Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 11(1)2024 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749534

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Early enteral nutrition (EN) in critically ill adult patients is thought to improve mortality and morbidity; expert guidelines recommend early initiation of EN in critically ill adults. However, the ideal schedule and dose of EN remain understudied. STUDY OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the relationship between achieving 70% of recommended EN within 2 days of intubation ('early goal EN') and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated medically critically ill adults. We hypothesised that early goal EN would be associated with reduced in-hospital death. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated adult patients admitted to our medical intensive care unit during 2013-2019. We assessed the proportion of recommended total EN provided to the patient each day following intubation until extubation, death or 7 days whichever was shortest. Patients who received 70% or more of their recommended total daily EN within 2 days of intubation (ie, 'baseline period') were considered to have achieved 'early goal EN'; these patients were compared with patients who did not ('low EN'). The primary outcome was in-hospital death; secondary outcomes were successful extubation and discharge alive. RESULTS: 938 patients met eligibility criteria and survived the baseline period. During the 7-day postintubation period, 64% of all patients reached 70% of recommended daily calories; 33% of patients achieved early goal EN. In unadjusted and adjusted models, early goal EN versus low EN was associated with a lower incidence of in-hospital death (subdistribution HR (SHR) unadjusted=0.63, p=0.0003, SHR adjusted=0.73, p=0.02). Early goal EN was also associated with a higher incidence of successful extubation (SHR unadjusted=1.41, p<0.00001, SHR adjusted=1.27, p=0.002) and discharge alive (SHR unadjusted=1.54, p<0.00001, SHR adjusted=1.24, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Early goal EN was associated with significant improvement in clinical metrics of decreased in-hospital death, increased extubation and increased hospital discharge alive.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Nutrição Enteral , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Respiração Artificial , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Estado Terminal/terapia , Masculino , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Fatores de Tempo
2.
PM R ; 9(11): 1077-1084, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28400221

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aerobic exercise at a subsymptom heart rate has been recommended as therapy for postconcussion syndrome. Assessing adherence with an accurate heart rate-monitoring instrument is difficult, limiting the proliferation of large-scale randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the Fitbit Charge HR compared with electrocardiogram (EKG) to monitor heart rate during a treadmill-based exercise protocol. DESIGN: A methods comparison study. SETTING: Sports medicine research center within a tertiary care institution. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 22 healthy participants (12 female) aged 18-26 years (mean age: 22 ± 2 years). METHODS: Fitbit Charge HR heart rate measurements were compared with EKG data concurrently collected while participants completed the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement between Fitbit Charge HR and EKG was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC3,1), Bland-Altman limits of agreement, and percent error. RESULTS: We observed a strong single-measure absolute agreement between Fitbit Charge HR and EKG (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.83; 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.90). Fitbit Charge HR underestimated heart rate compared with EKG (mean difference = -6.04 bpm; standard deviation = 10.40 bpm; Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement = -26.42 to 14.35 bpm). A total of 69.9% of Fitbit heart rate measurements were within 10% error compared with EKG, and 91.5% of all heart rate measurements were within 20% error. CONCLUSIONS: Although the mean bias in measuring heart rate was relatively small, the limits of agreement between the Fitbit Charge HR and EKG were broad. Thus, the Fitbit Charge HR would not be a suitable option for monitoring heart rate within a narrow range. For the purposes of postconcussion exercise therapy, the relatively inexpensive cost, easy implementation, and low maintenance make Fitbit Charge HR a viable option for assessing adherence to an exercise program when expensive clinical equipment is unavailable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.


Assuntos
Eletrocardiografia Ambulatorial/instrumentação , Terapia por Exercício , Frequência Cardíaca/fisiologia , Autocuidado/instrumentação , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA