A comparison of subcutaneous sumatriptan and dihydroergotamine nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine.

We compared the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) sumatriptan (6 mg) with that of dihydroergotamine (DHE) nasal spray (1 mg plus optional 1 mg) in the acute treatment of migraine. Two hundred sixty-six adult migraineurs (International Headache Society criteria) completed a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over study. Patients took SC sumatriptan for one attack and DHE nasal spray for the other in random order. Data from both treatment periods show that at all time points from 15 minutes, SC sumatriptan was significantly better than DHE nasal spray at providing both headache relief (moderate/severe headache improving to mild/none) and resolution of headache. Similarly, SC sumatriptan was superior to DHE nasal spray for the other efficacy end points assessed in the study. Patients reported that both treatments were well tolerated. Adverse events were reported by 43% of patients taking SC sumatriptan and 22% of patients taking DHE nasal spray. These were usually mild and transient. We conclude that subcutaneous sumatriptan has a faster onset of action than DHE nasal spray and provides greater relief of acute migraine symptoms.

Subcutaneous sumatriptan during the migraine aura. Sumatriptan Aura Study Group.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group study assessed whether subcutaneous sumatriptan administered during the migraine aura would prolong or modify the aura and prevent or delay development of the headache. One hundred seventy-one patients (88 receiving 6 mg sumatriptan, 83 receiving placebo) treated a single attack of migraine with typical aura at home, by self-injection. The median duration of aura following the first injection was 25 minutes for the sumatriptan group and 30 minutes for the placebo group (NS). The aura symptom profile was similar for the two treatment groups. The proportion of patients who developed a moderate or severe headache within 6 hours after dose administration was similar in the two groups--68% among those receiving sumatriptan and 75% among those receiving placebo (NS). Sumatriptan given during the aura did not prolong or alter the nature of the migraine aura and did not prevent or significantly delay headache development.

Comparative safety and tolerability of clopidogrel and aspirin: results from CAPRIE. CAPRIE Steering Committee and Investigators. Clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive comparison of the long term safety and tolerability of clopidogrel, a new adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist that inhibits platelet activation induced by ADP, and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 19,185 patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis manifested as recent ischaemic stroke, recent myocardial infarction or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Patients were randomised to receive clopidogrel 75 mg/day or aspirin 325 mg/day for a minimum of 1 year and a maximum of 3 years. RESULTS: Compared with aspirin, clopidogrel reduced the combined risk of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death by 8.7% (p = 0.043). The incidence of early permanent discontinuations of the study drug due to adverse events was almost identical in both treatment groups (11.94% for clopidogrel vs 11.92% for aspirin). Reported neutropenia was similar in the clopidogrel and aspirin groups (0.10 vs 0.17%, respectively) with corresponding rates (0.05 vs 0.04%, respectively) for severe neutropenia. Thrombocytopenia was identical in the clopidogrel and aspirin groups (0.26%), with the rates of severe thrombocytopenia being 0.19 vs 0.10%, respectively. None of these observed differences was statistically significant. The overall incidence of haemorrhagic events did not differ statistically significantly between treatment groups (9.27% for clopidogrel vs 9.28% for aspirin; p = 0.98). There was a trend towards a lower incidence of intracranial haemorrhage in the clopidogrel group (0.31%) compared with the aspirin group (0.42%). Any reported gastrointestinal haemorrhage was significantly less frequent with clopidogrel (1.99%) than with aspirin (2.66%) [p < 0.002]. The corresponding data for severe gastrointestinal bleeding were 0.49 vs 0.71%; p < 0.05. Overall, there were significantly fewer gastrointestinal adverse events with clopidogrel than with aspirin (27.1 vs 29.8%; p < 0.001), with less abdominal pain, dyspepsia, constipation, or peptic, gastric, or duodenal ulceration with clopidogrel. Diarrhoea was significantly more common in the clopidogrel group (4.46 vs 3.36%; p < 0.001), although the incidence of severe diarrhoea (0.23 vs 0.11%) was low and was not significantly different between groups. There were significantly more patients with rash in the clopidogrel group (6.0%) compared with the aspirin group (4.6%) [p < 0.001]. However, these events were generally mild and transient in nature. CONCLUSION: Given the favourable benefit/risk ratio, clopidogrel represents a clinically important advance in the treatment of patients with manifest atherosclerotic disease.

Sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine.

Sumatriptan is a selective 5-HT1-like agonist, which is effective in the treatment of migraine and cluster headache. It has been rigorously assessed in clinical trials involving over 7000 patients who have treated over 35,000 migraine attacks. Both subcutaneous and oral sumatriptan provide a high level of efficacy with 86% of patients obtaining relief after a single 6 mg injection (at 2 h) and 75% after 100 mg oral sumatriptan (4 h), compared with up to 37% in the placebo-treated group (P < 0.001). The onset of effect is rapid, occurring 10 min after injection and 30 min after the tablet. Oral sumatriptan (100 mg) has been evaluated against ergotamine, 2 mg, plus caffeine, 200 mg (as Cafergot); and against aspirin, 900 mg, plus metoclopramide, 10 mg. Headache relief was superior in sumatriptan-treated patients; 66% obtaining relief at 2 h, compared with 48% on Cafergot (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients obtaining complete relief of headache (Grade 0, no pain) was significantly higher with sumatriptan (40%) than with Cafergot (14%) at 2 h. Associated symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and photophobia are effectively relieved by sumatriptan, whereas Cafergot provoked nausea and vomiting in a proportion of patients. Headache relief with sumatriptan was also superior to that seen with aspirin plus metoclopramide. Sumatriptan was as effective in the relief of accompanying nausea and vomiting as aspirin plus metoclopramide. The efficacy of sumatriptan is maintained after repeated long-term use; over a six-month period efficacy was comparable in the first and last attacks, regardless of how many attacks were treated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Sumatriptan treatment of migraine in general practice. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study]. / Sumatriptan ved migraene i almen praksis. En randomiseret, dobbeltblind, placebokontrolleret overkrydsningsundersøgelse.

Two hundred and thirty migraineurs diagnosed by their general practitioners in accordance with their usual practice were included. The patients treated two migraine attacks at home by subcutaneous injection of sumatriptan or placebo and the alternative medication for the second attack (cross-over). When sumatriptan was compared to placebo, significantly more of the 209 evaluable patients reported headache relief at one hour (56% v 8%, p < 0.001) and two hours (62% v 15%, p < 0.001) after the first injection. Resolution of nausea, photophobia and phonophobia was significantly more common in patients on sumatriptan than on placebo (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The adverse events were usually transient and of mild or moderate severity, although, three patients withdrew due to adverse events. Ninety-five percent of patients evaluated by a neurological research fellow met the International Headache Society's criteria for migraine. In general practice, sumatriptan taken subcutaneously using an autoinjector at home was an effective and well tolerated acute treatment for migraine.

Methodology of clinical trials of sumatriptan in migraine and cluster headache.

The clinical development of sumatriptan has involved large international multicentre trials. To allow comparison of results obtained in a variety of clinical settings, great emphasis was placed on the use of consistent methodology across the programme. This applied to selection of patients, trial design, symptom evaluation and statistical analysis. Patients were selected for the major trials if they fulfilled the International Headache Society's diagnostic criteria for migraine or cluster headache. Relief of the headache was used as the main efficacy measure and this was assessed using standardized self-rating scales. All major controlled trials in migraine employed a parallel group design to avoid carryover effects and to ensure blinding was not compromised; however, because of the rarity of cluster headache, a crossover trial was performed in this indication. Appropriate statistical analyses were then performed on the data. The rationale for the methodology adopted is discussed. Strict adherence to these principles has allowed us to compare the results of sumatriptan treatment across a wide range of countries and treatment settings, and a selection of different administration routes.

