Awareness and perceptions of advanced practice pharmacists among health care providers in New Mexico.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate health care provider awareness and perceptions of the 2 types of advanced practice pharmacists (APPhs) in New Mexico: pharmacist clinicians (PhCs) and community pharmacists with independent prescriptive authority (iRPhs). METHODS: A cross-sectional electronic survey was administered to health care providers in New Mexico to describe awareness and perceptions of APPhs and benefits and barriers to collaborative practice with APPhs. RESULTS: A total of 5905 providers received the emailed survey, and 634 (11%) completed the survey, with 68% of the respondents indicating that they were not aware of the 2 types of APPhs in New Mexico. The top benefits of working with a PhC identified by the respondents were access to medication knowledge, enhanced clinical outcomes, and increased access to patient care. The barriers to employing a PhC at their practice included cost, difficulty in billing for services, and limited reimbursement. Importantly, 80% of the respondents felt that PhCs should be recognized as providers for insurance reimbursement. Awareness of iRPhs varied by prescriptive authority service, ranging from 34% for tuberculin skin testing to 84% for adult vaccinations. Overall, 80%-92% indicated that iRPhs should be reimbursed, depending on the prescriptive authority service. CONCLUSION: Provider awareness of APPhs in New Mexico was low; however, the willingness to refer patients to APPhs for clinical services was high. Cost, difficulty in billing for services, and reimbursement for PhC services were the primary identified barriers to adding a PhC into practice. Most of the respondents indicated that both types of APPhs should be granted provider status and reimbursed by third-party payers for their services.

Diabetic Kidney Disease in Post-Kidney Transplant Patients.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common occurrence in post-kidney transplantation and is associated with greater mortality, allograft failure, and increased risk of infections. The primary goal in the management of PTDM is to achieve glycemic control to minimize the risk of complications while balancing the need for immunosuppression to maintain the health of the transplanted kidney. This review summarizes the effects of maintenance immunosuppression and therapeutic options among kidney transplant recipients. Patients with PTDM are at increased risk of diabetic kidney disease development; therefore, in this review, we focus on evidence supporting the use of novel antidiabetic agents and discuss their benefits and potential side effects in detail.

The Use of Thiazide Diuretics for the Treatment of Hypertension in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

The use of thiazide diuretics for the treatment of hypertension in patients with advance chronic kidney disease. Thiazides have been recommended as the first-line for the treatment of hypertension, yet their use has been discouraged in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), as they are suggested to be ineffective in advanced CKD. Recent data suggest that thiazide diuretics may be beneficial blood pressure control in addition to natriuresis in existing CKD. This review discusses the commercially available thiazides with a focus on thiazide pharmacology, most common adverse effects, clinical uses of thiazide diuretic, and the evidence for efficacy of thiazide use in advanced CKD.

Long-Acting Basal Insulins: A Review of the More Recently Approved Agents.

Long-acting basal insulins are used for the management of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Long-acting basal insulins were developed utilizing recombinant DNA technology and have been available since 2000 with the approval of insulin glargine U-100 followed by insulin detemir in 2005. In recent years, diabetes management has become more complex with the approval of insulin glargine U-300 and insulin degludec U-100 and U-200. Both insulin glargine U-300 and insulin degludec have been compared with insulin glargine U-100 and have demonstrated longer durations of action, as well as lower rates of hypoglycemia. This review discusses the Food and Drug Administration-approved long-acting insulins with a focus on recently approved agents and their efficacy and safety compared with the first long-acting basal insulins.