Safety and Efficacy of All Comers Treated with a Paclitaxel Coated Balloon for Below Knee Intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Data on paclitaxel coated balloons (PCBs) for below knee (BTK) angioplasty exhibited conflicting efficacy results, and previous meta-analyses suggested an increased mortality and amputation risk highlighting the need for further research. The aim of this study was to investigate safety and efficacy of PCBs for BTK interventions in a real world cohort. METHODS: Within a single centre cohort study, 552 consecutive patients were included undergoing BTK interventions with and without PCB use. Two year safety and efficacy results were compared in unadjusted and propensity score matched (PSM) analysis. RESULTS: BTK interventions were performed in 157 patients with PCB angioplasty (100% Lutonix 0.014 inch drug coated balloon; Bard Lutonix, New Hope, MN, USA) and 395 patients with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). The majority of interventions (> 70%) were performed for chronic limb threatening ischaemia. Mean lesion length was 20.8 ± 12.6 cm; 61.2% in the PCB and 66.7% in the POBA group were occlusions. In the PCB group, more procedures were performed for re-stenotic lesions than POBA (28.5 vs. 17.2%). In PSM analysis (128 matched pairs), the primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD TLR), which occurred in 70.1% in the PCB and 73.1% in the POBA group at one year (p = .85; McNemar test). Survival analysis suggested lower rates of major amputations in the PCB group in unadjusted (94.4% ± 2.1 vs. 89.2% ± 1.9 in the POBA group) and PSM analyses (97.2% ± 1.6 vs. 89.3% ± 3.5) through two years, while no differences were seen for CD TLR and all cause mortality between the groups. CONCLUSION: In this all comer analysis, PCBs were found to be safe for BTK interventions with a signal towards lower amputation rates but no benefit was seen for repeat revascularisation.

Impact of Optimal Medical Therapy on Reintervention and Survival Rates after Endovascular Infrapopliteal Revascularization.

Within this single-center cohort study, we investigated the impact of optimal medical therapy on all-cause mortality, major amputation-free survival and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD TLR) in 552 patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) undergoing endovascular infrapopliteal revascularization. From the overall cohort, 145 patients were treated for intermittent claudication (IC) and 407 were treated for critical limb ischemia (CLI). Optimal medical therapy (OMT) was defined as the presence of at least one antiplatelet agent, statin and ACE inhibitor or AT-2 antagonist based on guideline recommendations. About half (55.5%) of all patients were prescribed OMT at discharge, with a higher proportion in claudicants (62.1%) versus CLI patients (53.2%). Over three years of follow-up, survival was significantly better in patients with IC (80.6 ± 3.8% vs. 59.9 ± 2.9%; p < 0.001). There was a signal towards better survival in those patients receiving OMT (log-rank p = 0.09). Similarly, amputation-free survival (AFS) was significantly better in patients with IC (p = 0.004) and also in patients receiving OMT (78.8 ± 3.6%) compared to that in those without OMT (71.5 ± 4.2%; p = 0.046). Freedom from CD TLR within three years was significantly better in the IC group (p = 0.002), but there were no statistically significant differences for CD TLR dependent on the presence of OMT (p = 0.79). In conclusion, there is still an important underuse of OMT in patients undergoing infrapopliteal interventions, which is even more pronounced in CLI despite a signal for its benefit regarding all-cause mortality and major amputation-free survival.