Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations.

Opening remarks: These guidelines are the result of discussions within a diverse group of RSA researchers. They were approved in December 2023 by the board and selected members of the International Radiostereometry Society to update the guidelines by Valstar et al. [1]. By adhering to these guidelines, RSA studies will become more transparent and consistent in execution, presentation, reporting, and interpretation. Both authors and reviewers of scientific papers using RSA may use these guidelines, summarized in the Checklist, as a reference. Deviations from these guidelines should have the underlying rationale stated.

Increased risk of aseptic loosening for posterior stabilized compared with posterior cruciate-retaining uncemented total knee replacements: a cohort study of 13,667 knees from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: While registry studies have suggested a higher risk of revision for posterior-stabilized (PS) compared with posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee replacements (TKR) using cement, it is unknown whether this is also the case for uncemented TKR. We aimed to compare the revision rates of PS and CR designs in patients receiving primary uncemented TKR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from the Dutch arthroplasty register (LROI) was analyzed, comprising 12,226 uncemented primary CR TKRs and 750 uncemented PS TKRs registered between 2007 and 2022. Competing risk and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to compare revision rates, risks of revision, and reasons for revision between groups. Sensitivity analyses were performed to analyze the risk, concerning the 5 most commonly used implants and performing hospitals for each group. RESULTS: Uncemented PS TKRs had higher 10-year revision rates for any reason and aseptic loosening (6.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-9.2 and 3.9%, CI 2.6-6.7) compared with uncemented CR TKRs (4.2%, CI 3.8-4.7 and 1.4%, CI 1.2-1.7). PS TKRs were 1.4 and 2.5 times more likely to be revised for any reason and aseptic loosening, respectively. These results remained consistent after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, previous surgeries, bearing mobility, and surface modification, with sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: We found that uncemented PS implants have a higher rate of revision than uncemented CR implants, mainly due to a higher risk of aseptic loosening.

Change in CT-measured acetabular bone density following total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Assessing peri-acetabular bone quality is valuable for optimizing the outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) as preservation of good quality bone stock likely affects implant stability. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of peri-acetabular bone mineral density (BMD) changes over time measured using quantitative computer tomography (CT) and, second, to investigate the influence of age, sex, and fixation on the change in BMD over time. METHODS: A systematic search of Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases identified 19 studies that measured BMD using CT following THA. The regions of interest (ROI), reporting of BMD results, and scan protocols were extracted. A meta-analysis of BMD was performed on 12 studies that reported measurements immediately postoperatively and at follow-up. RESULTS: The meta-analysis determined that periacetabular BMD around both cemented and uncemented components decreases over time. The amount of BMD loss increased relative to proximity of the acetabular component. There was a greater decrease in cortical BMD over time in females and cancellous BMD for young patients of any sex. CONCLUSION: Peri-acetabular BMD decreases at different rates relative to its proximity to the acetabular component. Cancellous BMD decreases more in young patients and cortical bone decreases more in females. Standardized reporting parameters and suggested ROI to measure peri-acetabular BMD are proposed, to enable comparison between implant and patient variables in the future.

6-month migration sufficient for evaluation of total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This updated meta-analysis evaluates the migration pattern of the tibial component of primary total knee replacements measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). We aimed to evaluate whether 6-month maximum total point motion (MTPM) values could be used instead of 1-year MTPM for RSA threshold testing and to present the pooled migration patterns for different implant designs that can be used as a benchmark. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The search included all published RSA studies on migration patterns of tibial components until 2023. Study groups were classified according to their prosthesis brand, fixation, and insert (PFI). Sub-analyses were performed to compare the mean tibial component migration patterns of different implant variables, stratified according to fixation. RESULTS: 96 studies (43 new studies), including 197 study groups and 4,706 knees, were included. Most migration occurred within the first 6 postoperative months (126 study groups: mean 0.58 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.65), followed by minimal migration between 6 and 12 months (197 study groups: mean 0.04 mm, CI 0.03-0.06), irrespective of the fixation method used. Distinct migration patterns were observed among the different fixation methods. No differences were found in migration patterns among cemented components in any of the sub-group analyses conducted. For uncemented implants, trabecular metal surfaced components seemed to migrate less than porous-coated or uncoated components Conclusion: Based on the small difference between MTPM values at 6 months and 1 year, MTPM at 6 months could be used instead of MTPM at 1 year for RSA threshold testing. The pooled migration patterns can be used as benchmark for evaluation of new implants by defining fixation-specific RSA thresholds when combined with implant survival.