Early-phase clinical trials in migraine: efficacy, safety and dose-finding.

Early-phase clinical trials with any new chemical entity have three main objectives: to establish that the drug is effective in the target disease and patient population; to assess tolerability and safety; and to select the optimum dose or doses for further evaluation. Clinical trials in migraine and other headache disorders pose additional problems because of the lack of specific objective diagnostic tests and the reliance on patient assessments of symptom relief. For these reasons particular care must be taken in selection of patients, design of the trials, choice of end-points and statistical analytical methodology. A wide range of doses must be evaluated to ensure that the dose-response curves for both efficacy and safety/tolerability are fully defined. Successful early-phase trials should then allow the optimum dose or doses of the drug to be identified for further evaluation in large-scale outpatient studies.

The clinical profile of sumatriptan: efficacy in migraine.

The efficacy of the 5-HT1 receptor agonist sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine has been investigated in an extensive programme of controlled clinical trials. Sumatriptan provided rapid relief from migraine headache with onset of relief occurring within 10 min of a 6 mg subcutaneous injection and within 30 min of a 100 mg oral dose. Maximum benefit was observed by 2 h after the injection and 4 h after the oral dose. Sumatriptan also significantly decreased the incidence of associated migraine symptoms (nausea, photophobia, phonophobia) and the need for rescue medication. Sumatriptan was an effective treatment for migraine with and without aura and when used at any time during the attack. Oral sumatriptan 100 mg provided significantly greater pain relief and had a more rapid onset of action than two commonly used acute treatments for migraine. Efficacy is maintained in long-term use, with no evidence of tachyphylaxis or dependence. Sumatriptan, whether given subcutaneously or orally, is an effective long-term acute treatment for migraine.

The safety of sumatriptan in asthmatic migraineurs.

A recent report has questioned the safety of sumatriptan in asthmatic migraineurs. To investigate this, we have reviewed the sumatriptan clinical trial safety database of over 75 completed trials. Within the clinical trial database, 375 asthmatic patients were identified who treated 1214 migraine attacks with sumatriptan. The incidence and nature of adverse events in the asthmatic patient subgroup who received sumatriptan was similar to that in the complete clinical trial population. Six reports of asthma were recorded as adverse events, but only one case was classified by the investigator as related to treatment. There is no clinical or pharmacological evidence to suggest that the safety profile of sumatriptan is altered in asthmatic patients compared to other migraine sufferers.

A comparison of the central nervous system effects of haloperidol, chlorpromazine and sulpiride in normal volunteers.

1. Twelve healthy male volunteers participated in four experimental occasions during each of which they were dosed with one of the following anti-psychotic drugs: chlorpromazine (50 mg), haloperidol (3 mg), sulpiride (400 mg) and placebo. Drugs were allocated to subjects in a double-blind, crossover fashion. 2. The subject's mood state, psychometric performance and electroencephalogram (EEG) were assessed pre-dose, and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 h post-dose. Mood states were assessed using 16 visual analogue scales and psychomotor performance was measured using the following tests: elapsed time estimation, tapping rate, choice reaction times, a rapid information processing task, flash fusion threshold, a manipulative motor task, digit span, body sway and tremor. 3. Chlorpromazine and haloperidol significantly reduced subjective ratings of 'alertness' and 'contentedness', and haloperidol significantly reduced feelings of 'calmness'. Sulpiride did not significantly affect any of the visual analogue scales. 4. All three anti-psychotic drugs had similar EEG effects with peak effect 2 to 4 h postdose. The profile was characterised by an increase in the proportion of slow wave activity (delta and theta) as well as decreased alpha (8-14 Hz) and faster (beta) wave activity. 5. Chlorpromazine reduced tapping rate and increased choice reaction movement times. Haloperidol reduced the flash fusion threshold frequency at 6 h post-dose. Sulpiride prolonged the duration of the manipulative motor task, particularly at 48 h post-dose. 6. All three anti-psychotic drugs impaired performance on the rapid information processing task. Chlorpromazine significantly reduced the number of correct letter pair identifications at 2, 4 and 6 h post-dose, haloperidol at 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 h post-dose, and sulpiride at 24 h post-dose.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Long-term experience with sumatriptan in the treatment of migraine.

