One Step Closer to Safer: Counseling Outcomes from American Academy of Pediatrics Firearm Safe Storage Education Training.

OBJECTIVE: To assess pre and postself-reported counseling outcomes for Safer: Storing Firearms Prevents Harm, an American Academy of Pediatrics universal firearm safe storage counseling training for pediatric clinicians providing health maintenance in outpatient settings. STUDY DESIGN: Safer was developed by a national multidisciplinary committee of firearm injury prevention experts with input from firearm-owning families and launched in June 2021. Pediatric clinicians completed baseline and 1-month posttraining surveys after signing up for the Pedialink course from February through June 2022. Primary outcomes included self-reported measures of counseling self-efficacy and frequency. Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests compared outcome distributions at baseline and follow-up. Two adjusted, multilevel mixed-effects regression models were conducted. RESULTS: Of 230 clinicians who completed baseline surveys, 146 (64%) completed 1-month postsurveys. Regional representation included Southeast = 67 (46%), Northeast = 24 (16%), Midwest = 21 (14%), Pacific = 15 (10%), Southwest = 11 (8%), and Rocky Mountain = 8 (5%). At follow-up, there was significant improvement in both the distribution of self-efficacy (median [first Quartile-third Quartile = 50 [20-70] at baseline and 80 [60-85] at follow-up; P < .001) and self-reported counseling frequency (median [first Quartile-third Quartile] = 10 [0-50] at baseline and 50 [10-80] at follow-up; P < .001). Adjusted regression model results suggested that self-efficacy significantly improved from baseline to follow-up (time coefficient 25.3; 95% CI = [21.0, 29.5]; P < .001) as did counseling frequency (time coefficient 13.6; 95% CI = [9.2, 18.0]; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvement in self-reported counseling self-efficacy and frequency was demonstrated 1 month following Safer training.

Comparing Family Health Before and After a Family-Focused Nutrition Program during the Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic affected child health behaviors, leading to worse physical health. Given the importance of good family health in improved child health outcomes, this secondary cohort analysis tested the hypothesis that family health would improve from baseline to 12-week follow-up after participation in a novel family nutrition program. METHODS: Diverse parent-child dyads participated in a home-based virtual Teaching Kitchen Outreach (vTKO) program (11 weekly healthy, low-cost recipes, cooking videos, and associated groceries delivered). The primary outcome was the Family Healthy Lifestyle Subscale (FHLS). Secondary outcomes were parent and child nutrition, and food insecurity. Statistical testing and modeling were used to evaluate pre-post outcomes. RESULTS: Of 123 enrolled dyads, 114 (93%) had sufficient data for analysis. Participants were 11% Hispanic, 54% Black, and 28% White; 31% completed high school or less; and 30% indicated food insecurity. Cohort mean pre-post FHLS scores significantly increased (25.5 vs. 27.3; p < 0.001). There were significant improvements in parent nutrition (p < 0.001) and child nutrition (p = 0.02 to < 0.001), but not in food security. After adjusting for baseline covariates, tobit regression found statistically significant pre-post FHLS differences (2.3; 95% CI=[1.4, 3.3]; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Participants in the novel home-based vTKO program reported improved family health over 12 weeks.

The Utility of the Brokamp Area Deprivation Index as a Prescreen for Social Risk in Primary Care.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between an Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and a Social Determinant of Health (SDoH) measure within a diverse sample. A prescreening tool based on routinely collected information could reduce clinical burden by identifying patients impacted by SDoH for comprehensive assessment. STUDY DESIGN: In total, 499 consented pediatric patient-families who spoke English, Spanish, or Arabic and had a child ≤12 years receiving primary care at a large academic institution were enrolled. Participants completed the Health Leads Social Needs (HLSN) survey. Residential address was extracted from the electronic health record to calculate Brokamp ADI at the census-tract level. The main outcome was the correlations between the total HLSN score and Brokamp ADI, overall and in each language subgroup. ADI distributions were also compared between participants with/without need for each of the 8 HLSN survey SDoH domains, using 2-sample t-tests and Pearson χ2 tests. RESULTS: In total, 54.9% of participants were English-speaking, 30.9% were Spanish-speaking, and 14.2% were Arabic-speaking. Spearman correlations between Brokamp ADI and total HLSN score were overall (rs = 0.15; P = .001), English (rs = 0.12; P = .04), Spanish (rs = 0.03; P = .7), and Arabic (rs = 0.24; P = .04). SDoH domain analyses found significant ADI differences between those with/without need in housing instability, childcare, transportation, and health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: There were small but statistically significant associations between the Brokamp ADI and total HLSN score and SDoH domains of housing instability, childcare, transportation, and health literacy. These findings support testing the Brokamp ADI as a prescreening tool to help identify patients with social needs in an outpatient clinical setting.

Head Start's Role in Addressing Food and Nutrition Insecurity: Focus Group Findings.

OBJECTIVE: To elicit Head Start (HS) families' and employees' perspectives on family experiences with food and nutrition insecurity (FNI) and identify how HS addresses them. METHODS: Four moderated virtual focus groups with 27 HS employee and family participants occurred from August 2021 to January 2022. Qualitative analysis used an iterative inductive/deductive approach. RESULTS: Findings were summarized in a conceptual framework and suggested that HS's current 2-generational approach is useful for families when addressing multilevel factors affecting FNI. The role of the family advocate is essential. In addition to increasing access to nutritious foods, emphasis should also be placed on skills and education to decrease generational unhealthy behaviors. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Head Start intervenes in generational cycles of FNI by using the family advocate to add to skills building for 2-generational health. Other programs targeting underserved children can use a similar structure for the greatest impact on FNI.

