Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 203(3): 307-317, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33480831

RESUMO

Rationale: Whether severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a significant risk factor for the development of invasive fungal superinfections is of great medical interest and remains, for now, an open question.Objectives: We aim to assess the occurrence of invasive fungal respiratory superinfections in patients with severe COVID-19.Methods: We conducted the study on patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related pneumonia admitted to five ICUs in France who had respiratory and serum sampling performed for specific screening of fungal complications.Measurements and Main Results: The study population included a total of 145 patients; the median age was 55 years old. Most of them were male (n = 104; 72%), were overweight (n = 99; 68%), and had hypertension (n = 83; 57%) and diabetes (n = 46; 32%). Few patients presented preexisting host risk factors for invasive fungal infection (n = 20; 14%). Their global severity was high; all patients were on invasive mechanical ventilation, and half (n = 73, 54%) were on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Mycological analysis included 2,815 mycological tests (culture, galactomannan, ß-glucan, and PCR) performed on 475 respiratory samples and 532 sera. A probable/putative invasive pulmonary mold infection was diagnosed in 7 (4.8%) patients and linked to high mortality. Multivariate analysis indicates a significantly higher risk for solid organ transplant recipients (odds ratio, = 4.66; interquartile range, 1.98-7.34; P = 0.004). False-positive fungal test and clinically irrelevant colonization, which did not require the initiation of antifungal treatment, was observed in 25 patients (17.2%).Conclusions: In patients with no underlying immunosuppression, severe SARS-CoV-2-related pneumonia seems at low risk of invasive fungal secondary infection, especially aspergillosis.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/epidemiologia , Pneumopatias Fúngicas/epidemiologia , Idoso , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/mortalidade , Feminino , França , Hospitalização , Humanos , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/diagnóstico , Pneumopatias Fúngicas/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração Artificial , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
4.
J Mol Diagn ; 25(7): 467-476, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37068735

RESUMO

Accurate tools for Toxoplasma gondii detection and quantification can be valuable for the early and effective management of toxoplasmosis. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a next-generation end-point PCR technique with high performance. The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of ddPCR for the detection and absolute quantification of T. gondii. From January 2019 to October 2020, DNA samples collected at the Laboratory of Parasitology and Mycology of Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital in Paris were retrospectively analyzed by ddPCR and real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). To detect T. gondii with the best sensitivity possible, the REP-529 multicopy target was used. For absolute quantification of T. gondii, a specific single-copy target of α-tubulin was designed. T. gondii detection by ddPCR and qPCR was strongly correlated (R2 = 0.93), with a total concordance of 96.7% (n = 145/150). Quantification of T. gondii using ddPCR was successful for 15 of 35 samples showing a parasite load ≥170 copies/mL of DNA eluate using the α-tubulin target. The qPCR REP-529 quantification based on a standard curve was approximate and dependent on the strain genotype, which led to an estimate of parasite copy number 14- to 160-fold superior to the ddPCR result. In total, ddPCR is an effective molecular method for T. gondii detection that shows equivalent performance to qPCR. For robust T. gondii quantification, ddPCR is clearly more accurate than semiquantitative qPCR methods.


Assuntos
Toxoplasma , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Toxoplasma/genética , Tubulina (Proteína)/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real/métodos
5.
Life (Basel) ; 12(12)2022 Dec 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36556429

RESUMO

The SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies response is the best indicator of effective protection after infection and/or vaccination, but its evaluation requires tedious cell-based experiments using an infectious virus. We analyzed, in 105 patients with various histories of SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or vaccination, the neutralizing response using a virus neutralization test (VNT) against B.1, Alpha, Beta and Omicron variants, and compared the results with two surrogate assays based on antibody-mediated blockage of the ACE2-RBD interaction (Lateral Flow Boditech and ELISA Genscript). The strongest response was observed for recovered COVID-19 patients receiving one vaccine dose. Naïve patients receiving 2 doses of mRNA vaccine also demonstrate high neutralization titers against B.1, Alpha and Beta variants, but only 34.3% displayed a neutralization activity against the Omicron variant. On the other hand, non-infected patients with half vaccination schedules displayed a weak and inconstant activity against all isolates. Non-vaccinated COVID-19 patients kept a neutralizing activity against B.1 and Alpha up to 12 months after recovery but a decreased activity against Beta and Omicron. Both surrogate assays displayed a good correlation with the VNT. However, an adaptation of the cut-off positivity was necessary, especially for the most resistant Beta and Omicron variants. We validated two simple and reliable surrogate neutralization assays, which may favorably replace cell-based methods, allowing functional analysis on a larger scale.

6.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ; 78(1): 17-26, 2020 02 01.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32108576

RESUMO

The lipoproteinogram (or lipidogram) consists in an electrophoretic separation of the main classes of serum lipoproteins. Separation was done in agarose gel using the Sebia Hydragel Lipo + Lp(a)® kit. A repeatability study (n=6) was conducted on 3 sera (1 normolipidemic, 1 hypertriglyceridemic and 1 with a high Lp(a) concentration). The reproducibility was studied on these 3 sera and on an ascites liquid containing chylomicrons, upon 6 days (n=6). A quantitative approach was made by studying areas under the curve and percentages of fractions. In both cases (repeatability and reproducibility), the revelation of the lipoproteins in the gel after electrophoretic migration was made either by staining with Sudan Black (procedure recommended by Sebia), or with Fat Red 7B. Regardless of staining, both repeatability and reproducibility studies show that all lipoprotein fractions were correctly detected at their respective positions, leading to satisfactory interpretations of lipoproteinograms. Our reproducibility study also confirmed a good stability of the fractions over 6 days (storage at +5 ± 3̊C). In addition, the Fat Red 7B staining leads to a shorter technical time (about 40 min) for the gel drying and staining/destaining phases, which allows us to respond more quickly to certain urgent requests such as chylothorax diagnosis.


Assuntos
Compostos Azo/farmacologia , Eletroforese/métodos , Lipoproteínas/análise , Lipoproteínas/sangue , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Coloração e Rotulagem/métodos , Líquido Ascítico/química , Compostos Azo/química , Análise Química do Sangue/métodos , Fracionamento Químico/métodos , Eletroforese em Gel de Ágar , Humanos , Lipoproteína(a)/análise , Lipoproteína(a)/sangue , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA