Extremes of body mass index and postoperative complications after esophagectomy.

Obesity has been variously associated with reduced or similar rates of postoperative complications compared to normal weight patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer. In contrast, little is known about esophagectomy risks in the underweight population. The relationship between the extremes of body mass index (BMI) and postoperative complications after esophagectomy was evaluated. Consecutive esophagectomy patients (2000-2013) were reviewed. The patients were stratified based on BMI at the time of diagnosis: underweight (<18.5), normal (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9), obese I (30-34.9), and obese II or III (≥35). Hospital length of stay as well as postoperative complications and their accordion severity grading were evaluated according to the BMI category. Of 388 patients, 78.6% were male with a median age of 62 years at the time of operation. Pathologic cancer stage was 0 to I in 53%. BMI distribution was as follows: 5.6% underweight, 28.7% normal, 31.4% overweight, 22.8% obese I, and 11.5% obese II or III. Performance status was 0 or 1 in 99.2%. Compared to normal BMI patients, underweight patients had increased pulmonary complications (odds ratio (OR) 3.32, P = 0.014) and increased other postoperative complications (OR 3.00, P = 0.043). Patients who were overweight did not have increased complications compared to normal BMI patients. BMI groups did not differ in mortality rates or complication accordion severity grading. Hospital length of stay trended toward a longer duration in the underweight population (P = 0.06). Underweight patients are at increased risk for postoperative pulmonary and other complications. Underweight patients may benefit from preoperative nutritional repletion and mitigation for sarcopenia. Aggressive postoperative pulmonary care may help reduce complications in these patients. In contrast, the operative risk in overweight and obese patients is similar to normal BMI patients.

Consensus Conference on North American Training in Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery: A Review of the Conference and Presentation of Consensus Statements.

The findings and recommendations of the North American consensus conference on training in hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery held in October 2014 are presented. The conference was hosted by the Society for Surgical Oncology (SSO), the Americas Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Association (AHPBA), and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS). The current state of training in HPB surgery in North America was defined through three pathways-HPB, surgical oncology, and solid organ transplant fellowships. Consensus regarding programmatic requirements included establishment of minimum case volumes and inclusion of quality metrics. Formative assessment, using milestones as a framework and inclusive of both operative and nonoperative skills, must be present. Specific core HPB cases should be defined and used for evaluation of operative skills. The conference concluded with a focus on the optimal means to perform summative assessment to evaluate the individual fellow completing a fellowship in HPB surgery. Presentations from the hospital perspective and the American Board of Surgery led to consensus that summative assessment was desired by the public and the hospital systems and should occur in a uniform but possibly modular manner for all HPB fellowship pathways. A task force composed of representatives of the SSO, AHPBA, and ASTS are charged with implementation of the consensus statements emanating from this consensus conference.

Oncogenic CXCL10 signalling drives metastasis development and poor clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: The CXCL10/CXCR3 signalling mediates paracrine interactions between tumour and stromal cells that govern leukocyte trafficking and angiogenesis. Emerging data implicate noncanonical CXCL10/CXCR3 signalling in tumourigenesis and metastasis. However, little is known regarding the role for autocrine CXCL10/CXCR3 signalling in regulating the metastatic potential of individual tumour clones. METHODS: We performed transcriptomic and cytokine profiling to characterise the functions of CXCL10 and CXCR3 in tumour cells with different metastatic abilities. We modulated the expression of the CXCL10/CXCR3 pathway using shRNA-mediated silencing in both in vitro and in vivo models of B16F1 melanoma. In addition, we examined the expression of CXCL10 and CXCR3 and their associations with clinical outcomes in clinical data sets derived from over 670 patients with melanoma and colon and renal cell carcinomas. RESULTS: We identified a critical role for autocrine CXCL10/CXCR3 signalling in promoting tumour cell growth, motility and metastasis. Analysis of publicly available clinical data sets demonstrated that coexpression of CXCL10 and CXCR3 predicted an increased metastatic potential and was associated with early metastatic disease progression and poor overall survival. CONCLUSION: These findings support the potential for CXCL10/CXCR3 coexpression as a predictor of metastatic recurrence and point towards a role for targeting of this oncogenic axis in the treatment of metastatic disease.

Multicenter phase II trial of adjuvant therapy for resected pancreatic cancer using cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and interferon-alfa-2b-based chemoradiation: ACOSOG Trial Z05031.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group sought to confirm the efficacy of a novel interferon-based chemoradiation regimen in a multicenter phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resected (R0/R1) adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head were treated with adjuvant interferon-alfa-2b (3 million units s.c. on days 1, 3, and 5 of each week for 5.5 weeks), cisplatin (30 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly for 6 weeks), and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 175 mg·m(2)/day for 38 days) concurrently with external-beam radiation (50.4 Gy). Chemoradiation was followed by two 6-week courses of continuous infusion 5-FU (200 mg·m(2)/day). The primary study end point was 18-month overall survival from protocol enrollment (OS18); an OS18 ≥65% was considered a positive study outcome. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were enrolled. Eighty-four patients were assessable for toxicity. The all-cause grade ≥3 toxicity rate was 95% (80 patients) during therapy. No long-term toxicity or toxicity-related deaths were noted. At 36-month median follow-up, the OS18 was 69% [95% confidence interval (CI) 60% to 80%]; the median disease-free survival and overall survival were 14.1 months (95% CI 11.0-20.1 months) and 25.4 months (95% CI 23.4-34.1 months), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Notwithstanding promising multi-institutional efficacy results, further development of this regimen will require additional modifications to mitigate toxic effects.

Ionizing radiation: a genetic switch for cancer therapy.

Gene therapy of cancer represents a promising but challenging area of therapeutic research. The discovery of radiation-inducible genes led to the concept and development of radiation-targeted gene therapy. In this approach, promoters of radiation-inducible genes are used to drive transcription of transgenes in the response to radiation. Constructs in which the radiation-inducible promoter elements activate a transgene encoding a cytotoxic protein are delivered to tumors by adenoviral vectors. The tumoricidal effects are then localized temporally and spatially by X-rays. We review the conceptual development of TNFerade, an adenoviral vector containing radiation-inducible elements of the early growth response-1 promoter upstream of a cDNA encoding human tumor necrosis factor-alpha. We also summarize the preclinical work and clinical trials utilizing this vector as a treatment for diverse solid tumors.

Interstitial hypertension in human breast and colorectal tumors.

The efficacy of present day antineoplastic regimens depends upon the delivery and penetration of therapeutic agents through the tumor vascular and interstitial spaces to the tumor cell target. The distribution of relevant molecules or cells in a solid tumor is often poor and heterogeneous and is believed to be due to a number of pathophysiological factors, including elevated interstitial fluid pressure (IFP). Using the wick-in-needle technique, IFP was measured in primary breast and colorectal carcinomas as well as their respective metastases to the lymph nodes and liver in a total of 17 patients. IFP was also measured in one recurrent renal cell carcinoma, one melanoma metastasis to the lymph nodes, and another melanoma metastasis to the lung. IFP varied from 4 to 50 mm Hg with a mean +/- SD of 20 +/- 13 mm Hg in the neoplasms (n = 41 measurements; n = 21 tumors), while IFP in normal tissues had a mean of 2 +/- 4 mm Hg (n = 11). The mean IFPs for metastatic melanoma, primary breast carcinoma, and liver metastases from a colorectal primary were found to be 33 +/- 14, 15 +/- 9, and 21 +/- 12 mm Hg, respectively. In the renal cell carcinoma, the pressure was 38 mm Hg. These results agree with the findings of our 3 previous studies examining IFP in human superficial melanomas (14.3 +/- 12.5 mm Hg, n = 12), cervical carcinomas (15.7 +/- 5.7 mm Hg, n = 12), and head and neck tumors (13.2 +/- 8.8 mm Hg, n = 19), and indicate that in all types of human tumors studied to date, IFP was significantly elevated above that of normal tissue. This observation may be useful in localizing tumors during needle biopsy.

NM-3, an isocoumarin, increases the antitumor effects of radiotherapy without toxicity.

