Implementing Prone Positioning for COVID-19 Patients Outside the Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Proning intubated intensive care unit patients for the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome is an accepted standard of practice. We examined the nursing climate in 4 units and its impact on implementing a novel self-proning protocol to treat COVID-19 patients outside the intensive care unit. LOCAL PROBLEM: Nursing units previously designated for medical/surgical populations had to adjust quickly to provide evidence-based care for COVID-19 patients attempting self-proning. METHODS: Nurses from 4 nursing units were surveyed about the implementation process on the self-proning protocol. Their perception of unit implementation was assessed via the Implementation Climate Scale. INTERVENTIONS: A new self-proning nursing protocol was implemented outside the intensive care unit. RESULTS: Consistent education on the protocol, belief in the effectiveness of the intervention, and a strong unit-based climate of evidence-based practice contributed to greater implementation of the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a new nursing protocol is possible with strong unit-based support, even during a pandemic.

Implementation and Assessment of a Proning Protocol for Nonintubated Patients With COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused over 1,250,000 deaths worldwide. With limited therapeutic options, proning nonintubated patients emerged as a safe and affordable intervention to manage hypoxemia. METHODS: A proning protocol to identify and prone eligible patients was implemented. Patients were encouraged to self-prone for 2-3 hours, 3 times daily. Investigators created educational materials for nurses and patients and developed a COVID-19-specific proning order within the electronic health record (EHR). Investigators completed an 800-person retrospective chart review to study the implementation of this protocol. RESULTS: From March 22, 2020, to June 5, 2020, 586 patients were admitted to the COVID-19 floor. Of these patients, 42.8% were eligible for proning. Common contraindications were lack of hypoxia, altered mental status, and fall risk. The proning protocol led to a significant improvement in provider awareness of patients appropriate for proning, increasing from 12% to 83%, as measured by placement of a proning order into the EHR. There was a significant improvement in all appropriate patients documented as proned, increasing from 18% to 45% of eligible patients. CONCLUSIONS: The creation of an effective hospital-wide proning protocol to address the exigencies of the COVID-19 pandemic is possible and may be accomplished in a short period of time.

Social resource assessment: Application of a novel communication tool during hospital discharge.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an interactive tool designed to help patients communicate their social resources supportive of home recovery to health care providers. METHODS: Seventy medical and surgical inpatients completed the D-CEGRM social resource interview, demographic queries, and discharge readiness surveys (RHDS) at discharge. Two weeks later, patients completed post-discharge coping difficulty surveys (PDCDS). Nurses unassociated with patients' clinical care reviewed structured clinical notes created from the D-CEGRM and categorized patients as likely to have "inadequate" or "adequate" supportive resources for home self-management. Nurse decision making was tracked using an adjudication process, and post-hoc comparisons in patient characteristics, RHDS, and PDCDS were conducted. RESULTS: Nurses categorized 36 patients (51%) as having inadequate resources. Number and accessibility of supports, presence of negative relationships, and previous struggles meeting health-related needs were important decision-making factors. Post-hoc comparisons revealed significant differences in demographic risk factors and discharge readiness ratings for those with inadequate vs. adequate resources. CONCLUSION: The D-CEGRM may be an efficient tool for patients to communicate access to social resources, and an effective facilitator of transitional care planning. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The D-CEGRM may provide a useful assessment of patients' home context and guide for transitional care planning.

Pain in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: How and What Are We Doing?

BACKGROUND: Pain management in critically ill children is complex. Epidemiological research is needed to identify how often patients in pediatric intensive care units experience pain and the practices being used to lessen pain. OBJECTIVES: To describe pain assessment and intervention practices in pediatric intensive care units, determine the prevalence of pain and painful procedures, and identify characteristics of children with moderate to severe pain. METHODS: A 24-hour observational cohort study was conducted in 15 units. Nurses completed surveys regarding patients' communicative ability. Patients' records were reviewed for pain assessments, painful procedures, and pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. RESULTS: For the 220 patients in this study, pain was assessed a median (interquartile range) of 10 (7-13) times, usually with behavioral pain scales. Sixty-eight percent of patients received pharmacologic interventions and 44% received nonpharmacologic interventions. Fentanyl was the most common analgesic provided. Repositioning was the most common nonpharmacologic intervention. Forty-five percent of patients had pain and 24% had moderate to severe pain. Patients experienced a median (interquartile range) of 7 (2-15) painful procedures in 24 hours. More frequent pain assessments and pharmacologic interventions and the ability to communicate were associated with moderate to severe pain. No patient in the moderate to severe pain category received neuromuscular blockers. CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill children experience pain and multiple painful procedures daily. Assessment and intervention practices vary considerably. Research is needed to establish best practices for pain assessment in patients with limited communicative ability and to determine which pain management strategies improve patients' outcomes.