META Score: An International Consensus Scoring System on Mesh-Tissue Adhesions.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the lack of consensus on postoperative mesh-tissue adhesion scoring leads to incomparable scientific results. The aim of this study was to develop an adhesion score recognized by experts in the field of hernia surgery. METHODS: Authors of three or more previously published articles on both mesh-tissue adhesion scores and postoperative adhesions were marked as experts. They were queried on seven items using a modified Delphi method. The items concerned the utility of adhesion scoring models, the appropriateness of macroscopic and microscopic variables, the range and use of composite scores or subscores, adhesion-related complications and follow-up length. This study comprised two questionnaire-based rounds and one consensus meeting. RESULTS: The first round was completed by 23 experts (82%), the second round by 18 experts (64%). Of those 18 experts, ten were able to participate in the final consensus meeting and all approved the final proposal. From a total of 158 items, consensus was reached on 90 items. The amount of mesh surface covered with adhesions, tenacity and thickness of adhesions and organ involvement was concluded to be a minimal set of variables to be communicated separately in each future study on mesh adhesions. CONCLUSION: The MEsh Tissue Adhesion scoring system is the first consensus-based scoring system with a wide backing of renowned experts and can be used to assess mesh-related adhesions. By including this minimal set of variables in future research interstudy comparability and objectivity can be increased and eventually linked to clinically relevant outcomes.

Liquid antiadhesive agents for intraperitoneal hernia repair procedures: Artiss® compared to CoSeal® and Adept® in an IPOM rat model.

BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation remains an important issue in hernia surgery. Liquid agents were developed for easy and versatile application, especially in laparoscopy. The aim of this study was to compare the antiadhesive effect of fibrin sealant (FS, Artiss®), Icodextrin (ID, Adept®) and Polyethylene glycol (PEG, CoSeal®) alone and in combination and to evaluate the resulting effect on tissue integration of the mesh. METHODS: A total of 56 Sprague-Dawley rats were operated in open IPOM technique. A middleweight polypropylene mesh of 2 × 2 cm size was implanted and covered with 1: FS, 2: ID, 3: PEG, 4: FS + ID, 5: FS + PEG, 6: PEG + ID, 7: control group, uncovered mesh (n = 8 per treatment/control). Observation period was 30 days. Macroscopic and histological evaluation was performed. RESULTS: Severe adhesions were found in group 2 (ID), group 6 (PEG + ID) and the controls. Best results were achieved with FS alone or FS + ID. Mesh integration in the treatment groups was reduced in comparison with the control group. This is a new finding possibly relevant for the outcome of intraperitoneal mesh repair. Group 6 (PEG + ID) showed an impairment of tissue integration with <50 % of the mesh surface in seven samples. CONCLUSION: FS alone and in combination with ID yielded excellent adhesion prevention. ID alone did not show significant adhesion prevention after 30 days. Tissue integration of FS-covered meshes was superior to ID or PEG alone or combined. PEG did show adhesion prevention comparable to FS but evoked impaired tissue integration. So Artiss® is among the most potent antiadhesive agents in IPOM repair.

Fabrication of silk mesh with enhanced cytocompatibility: preliminary in vitro investigation toward cell-based therapy for hernia repair.

Recent studies have demonstrated that combining cells with meshes prior to implantation successfully enhanced hernia repair. The idea is to create a biologic coating surrounding the mesh with autologous cells, before transplantation into the patient. However, due to the lack of a prompt and robust cell adhesion to the meshes, extensive in vitro cultivation is required to obtain a homogenous cell layer covering the mesh. In this context, the objective of this publication is to manufacture meshes made of silk fibres and to enhance the cytoadhesion and cytocompatibility of the biomaterial by surface immobilization of a pro-adhesive wheat germ agglutinin (lectin WGA). We first investigated the affinity between the glycoprotein WGA and cells, in solution and then after covalent immobilization of WGA on silk films. Then, we manufactured meshes made of silk fibres, tailored them with WGA grafting and finally evaluated the cytocompatibility and the inflammatory response of silk and silk-lectin meshes compared to common polypropylene mesh, using fibroblasts and peripheral blood mononuclear cells, respectively. The in vitro experiments revealed that the cytocompatibility of silk can be enhanced by surface immobilization with lectin WGA without exhibiting negative response in terms of pro-inflammatory reaction. Grafting lectin to silk meshes could bring advantages to facilitate cell-coating of meshes prior to implantation, which is an imperative prerequisite for abdominal wall tissue regeneration using cell-based therapy.

The impact of atraumatic fibrin sealant vs. staple mesh fixation in TAPP hernia repair on chronic pain and quality of life: results of a randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Mesh reinforcement has become the standard of care in the open and laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia. Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair is often due to nerve injury by penetrating mesh fixation devices such as staples (ST), tacks, or sutures. In several studies on hernioplasty, atraumatic mesh fixation with fibrin sealant (FS) proved to be efficient in terms of fixation strength and elasticity. Unfortunately, most of these studies did not provide a standardized follow-up and assessment of the development of chronic pain (CP) and the quality of life (QoL). Therefore, a randomized controlled trial comparing CP and QoL after FS fixation of mesh with ST in transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP) was performed at our department. The primary end point of our study was to assess the patient outcome by using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the short form 36 (SF-36). The evaluation of recurrence rates was the secondary aim. METHODS: According to the randomization, a macroporous mesh (TiMESH(®)) was fixed in group A (44 patients with 54 inguinal hernias) with FS (TISSEEL) or in group B (45 patients with 56 inguinal hernias) with ST (EMS(®) Stapler). The observation period was 1 year with regular clinical check ups and assessment of VAS and SF-36. RESULTS: Patient characteristics expressed by BMI, ASA scores, and Schumpelick hernia classification were similar in both treatment groups. In each group there was one recurrence within 8 (FS) and 9 months (ST) postsurgery. The mean preoperative pain values scored by VAS were 1.7 (range = 0-7.5) in the FS group and 2.2 (range = 0-6) in the ST group. Postoperative mean VAS scores measured at 1 year postsurgery were 0.4 (range = 0-3) in the FS group and 0.9 (range = 0-7.5) in the ST group. One year postsurgery there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the parameter pain in the SF-36 and VAS. CONCLUSION: Fibrin sealant fixation leads to a low rate of hernia recurrence and avoids tissue trauma. ST provide similar results in the hand of the expert but bear inherent risks of complications due to tissue perforation.

Comparison of three separate antiadhesive barriers for intraperitoneal onlay mesh hernia repair in an experimental model.

BACKGROUND: Adhesion formation is a common adverse effect in intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) surgery. Different methods of adhesion prevention have been developed, including coated meshes and separate antiadhesive barriers (SABs). In this study one type of mesh was tested with different SABs, which were fixed to the sutured mesh using fibrin sealant. The primary aim was to compare adhesion prevention between different SABs. Secondary aims were the assessment of tissue integration and evaluation of SAB fixation with fibrin sealant. METHODS: Thirty-two rats were randomized to one of three treatment groups (SurgiWrap, Prevadh and Seprafilm) or a control group (no SAB). Animals were operated on with an open IPOM technique (8 per group). One macroporous polypropylene mesh per animal (2 × 2 cm) was fixed with four non-absorbable sutures. An antiadhesive barrier of 2·5 × 2·5 cm was fixed with fibrin sealant. After 30 days, adhesion formation, tissue integration, seroma formation, inflammation and vascularization were evaluated macroscopically and by histology. RESULTS: Prevadh and Seprafilm groups showed a significant reduction in adhesion formation compared with the control group. Tissue integration of the mesh was reduced in these groups. Fibrin sealant fixed the SAB to the mesh securely in all groups. CONCLUSION: Prevadh and Seprafilm are potent materials for the reduction of adhesion formation. A potential relationship between effective adhesion prevention and impaired tissue integration of the implant was observed. Fibrin sealant proved an excellent agent for SAB fixation.

Human vital amniotic membrane reduces adhesions in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair.