A 3-Item Measure of Digital Health Care Literacy: Development and Validation Study.

BACKGROUND: With increased reliance on digital health care, including telehealth, efficient and effective ways are needed to assess patients' comfort and confidence with using these services. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to develop and validate a brief scale that assesses digital health care literacy. METHODS: We first developed an item pool using existing literature and expert review. We then administered the items to participants as part of a larger study. Participants were caregivers of children receiving care at a pediatric clinic who completed a survey either on the web or over the telephone. We randomized participants into development and confirmatory samples, stratifying by language so that exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis could be performed with separate samples of participants. We assessed the scale's validity by examining its associations with participants' demographics, digital access, and prior digital health care use. RESULTS: Participants (N=508) were, on average, aged 34.7 (SD 7.7) years, and 89.4% (454/508) were women. Of the 508 participants, 280 (55.1%) preferred English as their primary language, 157 (30.9%) preferred Spanish, and 71 (14%) preferred Arabic; 228 (45%) had a high school degree or less; and 230 (45.3%) had an annual household income of

Effect of a Virtual Home-Based Behavioral Intervention on Family Health and Resilience During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Virtual home-based interventions may bolster protective factors, such as family health and resilience, during stressors such as the COVID-19 pandemic; however, their effectiveness is unknown. Objective: To examine the effectiveness of a virtual health coaching intervention on family health and resilience during the pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this parallel-group, single-site randomized clinical trial, 123 parents and their 2- to 8-year-old children were enrolled at a pediatric clinic or community partner site in Tennessee from March 10 to August 11, 2021. Follow-up surveys were completed between June 29 and November 11, 2021. Interventions: All participants received 11 weekly cooking videos and associated home-delivered groceries. The intervention group also received 12 weekly, 30-minute virtual health coach sessions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the validated 6-item (range, 6-30) Family Healthy Lifestyle Subscale (FHLS) scores. The secondary outcome was the validated 6-item (range, 0-6) Family Resilience and Connection Index (FRCI) scores. Outcomes were determined a priori and evaluated at baseline and 12-week follow-up. A priori independent t tests and multivariable tobit regression models assessed intervention effects, and post hoc, secondary interaction models assessed whether effects differed over baseline outcomes. Results: Among the 123 enrolled families, 110 (89%) were included in the primary analyses (parent mean [SD] age, 35.1 [8.2] years; 104 [95%] female; 55 [50%] non-Hispanic Black; child mean [SD] age, 5.2 [1.7] years; 62 [56%] male). Intervention-control group mean differences were nonsignificant for follow-up FHLS scores (0.7; 95% CI, -0.6 to 2.0; P = .17) and FRCI scores (0.1; 95% CI, -0.5 to 0.6; P = .74). Tobit regression model intervention effects were nonsignificant for FHLS scores (0.9; 95% CI, -0.3 to 2.2; P = .15) and FRCI scores (0.4; 95% CI, -0.2 to 1.1; P = .17). Post hoc, secondary models found no significant interaction for FHLS scores (1.3 increase per 5-point decrease; 95% CI, -0.2 to 2.7; P = .09), with significant intervention associations for baseline scores of 6 to 23. The interaction was significant for FRCI scores (0.4 increase per 1-point decrease; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.8; P = .047), with significant intervention associations for baseline scores of 0 to 3. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of families with young children, weekly virtual health coaching did not detectably improve family health and resilience. Post hoc, secondary results provided preliminary evidence of potential effectiveness among families with low baseline scores. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05328193.

Sexually Transmitted Infections and Contraceptive Use in Adolescents.

INTRODUCTION: Although a number of contraception methods exist, long-acting reversible contraceptives have been recommended for female adolescents owing to their low failure rates. However, concern exists that the increasing use of long-acting reversible contraceptive among female adolescents may have unintended consequences of decreasing condom use for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Despite this concern, few studies have directly explored the relationship between the use of long-acting reversible contraceptive versus other forms of contraception and diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections in female adolescents. This study compares the rates of sexually transmitted infection diagnosis following various forms of contraceptive use. METHODS: This study was an archival data analysis of single state Medicaid claims retrieved for female adolescents, aged 14-19 years, who received a contraceptive prescription and had 1 year of follow-up data available (n=62,550) between 2011 and 2015. Incidence of sexually transmitted infections was the outcome of interest. Data analysis was conducted in 2018. RESULTS: Compared with the contraceptive pill, hormonal implant (a form of long-acting reversible contraceptives) was associated with significantly lower risk of sexually transmitted infections (hazard ratio=0.81; 95% CI=0.70, 0.93; p=0.004), and hormonal injection was associated with higher risk of sexually transmitted infections (hazard ratio=1.08; 95% CI=1.00, 1.16; p=0.040). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides strong evidence that the risk for the acquisition of sexually transmitted infections is no higher for long-acting reversible contraceptives than for other forms of contraception. These results support the use of long-acting reversible contraceptive in female adolescents, as proposed and reaffirmed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and American Academy of Pediatrics.