The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients - a national cancer centre experience.

Purpose or objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant healthcare implications, with care for cancer patients compromised due to resource diversion towards battling the pandemic. We aim to investigate the impact of the peak wave of the pandemic in 2020 on the delivery of cancer care in Singapore, specifically via our nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment data. This study applies real world numbers to the impact of COVID-19 on cancer care delivery in Singapore. The choice of nasopharyngeal cancer allows a good direct estimate of common treatment measures such as time to biopsy, time to staging scans, time to treatment commencement, due to its clear protocol and algorithms for staging and treatment; thus serving as an excellent surrogate for the effectiveness and timeliness of the different aspects of cancer care delivery. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, we included all patients with newly diagnosed NPC from 1st January to 31st May from 2017 to 2020 at our centre. This time period was chosen as it coincided with the period in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic where there was the most strain on healthcare resources and the most restrictions on population movement within Singapore, which may impact on healthcare seeking behaviour. Narrowing down the time period to the first 5 months of the 4 respective years also allowed us to reduce the effect of annual seasonal variation in patient numbers seen as a result of holidays and festive periods such as the Lunar New Year and scheduled school holidays. Electronic medical records (EMR) were accessed. Only newly diagnosed NPC cases were included in our analysis. Patients with second synchronous primary malignancies or NPC disease recurrence were excluded. Data analysis was carried out using a combination of SPSS and Microsoft Excel. Results: Significantly, there was a reduction of 37-46.3% in newly diagnosed NPC cases during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic from January to end May 2020 compared to the preceding three years. Despite the reduction in numbers of newly diagnosed NPC, there was no statistically significant differences in delay from biopsy to the first radiation oncology visit and from biopsy to the first day of treatment in 2020 compared to the preceding years. All the patients treated in our centre also received the standard NPC treatment for their disease stage as per international guidelines. Conclusion: We recommend a heightened awareness of the dangers of delaying cancer presentation and care in healthcare policies and resource allocation and at the same time, encourage patient's confidence in their ability to seek care. With the resurgence of new COVID-19 variants and case numbers worldwide and in Singapore, this study focuses upon the need to be aware of the exigencies of other clinical groups in resource utilization. It would be instructive to compare this study with future long term follow up to investigate the trajectory of our cancer care delivery, as well as survival outcomes.

Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in nasopharynx carcinoma (MAC-NPC): An update on 26 trials and 7080 patients.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy, when added to radiotherapy, improves survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This article presents the second update of the Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in NPC. METHODS: Published or unpublished randomized trials assessing radiotherapy (±a second chemotherapy timing) with/without chemotherapy in non-metastatic NPC patients were identified. Updated data were sought for studies included in the previous rounds of the meta-analysis. The primary endpoint was overall survival. All trials were analyzed following the intent-to-treat principle using a fixed-effects model. Treatments were classified in five subsets according to chemotherapy timing. The statistical analysis plan was pre-specified. RESULTS: Eighteen new trials were identified. Individual patient data were available for seven. In total, the meta-analysis now included 26 trials and 7,080 patients. The addition of chemotherapy reduced the risk of death, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.73; 0.85]), and an absolute survival increase at 5 and 10 years of 6.1% [+3.9; +8.3] and + 8.4% [+5.7; +11.1], respectively. The largest effect was observed for concomitant + adjuvant, induction (with concomitant in both arms) and concomitant chemotherapy, with respective HR [95%CI] of 0.68 [0.59; 0.79] (absolute survival increase at 5 years: 12.3% (7.0%;17.6%)), 0.73 [0.63; 0.86] (6.0% (2.5%;9.5%)) and 0.81 [0.70; 0.92] (5.2% (0.8%;9.6%)). The benefit of chemotherapy was also demonstrated by improvement in progression-free survival, cancer mortality, locoregional control and distant control. There was a significant interaction between patient age and chemotherapy effect. CONCLUSION: This updated meta-analysis confirms the benefit of concomitant chemotherapy and concomitant + adjuvant chemotherapy, and suggests that addition of induction or adjuvant chemotherapy to concomitant chemotherapy improves tumor control and survival. The benefit of chemotherapy decreases with increasing patient age.