BACKGROUND: Various antiadhesive coatings have been proposed for intraperitoneal onlay meshes (IPOM). However, adhesions, mesh infections, and impaired integration remain clinically relevant problems. In this experiment, human vital amniotic membrane (AM) was tested as antiadhesive mesh coating. Vital AM complies with clinical standards of product safety. METHODS: In this study, 24 rats were randomized to one control or two treatment groups (n=8). An uncoated polypropylene mesh (Vitamesh) was implanted using open IPOM technique and fixed with four sutures. In the treatment groups, vital AM was attached to Vitamesh by fibrin sealant fixation. The observation period was 7 and 17 days. Vitamesh fixed by suture only served as the control condition (17 days). Adhesion formation, tissue integration, and neovascularization were assessed macroscopically and histologically. RESULTS: All the meshes in the control group elicited severe adhesions. Vital AM was highly efficient in reducing adhesions to mesh and sutures. No foreign body reaction or unfavorable immunologic response to vital AM occurred. Tissue integration and neovascularization of coated meshes were good. Fibrin sealant yielded a reliable fixation. CONCLUSION: Human vital AM was highly effective in reducing adhesions to polypropylene mesh and sutures in experimental IPOM. No adverse effects were detected, and tissue integration of the mesh was good.

Biologic hernia implants in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty repair: the impact of proprietary collagen processing methods and fibrin sealant application on tissue integration.

BACKGROUND: Biologic implants have been recommended for reinforcement in routine and challenging hernia repair. However, experimental and clinical studies have reported adverse effects (e.g., slow implant integration and pronounced foreign body reaction). To evaluate the impact of different material processing methods (cross-linking vs. non-cross-linking of collagen) and implant design, four different biologic hernia implants were compared directly in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty (IPOM). Tissue integration, shrinkage, and foreign body reaction were primary outcome parameters. METHODS: In this study, 48 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to four treatment groups. Open IPOM repair was performed. One peritoneal defect per animal was covered with 2 × 2 cm patches of cross-linked or non-cross-linked implants including CollaMend (n = 12), Peripatch (n = 12), Surgisis (n = 12), and Tutomesh (n = 12). In half of the animals, fibrin sealant was applied for additional fixation and to cover sutures. The observation period was 60 days. The primary outcome parameters were implant integration, shrinkage, and foreign body reaction. Macroscopic and histologic assessments were performed. RESULTS: The integration of implants was insufficient in all the groups. The implants could be detached easily from the underlying tissue, and the penetration of fibroblasts and vessels was limited to the perforations. Foreign body reaction was pronounced with CollaMend and Surgisis, leading to persistent granulomatous inflammation. Shrinkage was excessive with Surgisis, whereas Tutomesh and Peripatch yielded sufficient anti-adhesion and elicited no foreign body reaction. CONCLUSION: At 2 months, cross-linked and non-cross-linked biologic hernia implants were poorly integrated. Cross-linking led to a more pronounced foreign body reaction. Less inflammatory response may reduce local complications, but did not enhance implant integration in this study.

Adverse effects of polyvinylidene fluoride-coated polypropylene mesh used for laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay repair of incisional hernia.

BACKGROUND: Polyvinylidene fluoride-coated polypropylene meshes have been developed specifically for intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair. They combine a macroporous design with biomechanical characteristics compatible with the abdominal wall and are reported to have favourable antiadhesive properties. This retrospective study reports complications related to one of these materials, DynaMesh. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients underwent intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair with DynaMesh at one of two hospitals. Patients characteristics, surgical procedures and postoperative analgesia were comparable at both sites. RESULTS: Six patients developed DynaMesh-related complications that required surgical reintervention by laparotomy within 1 year of operation. Surgical reintervention was for adhesions in five patients and the mesh had to be explanted in three. One mesh was explanted because of early infection. Adhesions to DynaMesh were found in two patients who had surgery for unrelated reasons. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay DynaMesh repair was associated with a high rate of complications.

A comparison of a bovine albumin/glutaraldehyde glue versus fibrin sealant for hernia mesh fixation in experimental onlay and IPOM repair in rats.

