Stronger correlation between antibiotic use and the incidence of Clostridium difficile determined by culture results instead of faecal toxin detection only.

The detection of Clostridium difficile in previous studies evaluating antibiotic use as a risk factor was limited to toxin assay tests. The reported associations may have been misleading due to the low sensitivity of toxin assay tests compared to culture results. Antibiotic use and the incidence of C. difficile of 19 units (wards) over 5 years were analysed. Stool samples were tested for toxin A/B and cultured. The correlation of antibiotic use with the incidence of C. difficile determined by culture results was compared to the correlation determined by toxin assay results. Additionally, single antibiotics were analysed as risk factors. Of 5,772 faecal samples tested for C. difficile, 154 single-first cases were detected by the toxin assay and 251 additional single-first cases by culture. Antibiotic use was a significantly stronger risk factor in the correlation based on the culture results (R² = 0.63) versus toxin assay results (R² = 0.40). Multivariate analysis did not improve the correlation significantly and only the group of broad-spectrum beta-lactams was identified as an independent risk factor. The correlation between antibiotic use and C. difficile incidence rates significantly improves if detection is not limited to faecal toxin assays. Therefore, antibiotic pressure was previously underestimated as a risk factor.

How much money can be saved by applying intravenous antibiotics once instead of several times a day?

BACKGROUND: The preparation, administration and monitoring of intravenous (IV) applications are time consuming and require human resources. We estimated the potential time and cost savings by replacing antibiotics given 3-4 times daily with antibiotics with similar spectrum and efficacy given once daily. METHODS: The savings of indirect costs were estimated based on the antibiotic consumption data of a two-year period (i.e. 2007 and 2008), a nurse's mean workload per application and the average nurse's salary in Switzerland. RESULTS: The consumption of IV antibiotics in 2007 and 2008 at the University Hospital of Basel was 29.0 and 32.2 defined daily doses (DDD) per 100 patient days, respectively. Nurses spent an estimated 13,786 h on the application of the estimated 82,715 does of IV antibiotics. A total of 56,404 applications or nursing staff time costs of 338,436 Swiss Francs (CHF; 236,669 ), equal to 16% of the overall costs spent on purchasing antibiotics in the year 2008, may have been saved by switching multiple-dose antibiotics to a hypothetical once-daily antibiotic. Including disposable materials, 21% or 456,884 CHF (319,499 ) could be saved annually (purchase costs not taken into account). CONCLUSION: We found a potential cost saving of 21% of the purchase costs in a 750-bed institution. Hence, indirect costs should be included in the calculation of the total cost for the application of broad-spectrum IV antibiotics. Switching from a 3-4 times daily application to a once-daily antibiotic should be considered if a once-daily antibiotic is deemed equally effective and has a similar spectrum.

Individualising drug dispensaries in a university hospital.

BACKGROUND: In hospitals and other healthcare institutions drugs are routinely stored in designated satellite areas on the wards. Often ad hoc decisions are made by clinicians and nurses regarding drug type and quantity to be stored. As a result the number of different drugs and drug packages in storage tends to increase, which may lead to inefficient drug handling and become a potential risk factor in the medication control process. Based on an extended analysis of drug inventories on three different wards it was hypothesized that a ward-individualised formulary (WIF) can halve the number of different drugs and drug packages in a drug dispensary and hence reduce bound capital, money lost through expired drugs, and facilitate safer drug handling. The interdisciplinary intervention described here took place on three 40-bed wards in a 700-bed university hospital housing patients in general internal medicine, haematology, nephrology and oncology. METHODS: A WIF was defined by including all drugs from the hospital formulary ordered at least three times in the past six months. A pharmacist, a nurse and a clinician reviewed the inclusion list of drugs and clinicians were strongly encouraged to prescribe drugs primarily from the WIF. Drugs excluded from the WIF were removed from the drug dispensaries and the number of included drug packages stored in the remote dispensaries was reduced according to their order history. Drug inventory on the wards was monitored from February 2004 to April 2006. RESULTS: The initial drug dispensary inventories on wards A, B and C consisted of 2031, 1667 and 1536 packages with 943, 897 and 831 different drugs valued at h 83 931, h 44 590 and h 57 285. respectively. After adjusting the drug dispensaries according to the WIF drug dispensary inventories on wards A, B and C consisted of 808 (-60%), 600 (-64%) and 485 (-68%) packages with 415 (-56%), 334 (-63%) and 376 (-55%) different drugs valued euro 28 012 (-67%), euro 10 381 (-77%) an euro 17 898 (-69%). The overall reductions the number of packages, the different drugs and the drug value were comparable (>50%) and remained low during the entire observation time (A: 18 months, B: 13 months, C: 8 months). CONCLUSION: Rearranging dispensaries by individualizing the drug inventory according to the needs of the ward by introducing a WIF is a valuable means to significantly (>50%) reduce [1] the number of drug packages, [2] the number of different drugs stored and [3] the capital bound drugs. The positive effects of the WIF are supported by the interdisciplinary interaction of the different professional groups involved in the medication process. The leaner drug dispensaries offer optimal basic conditions for introducing new IT-based systems to further increase the safety of the medication process.

Association of daptomycin use with resistance development in Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia-a 7-year individual and population-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to analyse the association between use of daptomycin and MICs of daptomycin in Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients aged ≥18 years with E. faecium bacteraemia hospitalized at the University Hospital Basel from 2008 to 2014. We determined daptomycin MICs by Etests and used pulsed field gel electrophoresis to determine clonal relatedness. We recorded the defined daily dosages of daptomycin (DDDs) per 100 patient-days and clinical data from charts. We correlated daptomycin MIC with use of daptomycin in patients with recurrence/persistence. RESULTS: In 195 E. faecium bacteraemias originating from 162 patients the median MIC for daptomycin was 2 mg/L (IQR 2-3); 30% (15.4%) isolates had a MIC ≥4 mg/L and 6 (3.1%) were resistant (MIC >4 mg/L) according to CLSI criteria. The usage of daptomycin increased more than four-fold from 0.36 DDDs/100 patient-days in 2008 to 1.6 in 2014. In 13 of 28 (42.9%) patients with a relapsing or persisting bacteraemia, the daptomycin MIC of the second isolate increased from a median of 2.0 to 2.5 mg/L (p 0.010); 3/13 (23.1%) developed resistance. All patients with the same clone in the first and second episode and an increase of daptomycin MIC had been treated with daptomycin (6/6 versus 1/7 p 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin MICs and Daptomycin usage increased over time. On an individual patient level daptomycin exposure was associated with an increased MIC in subsequent bacteraemia episodes. Diversity did not indicate a clonal origin and argues for a de novo development of resistance.

[A case of complex discharge medication]. / Komplexe Spitalaustrittsmedikation.

At discharge of a 72 year old epileptic patient from the hospital, the clinician prescribed the switch from Orfiril® to Lamictal®. The general practitioner misinterpreted the confusing medication list and made handwritten changes. Later on, family members of the patient observed a discrepancy between the handwritten comments of the general practitioner and the medication list of the clinician. The medication could be re-evaluated in cooperation with the hospital pharmacy and the general practitioner. An early interdisciplinary collaboration would help improving patient safety.