Sumatriptan, a specific 5-hydroxytryptamine agonist, is a novel acute treatment for migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles of sumatriptan have previously been demonstrated in several controlled short-term studies. However, because migraine is a recurrent disorder which may persist throughout adult life, sustained efficacy and tolerability are essential if sumatriptan is to be of value in clinical practice. These aspects were therefore evaluated in a programme of three 12-month studies. Sustained efficacy with long-term use of single 100-mg oral doses has been demonstrated in an open study in which 288 patients treated 8,094 migraine attacks. The long-term safety profile of oral and subcutaneous sumatriptan has been evaluated in a total of 849 patients who treated 24,907 migraine attacks in studies lasting up to 1 year. Sumatriptan was well tolerated. Adverse events did not differ qualitatively or quantitatively from those in short-term studies, irrespective of the frequency of attacks or the number of doses used. Migraine attacks were effectively treated with doses less than the recommended maximum and there was no evidence of any adverse effect on attack frequency. In long-term studies the high efficacy of sumatriptan is maintained, and the adverse event profile is unchanged and unaffected by attack frequency.

Consequences of misrouting goldfish optic axons.

Cut optic axons regenerate into the goldfish tectum by indirect routes. To study the accuracy with which they terminate we made visuotectal maps before and immediately after cutting through the rostral tectum from its medial edge. This severed the normal pathway to medial tectum leaving intact only grossly misrouted axons. In fish mapped in this way, 3 months or more after contralateral optic nerve cuts, each initial map was essentially normal. After a tectal cut the electrical responses were usually weaker; but their receptive field positions proved to match very closely those noted previously for the same recording sites. The mean angular change was only 8.48 degrees and much of this could be accounted for by experimental errors. In fish mapped 6 months or more after attempts to cross-unite the optic tract brachia, initial maps were less regular. Some showed gross rearrangement of groups of terminals; and recognizable irregularities persisted in two fish mapped again after a further 4 or 5 months. However, maps made after tectal cuts in such fish were not noticeably less regular than the initial maps. Field position changes averaged 17.85 degrees. In both groups misrouted axons, filled with horseradish peroxidase after mapping and visualized in whole-mounts, crossed the tectum from lateral regions to reach the medial recording sites. The small field position changes in both groups confirm that axons from detectable terminals only among their retinal neighbours; nevertheless the irregular maps seen after tract cross-union lead us to expect the orderly arrangement of the normal pathway to contribute significantly to the precision of the normal map.

Treatment of migraine attacks with subcutaneous sumatriptan: first placebo-controlled study. The Subcutaneous Sumatriptan International Study Group.

The results of the very first large-scale placebo-controlled dose-response trial with the novel selective 5-hydroxytryptamine1-like (5HT1-like) receptor agonist sumatriptan are presented. We studied the efficacy and tolerability of subcutaneous injections of 1 mg, 2 mg and 3 mg of sumatriptan in alleviating migraine attacks in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre clinical trial. Six-hundred and ninety patients were randomized and 685 received study medication. At 30 min, reduction of headache severity to mild or none (primary efficacy endpoint) was achieved in 22% (95% CI: 15-28%) of placebo-treated patients and in 39% (CI: 31-46%) of patients treated with 1 mg sumatriptan, 44% (CI: 36-51%) treated with 2 mg sumatriptan and 55% (CI: 48-63%) treated with 3 mg sumatriptan. Differences from placebo were 17% (CI: 8-27%) for 1 mg sumatriptan, 22% (CI: 13-32%) for 2 mg sumatriptan and 34% (CI: 24-44%) for 3 mg sumatriptan (p < 0.001 for all three comparisons). Other migraine symptoms were also more effectively treated by sumatriptan than by placebo. Subsequently, an open-label 3 mg dose subcutaneous sumatriptan was given to partial or non-responders. Thirty minutes after this open dose the response rate to sumatriptan had improved to between 70 and 80%. Adverse events after sumatriptan were minor and short-lived. We conclude that subcutaneous sumatriptan is well tolerated in doses up to 3 + 3 mg and may rapidly abort migraine attacks.