Migration patterns of acetabular cups: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RSA studies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RSA studies to investigate the early and long-term migration patterns of acetabular cups and the influence of implant factors on cup migration over time. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases to identify all RSA studies of cup migration following primary total hip replacement (THR). Proximal migration at 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were considered for analysis. Implant factors investigated included fixation type, head size, bearing surface, uncemented coating design, and the decade of RSA introduction. RESULTS: 47 studies reported the proximal migration of 83 cohorts (2,328 cups). Besides 1 threaded cup design, no implant factor investigated was found to significantly influence proximal migration. The mean pooled 2-year proximal migration of cemented cups (0.14 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.20) was not significantly different from uncemented cups (0.12 mm, CI 0.04-0.19). The mean pooled proximal migration at 6 months was 0.11 mm (CI 0.06-0.16) and there was no significant increase between 6 months and 2 years (0.015 mm, CI 0.000-0.030). 27 of 75 cohorts (36%) reported mean proximal migration greater than 0.2 mm at 2 years, which has previously been identified as a predictor of implants at risk of long-term loosening. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the majority of cup migration occurs within the first 6 months. With one exception, no implant factors influenced the 2-year proximal migration of acetabular cups. 36% of studies with 2-year migration were considered at risk of long-term loosening. Further investigation and comparison against long-term survivorship data would validate 6-month and/or 1-year proximal migration measurements as an earlier predictor of long-term loosening than the current 2-year threshold.

Decreased Mortality in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients Treated With Tocilizumab: A Rapid Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

BACKGROUND: We systematically reviewed the literature to answer the following research questions: (1) Does interleukin 6 (IL-6) (receptor) antagonist therapy reduce mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients compared to patients not treated with IL-6 (receptor) antagonists; and (2) is there an increased risk of side effects in COVID-19 patients treated with IL-6 (receptor) antagonists compared to patients not treated with IL-6 (receptor) antagonists? METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, PMC PubMed Central, Medline, World Health Organization COVID-19 Database, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, and Academic Search Premier (through 30 June 2020). Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool the risk ratios and risk differences of individual studies. Risk of bias was appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) checklist. RESULTS: The search strategy retrieved 743 unique titles, of which 10 studies (all on tocilizumab [TCZ]) comprising 1358 patients were included. Nine of 10 studies were considered to be of high quality. Meta-analysis showed that the TCZ group had lower mortality than the control group. The risk ratio was 0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], .12-.59) and the risk difference was 12% (95% CI, 4.6%-20%) in favor of the TCZ group. With only a few studies available, there were no differences observed regarding side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that mortality was 12% lower for COVID-19 patients treated with TCZ compared with those not treated with TCZ. The number needed to treat was 11, suggesting that for every 11 (severe) COVID-19 patients treated with TCZ, 1 death is prevented. These results require confirmation by randomized controlled trials.

Proton-pump inhibitors are associated with increased risk of prosthetic joint infection in patients with total hip arthroplasty: a case-cohort study.

Background and purpose - Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) have previously been associated with an increased risk of infections such as community-acquired pneumonia, gastrointestinal infections and central nervous system infection. Therefore, we evaluated a possible association between proton-pump inhibitor use and prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA), because they can be stopped perioperatively or switched to a less harmful alternative.Patients and methods - A cohort of 5,512 primary THAs provided the base for a case-cohort design; cases were identified as patients with early-onset PJI. A weighted Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for the study design and to adjust for potential confounders.Results - There were 75 patients diagnosed with PJI of whom 32 (43%) used PPIs perioperatively compared with 75 PPI users (25%) in the control group of 302 patients. The risk of PJI was 2.4 times higher (95% CI 1.4-4.0) for patients using PPI. This effect remained after correction for possible confounders.Interpretation - The use of PPIs was associated with an increased risk of developing PJI after THA. Hence, the use of a PPI appears to be a modifiable risk factor for PJI.

Synergy between induction heating, antibiotics, and N-acetylcysteine eradicates Staphylococcus aureus from biofilm.

Background: Non-contact induction heating (NCIH) is a noninvasive treatment modality that can be used to cause thermal damage to bacterial biofilms on a metal implant surface in the context of a prosthetic joint infection. The purpose of this study was (1) to determine the effectiveness of NCIH on killing Staphylococcus aureus from biofilm and (2) to determine the possible synergistic effect of NCIH and cocktails of antibiotics and N-acetylcysteine (NAC).Methods:Staphylococcus aureus biofilms were grown on titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) coupons. These coupons were heated to 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, 80 °C, and 90 °C for 3.5 min and subsequently exposed to cocktails of vancomycin, rifampicin and NAC at clinically relevant concentrations over 24 h.Results: In the control group without induction heating, 2.2*107 colony forming units (CFU)/cm2 were observed. At 50 °C, 60 °C, 70 °C, 80 °C, and 90 °C, a reduction of 0.3-log, 3.9-log, 4.2-log, 4.3-log, and 6.6-log CFU/cm2 were observed, respectively. There was synergy between antibiotics and induction heating that resulted in less than 100 CFU/cm2 remaining after 3.5 min at 60 °C, and exposure to vancomycin and rifampicin. Total eradication was observed at 80 °C. Total eradication was also observed at 60 °C and a cocktail of antibiotics with NAC.Conclusion: Induction heating of titanium alloy coupons is effective for the reduction of bacterial load in vitro in S. aureus biofilms. Induction heating and cocktails of antibiotics and NAC have a synergistic effect that results in the total eradication of the biofilm at 60 °C and higher for clinically relevant concentrations of vancomycin, rifampicin and NAC.

RSA-tested TKA Implants on Average Have Lower Mean 10-year Revision Rates Than Non-RSA-tested Designs.

BACKGROUND: The number of revisions after TKA is expected to rise because of aging populations in many countries and because patients are undergoing TKA at younger ages. Aseptic loosening is a major reason for late revision, which can be predicted by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) of small groups of patients at 2 years of follow-up. RSA is therefore an ideal tool to assess new TKA designs before they are introduced to the market, although not every TKA design has been studied with RSA. If RSA-tested TKA designs have lower 10-year revision rates in national registries than non-RSA-tested TKA designs, RSA testing of all new designs could be advocated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this study, we asked: Is there a difference in the all-cause revision rate between non-RSA-tested and RSA-tested TKA designs registered in national knee arthroplasty registries at 5 and 10 years of follow-up? METHODS: Knee arthroplasty registries were identified through the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology webpage and through a manual internet search. Inclusion criteria were a minimum follow-up duration of 10 years and available revision or survival data per TKA design. Twenty-six registries were identified; seven were included comprising 339 TKA designs, of which 236 designs were classified as RSA-tested and 103 as non-RSA-tested. Six registries were excluded because no report was published. One registry was excluded because no fixation method was mentioned (79 TKA designs). Another registry was excluded because there was no 10-year data available (22 non-RSA-tested designs; 10 RSA-tested designs). Eleven registries were excluded because they did not provide revision rates per design and had not reached 10 years follow-up. The revision rates with their standard errors were extracted per design. We used the data from a recent meta-analysis to identify whether a TKA design was previously tested with RSA. This meta-analysis found 53 RSA studies comprising 70 different TKA designs. The prosthesis model, fixation method and insert type were extracted from these RSA-studies. The design characteristics of the TKA reported in the knee arthroplasty registries were also extracted, and if possible, matched to the TKA designs reported in the RSA-studies. At 5 years of follow-up, 191 TKA designs were identified as non-RSA-tested and 92 were identified as RSA-tested. At 10 years of follow-up, 154 TKA designs and 74 TKA designs were classified as non-RSA-tested and RSA-tested, respectively. A random-effects model using the Metafor Package in R statistics was used to estimate the pooled revision rate at 5 and 10 years of follow-up for both groups. The difference in revision rates between groups at 5 and 10 years of follow-up was estimated by including RSA as a factor in the random-effects model. RESULTS: Mean all-cause revision rates at 5 years for non-RSA-tested and RSA-tested implants were 3.6% (95% CI 3.4 to 3.8) and 2.9% (95% CI 2.7 to 3.0), with a mean difference of 0.6% favoring RSA-tested implants (95% CI 0.4 to 0.8; p < 0.001). Mean all-cause revision rates at 10 years for non-RSA-tested and RSA-tested implants were 5.5% (95% CI 5.2 to 5.9) and 4.4% (95% CI 4.1 to 4.7), with a mean difference of 0.9% favoring RSA-tested implants (95% CI 0.4 to 1.3; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although there are exceptions, across registries, TKA designs that have been tested in an RSA setting have a slightly lower (about 1%) mean all-cause revision rate at 5-year and 10-year follow-up than those tested in a non-RSA setting. Acknowledging the inherent limitations of this observational study, a risk difference of 1% could potentially translate into an approximate 20% decrease in revision burden up to 10 years, which may have a profound impact on patient morbidity and health-related costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Ribbing disease: a systematic review.

Background Ribbing disease, or multiple diaphyseal sclerosis, is a rare benign bone dysplasia. Purpose To systematically review the literature to determine the clinical and radiological presentation of patients with Ribbing disease as well as the effects of attempted treatments. Material and Methods We considered individual patient data of patients diagnosed with Ribbing disease derived from patient reports and patient series. All stages of the review were performed by two reviewers independently. Standard descriptive statistics were used for quantitative analyses and mixed model analyses were used when appropriate Results The literature search yielded 420 unique hits of which 23 studies were included, covering a total of 40 patients of whom 29 had bilateral involvement. The mean age at diagnosis was 35 years and the mean time between diagnosis and onset of symptoms, mostly pain, was five years (range = 1-16 years). The tibial diaphysis was the most commonly involved bone in 35 of 36 patients. Non-surgical treatment consisted of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), prednisone, and bisphophonates with mixed results. Surgical treatment consisted of intramedullary reaming and fenestration and was very effective to reduce pain. Conclusion The clinical presentation and imaging findings of patients with Ribbing disease are becoming more apparent. However, there is paucity of evidence on the natural disease progression and effectiveness of treatment modalities.

RSA migration of total knee replacements.

Purpose - We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses to evaluate the early and long-term migration patterns of tibial components of TKR of all known RSA studies. Methods - Migration pattern was defined as at least 2 postoperative RSA follow-up moments. Maximal total point motion (MTPM) at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years were considered. Results - The literature search yielded 1,167 hits of which 53 studies were included, comprising 111 study groups and 2,470 knees. The majority of the early migration occurred in the first 6 months postoperatively followed by a period of stability, i.e., no or very little migration. Cemented and uncemented tibial components had different migration patterns. For cemented tibial components there was no difference in migration between all-poly and metal-backed components, between mobile bearing and fixed bearing, between cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized. Furthermore, no difference existed between TKR measured with model-based RSA or marker-based RSA methods. For uncemented TKR there was some variation in migration with the highest migration for uncoated TKR. Interpretation - The results from this meta-analysis on RSA migration of TKR are in line with both the survival analyses results from joint registries of these TKRs as well as revision rates results from meta-analyses, thus providing further proof for the association between early migration and late revision for loosening. The pooled migration patterns can be used both as benchmarks and for defining migration thresholds for future evaluation of new TKR.

