and selected full-text articles for inclusion. We included all references that reported results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of mycophenolate mofetil versus methotrexate for the prophylaxis of GVHD among people undergoing allo-HCT in this review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data on outcomes from all studies and compared prior to data entry and analysis. We expressed results as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for time-to-event outcomes. We pooled the individual study effects using the random-effects model. Estimates lower than one indicate that mycophenolate mofetil was favored over methotrexate. MAIN RESULTS: We included three trials enrolling 177 participants (174 participants analyzed). All participants in the trials by Keihl et al. and Bolwell et al. received cyclosporine while all participants enrolled in the trial by Perkins et al. received tacrolimus. However, the results did not differ by the type of calcineurin inhibitor employed (cyclosporine versus tacrolimus). There was no evidence for a difference between mycophenolate mofetil versus methotrexate for the outcomes of incidence of acute GVHD (RR 1.25; 95% CI 0.75 to 2.09; P value = 0.39, very low quality evidence), overall survival (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.45 to 1.17; P value = 0.19, low-quality evidence), median days to neutrophil engraftment (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.51 to 1.17; P value = 0.23, low-quality evidence), incidence of relapse (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.38; P value = 0.50, low-quality evidence), non-relapse mortality (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.62 to 2.36; P value = 0.57, low-quality evidence), and incidence of chronic GVHD (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.30; P value = 0.62, low-quality evidence). There was low-quality evidence that mycophenolate mofetil compared with methotrexate improved platelet engraftment period (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.93; P value < 0.0001, low-quality evidence). There was low-quality evidence that mycophenolate mofetil compared with methotrexate resulted in decreased incidence of severe mucositis (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.73; P value = 0.0006, low-quality evidence), use of parenteral nutrition (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.91; P value = 0.02, low-quality evidence), and medication for pain control (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.91; P value = 0.002, low-quality evidence). Overall heterogeneity was not detected in the analysis except for the outcome of neutrophil engraftment. None of the included studies reported any outcomes related to quality of life. Overall quality of evidence was low. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The use of mycophenolate mofetil compared with methotrexate for primary prevention of GVHD seems to be associated with a more favorable toxicity profile, without an apparent compromise on disease relapse, transplant-associated mortality, or overall survival. The effects on incidence of GVHD between people receiving mycophenolate mofetil compared with people receiving methotrexate were uncertain. There is a need for additional high-quality RCTs to determine the optimal GVHD prevention strategy. Future studies should take into account a comprehensive view of clinical benefit, including measures of morbidity, symptom burden, and healthcare resource utilization associated with interventions.

Association between CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genotype and tacrolimus treatment outcomes among allogeneic HSCT patients.

Aim: Successful treatment with tacrolimus to prevent graft versus host disease (GVHD) and minimize tacrolimus-related toxicities among allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) recipients is contingent upon quickly achieving and maintaining concentrations within a narrow therapeutic range. The primary objective was to investigate associations between CYP3A4, CYP3A5 or ABCB1 genotype and the proportion of patients that attained an initial tacrolimus goal concentration following initiation of intravenous (iv.) and conversion to oral administration. Materials & methods: We retrospectively evaluated 86 patients who underwent HLA-matched (8/8) related donor alloHCT and were prescribed a tacrolimus-based regimen for GVHD prophylaxis. Results & conclusion: The findings of the present study suggests that CYP3A5 genotype may impact attainment of initial therapeutic tacrolimus concentrations with oral administration in alloHCT recipients.

Phase II study of CD4+-guided pentostatin lymphodepletion and pharmacokinetically targeted busulfan as conditioning for hematopoietic cell allografting.

One limitation of reduced-intensity preparative regimens is potential for graft failure. We have developed a regimen that targets CD4(+) lymphodepletion to ensure early and durable engraftment. The primary endpoint was achievement of ≥50% CD3(+) donor chimerism by day +28. Forty-two patients (median age, 53 years; range, 29 to 73 years) received pentostatin 4 mg/m(2) i.v. on days -28, -21, and -14 when the CD4(+) cell count was >100 cells/µL and on days -4 and -3 regardless of CD4(+) level. Rituximab 375 mg/m(2) was administered to patients with CD20(+) malignancies on days -21, -14, -7, +1, and +8. Busulfan 200 mg/m(2) i.v. was administered on days -4 and -2 at a dose to target a cumulative AUC dose of 16,000 (±10%) µmol·min/L. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus plus methotrexate in 86% of patients. Donors were matched-related (47%), matched unrelated (43%), or mismatched unrelated (10%). Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (45%) and follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma (14%) were the most common diagnoses. Disease status at initiation of the preparative regimen was complete remission in 22%, partial response in 55%, and stable/progression in 24%. The median percent CD4(+) cell count decrease from baseline (day -28) was 52% to day -21, 66% to day -14, 62% to day -7, and 91% to day 0. At day +28, all 42 patients (100%) had ≥50% CD3(+) donor chimerism. No patient experienced graft failure. Overall response rate was 82% (complete remisson, 67%). The day +100 cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was 59% (grade III-IV acute GVHD, 19%), and the 2 year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 69% (moderate/severe, 58%). Nonrelapse mortality was 2% at day +100 and 17% at 2 years. Two-year PFS was 55%, and OS was 68%. This regimen ensures durable engraftment, is effective against persistent disease, and results in relatively low mortality from causes other than relapse.

Maximally tolerated busulfan systemic exposure in combination with fludarabine as conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Systemic exposure to high-dose busulfan has been correlated with efficacy and toxicity after hematopoietic cell transplantation for malignancy. We used the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to prospectively determine the maximally tolerated systemic exposure to i.v. busulfan when given once daily after fludarabine administered at 40 mg/m(2) for 4 days. Three target AUC levels were planned: 6,000, 7,500, and 9,000 µM-min. Included were patients 16 to 65 years old, with a hematologic malignancy, an HLA A, B, or C, DRB1 8/8 or 7/8 matched donor, Karnofsky performance status ≥70%, and adequate organ function. For level 1 patients, i.v. busulfan doses 1 and 2 were 170 mg/m(2)/day, then doses 3 and 4 were adjusted based on first-dose pharmacokinetic modeling to achieve an average daily AUC of 6,000 µM-min. Doses 1 and 2 for the subsequent cohorts were based on the level 1 data: 180 mg/m(2)/day for AUC 7,500 µM-min (level 2) and 220 mg/m(2)/day for AUC 9,000 µM-min (level 3), with pharmacokinetic targeting for doses 3 and 4. Pharmacokinetic analysis after the last dose showed that 88% of the patients had been exposed to a mean AUC within 10% of the target. Forty patients were treated at level 1, 29 patients at level 2, and three patients at level 3. DLT was veno-occlusive disease of the liver, which occurred in none of 40 patients (0%) at level 1, two of 29 patients (7%) at level 2, and three of three patients (100%) at level 3. Dermatitis (P < .01) and pulmonary toxicity (P = .01) were also increased at higher AUC levels. Level 2 (7,500 µM-min × 4 days) was the maximally tolerated AUC. Within the confines of the trial's small sample size, there was no suggestion that escalating busulfan AUC from 6,000 to 7,500 µM-min × 4 days increased nonrelapse mortality. Assessment of the higher busulfan AUC on relapse prevention requires trials in patients with a homogeneous risk of relapse.

A randomized phase II study to evaluate tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or methotrexate after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence suggesting that sirolimus, in combination with tacrolimus, is active in the prevention of graft-versus-host disease. Sirolimus-based immune suppression may suppress alloreactive T cells, while sparing the survival and function of regulatory T cells. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized trial to compare the impact of sirolimus/tacrolimus against that of methotrexate/tacrolimus on the prevention of graft-versus-host disease and regulatory T-cell reconstitution. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were randomized 1:1 to sirolimus/tacrolimus or methotrexate/tacrolimus, stratified for type of donor (sibling or unrelated) and the patients' age. The rate of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease at 100 days was 43% (95% CI: 27-59%) in the sirolimus/tacrolimus group and 89% (95% CI: 72-96%) in the methotrexate/tacrolimus group (P<0.001). The rate of moderate/severe chronic graft-versus-host disease was 24% (95% CI: 7-47%) in the sirolimus/tacrolimus group and 64% (95% CI: 41-79%) in the methotrexate/tacrolimus group (P=0.008). Overall survival and patient-reported quality of life did not differ between the two groups. On days 30 and 90 post-transplant, sirolimus-treated patients had a significantly greater proportion of regulatory T cells among the CD4(+) cells in the peripheral blood, and isolated regulatory T cells were functional. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that sirolimus/tacrolimus prevents grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease and moderate-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease more effectively than does methotrexate/tacrolimus, and supports regulatory T-cell reconstitution following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Retrospective comparison of filgrastim plus plerixafor to other regimens for remobilization after primary mobilization failure: clinical and economic outcomes.

We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes in patients receiving remobilization therapy after primary mobilization failure. Our primary endpoint was to compare filgrastim plus plerixafor to other regimens in their ability to collect a target cell dose of at least 2 million CD34+ cells/kg (cumulative). Of 96 consecutive patients who failed their primary mobilization therapy and in whom a second mobilization was attempted, remobilization consisted of filgrastim plus plerixafor (n = 38), filgrastim with or without sargramostim (n = 43), or chemotherapy plus filgrastim (n = 15), 84% of filgrastim/plerixafor patients were able to collect at least 2 million CD34+ cells/kg from both mobilizations, compared to 60% of patients mobilized with chemotherapy/filgrastim and 79% of the filgrastim ± sargramostim patients (P = 0.17). However, when combined with cells collected from the first mobilization, 53% of filgrastim/plerixafor patients reached the target of 2 million CD34+ cells in one apheresis, compared to 20% of those receiving chemotherapy/filgrastim and 28% of those receiving filgrastim ± sargramostim (P = 0.02). Resource utilization, mobilization drug costs, clinical care costs, and total costs were significantly different. We conclude that while filgrastim/plerixafor is the most efficient remobilization strategy, those clinical benefits may not translate into lower cost, especially when multiple days of plerixafor administration are required.

Dysglycemia following glucocorticoid therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease adversely affects transplantation outcomes.

Disordered glucose metabolism is a common complication of glucocorticoid therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We aimed to examine the impact of dysglycemia on outcomes in 173 recipients of HCT treated with glucocorticoids for aGVHD. A total of 147 of these patients contributed data to a landmark analysis performed at 12 weeks post-HCT. Median aGVHD onset was 21 days (range: 5-79) after transplant. Median duration of glucocorticoid therapy was 381 days (range: 15-1632). Glucose values were obtained from glucocorticoid initiation date to death or last follow-up, resulting in 11,588 total values. The median (range) for each parameter were: maximum 292 mg/dL (128-694), minimum 75 mg/dL (34-142), average 142 mg/dL (86-327), and standard deviation 46 mg/dL (12-108). Baseline diabetes mellitus predicted significantly greater maximum, mean, and standard deviation. With median follow-up of 20 months (range: 3-55), median overall survival (OS) was 33.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.4-not reached). On multivariable analysis, maximum, average, or standard deviation of glucose values predicted OS and maximum or average glucose values predicted nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Minimum glucose values of (0-60 mg/dL) were associated with worsened OS and increased NRM. Those patients treated with insulin or oral agents suffered significantly worse OS and increased NRM compared to patients who did not need therapy. Finally, those with sustained maximum values >200 mg/dL despite treatment suffered worse OS and increased NRM. These data suggest an independent adverse effect of dysglycemia in patients treated with glucocorticoids for aGVHD, and argue for stringent glycemic control in this setting.

Fludarabine and pharmacokinetic-targeted busulfan before allografting for adults with acute lymphoid leukemia.