BACKGROUND: Research in hernia repair has targeted new atraumatic mesh fixation to reduce major complications such as chronic pain and adhesion formation. The efficacy and safety of two surgical adhesives, viz. Artiss® (FS, fibrin sealant containing 4 IU thrombin) and Bioglue® (AGG, bovine serum albumin/glutaraldehyde glue), were evaluated in this study. Primary study endpoints were tissue integration, dislocation, and adhesion formation. Foreign-body reaction formed the secondary study endpoint. METHODS: Twenty-four polypropylene meshes (VM, Vitamesh®) were randomized to four groups (n = 6): two groups of onlay hernia repair (two meshes per animal) with mesh fixation by FS (O-FS) or by AGG (O-AGG), and two groups of IPOM repair (one mesh per animal) with mesh fixation by four sutures and FS (I-FS) or AGG (I-AGG). Eighteen rats underwent surgery. Follow-up was 30 days. Tissue integration, dislocation, seroma formation, inflammation, adhesion formation, and foreign-body reaction were assessed. RESULTS: Meshes fixed with FS (O-FS, I-FS) showed good tissue integration. No dislocation, seroma formation, or macroscopic signs of inflammation were detectable. Adhesion formation of I-FS was significantly milder compared with I-AGG (P = 0.024). A moderate foreign-body reaction without active inflammation was seen histologically in O-FS and I-FS groups. Samples fixed with AGG (O-AGG, I-AGG) showed extensive scar formation. No dislocation and no seroma formation were observed. All of these samples showed moderate to severe signs of inflammation with abscess formation in the six meshes of O-AGG. Histology underlined these findings. CONCLUSIONS: The fibrin sealant adhesive showed very good overall results of the primary and secondary outcome parameters. FS is a recommendable atraumatic fixation tool for the surgical onlay technique. AGG provides high adhesive strength, but shows low biocompatibility. Persisting active inflammation was seen in both the O-AGG and I-AGG groups, not favoring its use for these indications.

Stromal vascular fraction cells as biologic coating of mesh for hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: The interest in non-manipulated cells originating from adipose tissue has raised tremendously in the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The resulting stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells have been successfully used in numerous clinical applications. The aim of this experimental work is, first to combine a macroporous synthetic mesh with SVF isolated using a mechanical disruption process, and to assess the effect of those cells on the early healing phase of hernia. METHODS: Human SVF cells combined with fibrin were used to coat commercial titanized polypropylene meshes. In vitro, viability and growth of the SVF cells were assessed using live/dead staining and scanning electron microscopy. The influence of SVF cells on abdominal wall hernia healing was conducted on immunodeficient rats, with a focus on short-term vascularization and fibrogenesis. RESULTS: Macroporous meshes were easily coated with SVF using a fibrin gel as temporary carrier. The in vitro experiments showed that the whole process including the isolation of human SVF cells and their coating on PP meshes did not impact on the SVF cells' viability and on their capacity to attach and to proliferate. In vivo, the SVF cells were well tolerated by the animals, and coating mesh with SVF resulted in a decrease degree of vascularity compared to control group at day 21. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of SVF-coated mesh influences the level of angiogenesis during the early onset of tissue healing. Further long-term animal experiments are needed to confirm that this effect correlates with a more robust mesh integration compared to non-SVF-coated mesh.

The assessment of quality of life in a trial on lightweight mesh fixation with fibrin sealant in transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a major concern in open and laparoscopic hernia repair. Study groups have adopted a variety of tools to assess postoperative (postOP) pain and quality of life (QoL). Unfortunately, modifications of existing tests and self-designed questionnaires are common, yielding unvalidated results and making comparison of data difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the QoL in transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair (TAPP) with fibrin sealant (FS) for lightweight mesh fixation, applying the standardised Short Form 36 (SF36) questionnaire in its unmodified design. The SF36 has already been validated and implemented in a large number of studies. In this trial the physical-health-component summary measure (PHM), summarising the physical health-related scales, served as the primary outcome parameter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After informed written consent was obtained, TAPP with fibrin mesh sealing was performed in 11 non-selected consecutive patients by a single surgeon. A direct control group (e.g. TAPP with staples) was not enrolled, because a favourable change in the QoL in patients subjected to the mesh sealing approach was the tested hypothesis and not the comparison of techniques. The macroporous mesh (TI-Mesh, GfE, Germany) was fixed with 1 ml of FS (FS, Tisseel, Tissucol, Baxter Biosciences, Austria), and the QoL and pain were assessed preoperatively and 1 year postOP using the SF36 survey and the visual analogue score (VAS). RESULTS: After 12 months, recurrences or complications were observed. The analysis of the unmodifed SF36 revealed a highly significant improvement in the PHM, based on significant changes of all physical-health-related scales. The scale 'social functioning' (SOCIAL), which belongs to the mental-health-related scale, had also significantly improved. The VAS was significantly reduced after 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a small number of patients (n = 11), a strikingly significant improvement in physical health and reduction of pain was detected with the unmodified SF36 and the VAS 1 year after TAPP repair with fibrin-sealed lightweight meshes. We suggest the use of the unmodified SF36 for QoL in hernia repair in order to assess all aspects of recovery (physical and mental) and to facilitate comparison of data.

A critical review of the in vitro and in vivo models for the evaluation of anti-infective meshes.

BACKGROUND: Infectious complications following mesh implantation for abdominal wall repair appear in 0.7 up to 26.6% of hernia repairs and can have a detrimental impact for the patient. To prevent or to treat mesh-related infection, the scientific community is currently developing a veritable arsenal of antibacterial meshes. The numerous and increasing reports published every year describing new technologies indicate a clear clinical need, and an academic interest in solving this problem. Nevertheless, to really appreciate, to challenge, to compare and to optimize the antibacterial properties of next generation meshes, it is important to know which models are available and to understand them. PURPOSE: We proposed for the first time, a complete overview focusing only on the in vitro and in vivo models which have been employed specifically in the field of antibacterial meshes for hernia repair. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: From this investigation, it is clear that there has been vast progress and breadth in new technologies and models to test them. However, it also shows that standardization or adoption of a more restricted number of models would improve comparability and be a benefit to the field of study.

What is the evidence for the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction?

INTRODUCTION: Although many surgeons have adopted the use of biologic and biosynthetic meshes in complex abdominal wall hernia repair, others have questioned the use of these products. Criticism is addressed in several review articles on the poor standard of studies reporting on the use of biologic meshes for different abdominal wall repairs. The aim of this consensus review is to conduct an evidence-based analysis of the efficacy of biologic and biosynthetic meshes in predefined clinical situations. METHODS: A European working group, "BioMesh Study Group", composed of invited surgeons with a special interest in surgical meshes, formulated key questions, and forwarded them for processing in subgroups. In January 2016, a workshop was held in Berlin where the findings were presented, discussed, and voted on for consensus. Findings were set out in writing by the subgroups followed by consensus being reached. For the review, 114 studies and background analyses were used. RESULTS: The cumulative data regarding biologic mesh under contaminated conditions do not support the claim that it is better than synthetic mesh. Biologic mesh use should be avoided when bridging is needed. In inguinal hernia repair biologic and biosynthetic meshes do not have a clear advantage over the synthetic meshes. For prevention of incisional or parastomal hernias, there is no evidence to support the use of biologic/biosynthetic meshes. In complex abdominal wall hernia repairs (incarcerated hernia, parastomal hernia, infected mesh, open abdomen, enterocutaneous fistula, and component separation technique), biologic and biosynthetic meshes do not provide a superior alternative to synthetic meshes. CONCLUSION: The routine use of biologic and biosynthetic meshes cannot be recommended.

Infections associated with mesh repairs of abdominal wall hernias: Are antimicrobial biomaterials the longed-for solution?

The incidence of mesh-related infection after abdominal wall hernia repair is low, generally between 1 and 4%; however, worldwide, this corresponds to tens of thousands of difficult cases to treat annually. Adopting best practices in prevention is one of the keys to reduce the incidence of mesh-related infection. Once the infection is established, however, only a limited number of options are available that provides an efficient and successful treatment outcome. Over the past few years, there has been a tremendous amount of research dedicated to the functionalization of prosthetic meshes with antimicrobial properties, with some receiving regulatory approval and are currently available for clinical use. In this context, it is important to review the clinical importance of mesh infection, its risk factors, prophylaxis and pathogenicity. In addition, we give an overview of the main functionalization approaches that have been applied on meshes to confer anti-bacterial protection, the respective benefits and limitations, and finally some relevant future directions.

