Pre-analytical considerations in the development of a prototype SARS-CoV-2 antigen ARCHITECT automated immunoassay.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate pre-analytical challenges related to high-volume central laboratory SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing with a prototype qualitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen immunoassay run on the automated Abbott ARCHITECT instrument. METHODS: Contrived positive and negative specimens and de-identified nasal and nasopharyngeal specimens in transport media were used to evaluate specimen and reagent on-board stability, assay analytical performance and interference, and clinical performance. RESULTS: TCID50/mL values were similar for specimens in various transport media. Inactivated positive clinical specimens and viral lysate (USA-WA1/2020) were positive on the prototype immunoassay. Within-laboratory imprecision was ≤0.10 SD (<1.00 S/C) with a ≤10% CV (≥1.00 S/C). Assay reagents were stable on board the instrument for 14 days. No high-dose hook effect was observed with a SARS-CoV-2 stock of Ct 13.0 (RLU>1.0 × 106). No interference was observed from mucin, whole blood, 12 drugs, and more than 20 cross-reactants. While specimen stability was limited at room temperature for specimens with or without viral inactivation, a single freeze/thaw cycle or long-term storage (>30 days) at -20 °C did not adversely impact specimen stability or assay performance. Specificity of the prototype SARS-CoV-2 antigen immunoassay was ≥98.5% and sensitivity was ≥89.5% across two ARCHITECT instruments. Assay sensitivity was inversely correlated with Ct and was similar to that reported for the Roche Elecsys® SARS-CoV-2 Ag immunoassay. CONCLUSIONS: The prototype SARS-CoV-2 antigen ARCHITECT immunoassay is sensitive and specific for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasal and nasopharyngeal specimens. Endogenous proteases in mucus may degrade the target antigen, which limits specimen storage and transport times and complicates assay workflow.

Development of a new automated IL-6 immunoassay.

OBJECTIVES: Quantitative detection of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in serum and plasma can help monitor immune responses and the development of acute inflammation to guide patient management. We developed an IL-6 immunoassay for use with the automated ARCHITECT system for detecting an increase in the inflammatory response. METHODS: Immunized mouse sera were tested and selected B-cells were harvested for fusion with myeloma cells. A panel of monoclonal antibodies were produced, from which capture and detection monoclonal antibodies for the prototype IL-6 immunoassay were selected and screened on the ARCHITECT instrument. The antibody pair that most effectively captured and detected IL-6 was selected to develop a prototype IL-6 immunoassay. Calibrator and panel preparations using an internal recombinant IL-6 standard were compared to serum panels prepared with the IL-6 International Standard 89/548. Assay specificity and spike recovery were determined, and assay sensitivity was compared with the Roche EUA Elecsys IL-6 assay run on the cobas analyzer. RESULTS: Twenty-one antibodies in 441 antibody pairs were screened. The prototype IL-6 assay showed high sensitivity with an estimated limit of detection of 0.317 pg/mL and limit of quantitation of <1.27. Spike recovery was 90%-110% in serum and plasma. The internal recombinant human IL-6 calibrator showed excellent stability for 63 days at 2-8 °C. The prototype IL-6 immunoassay was specific for IL-6, exhibited no cross reactivity to related cytokines and interleukins, and was 10-fold more sensitive than the Elecsys IL-6 assay. CONCLUSIONS: The prototype ARCHITECT IL-6 automated immunoassay is a reliable and robust method for the quantitative determination of IL-6 in human serum and plasma.

Development of an Abbott ARCHITECT cyclosporine immunoassay without metabolite cross-reactivity.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the mechanism by which the ARCHITECT cyclosporine (CsA) chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) eliminates cross-reactivity to CsA metabolites AM1 and AM9, despite its use of a monoclonal antibody which shows cross-reactivity in fluorescence polarization immunoassays. DESIGN AND METHODS: The CMIA was accomplished by incubating an extracted blood sample with magnetic microparticles coated with a very low amount of anti-CsA antibody. After a wash step the microparticles were incubated with a chemiluminescent CsA tracer, followed by a second wash step and measurement of chemiluminescence. The reagent concentrations of salt and detergent were optimized to maximize CsA binding and minimize metabolite interference. RESULTS: Elimination of CsA metabolite cross-reactivity was shown using purified metabolites and blood samples containing native CsA metabolites. The CMIA demonstrated precision and sensitivity acceptable for use in a clinical setting. CONCLUSION: We conclude that it is possible to eliminate CsA metabolite immuno-cross-reactivity by careful assay design.