We examined the effects of a new antiangiogenic isocoumarin, NM-3, as a radiation modifier in vitro and in vivo. The present studies demonstrate that NM-3 is cytotoxic to human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) but not to Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells nor Seg-1, esophageal adenocarcinoma cells, in clonogenic survival assays. When HUVEC cultures are treated with NM-3 combined with ionizing radiation (IR), additive cytotoxicity is observed. In addition, the combination of NM-3 and IR inhibits HUVEC migration to a greater extent than either treatment alone. The effects of treatment with NM-3 and IR were also evaluated in tumor model systems. C57BL/6 female mice bearing LLC tumors were given injections for 4 consecutive days with NM-3 (25 mg/kg/day) and treated with IR (20 Gy) for 2 consecutive days. Combined treatment with NM-3 and IR significantly reduced mean tumor volume compared with either treatment alone. An increase in local tumor control was also observed in LLC tumors in mice receiving NM-3/IR therapy. When athymic nude mice bearing Seg-1 tumor xenografts were treated with NM-3 (100 mg/kg/day for 4 days) and 20 Gy (four 5 Gy fractions), significant tumor regression was observed after combined treatment (NM-3 and IR) compared with IR alone. Importantly, no increase in systemic or local tissue toxicity was observed after combined treatment (NM-3 and IR) when compared with IR alone. The bioavailability and nontoxic profile of NM-3 suggests that the efficacy of this agent should be tested in clinical radiotherapy.

Basal Tumor Cell Isolation and Patient-Derived Xenograft Engraftment Identify High-Risk Clinical Bladder Cancers.

Strategies to identify tumors at highest risk for treatment failure are currently under investigation for patients with bladder cancer. We demonstrate that flow cytometric detection of poorly differentiated basal tumor cells (BTCs), as defined by the co-expression of CD90, CD44 and CD49f, directly from patients with early stage tumors (T1-T2 and N0) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) engraftment in locally advanced tumors (T3-T4 or N+) predict poor prognosis in patients with bladder cancer. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of bladder tumor cells isolated from PDXs indicates unique patterns of gene expression during bladder tumor cell differentiation. We found cell division cycle 25C (CDC25C) overexpression in poorly differentiated BTCs and determined that CDC25C expression predicts adverse survival independent of standard clinical and pathologic features in bladder cancer patients. Taken together, our findings support the utility of BTCs and bladder cancer PDX models in the discovery of novel molecular targets and predictive biomarkers for personalizing oncology care for patients.

Complete 5-year follow-up of a prospective phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Conclusive evidence supporting the routine use of multimodality therapy in esophageal cancer is lacking. However, since long-term survival after esophagectomy alone is unusual, clinical trials designed to identify effective therapeutic regimens are essential. We report here the 5-year results of a phase II induction chemoradiotherapy trial. METHODS: From August 1991 to January 1995, 44 patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma were treated with a combination of 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and interferon-alpha with concurrent external beam radiotherapy. RESULTS: Forty-one (93%) patients completed chemoradiotherapy, with most toxic events recorded as grade I or II. Curative resection (all gross tumor removed) was achieved in 36 of 37 surgical explorations, with 10 tumors demonstrating complete pathologic response and 23 showing partial pathologic response. Median follow-up for survivors was 75 months (range, 60-100 months). Five-year survival for all patients was 32%, with a median survival of 28 months. Five-year disease-free survival in patients with curative resection was 36% (median, 26 months) and overall survival was 39% (median, 34 months). Five-year survival for patients with curative resection whose disease responded to chemoradiotherapy was 42% (median overall survival, 36 months). Local-regional recurrence alone occurred in 3 patients, distant failure alone in 12 patients, and combined local-regional and distant failure in 2 patients. A Cox proportional hazards model identified both pathologic tumor and nodal stage as independent predictors of disease-free survival. Fourteen patients (32%) were 5-year survivors; 1 of these patients later experienced disease recurrence and died. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy can result in a long-term and durable disease-free state. Only large, multi-institutional phase III trials can determine whether combined modality therapy is superior to resection alone.

Comparative p53 mutational analysis of multiple primary cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract.