We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fludarabine (FLU) and pharmacokinetic-targeted busulfan (BU) as conditioning regimen for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in adult patients with acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL). Forty-four patients with ALL (27 in first complete remission [CR1] and 17 in more advanced disease stage: 4 with primary induction failure [PIF], 12 in CR2, and 1 in CR3) received FLU and pharmacokinetic-targeted BU as preparative therapy for HCT. Grafts were T-replete, filgrastim-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus (TAC) and short-course methotrexate in 36 patients, TAC and sirolimus in 3, and TAC and mycophenolate mofetil in 5. Primary engraftment was achieved in all 44 patients. The cumulative incidence of transplant-related mortality (TRM) was 2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0%-16%) at 100 days and 18% (95% CI 10%-34%) at 2 years. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 19% (95% CI 8%-41%) for those transplanted in CR1, and 48% (29%-80%) for those with more advanced disease. After a median follow-up of 32 months (range: 15-69 months), the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 54% (95% CI 39%-69%). Relapse-free survival (RFS) at 2 years was 63% (95% CI 45%-81%) for patients transplanted in CR1 and 34% (95% CI 11%-57%) for patients transplanted in more advanced disease. When compared to irradiation-containing regimens, FLU and PK-targeted BU appear safer and similarly effective in controlling ALL, providing a treatment option for adult patients with ALL.

ATG prevents severe acute graft-versus-host disease in mismatched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Severe acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains a major source of morbidity and mortality following mismatched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Through a retrospective analysis, we investigated the efficacy of GVHD prophylaxis with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) 7.5 mg/kg (1 mg/kg given on day -3, then 3.25 mg/kg/day on days -2 and -1 before stem cell infusion) followed by standard tacrolimus plus methotrexate in a consecutive series of 45 HLA partially matched unrelated donor HCT recipients. The cumulative incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD was 11% by 100 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 5%-25%). Moderate to severe chronic GVHD (per NIH consensus criteria) was 19% (95% CI 10%-36%) at 1 year, and 28% (95% CI 16%-48%) at 2 years. With a median follow-up time for surviving patients of 12 months (range: 5-39 months), overall survival was 55% (95% CI 39%-71%) at 1 year, and 45% (95% CI 27%-63%) at 2 years. Nonrelapse mortality was 11% (95% CI 5%-25%) by 100 days post-HCT, 26% (95% CI 16%-44%) by 1 year, and 30% (95% CI 18%-50%) by 2 years. The cumulative incidence of primary disease relapse was 23% (95% CI 13%-41%) at 1 year, and 33% (95% CI 20%-56%) by 2 years after HCT. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection or reactivation varied according to recipient and donor CMV serostatus. Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) reactivation occurred in 54% (95% CI 40%-71%) of patients. Preemptive rituximab therapy was administered for EBV reactivation, however, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was diagnosed in 5 (11%) cases, and was fatal in 1. A regimen of ATG 7.5 mg/kg total ending on day -1 effectively decreased the occurrence of grade III-IV aGVHD and severe chronic GVHD.

Severe hypoalbuminemia at day 90 predicts worse nonrelapse mortality and overall survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Because patients who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remain in the vicinity of the transplant center for approximately 90 days posttransplantation, identifying prognostic factors to determine those at immediate higher risk of mortality is essential. A normal serum albumin level generally denotes healthiness. We evaluated the prognostic significance of day 90 hypoalbuminemia (and other clinical, pharmacologic, and laboratory variables) in 163 patients, median age 48 years (range, 19-69 years), who underwent allo-HCT for acute myelogenous leukemia (n = 124) or myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 39). Day 90 hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin <3.0 g/dL) was associated with worse nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and poor overall survival (OS). The estimated 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of NRM were 48% and 52%, respectively, and the corresponding OS rates were 7% and 3%. Serum albumin level <3.0 g/dL and Karnofsky score <80 at day 90 were strong independent predictors of worse NRM and OS in multivariate analysis. These results support day 90 hypoalbuminemia as an adverse prognostic marker for NRM and OS after allo-HCT for acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

The global severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease, determined by National Institutes of Health consensus criteria, is associated with overall survival and non-relapse mortality.

