Days of symptoms and days of hospital admission before surgery do not influence the results of cholecystectomy in moderate acute calculous cholecystitis-Cholecystectomy remains the best treatment.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: early cholecystectomy is the gold-standard treatment for acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC), although many surgeons still prefer delayed cholecystectomy for grade II to avoid surgical complications. The aim of this study was to analyze the postoperative morbidity and mortality of Tokyo Guidelines grade-II ACC as treated with cholecystectomy, taking into account the days of symptoms and days since hospital admission. MATERIALS AND METHODS: a unicenter, retrospective study was performed based on a prospective database. Patients with grade-II ACC treated with cholecystectomy were selected. Patients were analyzed according to days of symptoms (DS) and days of hospital admission (DHA) until cholecystectomy. Patients were subdivided into 3 groups: < 3 days, 3-5 days, and > 5 days. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for morbidity and mortality. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-squared or Fischer's exact test. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: a total of 998 patients with ACC diagnosis were included; 567 with grade-II ACC and 368 treated with cholecystectomy. Nearly 90 % were treated laparoscopically and 48.1 % underwent surgery the same day of emergency admission. With regard to DS and DHA, there were no statistical differences for severe postoperative complications, although a greater number of complications were detected in the > 5 DS group (p: 0.32) and > 5 DHA group (p: 0.00). Statistically significant differences were found in DS for mortality (p: 0.04). Postoperative length of stay was longer for > 5 DHA group cholecystectomies (p > 0.05). There were no differences with regard to hospital readmission. CONCLUSION: with regard to DS or DHA until cholecystectomy, there were no statistically significant differences related to severe postoperative complications, length of stay, or mortality.

Failure to perform index cholecystectomy during acute cholecystitis results in significant morbidity for patients who present with recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Although index cholecystectomy is considered the treatment of choice for acute cholecystitis (AC), many hospital systems struggle to provide such a service. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of failure to perform index cholecystectomy in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Between June 2010 and December 2015, all patients presenting to one hospital with an initial attack of AC were enrolled into a prospective database. Patient's records were reviewed up until point of delayed cholecystectomy or for a minimum of 24 months after the initial presentation with AC. Recurrent AC was defined as early (<6 weeks from initial discharge) or late (>6 weeks from initial discharge). RESULTS: In total 998 patients presented with AC, 409 (41%) of whom were discharged without index cholecystectomy. Eighty-three (20%) patients presented with AC recurrence (ACR). Compared to the first AC episode, patients were more likely to present with grade III AC and suffer significantly greater morbidity (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). A prior history of biliary disease was associated with ACR (p = 0.002). ACR occurred early in 48 (58%) patients and delayed in 35 (42%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty percent of patients discharged without cholecystectomy after their first attack of ACR will develop recurrence within the first two years. Half of ACR will occur within 6 weeks. Patients who present with ACR are more likely to develop more severe AC and are likely to suffer greater morbidity as compared to their first attack.

Litiasic acute cholecystitis: application of Tokyo Guidelines in severity grading.

BACKGROUND: Acute calculous cholecystitis (AC) is one of the most frequent surgical emergencies in our field. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the treatment of choice, although not sufficiently widespread. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the application of the Tokyo Guidelines in the management of AC and to determine the influence of the degree of severity on management and prognosis. METHOD: Prospective, observational study of patients with a primary diagnosis of AC between 2010 and 2015.. Exclusion criteria: AC recurrence; AC as a secondary diagnosis; acalculous cholecystitis; concurrent biliary pathology. Severity was classified according Tokyo 2013 Guidelines. RESULTS: 998 patients were included: 338 (33.9%) mild AC, 567 (56.8%) moderate AC, and 93 (9.3%) severe AC. A total of 582 (58.3%) patients were operated on. Postoperative complications Dindo-Clavien grade ≥ II 12.6%: mild AC 3.6%; moderate AC 12.2%; severe AC 49.0% (p < 0.001). Overall mortality 2%: mild AC 0%; moderate AC 0.5%; severe AC 18.0% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains the treatment of choice for mild and moderate AC. In patients with severe AC, the risks and benefits of surgery should be assessed, given the high degree of complications and associated mortality.

ANTECEDENTES: La colecistitis aguda litiásica (CA) es una de las urgencias quirúrgicas más frecuentes en nuestro medio. La colecistectomía laparoscópica se considera el tratamiento de elección, aunque sigue sin ser una realidad su práctica generalizada. OBJETIVO: Analizar la aplicación de las Guías de Tokio en el manejo de la CA y determinar la influencia de la gravedad en el manejo y el pronóstico. MÉTODO: Estudio prospectivo, observacional, de pacientes con diagnóstico primario de CA entre 2010 y 2015. Criterios de exclusión: recidiva de CA, CA como diagnóstico secundario, CA alitiásica u otra patología biliar concomitante. Se ha clasificado la gravedad según las Guías de Tokio de 2013. RESULTADOS: Se incluyen 998 CA: 338 (33.9%) leves, 567 (56.8%) moderadas y 93 (9.3%) graves. Se operaron 582 pacientes (58.3%), y posteriormente 15 precisaron rescate. Complicaciones posoperatorias Dindo-Clavien ≥ 12,6%: CA leve 3,6%, CA moderada 12,2%, CA grave 49% (p < 0.001). Mortalidad global 2%: CA leve 0%, CA moderada 0.5%, CA grave 18% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIÓN: La colecistectomía laparoscópica sigue siendo el tratamiento de elección para la CA leve y moderada. En pacientes con CA grave debe valorarse el riesgo-beneficio de la cirugía, dadas las complicaciones y la mortalidad asociadas.

Acute Cholecystitis in Very Elderly Patients: Disease Management, Outcomes, and Risk Factors for Complications.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the characteristics, management, and outcomes of acute cholecystitis in patients ≥80 years. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective single-center patient registry. RESULTS: The study population was composed of 348 patients, which were divided into two groups: those younger (Group A) and those older (Group B) than the median age (85.4 years). Although demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar, the disease management was clearly different, with older patients undergoing cholecystectomy less frequently (n=80 46.0% in Group A vs n=39 22.4% in Group B; p < 0.001). The outcomes in both groups of age were similar, with 30-day mortality of 3.7%, morbidity of 17.2%, and readmissions of 4.2% and two-year AC recurrence in nonoperated patients of 22.5%. No differences were seen between operated and no operated patients. Severe (Grade III) AC was the only independent factor significantly associated with mortality (OR 86.05 (95% CI: 11-679); p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with AC, the choice of therapeutic options was not limited by the age per se, but rather by the disease severity (grade III AC) and/or poor physical status (ASA III-IV). In case of grade I-II AC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed and yield good results even in very old patients. Patients with grade III AC present high risk of morbidity and mortality, and the treatment should be individualized. ASA IV patients should avoid cholecystectomy, being antibiotic treatment and cholecystectomy the best option.