International Recommendations on Reirradiation by Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Reirradiation for locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is challenging because prior radiation dose delivered in the first course is often close to the tolerance limit of surrounding normal structures. A delicate balance between achieving local salvage and minimizing treatment toxicities is needed. However, high-level evidence is lacking because available reports are mostly retrospective studies on small series of patients. Pragmatic consensus guidelines, based on an extensive literature search and the pooling of opinions by leading specialists, will provide a useful reference to assist decision-making for these difficult decisions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A thorough review of available literature on recurrent NPC was conducted. A set of questions and preliminary draft guideline was circulated to a panel of international specialists with extensive experience in this field for voting on controversial areas and comments. A refined second proposal, based on a summary of the initial voting and different opinions expressed, was recirculated to the whole panel for review and reconsideration. The current guideline was based on majority voting after repeated iteration for final agreement. RESULTS: The initial round of questions showed variations in clinical practice even among the specialists, reflecting the lack of high-quality supporting data and the difficulties in formulating clinical decisions. Through exchange of comments and iterative revisions, recommendations with high-to-moderate agreement were formulated on general treatment strategies and details of reirradiation (including patient selection, targets contouring, dose prescription, and constraints). CONCLUSION: This paper provides useful reference on radical salvage treatment strategies for recurrent NPC and optimization of reirradiation through review of published evidence and consensus building. However, the final decision by the attending clinician must include full consideration of an individual patient's condition, understanding of the delicate balance between risk and benefits, and acceptance of risk of complications.

International Guideline on Dose Prioritization and Acceptance Criteria in Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma requires high radiation doses. The balance of the risks of local recurrence owing to inadequate tumor coverage versus the potential damage to the adjacent organs at risk (OARs) is of critical importance. With advancements in technology, high target conformality is possible. Nonetheless, to achieve the best possible dose distribution, optimal setting of dose targets and dose prioritization for tumor volumes and various OARs is fundamental. Radiation doses should always be guided by the As Low As Reasonably Practicable principle. There are marked variations in practice. This study aimed to develop a guideline to serve as a global practical reference. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A literature search on dose tolerances and normal-tissue complications after treatment for nasopharyngeal carcinoma was conducted. In addition, published guidelines and protocols on dose prioritization and constraints were reviewed. A text document and preliminary set of variants was circulated to a panel of international experts with publications or extensive experience in the field. An anonymized voting process was conducted to rank the proposed variants. A summary of the initial voting and different opinions expressed by members were then recirculated to the whole panel for review and reconsideration. Based on the comments of the panel, a refined second proposal was recirculated to the same panel. The current guideline was based on majority voting after repeated iteration for final agreement. RESULTS: Variation in opinion among international experts was repeatedly iterated to develop a guideline describing appropriate dose prioritization and constraints. The percentage of final agreement on the recommended parameters and alternative views is shown. The rationale for the recommendations and the limitations of current evidence are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Through this comprehensive review of available evidence and interactive exchange of vast experience by international experts, a guideline was developed to provide a practical reference for setting dose prioritization and acceptance criteria for tumor volumes and OARs. The final decision on the treatment prescription should be based on the individual clinical situation and the patient's acceptance of optimal balance of risk.

International guideline for the delineation of the clinical target volumes (CTV) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Target delineation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) often proves challenging because of the notoriously narrow therapeutic margin. High doses are needed to achieve optimal levels of tumour control, and dosimetric inadequacy remains one of the most important independent factors affecting treatment outcome. METHOD: A review of the available literature addressing the natural behaviour of NPC and correlation between clinical and pathological aspects of the disease was conducted. Existing international guidelines as well as published protocols specified by clinical trials on contouring of clinical target volumes (CTV) were compared. This information was then summarized into a preliminary draft guideline which was then circulated to international experts in the field for exchange of opinions and subsequent voting on areas with the greatest controversies. RESULTS: Common areas of uncertainty and variation in practices among experts experienced in radiation therapy for NPC were elucidated. Iterative revisions were made based on extensive discussion and final voting on controversial areas by the expert panel, to formulate the recommendations on contouring of CTV based on optimal geometric expansion and anatomical editing for those structures with substantial risk of microscopic infiltration. CONCLUSION: Through this comprehensive review of available evidence and best practices at major institutions, as well as interactive exchange of vast experience by international experts, this set of consensus guidelines has been developed to provide a practical reference for appropriate contouring to ensure optimal target coverage. However, the final decision on the treatment volumes should be based on full consideration of individual patients' factors and facilities of an individual centre (including the quality of imaging methods and the precision of treatment delivery).