BACKGROUND: The 2005 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on chronic graft-versus-host disease proposed major changes in the classification and grading of severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease. DESIGN AND METHODS: We aimed to study the association of the proposed chronic graft-versus-host disease classification and global severity with transplantation outcomes among a consecutive series of patients who received pharmacokinetically-targeted doses of intravenous busulfan and fludarabine conditioning followed by transplantation of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells. RESULTS: From a total cohort (n = 242) of patients surviving more than 100 days after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 181 (75% of those at risk) had some manifestations of graft-versus-host disease after day 100. Of these, at onset 13 (7%) had late acute graft-versus-host disease, 62 (34%) had classic chronic graft-versus-host disease, and 106 (59%) had the overlap subtype of chronic graft-versus-host disease. The global severity of the chronic graft-versus-host disease was mild in 25% of cases, moderate in 46%, and severe in 29%. Multivariable modeling demonstrated the independent association of global severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease with overall survival (moderate/severe versus mild; HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8-4.7, P < 0.0001) and non-relapse mortality (moderate versus mild; HR 3.86, 95% CI 1.17-12.73, P = 0.03, and severe versus mild (HR 10.06, 95% CI 3.07-32.97, P < 0.001). The type of onset of progressive chronic graft-versus-host disease and the platelet count at the time of diagnosis of the disease were significantly associated with overall survival. The occurrence and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease was also significantly associated with primary disease relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate to severe chronic graft-versus-host disease, as determined by National Institutes of Health Consensus criteria, have an inferior overall survival and worse non-relapse mortality. Clinical and research advances are needed to improve the outcomes of affected patients.

Sirolimus demonstrates activity in the primary therapy of acute graft-versus-host disease without systemic glucocorticoids.

BACKGROUND: Advances in acute graft-versus-host disease therapy are needed. DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined the efficacy of sirolimus as primary therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease in 32 patients. RESULTS: Acute graft-versus-host disease involved the skin in 53% of cases, gastrointestinal tract in 66%, liver in 16%. The syndrome was overall grade 1 in 12% cases, grade 2 in 75%, and grade 3 in 13%. Sirolimus was targeted to achieve serum trough levels of 5-14 ng/mL. Sixteen (50%) patients achieved sustained, complete resolution of acute graft-versus-host disease with sirolimus alone. In contrast, 19 of 32 (59%) matched historical controls treated with standard 1 mg/kg steroids achieved complete response (P=0.47). With median follow-up time for surviving patients of 16 (range 6-26) months, one year overall survival was 56% (95% CI 38-74%). The cumulative incidence of relapse at one year was 37% (95% CI 23-60%), and mortality in remission was 20% (95% CI 10-42%). The cumulative incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease was 55% (95% CI 39-79%). Thrombotic microangiopathy occurred in 3 cases (grade 1 n=1; grade 2 n=2), and responded to dose reduction of calcineurin inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective series, sirolimus demonstrates activity comparable to that of high-dose glucocorticoids in the primary therapy of acute graft-versus-host disease. Confirmation of this activity requires prospective clinical trials.

A randomized phase II trial comparing tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil to tacrolimus and methotrexate for acute graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis.

Tacrolimus (Tac) plus methotrexate (MTX) is a standard regimen for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is sometimes used instead of MTX to minimize toxicity, despite the lack of controlled studies demonstrating efficacy. We conducted a single-center, randomized phase II trial comparing Tac + MMF to Tac + MTX. Intent-to-treat analyses included 42 patients randomized to Tac + MMF and 47 to Tac + MTX. Patient characteristics were not different between the study arms. Patients in the Tac + MMF arm were less likely to experience severe mucositis, require narcotic analgesia and parenteral nutrition, and had earlier hospital discharge. The Tac + MMF arm had the same time to neutrophil recovery, but earlier platelet recovery. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) at 100 days was similar (P = .8), but grade III-IV aGVHD was higher in the Tac + MMF arm (19% versus 4%; P = .03); this was predominantly seen in unrelated donor transplants (26% versus 4%; P = .04), and less in related donor transplants (11% versus 4%; P = n.s.). Moderate or severe chronic GVHD was similar (P = .71). There were no significant differences between the arms in relapse, nonrelapse mortality, or overall and relapse-free survivals. MMF was associated with less early toxicity than MTX but was not as effective in preventing severe aGVHD, especially in unrelated donor transplants.

Reduced-intensity fludarabine/melphalan confers similar survival to busulfan/fludarabine myeloablative regimens for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia.