BACKGROUND: Tumors arising in the upper aerodigestive tract (UAT) are often associated with predisposing factors that place the patient at risk for development of multiple synchronous or metachronous tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate p53 as a susceptibility gene in UAT malignancy. METHODS: Seventeen patients with 41 separate primary tumors involving esophagus (n = 15), larynx (n = 14), pharynx (n = 6), lung (n = 2), mouth (n = 2), and tongue (n = 2) were analyzed for the presence and specific genotype of p53 point mutation. Immunohistochemical staining of p53 and topographic genotyping consisting of polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct sequencing of p53 exons to 5 to 8 were performed. RESULTS: Eleven tumors were metachronous (6 months to 11 years), and 11 were synchronous. We found p53 point mutations in 19 (46.3%) of 41 tumors in exons 8 (n = 11), 7 (n = 4), 5 (n = 3), and 6 (n = 1). Tumors possessed either wild-type p53 or a single type of point mutation. Metastases displayed the identical genotype of its primary tumor in all cases. Most importantly, p53 genotype was found to be completely discordant between separate primary tumors for the same patient. CONCLUSIONS: Complete discordance in p53 genotype between separate primary UAT cancers strongly indicates that p53 is not functioning as a susceptibility gene in this setting.

Hepatic resection: effective treatment for primary and secondary tumors.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection is an accepted therapeutic modality for isolated colorectal metastases (CRM) and primary hepatobiliary cancers (PC). Controversy continues regarding the safety, efficacy, and appropriateness of resection for noncolorectal metastases (NCM). METHODS: A retrospective review of 167 resections in 160 patients was performed to evaluate the impact of demographics and perioperative data on survival and recurrence. Statistical analyses were performed by Student t test, analysis of variance, and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. RESULTS: Resections were performed for CRM, 110 of 167 (66%), NCM, 31 of 167 (19%), and PC, 26 of 167 (15%). The interval from primary to metastases was significantly longer in the NCM group than the CRM group (34.7+/-45.1 vs. 18.7+/-23.7 months; P<.01). Mean number of lesions was not different between groups; however, NCM were larger than CRM (5.9+/-4.5 vs 4.5+/-2.9 cm; P<.05). Operative complications were significantly greater for PC (54%) versus CRM and NCM (21% and 19%, respectively; P<.01), although length of stay was similar between groups. Perioperative mortality was 2%. Actuarial survival at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was CRM 91%, 54%, and 40%, PC 75%, 60%, and 38%, and NCM 68%, 36%, and not available, respectively (CRM vs. NCM; P<.01 at 3 years). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection for primary and secondary malignancy can be performed with minimal morbidity and mortality. Resection of NCM is associated with a lower overall survival compared with CRM and PC. The disease-free interval from resection of the primary to metastasectomy is prolonged and hepatic recurrence infrequent after resection in the NCM group. These results suggest that tumor biology is a critical determinant of outcome after hepatic resection of primary and secondary hepatic tumors.

Long-term survival following induction chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma.

HYPOTHESIS: Long-term survival is rare in patients treated for esophageal carcinoma. Several clinical trials suggest the possibility of prolonged survival in patients who undergo induction chemoradiotherapy plus esophagectomy. DESIGN: Prospective uncontrolled study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction were prospectively entered into a phase II trial of preoperative 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and interferon alfa with concurrent external beam radiotherapy before esophagectomy. Curative resection was performed on 36 of 41 patients who completed the induction chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 44 patients, 17 are alive at a median follow-up of 50 months. Of these 17 patients, 15 show no evidence of recurrent disease. Of the 14 patients with long-term survival (> or =3 years), 1 patient died of disease, and another patient is alive with disease. The remaining 12 patients are alive and disease-free (median follow-up, 54 months). Six patients have survived longer than 4 years and 3 patients longer than 5 years. Subsequent primary tumors have developed in 2 patients. One patient had a recurrence at 11 months following initiation of treatment and remains disease-free 43 months postresection of a single brain metastasis. Standard clinicopathologic parameters (age, sex, histologic findings, chemoradiotherapy regimen, and clinical and pathologic stages) were not significantly associated with a survival time of 3 years or longer (Fisher exact test, 2-tailed). Although not significant, p 53 mutational status suggested long-term survival. In 11 of 14 patients who are alive with no history of recurrence, p53 genotyping demonstrated no point mutations in 10 patients. Median survival time for the long-term survivors has not been reached. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival can be achieved in patients with esophageal carcinoma who undergo induction chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy. Recurrence is unlikely in patients who survive for 3 years or longer after undergoing this multimodality treatment.