Subcutaneous sumatriptan in the acute treatment of cluster headache: a dose comparison study. The Sumatriptan Cluster Headache Study Group.

This multicentre, double-blind, randomised, crossover study compared the efficacy, safety and tolerability of subcutaneous sumatriptan (6 mg and 12 mg) with placebo in 134 in-patients with cluster headache. Headache improvement to mild or no pain at 5, 10 and 15 min after treatment was recorded. At 10 min, headache relief was reported by 25% (placebo), 49% (6 mg) and 63% (12 mg) of patients and at 15 min the results were 35% (placebo), 75% (6 mg) and 80% (12 mg) (p < 0.001 for all comparisons with placebo). The 12 mg dose was not significantly better than the 6 mg dose and was associated with more adverse events. The 6 mg dose is therefore recommended for the acute treatment of cluster headache.

Sumatriptan and cerebral perfusion in healthy volunteers.

1. The effect of sumatriptan on regional cerebral perfusion was studied in healthy volunteers. 2. Intravenous sumatriptan (2 mg) had no detectable effect on regional cerebral perfusion as measured using a SPECT system with 99technetiumm labelled hexemethylpropyleneamineoxime. 3. Sumatriptan had no effect on pulse, blood pressure or ECG indices. 4. All six volunteers experienced minor adverse effects during the intravenous infusion.

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study of subcutaneous sumatriptan in general practice.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic response to sumatriptan in the acute migraine attack, MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and thirty migraineurs diagnosed by their general practitioners in accordance with their usual practice were included in the study. The patients treated two migraine attacks at home by subcutaneous injection of sumatriptan or placebo for the first attack and the alternative medication, i.e. placebo or sumatriptan, for the second attack (crossover). Following treatment, a neurology resident interviewed and examined the patients. RESULTS: When sumatriptan was compared to placebo, significantly more of the 209 evaluable patients reported headache relief at 1 h (56% vs 8%, p < 0.001) and 2 h (62% vs 15%, p < 0.001) after the first injection. Resolution of nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia was significantly more common in patients on sumatriptan than in those on placebo (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The adverse events were usually transient and of mild or moderate severity; however, three patients withdrew due to adverse events. Ninety-five percent of patients evaluated by a neurology resident met the IHS criteria for migraine. CONCLUSION: In general practice, sumatriptan taken subcutaneously using an autoinjector at home was an effective and well tolerated acute treatment for migraine.

Cluster headache attacks treated for up to three months with subcutaneous sumatriptan (6 mg). Sumatriptan Cluster Headache Long-term Study Group.

In the first three months of a 24-month open study to assess the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg in the long-term acute treatment of cluster headache, 138 patients treated a maximum of two attacks daily each with a single 6 mg injection. A total of 6353 attacks were treated. Adverse events, reported in 28% of sumatriptan-treated attacks, were qualitatively similar to those seen in migraine long-term trials. Their incidence did not increase with frequent use of sumatriptan. There were no clinically significant treatment effects on vital signs, ECG recordings or laboratory parameters. Headache relief (a reduction from very severe, severe or moderate pain to mild or no pain) at 15 min was obtained for a median of 96% of attacks treated. There was no indication of tachyphylaxis, decrease in the speed of response, or increased frequency of attacks with long-term treatment. This study demonstrated that, in long-term use, subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg is a well-tolerated and effective acute treatment for cluster headache.