Optimal conditioning chemotherapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains uncertain. Myeloablative regimens such as fludarabine/busulfan are favored over reduced-intensity fludarabine/melphalan (Flu/Mel); however, it is not known if Flu/Mel is inferior. We analyzed hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients with AML and MDS who received fludarabine with once-daily intravenous busulfan targeted to either area under the curve (AUC) 5300 µM*L/min (Flu/Bu 5300) (n = 246) or AUC 3500 µM*L/min (Flu/Bu 3500) (n = 81), or Flu/Mel (n = 69). Flu/Bu regimens were compared separately to Flu/Mel. After 2-year follow-up, no differences in overall or relapse-free survival were found between Flu/Bu 5300 or 3500 versus Flu/Mel though relapse rates were significantly higher; 33.1% (p = 0.024), 44.6% (p = 0.002), versus 19.4%, respectively. Flu/Bu 5300 (p = 0.008) and Flu/Bu 3500 (p < 0.001) groups were prognostic for relapse compared to Flu/Mel. Flu/Mel yields lower relapse rates and similar survival benefit when compared to Flu/Bu 3500 or 5300 µM*L/min.

Infliximab for managing steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease.

Infliximab has demonstrated activity in the treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). We aimed to confirm the effectiveness of infliximab as a salvage therapy for steroid-refractory aGVHD. In a series of 52 patients, 71% of whom had grade III-IV aGVHD, only 15% achieved complete remission (CR) with the use of infliximab alone as salvage therapy. CR of aGVHD differed according to overall aGVHD grade at salvage (grade II, 5/15; grade III, 2/17; grade IV, 1/20; P=.03). Median overall survival (OS) was only 1.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.99 to 2.3 months). CR of aGVHD was significantly associated with OS, with a hazard ratio of 8.4 for death in those without CR (95% CI=3.6 to 19.6; P < .0001). This series demonstrates the limited activity of infliximab in patients with high-grade aGVHD. Further work is needed to identify effective therapy for aGVHD.

Effectiveness of a pharmacy teaching certificate program offered to practicing pharmacists.

INTRODUCTION: Regardless of the practice setting, pharmacists' roles often expand beyond patient-centered services and into health-related educational roles for patients, healthcare providers, and student pharmacists. Teaching roles of a clinical pharmacist can include providing invited presentations (such as continuing education lectures), teaching colleagues about new clinical initiatives, precepting students during advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) and introductory pharmacy practice experiences (IPPEs), and precepting residents on rotations. This program was designed to evaluate the effect of a university-affiliated pharmacy teaching certificate program on participant knowledge and perceived confidence in specific areas of academic pharmacy and preceptor development. METHODS: A 10-month program consisting of four live modules with associated continuing education (CE) credit was offered to pharmacy residents and practicing pharmacists in the surrounding area. The program format utilized didactic and active learning strategies with "at home" assignments to reinforce material presented. Content knowledge was measured with written summative assessments provided at the start and end of each module. Perceived confidence was assessed through online surveys provided at the start and end of the program. All results were evaluated using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 14 participants in the first cohort and 18 participants in the second cohort. For each of the four modules, there was a significant difference in pre- and post-knowledge assessments. Confidence data was also significantly increased regarding topics in each module. CONCLUSION: Knowledge assessments and perception surveys suggest that this university-affiliated teaching certificate program improved both knowledge and perceived confidence for program participants.

Enhancing Student Knowledge Through a Comprehensive Oncology Simulation.

Objective. To evaluate the impact of a comprehensive oncology simulation on pharmacy students' knowledge and perceptions related to oncology pharmacy practice. Methods. Third-year pharmacy students at the University of South Florida completed an ovarian cancer case-based simulation. Stations involved patient-specific order set completion, counseling, order verification, and aseptic technique. Pre- and post-simulation assessments regarding therapeutic knowledge and aseptic technique as well as perceptions of pharmacists' roles in oncology practice were evaluated. Results. All students (n=109, 100%) completed the pre- and post-simulation assessments. There was an increase in knowledge after the simulation, which was statistically significant in three of the six questions. Furthermore, students' perceptions regarding pharmacist roles and self-confidence in ability to prepare patient-specific regimens increased on a 5-point Likert scale from 3.8 and 3.2 to 4.5 and 4.2 on the post-assessment, respectively. Conclusion. Participation in the simulation improved students' oncology-related knowledge and perceived understanding of the roles of oncology pharmacists.