Cyanoacrylate tissue sealant impairs tissue integration of macroporous mesh in experimental hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Tissue sealants have been proposed as an alternative to permanent fixation devices in hernia repair with the aim of reducing perforation-associated complications and chronic pain. Sealants can be divided into three main categories: synthetic glues (e.g., cyanoacrylate based), biologic products (e.g., fibrin sealant), and genetically engineered polymer protein glues. The beneficial effects of fibrin sealant have been reported in both experimental and clinical hernia repair. However, data on cyanoacrylate glues for mesh sealing are limited. METHODS: In 20 Sprague-Dawley rats, two hernia defects (1.5 cm in diameter) per animal were created bilaterally in the midline of the abdominal wall. The peritoneum was spared. The lesions were left untreated for 10 days to achieve a chronic condition. Defects then were covered with TI-Mesh xl (2 x 2 cm), which was glued with Glubran-II. The time points of sacrifice were 17 days, 28 days, and 3 months. At autopsy, meshes were biomechanically tested, and histology was performed. RESULTS: Tissue integration of the meshes was impaired at all time points by impenetrable glue plaques. At application sites, the elasticity of the abdominal wall was significantly reduced because of nonresorbed, rigid glue residues. CONCLUSIONS: Mesh fixation by Glubran-II impairs tissue integration, elicits inflammation, and unfavorably alters the biomechanics of macroporous mesh and the abdominal wall.

Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices.

BACKGROUND: New biodegradable synthetic and biologic hernia implants have been promoted for rapid integration and tissue reinforcement in challenging repairs, e.g. at the hiatus or in contaminated wound fields. Interestingly, experimental data to support or falsify this assumption is scarce. METHODS: Synthetic (BioA®) and biologic implants (porcine and bovine collagen matrices Strattice® and Veritas®) have been tested in experimental onlay hernia repair in rats in observation periods of 30 and 60 days. The key outcome parameters were mesh integration and reinforcement of the tissue at the implant site over sutured and sealed defects as well as comparison to native abdominal wall. Macroscopic assessment, biomechanical analysis and histology with haematoxylin/eosin staining, collagen staining and van Willebrand factor staining for detection of neovascularization were performed. RESULTS: BioA® was well integrated. Although the matrices were already fragmented at 60 days follow-up, hernia sites treated with synthetic scaffolds showed a significantly enhanced tissue deflection and resistance to burst force when compared to the native abdominal wall. In porcine and bovine matrices, tissue integration and shrinkage were significantly inferior to BioA®. Histology revealed a lack of fibroblast ingrowth through mesh interstices in biologic samples, whereas BioA® was tightly connected to the underlying tissue by reticular collagen fibres. CONCLUSIONS: Strattice® and Veritas® yielded reduced tissue integration and significant shrinkage, prohibiting further biomechanical tests. The synthetic BioA® provides little inherent strength but reticular collagen remodelling led to an augmentation of the scar due to significantly higher burst force resistance in comparison to native tissue.

Adverse effects of porcine small intestine submucosa implants in experimental ventral hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Biomeshes made of porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) have recently been suggested for repair of ventral hernia. A fully biodegradable combination of implant and fibrin sealant fixation was assessed in a new rat model with sutures serving as control. METHODS: In 10 Sprague-Dawley rats, two defects per animal were created in the abdominal wall left and right of the linea alba (1 cm in diameter), and the peritoneum was spared. The lesions were left untreated for 10 days to achieve a chronic condition and were then covered with SIS (2 x 2 cm), sealed or sutured (n = 10 per group). Randomization allowed sealant and sutures in one animal. Animals were killed on postoperative day 17, and implant sites were analyzed macroscopically, histologically, and microbiologically. RESULTS: Abscedation, encapsulation, and putrid seroma were observed in all samples, regardless of fixation technique. Histology revealed lytic necrosis and extensive inflammatory response of the surrounding tissue. Tissue samples obtained from three implant sites were positive for beta-hemolytic Streptococcus. SIS was not detectable after 17 days. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse effects were observed using SIS in an experimental model of ventral hernia and were not linked to fixation method or study design. Further experimental investigations on SIS are necessary before its clinical use in hernia repair.