Effects of aripiprazole once-monthly on symptoms of schizophrenia in patients switched from oral antipsychotics.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400) on clinical symptoms and global improvement in schizophrenia after switching from an oral antipsychotic. METHODS: In a multicenter, open-label, mirror-image, naturalistic study in patients with schizophrenia (>1 year, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision [DSM-IV-TR] criteria), changes in efficacy measures were assessed during prospective treatment (6 months) with AOM 400 after switching from standard-of-care oral antipsychotics. During prospective treatment, patients were cross-titrated to oral aripiprazole monotherapy (1-4) weeks followed by open-label AOM 400 (24 weeks). Mean change from baseline of the open-label AOM 400 phase in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores (total, positive and negative subscales) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores; mean CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) score; and proportion of responders (≥30% decrease from baseline in PANSS total score or CGI-I score of 1 [very much improved] or 2 [much improved]) were assessed. RESULTS: PANSS and CGI-S scores improved from baseline (P<0.0001) and CGI-I demonstrated improvement at all time points. By the end of the study, 49.0% of patients were PANSS or CGI-I responders. CONCLUSIONS: In a community setting, patients with schizophrenia who were stabilized at baseline and switched to AOM 400 from oral antipsychotics showed clear improvements in clinical symptoms.

Aripiprazole once-monthly for treatment of schizophrenia: double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Long-acting injectable formulations of antipsychotics are treatment alternatives to oral agents. AIMS: To assess the efficacy of aripiprazole once-monthly compared with oral aripiprazole for maintenance treatment of schizophrenia. METHOD: A 38-week, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study; randomisation (2:2:1) to aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg, oral aripiprazole (10-30 mg/day) or aripiprazole once-monthly 50 mg (a dose below the therapeutic threshold for assay sensitivity). ( TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00706654.) RESULTS: A total of 1118 patients were screened, and 662 responders to oral aripiprazole were randomised. Kaplan-Meier estimated impending relapse rates at week 26 were 7.12% for aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg and 7.76% for oral aripiprazole. This difference (-0.64%, 95% CI -5.26 to 3.99) excluded the predefined non-inferiority margin of 11.5%. Treatments were superior to aripiprazole once-monthly 50 mg (21.80%, P < or = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg was non-inferior to oral aripiprazole, and the reduction in Kaplan-Meier estimated impending relapse rate at week 26 was statistically significant v. aripiprazole once-monthly 50 mg.

The safety and tolerability of aripiprazole once-monthly as maintenance treatment for bipolar I disorder: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal study.

BACKGROUND: Aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400), an atypical long-acting injectable antipsychotic, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder (BP-I). We further assess safety and tolerability and characterize adverse events (AEs) across the duration of aripiprazole exposure. METHODS: Patients with BP-I were stabilized on oral aripiprazole (2-8 weeks), AOM 400 (12-28 weeks), followed by 1:1 randomization of patients meeting stability criteria to a 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal phase. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were collected across study phases. AEs were counted in a phase if they were drug-related and continued from the baseline of that phase. A separate analysis on new-onset akathisia was conducted. RESULTS: Among TEAEs occurring in ≥10% of patients during all study phases were akathisia (23.3%) and weight increased (10.6%). Median time to akathisia onset was 20 days after starting oral aripiprazole; median duration was 29 days for the first occurrence; 21/168 patients (12.5%) reporting akathisia experienced >1 episode. Episodes of new-onset akathisia decreased over time, with few events reported in the randomized phase. Weight gain was minimal with oral aripiprazole, generally starting within 3 months after the first AOM 400 injection, and appearing to plateau at 36 weeks. The mean weight gain within any study phase was ≤1.0 kg. Potentially clinically significant changes in metabolic parameters were uncommon. LIMITATIONS: Patients on placebo had AOM 400 exposure before randomization. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that AEs with AOM 400 treatment were time-limited and support AOM 400 as a well-tolerated maintenance treatment of BP-I.

Patient-Centered Outcomes with Aripiprazole Once-Monthly for Maintenance Treatment in Patients with Schizophrenia: Results From Two Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Studies.

OBJECTIVES: To further characterize the clinical profile of long-term treatment with aripiprazole once-monthly 400 mg (AOM 400) by examining patient-centered outcomes in adults with schizophrenia. METHODS: Data are from 2 separate studies: a 52-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and a 38-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study that evaluated the clinical profile of AOM 400 as maintenance treatment in patients with schizophrenia. The studies were conducted from July 2008 through February 2011 and from September 2008 through August 2012, respectively. Both studies included the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI), the Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ), the Patient Satisfaction with Medication Questionnaire, and a resource utilization and hospitalization form as prespecified patient-centered endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 710 patients entered the oral stabilization phase in the 52-week study, and 403 patients were randomized to double-blind treatment. The corresponding sample sizes in the 38-week study were 842 and 662, respectively. In both studies, mean DAI and MAQ scores remained stable across all treatment phases; mean changes from baseline during the double-blind phase were not significantly different between treatment arms. Treatment satisfaction remained high throughout both studies, and most patients reported no or fewer side effects with AOM 400 relative to their prior medication. Most patients did not have unscheduled outpatient visits or hospitalizations throughout the studies. CONCLUSIONS: Data from 2 randomized, double-blind studies indicated that patient perceptions about treatment satisfaction, side effects, and medication adherence were maintained in patients with schizophrenia receiving maintenance treatment with AOM 400. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00705783, NCT00706654.

Aripiprazole once-monthly in the acute treatment of schizophrenia: findings from a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM), a long-acting injectable suspension of aripiprazole, as acute treatment in patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV-TR). METHOD: Adults experiencing an acute psychotic episode were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with AOM 400 mg or placebo (October 2012-August 2013). The primary efficacy outcome was change from baseline to endpoint (week 10) in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. The key secondary efficacy outcome was change from baseline in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) score. Secondary efficacy outcomes included change from baseline in PANSS positive and negative subscale and Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) scores. The study took place from October 2012 through August 2013. RESULTS: Patients (N = 340; 79% male, 66% black) were randomized to AOM (n = 168) or placebo (n = 172). Least squares (LS) mean change from baseline to endpoint (week 10) favored AOM versus placebo in PANSS total (treatment difference, -15.1 [95% CI, -19.4 to -10.8]; P < .0001) and CGI-S (treatment difference, -0.8 [95% CI, -1.1 to -0.6]; P < .0001) scores, as it did at all other timepoints through 12 weeks (all P ≤ .0005). LS mean change from baseline in PANSS positive and negative subscale and PSP scores favored AOM versus placebo (P < .0001). Common (> 10%) treatment-emergent adverse events (AOM vs. placebo) were increased weight (16.8% vs 7.0%), headache (14.4% vs. 16.3%), and akathisia (11.4% vs 3.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms and functioning improved with AOM 400 mg versus placebo in patients with acute schizophrenia, with acceptable safety and tolerability. These data suggest that AOM 400 mg is a viable treatment option for patients experiencing an acute schizophrenia episode. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01663532.

Effects of aripiprazole once-monthly on domains of personal and social performance: results from 2 multicenter, randomized, double-blind studies.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of maintenance therapy with aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg on personal and social functioning. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 2 randomized, double-blind trials of patients with schizophrenia requiring chronic antipsychotic treatment. One study was a 52-week trial of aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg versus placebo; the other was a 38-week trial of aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg, oral aripiprazole (10-30 mg daily), and aripiprazole once-monthly 50mg (subtherapeutic dose to test assay sensitivity). Functioning was assessed using the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale, comprising 4 domain subscales. RESULTS: In the 52-week study, 403 patients stabilized on aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg were randomized to receive aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg (n=269) or placebo (n=134). In the 38-week study, 662 patients stabilized on oral aripiprazole were randomized to receive aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg (n=265), oral aripiprazole (n=266), or aripiprazole once-monthly 50mg (subtherapeutic dose; n=131). In the 52-week study, mean changes from baseline were significantly worsened with placebo compared with aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg for PSP total score (P<0.001) and domain scores for Personal and Social Relationships (P<0.001), Self-Care (P<0.01), and Disturbing and Aggressive Behavior (P<0.0001). In the 38-week study, mean changes from baseline were significantly worsened with aripiprazole once-monthly 50mg compared with aripiprazole once-monthly 400mg for PSP total score (P<0.05) and the Personal and Social Relationships domain score (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Patient functioning, assessed using the PSP scale, was maintained in stabilized patients treated with aripiprazole once-monthly in 2 pivotal relapse studies.

Aripiprazole intramuscular depot as maintenance treatment in patients with schizophrenia: a 52-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a once-monthly intramuscular (IM) depot formulation of the dopamine partial agonist aripiprazole as maintenance treatment in adults meeting DSM-IV-TR schizophrenia criteria. METHOD: The study was conducted from July 2008 until February 2011. Subjects requiring chronic treatment with an antipsychotic entered a 4- to 12-week oral stabilization phase and received oral aripiprazole (10-30 mg/d). Subjects meeting stability criteria for 4 weeks entered an IM-depot stabilization phase in which they received 400-mg aripiprazole-IM-depot injections every 4 weeks (single decrease to 300 mg permitted) with coadministration of oral aripiprazole tablets in the first 2 weeks. Subjects meeting stability criteria for 12 consecutive weeks were randomly assigned (2:1) to aripiprazole-IM-depot or placebo during a 52-week, double-blind maintenance phase. The primary outcome measure was time to exacerbation of psychotic symptoms/impending relapse (event). Safety and tolerability were also assessed. RESULTS: 710 patients entered oral stabilization, 576 progressed to IM-depot stabilization, and 403 were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment. The study was terminated early because efficacy was demonstrated by the preplanned interim analysis (conducted after 64 events). Time to impending relapse was significantly delayed with aripiprazole-IM-depot treatment compared with placebo in both the interim analysis and the final analysis (P < .0001, log-rank test). The hazard ratio (placebo/aripiprazole-IM-depot) at final analysis was 5.03 (95% CI, 3.15-8.02). The rate of impending relapse was significantly lower with aripiprazole-IM-depot than placebo at endpoint (final analysis, 10.0% [n = 27/269] vs 39.6% [n = 53/134]). Improvements in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total scores were maintained with aripiprazole-IM-depot treatment but showed significant worsening with placebo (change from double-blind baseline, P < .0001 for aripiprazole-IM-depot vs placebo). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (occurring in ≥ 5% of aripiprazole-IM-depot subjects and greater than placebo) were insomnia, tremor, and headache. CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole-IM-depot significantly delayed time to impending relapse compared with placebo and appears to be a well-tolerated maintenance treatment option for schizophrenia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00705783.

Hyperalgesia in outpatients with dermal injury: quantitative sensory testing versus a novel simple technique.

OBJECTIVE: Dermal inflammation from many causes may produce a reversible period of hyperalgesia (increased sensitivity to pain perception) or allodynia (pain from innocuous stimuli). Hyperalgesia and allodynia have received relatively little attention in clinical trials of acute pain. We sought to quantitate tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in outpatients presenting with acute dermal injuries. DESIGN: We performed a randomized clinical trial to compare standard methodology for the assessment of hyperalgesia with two novel simple quantitative techniques. PATIENTS: After Institutional Review Board approval, 40 patients presenting with acute chemical, thermal, mechanical, or infectious skin injury were subjected to a series of tests at the site of injury, an intact mirror site, and a noninjured ipsilateral control site. OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitative thermal sensory testing (Medoc sensory analyzer) was followed by a 5-second application, in random order, of copper rods preheated in water to 40 degrees C, 43 degrees C, 46 degrees C, and 49 degrees C. Pressure testing was conducted with a 1.25-inch diameter commercially available pressure transducer gauge. RESULTS: The observed pattern of responses was remarkably consistent among testing methods. All challenges with the four different temperatures elicited pain scores on a visual analog scale markedly greater at the injured than at the mirror or control site (P < 0.001 vs control). Pressure discomfort thresholds followed a similar pattern. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that hyperalgesia is a prominent contributor to discomfort in acute dermal injury and hence is a legitimate therapeutic target. Quantitation of the contribution of thermal hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia and assessment of their management is feasible using simple, rugged, low-cost methods. This inexpensive methodology may be useful in everyday clinical practice as well as in clinical research evaluating pharmacological agents to manage hyperalgesia.