Phase I study of opaganib, an oral sphingosine kinase 2-specific inhibitor, in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease and there is an unmet medical need for novel therapeutic drugs that do not share similar mechanisms of action with currently available agents. Sphingosine kinase 2 (SK2) is an innovative molecular target for anticancer therapy. We previously reported that treatment with SK2 inhibitor opaganib inhibited myeloma tumor growth in vitro and in vivo in a mouse xenograft model. In the current study, we performed a phase I study of opaganib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Thirteen patients with RRMM previously treated with immunomodulatory agents and proteasome inhibitors were enrolled and treated with single-agent opaganib at three oral dosing regimens (250 mg BID, 500 mg BID, or 750 mg BID, 28 days as a cycle). Safety and maximal tolerated dose (MTD) were determined. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and correlative studies were also performed. Opaganib was well tolerated up to a dose of 750 mg BID. The most common possibly related adverse event (AE) was decreased neutrophil counts. There were no serious AEs considered to be related to opaganib. MTD was determined as at least 750 mg BID. On an intent-to-treat basis, one patient (7.7%) in the 500 mg BID dose cohort showed a very good partial response, and one other patient (7.7%) achieved stable disease for 3 months. SK2 is an innovative molecular target for antimyeloma therapy. The first-in-class SK2 inhibitor opaganib is generally safe for administration to RRMM patients, and has potential therapeutic activity in these patients. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02757326.

Absence of QT prolongation after administration of a 24-mg bimodal-release ondansetron pill (RHB-102).

OBJECTIVES: Prospective data evaluating the effect of ondansetron on the corrected QT (QTc) interval is lacking in emergency department clinical use. As part of a randomized trial of a 24-mg bimodal-release ondansetron (RHB-102) pill, we tested the effect of RHB-102 compared to placebo on QTc change. METHODS: This was a planned safety outcome analysis within a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The trial compared the effects of RHB-102 among patients ≥12 years who presented to 21 centers with symptoms of acute gastroenteritis. Patients with an initial baseline electrocardiogram as well as a follow-up electrocardiogram 4 h later were included in the analysis. The safety endpoint for this analysis was the change from baseline in QTc interval at 4 h, the median time at which ondansetron serum level peaks. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients were included with a mean baseline QTc in the RHB-102 and placebo arms of 410 and 406 ms, respectively. There was no difference in the change in QTc at 4 h post-study drug administration between the RHB-102 (+4, 95% CI 1-8 ms) and placebo group (+5, 95% CI 1-9 ms). In the RHB-102 arm, 6.6% of patients had a QTc change >30 ms and in the placebo arm 3.6% (p = 0.48). No patient in either arm had a QTc change >60 ms after study drug administration. CONCLUSION: In patients with normal baseline QTc, 24-mg bimodal-release ondansetron did not prolong the QTc in comparison to placebo.

Bimodal Release Ondansetron Improves Stool Consistency and Symptomatology in Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Previous, small studies have suggested that ondansetron has beneficial effects in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). This randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of daily 12 mg RHB-102, an investigational bimodal release ondansetron tablet, in IBS-D. METHODS: Men and women with IBS-D by the Rome III criteria, Bristol Stool Scale ≥6 on 2 or more days weekly, and average daily worst pain intensity ≥3/10 were randomized 60:40 to RHB-102 or placebo once daily for 8 weeks. The primary end point was overall stool consistency response for at least 4 of 8 weeks. Secondary end points included overall worst abdominal pain and overall composite response, defined as response on both abdominal pain and stool consistency end points. RESULTS: Overall stool consistency response rates were 56.0% and 35.3% (RHB-102 vs placebo, P = 0.036) and similar among male and female patients. Overall pain response (50.7% vs 39.2%) and composite response rates (40.0% vs 25.5%) favored RHB-102, although these differences were not statistically significant. Stool consistency response rates were enhanced in patients with baseline C-reactive protein above the median (2.09 mg/L), 59.5%, vs 23.1% (P = 0.009). Overall rates of adverse events were similar, with a higher rate of constipation in RHB-102 patients (13.3% vs 3.9%) that resolved rapidly on withholding treatment. DISCUSSION: RHB-102 was effective and safe in the treatment of men and women with IBS-D. Baseline C-reactive protein seemed to be predictive of response.

A randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study of upamostat, a host-directed serine protease inhibitor, for outpatient treatment of COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: We performed a pilot study of upamostat, a serine protease inhibitor, in outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19 before a pivotal trial. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 patients with ≥2 moderate-severe symptoms onset within 5 days were randomized to oral upamostat 200 or 400 mg or placebo daily for 14 days. Patients completed COVID-19 symptom questionnaires daily for 28 days, then thrice weekly for 4 weeks, and underwent physical and laboratory examinations periodically. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients enrolled of which 20 received a placebo or upamostat 200 mg daily; 21 received upamostat 400 mg daily. Treatment was well tolerated; only one patient (upamostat 400) reported a drug-related adverse event, mild skin rash; no patient discontinued owing to a drug-related adverse event. The median time to a sustained recovery from severe symptoms was 8, 4, and 3 days for the three treatment groups, respectively. New severe symptoms developed in 20% of the placebo group vs 2.4% in the combined upamostat groups, (P = 0.036). Three placebo patients (15%) versus no upamostat patients were hospitalized for worsening COVID (P= 0.03). The mean d-dimer level remained constant in placebo patients but decreased by 38% and 48% in upamostat 200 and 400 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Upamostat was well tolerated, shortened recovery time, and decreased new severe symptoms and hospitalization.

Recent Progress in the Development of Opaganib for the Treatment of Covid-19.

The Covid-19 pandemic driven by the SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to exert extensive humanitarian and economic stress across the world. Although antivirals active against mild disease have been identified recently, new drugs to treat moderate and severe Covid-19 patients are needed. Sphingolipids regulate key pathologic processes, including viral proliferation and pathologic host inflammation. Opaganib (aka ABC294640) is a first-in-class clinical drug targeting sphingolipid metabolism for the treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases. Recent work demonstrates that opaganib also has antiviral activity against several viruses including SARS-CoV-2. A recently completed multinational Phase 2/3 clinical trial of opaganib in patients hospitalized with Covid-19 demonstrated that opaganib can be safely administered to these patients, and more importantly, resulted in a 62% decrease in mortality in a large subpopulation of patients with moderately severe Covid-19. Furthermore, acceleration of the clearance of the virus was observed in opaganib-treated patients. Understanding the biochemical mechanism for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of opaganib is essential for optimizing Covid-19 treatment protocols. Opaganib inhibits three key enzymes in sphingolipid metabolism: sphingosine kinase-2 (SK2); dihydroceramide desaturase (DES1); and glucosylceramide synthase (GCS). Herein, we describe a tripartite model by which opaganib suppresses infection and replication of SARS-CoV-2 by inhibiting SK2, DES1 and GCS. The potential impact of modulation of sphingolipid signaling on multi-organ dysfunction in Covid-19 patients is also discussed.

A randomised placebo-controlled multicentre trial of intravenous semapimod HCl for moderate to severe Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVE: Semapimod, a small molecule known to inhibit proinflammatory cytokine activity, was studied to determine the optimal dose necessary to achieve a response in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (CD04) was carried out followed by an open-label extension study (CD05). The trial was conducted in international multicentre outpatient clinics and included patients with moderate to severe CD (Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) 250-400). Placebo was administered for 3 days; 60 mg semapimod intravenously for 1 day with placebo for 2 days; or 60 mg semapimod intravenously for 3 days. Participants who completed CD04 could participate in the open-label extension study, CD05, to receive up to five additional semapimod HCl 60 mg daily doses three times every 6-8 weeks. The main outcome measures were CDAI, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Inflammation Score (CDEIS) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration. RESULTS: 152 patients were randomised in CD04. Responses for 1 and 3 day regimens were similar to placebo for CDAI (p=0.82), IBDQ (p=0.85), CDEIS (p=0.57) and CRP (p=0.40). The only noteworthy treatment-related safety finding was infusion reaction (phlebitis): 7.3, 34.8 and 62.7% for the placebo and 1 and 3 day semapimod treatment groups, respectively (p<0.001). In the open-label CD05 study (included=119 patients) a posthoc analysis showed that the mean CDAI improved in patients receiving 6 compared with < or = 3 cumulative doses (204.1+/-83 vs 251.4+/-103.05, p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Single and 3 day dosing of semapimod (< or = 180 mg) was ineffective for the treatment of moderate to severe CD. However, cumulative dosing > or = 360 mg was associated with decreased CDAI in a limited number of patients.

Bimodal Release Ondansetron for Acute Gastroenteritis Among Adolescents and Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Vomiting resulting from acute gastroenteritis is commonly treated with intravenous antiemetics in acute care settings. If oral treatment were beneficial, patients might not need intravenous administered hydration or medication. Furthermore, a long-acting treatment could provide sustained relief from nausea and vomiting. Objective: To determine whether an experimental long-acting bimodal release ondansetron tablet decreases gastroenteritis-related vomiting and eliminates the need for intravenous therapy for 24 hours after administration. Design, Setting, and Participants: This placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trial included patients from 19 emergency departments and 2 urgent care centers in the United States from December 8, 2014, to February 17, 2017. Patients 12 years and older with at least 2 vomiting episodes from presumed gastroenteritis in the previous 4 hours and symptoms with less than 36 hours' duration were randomized using a 3:2 active to placebo ratio. Analyses were performed on an intent-to-treat basis and conducted from June 1, 2017, to November 1, 2017. Intervention: Bimodal release ondansetron tablet containing 6 mg of immediate release ondansetron and 18 mg of a 24-hour release matrix for a total of 24 mg of ondansetron. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment success was defined as no further vomiting, no need for rescue medication, and no intravenous hydration for 24 hours after bimodal release ondansetron administration. Results: Analysis included 321 patients (mean [SD] age, 29.0 [11.1] years; 195 [60.7%] women), with 192 patients in the bimodal release ondansetron group and 129 patients in the placebo group. Treatment successes were observed in 126 patients in the bimodal release ondansetron group (65.6%) compared with 70 patients in the placebo group (54.3%), with an 11.4% (95% CI, 0.3%-22.4%) absolute probability difference. The proportion of treatment success was 21% higher among patients who received bimodal release ondansetron compared with those who received a placebo (relative risk, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00-1.46; P = .04). In an analysis including only patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute gastroenteritis and no major protocol violations, there were 123 treatment successes (69.5%) in the bimodal release ondansetron group compared with 67 treatment successes (54.9%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.05-1.53; P = .01). Adverse effects were infrequent and similar to the known safety profile of ondansetron. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that a long-acting bimodal release oral ondansetron tablet was an effective antiemetic among adolescents and adults with moderate to severe vomiting from acute gastroenteritis. The drug benefits extended to 24 hours after administration. Bimodal release ondansetron may decrease the need for intravenous access and emergency department care to manage acute gastroenteritis. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02246439.

A randomized trial of docosahexaenoic acid supplementation during the third trimester of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To hypothesize that higher intake of docosahexaenoic acid, an n-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid, would increase duration of gestation and birth weight in US women. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled, clinical trial. Subjects were enrolled in an ambulatory clinic where they received prenatal care. This was a population-based sample. Most subjects received government assistance for medical care and most were black (73%). Subjects were enrolled between the 24th and 28th week of pregnancy and consumed docosahexaenoic acid (33 or 133 mg) from eggs until parturition. Gestational age and birth weight were the main study outcomes. Infant length and head circumference, preterm birth, and low birth weight were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-three percent of subjects completed the study (291 of 350 enrolled). No subject was discontinued for an adverse event. After controlling for important predefined risk factors and confounding variables, gestation increased by 6.0 +/- 2.3 days (P =.009) in the higher docosahexaenoic acid group. Birth weight, length, and head circumference increased, but did not reach statistical significance (P =.06-.18), although the increases could be clinically important indications of enhanced intrauterine growth. No safety concerns were raised by the study. CONCLUSION: Duration of gestation increased significantly when docosahexaenoic acid intake was increased during the last trimester of pregnancy. The increase in gestation was similar to that reported for interventions with much larger amounts of n-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Pharmacokinetics of a controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert at term.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to report the pharmacokinetic properties of misoprostol administered intravaginally to women at term via a controlled-release hydrogel polymer insert. METHODS: This open-label, dose escalation trial consisted of 31 nulliparous women at term who were treated intravaginally in cohorts of six with inserts containing reservoirs from 25 through 300 microg (7 at 200 microg) of misoprostol. Inserts remained intravaginally until the patient went into labor, developed adverse events, or completed 24 hours of treatment. Complete data about residual drug in the inserts and plasma concentrations of misoprostol acid were gathered for 27 and 25 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Misoprostol was released at a constant rate (5.1% total dose per hour) with the amount absorbed being directly proportional to the dose reservoir. For the 25-, 50-, 100-, 200-, and 300-microg reservoir doses, the maximum median plasma concentrations were 6.4, 11.3, 21.7, 40.8, and 74.2 pg/mL, respectively, and the area under the curve until drug removal was 39, 117, 223, 269, and 477 pg x h/mL. Regardless of dose, the peak plasma concentration occurred at approximately 7 hours after insertion and the elimination half-life of the misoprostol acid was 0.55 hours (95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 1.32 hours). CONCLUSIONS: Misoprostol is released from the vaginal insert in a controlled manner and is eliminated rapidly after removal. Pharmacokinetic parameters are proportional to the reservoir dose.

Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the maximum tolerable dose and to determine the efficacy of different misoprostol dose reservoirs in an intravaginal controlled-release hydrogel polymer. STUDY DESIGN: Nulliparous women at > or = 37 weeks' gestation requiring cervical ripening and induction of labor were treated with misoprostol in a controlled-release, retrievable hydrogel polymer vaginal insert. Sequential cohorts of 6 patients were to be treated with escalating dose reservoirs of 25, 50, 100, 200, and 300 mug. The insert was to be removed upon onset of active labor, at 24 hours, or earlier if treatment-related adverse events occurred. The safety end point was determination of the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) based on occurrence of hyperstimulation syndrome. Our primary efficacy end point was time to vaginal delivery. RESULTS: Increasing reservoir doses of misoprostol up to 100 microg produced more rapid increases in modified Bishop scores, less need for oxytocin, and a shorter time to vaginal delivery. Doses above 100 microg did not further enhance cervical ripening or shorten time to vaginal delivery. The median time to vaginal delivery was 14.2 hours using the 100 microg dose. Uterine hyperstimulation and adverse fetal heart rate effects occurred with the 200 and 300 microg inserts. CONCLUSION: The 100 microg vaginal insert resulted in successful cervical ripening and rapid vaginal delivery with an acceptable safety profile for future randomized clinical trials.

Inhibition of stress-activated MAP kinases induces clinical improvement in moderate to severe Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We investigated if inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) was beneficial in Crohn's disease. METHODS: Inhibition of JNK and p38 MAPK activation with CNI-1493, a guanylhydrazone, was tested in vitro. Twelve patients with severe Crohn's disease (mean baseline, CDAI 380) were randomly assigned to receive either 8 or 25 mg/m(2) CNI-1493 daily for 12 days. Clinical endpoints included safety, Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, and the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity. RESULTS: Colonic biopsies displayed enhanced JNK and p38 MAPK activation. CNI-1493 inhibition of both JNK and p38 phosphorylation was observed in vitro. Treatment resulted in diminished JNK phosphorylation and tumor necrosis factor production as well as significant clinical benefit and rapid endoscopic ulcer healing. No serious adverse events were noted. A CDAI decrease of 120 at week 4 (P = 0.005) and 146.5 at week 8 (P = 0.005) was observed. A clinical response was seen in 67% of patients at 4 weeks and 58% at 8 weeks. Clinical remission was observed in 25% of patients at week 4 and 42% at week 8. Endoscopic improvement occurred in all but 1 patient. Response was seen in 3 of 6 infliximab failures, 2 of whom showed remission. Fistulae healing occurred in 4 of 5 patients, and steroids were tapered in 89% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory MAPKs are critically involved in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease and their inhibition provides a novel therapeutic strategy.

Macrophage inhibitor, semapimod, reduces tumor necrosis factor-alpha in myocardium in a rat model of ischemic heart failure.

Pharmaceutical agents aimed at reducing tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) levels appeared to be attractive possibilities in the medical management of heart failure, as heart failure was shown to be associated with high TNF-alpha levels. However, therapies specifically targeting TNF-alpha failed to show any survival benefit. We examined whether a broad inhibition of inflammatory cytokine production secondary to macrophage inhibition would be more effective at improving cardiac function in the setting of heart failure. To this end, we studied Semapimod (formerly known as CNI-1493), a synthetic guanylhydrazone that inhibits macrophage activation and the production of several inflammatory cytokines. Left anterior descending coronary ligation surgery was performed on each animal to induce a myocardial infarction. After confirming heart failure by echocardiography, the animals were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) rats with myocardial infarct receiving high-dose Semapimod, 10 mg/kg/d (MI-H, N = 13); (2) rats with myocardial infarct receiving low-dose Semapimod, 3 mg/kg/d (MI-L, N = 9); (3) rats with myocardial infarct receiving vehicle treatment, 2.5% mannitol in water (MI-0, N = 9); and (4) control rats with sham operation and vehicle treatment (Sham, N = 10). Both Semapimod and vehicle treatments were administered by daily tail vein injections over a course of five days. Echoes were repeated at 2, 5, and 9 weeks following treatment. At 9 weeks, hemodynamic data were collected and the animals were euthanized. Trichrome staining was done to assess infarct, and immunohistochemistry was performed to assess TNF-alpha levels. Prior to drug administration, serum was taken from 5 random rats. No detectable level of TNF-alpha was seen (lower limit of detection for the assay used = 12.5 pg/mL). Also prior to any treatment, echocardiography confirmed significant cardiac impairment of rats undergoing LAD ligation as compared with sham. Over the course of the 9 weeks, there were 4 deaths, all in the MI-H group. There was no difference between Semapimod-treated animals and vehicle-treated MI animals in any echocardiographic or hemodynamic parameter. TNF-alpha staining in the noninfarcted region was evident only in the MI groups, not the sham group. When blindly compared on a semiquantitative scale (ie, 0 = no visible staining to 3 = marked staining), a significant difference in staining was observed between MI-0 versus MI-H (1.19 +/- 0.32 versus 0.33 +/- 0.14; P = 0.03) and between MI-0 and MI-L (1.19 +/- 0.32 versus 0.39 +/- 0.22; P = 0.05). In this setting, despite the fact that Semapimod treatment decreased tissue TNF-alpha levels, it did not improve cardiac function, and at high doses it was associated with higher mortality. These results in a rodent model confirm the results of clinical trials with etanercept and infliximab (ie, that decreasing TNF levels in plasma or tissues does not improve cardiac function and may actually increase mortality).