Cardiovascular comorbidities are increased in U.S. patients with haemophilia A: a retrospective database analysis.

There is conflicting evidence in the literature on whether individuals with haemophilia in the USA have greater, reduced, or similar risks for cardiovascular disease as the general population. This study evaluated the prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities among USA males with haemophilia A, relative to an unaffected general male population with similar characteristics. Males with haemophilia A and continuous insurance coverage were identified by ICD-9-CM code 286.0 (1 January 2007-31 December 2009) using the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Research Databases. Individuals with haemophilia A were exact matched 1:3 with males without a diagnosis of haemophilia A. The prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities identified by ICD-9-CM code was determined for matched cohorts. Of the study population, 2506 were grouped in the haemophilia A cohort and 7518 in the general cohort. Proportions of individuals with haemorrhagic stroke (2.0% vs. 0.5%, P < 0.001), ischemic stroke (4.7% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.001), coronary artery disease (10.7% vs. 5.8%, P < 0.001), myocardial infarction (0.8% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.003), hypertension (22.6% vs. 15.5%, P < 0.001), hyperlipidaemia (15.9% vs. 11.9%, P < 0.001), arterial thrombosis (12.1% vs. 5.9%, P < 0.001), and venous thrombosis (4.4% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001) were significantly greater for the haemophilia A cohort. Results were consistent across most age groups, and comorbidities appeared at an earlier age in those with haemophilia A than in the general population. Among the USA haemophilia A population cardiovascular comorbidities are more prevalent and they appear earlier in life in comparison to the general male population, suggesting the need for earlier, enhanced screening for age-related comorbidities in the haemophilia community.

Effect of late prophylaxis in hemophilia on joint status: a randomized trial.

Essentials High-quality data are lacking on use of prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia and arthropathy. SPINART was a 3-year randomized clinical trial of late/tertiary prophylaxis vs on-demand therapy. Prophylaxis improved function, quality of life, activity and pain but not joint structure by MRI. Prophylaxis improves function but must start before joint bleeding onset to prevent arthropathy. SUMMARY: Background Limited data exist on the impact of prophylaxis on adults with severe hemophilia A and pre-existing joint disease. Objectives To describe 3-year bleeding, joint health and structure, health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and other outcomes from the open-label, randomized, multinational SPINART study. Patients/Methods Males aged 12-50 years with severe hemophilia A, ≥ 150 factor VIII exposure days, no inhibitors and no prophylaxis for > 12 consecutive months in the past 5 years were randomized to sucrose-formulated recombinant FVIII prophylaxis or on-demand therapy (OD). Data collected included total and joint bleeding events (BEs), joint structure (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), joint health (Colorado Adult Joint Assessment Scale [CAJAS]), HRQoL, pain, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), activity, and treatment satisfaction. Results Following 3 years of prophylaxis, adults maintained excellent adherence, with a 94% reduction in BEs despite severe pre-existing arthropathy; 35.7% and 76.2% of prophylaxis participants were bleed-free or had fewer than two BEs per year, respectively. As compared with OD, prophylaxis was associated with improved CAJAS scores (least squares [LS] mean, - 0.31 [n = 42] versus + 0.63 [n = 42]) and HAEMO-QoL-A scores (LS mean, + 3.98 [n = 41] versus - 6.00 [n = 42]), less chronic pain (50% decrease), and approximately two-fold less HRU; activity, Euro QoL-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L) scores and satisfaction scores also favored prophylaxis. However, MRI score changes were not different for prophylaxis versus OD (LS mean, + 0.79 [n = 41] versus + 0.96 [n = 38]). Conclusions Over a period of 3 years, prophylaxis versus OD in adults with severe hemophilia A and arthropathy led to decreased bleeding, pain, and HRU, better joint health, activity, satisfaction, and HRQoL, but no reduction in structural arthropathy progression, suggesting that pre-existing joint arthropathy may be irreversible.