Is esophagectomy following upfront chemoradiotherapy safe and necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and necessity of esophagectomy following upfront chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. DESIGN: Cohort analytic study during a 4-year period. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-seven patients who completed CRT and underwent esophagectomy as compared with 30 patients who underwent esophagectomy alone without pretreatment during the same period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Resection-related events, perioperative morbidity and mortality, response to CRT, site of residual disease following CRT, and survival of partial responders. RESULTS: Patients receiving CRT followed by esophagectomy were similar to patients who underwent esophagectomy alone for operative characteristics, postoperative course, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. Of the 33 patients who achieved an objective response to CRT, 23 had residual tumor in the resection specimen. Of the 18 patients alive with no evidence of disease at a median follow-up of 30 months, 50% had residual tumor following CRT. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront CRT did not adversely affect resection-related outcome and may facilitate resection by downstaging disease. A considerable number of patients had prolonged survival after esophageal resection despite having residual tumor present following treatment with upfront CRT. Therefore, esophagectomy following upfront CRT can improve locoregional control of disease and should remain a critical component of any multimodality regimen.

Initial presentation with stage IV colorectal cancer: how aggressive should we be?

HYPOTHESIS: The appropriate surgical treatment of patients with colorectal cancer who are found on initial presentation to have stage IV disease is controversial. With presumed limited life expectancy, the role of primary colon or rectal resection has been questioned, as has the utility of synchronous hepatic resection. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. SETTING: The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Ill, a tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty patients were identified through The University of Chicago Hospitals Tumor Registry whose initial presentation showed stage IV colorectal cancer and who underwent laparotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end points of the study were perioperative morbidity and mortality and overall survival. RESULTS: Median survival and 5-year survival were 14.4 months and 10%, respectively. Survival was greater for patients younger than 65 years than for those who were aged 65 years or older (18.3 vs 9.8 months; P = .007). Carcinomatosis was associated with significantly decreased survival when compared with less extensive stage IV disease (6.7 vs 18.1 months; P<.001). Patients who underwent any form of resection of hepatic metastases achieved a survival advantage over those with unresectable liver lesions (median survival, 29.6 vs 10.2 months; P<.001). Overall, 27 patients (22.5%) developed postoperative complications. Seven patients (5.8%) died during the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: Age of 65 years or older, carcinomatosis, and extensive (bilobar) liver involvement are associated with decreased survival and increased postoperative morbidity and mortality and may negate any potential benefit patients derive from resection of the primary lesion. A substantial number of patients with synchronous hepatic metastases have protracted survival that justifies resection of the primary colorectal tumor at initial presentation. Despite the presence of stage IV disease, resection of the primary tumor and, when feasible, liver metastases is indicated.

Is any method of vascular control superior in hepatic resection of metastatic cancers? Longmire clamping, pringle maneuver, and total vascular isolation.

HYPOTHESIS: Although control of the hepatic vascular pedicle is commonly used during hepatic resection, the optimal method of vascular control continues to be debated. The utility of total or selective vascular isolation, pedicle inflow occlusion, or the absence of vascular isolation during minor and major hepatectomy needs to be examined. DESIGN: Retrospective review of hepatic resections performed for either isolated colorectal or noncolorectal hepatic metastases. SETTING: The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, Ill, a tertiary-care referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-one patients who underwent hepatic resection for isolated metastatic liver disease were identified through The University of Chicago Hospitals Tumor Registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative parameters, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and tumor recurrence. RESULTS: Four groups were compared with alternative methods of vascular management, including total vascular isolation, Longmire clamping, Pringle maneuver, or no vascular control. Tumor number and size were not significantly different between groups. Blood loss and transfusion requirements tended to be higher in the total vascular isolation group and were significantly higher compared with the Pringle group (P =.06) and the no vascular control group (P =.04), but this also correlated with a higher incidence of complexity of surgical resection. The highest incidence of postoperative complications occurred in the total vascular isolation group (P<.05). With similar permanent pathologic margins, the rates of intrahepatic recurrence were similar among all groups, with the no vascular control group having the lowest recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: All methods of vascular control appeared equivalent with respect to limiting blood loss and transfusion requirements while providing adequate surgical margins. The highest rates of blood requirements and complications were noted in the total vascular isolation group, which corresponded to the highest incidence of complex resections. The Longmire clamp group incurred the lowest incidence of complications and resulted in identical surgical margins. The application of vascular control is beneficial to surgeons during hepatic resection, but the method of control should be selected based on the location and complexity of resection required and preference of the individual surgeon.