Tibial component rotation in total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Both the range of motion (ROM) technique and the tibial tubercle landmark (TTL) technique are frequently used to align the tibial component into proper rotational position during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of the study was to assess the intra-operative differences in tibial rotation position during computer-navigated primary TKA using either the TTL or ROM techniques. The ROM technique was hypothesized to be a repeatable method and to produce different tibial rotation positions compared to the TTL technique. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was performed to evaluate the antero-posterior axis of the cut proximal tibia using both the ROM and the TTL technique during primary TKA without postoperative clinical assessment. Computer navigation was used to measure this difference in 20 consecutive knees of 20 patients who underwent a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty with a fixed-bearing polyethylene insert and a patella resurfacing. RESULTS: The ROM technique is a repeatable method with an interclass correlation coefficient (ICC2) of 0.84 (p < 0.001). The trial tibial baseplate was on average 4.56 degrees externally rotated compared to the tubercle landmark. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.028). The amount of maximum intra-operative flexion and the pre-operative mechanical axis were positively correlated with the magnitude of difference between the two methods. CONCLUSIONS: It is important for the orthopaedic surgeon to realise that there is a significant difference between the TTL technique and ROM technique when positioning the tibial component in a rotational position. This difference is correlated with high maximum flexion and mechanical axis deviations.

Conversion from knee arthrodesis to arthroplasty: systematic review.

PURPOSE: Arthrodesis (AD) of the knee reduces pain and provides stability, but has severe functional and social limitations. There has been ample discussion on the value of a conversion of an AD to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to perform a review and meta-analysis of the current literature on conversion of an AD to TKA and assess clinical outcome, complication rate, surgical technique and overall patient-related outcome measures. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, ScienceDirect and searching by hand for papers on conversion of AD of the knee to TKA. Two reviewers independently reviewed all titles and abstracts, and extracted the available data. Study eligibility criteria were: conversion of knee AD to TKA, five cases or more and non-oncology patients. Data consisted of study characteristics, patient demographics, clinical outcome and complications. Additionally, details on surgical technique were reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 866 unique references identified, six papers were included for further analyses, comprising a total of 123 knees with conversion of AD of the knee to TKA. Mean gain of knee flexion was 80 degrees and the mean HSS score improved with 20 points. A complicated postoperative course was found in 65 % of all cases. The most frequent complication was skin necrosis (25 %), followed by arthrofibrosis (13 %), infection (11 %) and revision (11 %). Major complications such as refusion, amputation and death occurred in less than 5 % of all cases. DISCUSSION: The majority of the papers consisted of small case series of moderate methodological quality, resulting in 123 included knees. Further series are necessary to draw definitive conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis on conversion of a knee arthrodesis to TKA. Good clinical results can be expected after conversion, albeit at a high risk of postoperative complications.

Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether there are differences in benefits and harms between mobile and fixed prostheses for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The previous Cochrane review published in 2004 included two articles. Many more trials have been performed since then; therefore an update is needed. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of mobile bearing compared with fixed bearing cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for functional and clinical outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SEARCH METHODS: We searched The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science up to 27 February 2014, and the trial registers ClinicalTrials.gov, Multiregister, Current Controlled Trials and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for data from unpublished trials, up to 11 February 2014. We also screened the reference lists of selected articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomised controlled trials comparing mobile bearing with fixed bearing prostheses in cruciate retaining TKA among patients with osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis, using functional or clinical outcome measures and follow-up of at least six months. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures as expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. MAIN RESULTS: We found 19 studies with 1641 participants (1616 with OA (98.5%) and 25 with RA (1.5%)) and 2247 knees. Seventeen new studies were included in this update.Quality of the evidence ranged from moderate (knee pain) to low (other outcomes). Most studies had unclear risk of bias for allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment and selective reporting, and high risk of bias for incomplete outcome data and other bias. Knee painWe calculated the standardised mean difference (SMD) for pain, using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) in 11 studies (58%) and 1531 knees (68%). No statistically significant differences between groups were reported (SMD 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 0.22, P value 0.15). This represents an absolute risk difference of 2.4% points higher (95% CI 0.8% lower to 5.9% higher) on the KSS pain scale and a relative percent change of 0.22% (95% CI 0.07% lower to 0.53% higher). The results were homogeneous. Clinical and functional scores The KSS clinical score did not differ statistically significantly between groups (14 studies (74%) and 1845 knees (82%)) with a mean difference (MD) of -1.06 points (95% CI -2.87 to 0.74, P value 0.25) and heterogeneous results. KSS function was reported in 14 studies (74%) with 1845 knees (82%) as an MD of -0.10 point (95% CI -1.93 to 1.73, P value 0.91) and homogeneous results. In two studies (11%), the KSS total score was favourable for mobile bearing (159 vs 132 for fixed bearing), with MD of -26.52 points (95% CI -45.03 to -8.01, P value 0.005), but with a wide 95% confidence interval indicating uncertainty about the estimate.Other reported scoring systems did not show statistically significant differences: Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score (seven studies (37%) in 1021 knees (45%)) with an MD of -1.36 (95% CI -4.18 to 1.46, P value 0.35); Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score (two studies (11%), 167 knees (7%)) with an MD of -4.46 (95% CI -16.26 to 7.34, P value 0.46); and Oxford total (five studies (26%), 647 knees (29%) with an MD of -0.25 (95% CI -1.41 to 0.91, P value 0.67). Health-related quality of lifeThree studies (16%) with 498 knees (22%) reported on health-related quality of life, and no statistically significant differences were noted between the mobile bearing and fixed bearing groups. The Short Form (SF)-12 Physical Component Summary had an MD of -1.96 (95% CI -4.55 to 0.63, P value 0.14) and heterogeneous results. Revision surgeryTwenty seven revisions (1.3%) were performed in 17 studies (89%) with 2065 knees (92%). In all, 13 knees were revised in the fixed bearing group and 14 knees in the mobile bearing group. No statistically significant differences were found (risk difference 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, P value 0.58), and homogeneous results were reported. MortalityIn seven out of 19 studies, 13 participants (37%) died. Two of these participants had undergone bilateral surgery, and for seven participants, it was unclear which prosthesis they had received; therefore they were excluded from the analyses. Thus our analysis included four out of 191 participants (2.1%) who had died: one in the fixed bearing group and three in the mobile bearing group. No statistically significant differences were found. The risk difference was -0.02 (95% CI -0.06 to 0.03, P value 0.49) and results were homogeneous. Reoperation ratesThirty reoperations were performed in 17 studies (89%) with 2065 knees (92%): 18 knees in the fixed bearing group (of the 1031 knees) and 12 knees in the mobile group (of the 1034 knees). No statistically significant differences were found. The risk difference was -0.01 (95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, P value 0.99) with homogeneous results. Other serious adverse eventsSixteen studies (84%) reported nine other serious adverse events in 1735 knees (77%): four in the fixed bearing group (of the 862 knees) and five in the mobile bearing group (of the 873 knees). No statistically significant differences were found (risk difference 0.00, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.01, P value 0.88), and results were homogeneous. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate- to low-quality evidence suggests that mobile bearing prostheses may have similar effects on knee pain, clinical and functional scores, health-related quality of life, revision surgery, mortality, reoperation rate and other serious adverse events compared with fixed bearing prostheses in posterior cruciate retaining TKA. Therefore we cannot draw firm conclusions. Most (98.5%) participants had OA, so the findings primarily reflect results reported in participants with OA. Future studies should report in greater detail outcomes such as those presented in this systematic review, with sufficient follow-up time to allow gathering of high-quality evidence and to inform clinical practice. Large registry-based studies may have added value, but they are subject to treatment-by-indication bias. Therefore, this systematic review of RCTs can be viewed as the best available evidence.