The desmoid tumor. Not a benign disease.

The necessity of aggressive therapy for desmoid tumors has not been clearly established. To evaluate the therapeutic value of adequate resection and radiation therapy, we conducted a retrospective study of 138 patients treated from 1965 through 1984. Univariate analysis revealed five factors predictive of local failure: (1) age between 18 and 30 years, (2) presentation with recurrent disease, (3) partial or limited margin excision, (4) tumor at or close to the microscopic margin of resection, and (5) radiation therapy not administered for gross residual disease. Multivariate analysis identified two of these factors as having independent predictive value for recurrence: (1) presentation with recurrent disease and (2) less-than-adequate margins of resection. The five-year survival probability was 92%, but 11 of the 138 patients died as a consequence of locally uncontrolled tumor. These findings confirm that desmoid tumors are malignant soft-tissue neoplasms that warrant aggressive therapy.

Retention of adoptively transferred interleukin-2-activated natural killer cells in tumor tissue.

BACKGROUND: Adoptively transferred interleukin-2 activated natural killer (A-NK) cells are capable of selectively infiltrating tumor, however, only at low efficiency. The aim of this study was to investigate the intratumoral A-NK cell retention using an ex-vivo tissue-isolated tumor preparation. METHODS: R3230AC mammary adenocarcinoma and CSE fibrosarcoma were implanted in the ovarian fat pad of Fisher 344 rats. The tumors were perfused ex vivo 14 to 15 days post-implant with a known number of fluorescent labelled A-NK cells, and the effluent collected serially over time. Non stimulated splenocytes (N-SS) were used as controls. RESULTS: In group 1, tumors were perfused with either A-NK (n = 16) or N-SS (n = 7) cells. The mean number of the cells which remained intratumorally at the completion of the perfusion was 48.37% +/- 14.94 for A-NK cells and 34.68% +/- 13.20 of N-SS (p = 0.048). In group 2, tumors were perfused with a suspension containing both A-NK and N-SS cell (n = 11). The difference in tumor retention between A-NK cells and N-SS was 22.5% (p = 0.0053) for R3230AC tumors (retention of intratumoral A-NK cells was 45.1% +/- 6.47 vs. 22.6% +/- 19.09 for N-SS) and 15.88% (p = 0.028) for the fibrosarcomas (34.01% +/- 15.96 vs. 18.12 +/- 17.78 for A-NK and N-SS, respectively). No difference with respect to retention of A-NK cells or N-SS cells was observed between tumor types (p = 0.23 and p = 0.71, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The retention of A-NK cells in tumor tissues was significantly better than the retention of N-SS when administered directly. Since the retention of A-NK cells in tumor tissue was high (35-50%), this factor does not explain the low efficiency of adoptively transferred A-NK cells accumulating in tumors when administered systemically.

Role of nutrition support during induction chemoradiation therapy in esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) potentially benefits a subgroup of patients with esophageal cancer. The ability to administer aggressive CRT may depend on the initial nutritional status and the ability to sustain nutrition during therapy. Parenteral nutrition support during CRT may lead to complications that limit its usefulness and negate any potential benefit. METHODS: Data were analyzed to evaluate the role of parenteral nutrition support (PNS) in patients receiving CRT. Forty-five consecutive patients with locoregional esophageal cancer, enrolled in a phase I/II trial of induction CRT, were analyzed. On the basis of the nutrition support received, two groups were defined as follows: group I (with PNS, n = 30) and group II (without PNS, n = 15). Results were compared in terms of chemotherapy (CT) dose tolerated, morbidity of CRT, response rates, and surgical outcome in groups with and without PNS. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable for demographic data, stage and site of disease, and performance status. There was no significant difference between the groups in the nutritional parameters (weight and serum albumin) before and after CRT. Group I patients received significantly more (% of total calculated dose) CT compared with group II (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], 86.4% vs 68.8%, p = .02; cisplatin [CDDP], 90.8% vs 78.2%, p = .05; and interferon alpha-2b [IFN-alpha], 95.4% vs 79.8%, p = .05, in groups I and II, respectively). Major (grade III/IV) adverse effects of CT were hematologic (group I, 93.3% vs group II, 86.6%, p = .59) and gastrointestinal (group I, 56.67% vs group II, 33.3%, p = .2). Postsurgical staging revealed complete response in 10 (22%) and a major response in 23 (51%) patients, although the response rates were similar in the two groups (group I, 76.6% vs group II, 66.6%, p = .8). Surgical morbidity (51.8% vs 61.5%, p = .73), mortality (7.4% vs 7.6%, p = 1.00), and hospital stay (22.5 vs 19.6 days, p = .63) were also similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: PNS can be provided to these patients without an increased risk of CRT or resection-related morbidity. Although early and prolonged PNS facilitates administration of complete CRT doses, no benefit is derived from the administration of more CRT in the present regimen. The utility of PNS in this setting is unclear and, until further clarified, should not be applied routinely to this cohort of patients.

Peripheral athero-embolism from the aorta complicating transhiatal esophagectomy.

The clinical courses of two patients with moderate atherosclerotic aneurysmal dilation of the upper abdominal aorta suffering significant thrombo-embolic sequelae following transhiatal esophagectomy are presented. Inadvertent dislodgement of debris from the diseased aorta during the course of the hiatal and intrathoracic "blunt" dissection was felt to be responsible for this uncommon postoperative problem. This potential complication should be kept in mind when operating near the esophageal hiatus during the course of esophagectomy in such vasculopathic patients.

Surgical management of benign tumors of the liver.

INTRODUCTION: Benign tumors of the liver are increasingly being diagnosed and continue to represent a management challenge. These lesions constitute a substantial component of hepatic neoplasms evaluated and resected at a tertiary referral center. We reviewed our experience with resection of benign liver lesions to clarify the safety and effectiveness of this treatment. METHODS: Between January 1996 and January 2000, 28 patients with benign hepatic lesions were identified from a cohort of 140 hepatic resection patients. Demographic characteristics, operative management, morbidity, mortality and follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age in our patients was 35 +/- 14, with 24/28 (86%) patients being female. Seven of the 24 woman (29%) at presentation were either pregnant or immediate postpartum. A history of OCP use was noted in 14/24 (58%) female patients. The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain in 12/28 (43%). Resection for an undiagnosed mass occurred in 11/28 (39%) patients. The distribution of pathology was hemangioma 10/28 (35.7%), adenoma 8/28 (28.6%), hepatic cyst 5/28 (17.9%), hamartoma 2/28 (7.1%), and FNH 3/28 (10.7%). Average size of the tumor was 7.4 +/- 3.9 (range 2.5-15 cm) with a mean of 1.4 +/- 0.8 lesions (range 1-3) per patient. Tumors were evenly distributed between the right and left side while eight patients (29%) had bilobar tumors. Enucleation rather than anatomic resection was performed in 18/28 (64%) patients, with a mean blood loss of 457 +/- 532 cc (range 50-2200 cc). Blood transfusion was required in only 3/28 (10%) patients, while total vascular isolation was used in only a single patient undergoing an extended left hepatectomy. Mean length of stay was 6.8 +/- 3.2 d (range 3-14 d). Three complications (10.7%) were encountered: pulmonary embolus, ileus and non-operative bile leak. There were no mortalities in this series. Recurrence of tumor occurred in only one patient with a giant hepatic cyst managed laparoscopically. CONCLUSIONS: In our institution, the management of clinically relevant benign tumors of the liver comprises a significant proportion of our resectional practice (20%). Our data suggests that both enucleation and anatomically based resections can be performed safely with minimal blood loss and transfusion requirements. Resection of symptomatic lesions was highly effective in treating abdominal pain due to these benign tumors. We advocate resection of non-resolving hepatic adenomas, symptomatic lesions, or when malignancy cannot be excluded.