High prevalence of severe sleep cycle disruption in de novo acromegaly and underdiagnosis by common clinical screening tools: A prospective, observational, cross-sectional study.

CONTEXT: Although sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is well-recognised in acromegaly, most studies have reported heterogeneous, often heavily treated, groups and few have performed detailed sleep phenotyping at presentation. OBJECTIVE: To study SDB using the gold standard of polysomnography, in the largest group of newly-diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly. SETTING AND PATIENTS: 40 patients [22 males, 18 females; mean age 54 years (range 23-78)], were studied to: (i) establish the prevalence and severity of SDB (ii) assess the reliability of commonly employed screening tools [Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and overnight oxygen desaturation index (DI)] to detect SDB (iii) determine the extent to which sleep architecture is disrupted. RESULTS: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), defined by the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI), was present in 79% of subjects (mild, n = 12; moderate, n = 5; severe, n = 14). However, in these individuals with OSA by AHI criteria, ESS (positive in 35% [n = 11]) and DI (positive in 71%: mild, n = 11; moderate, n = 6; severe, n = 5) markedly underestimated its prevalence/extent. Seventy-eight percent of patients exhibited increased arousal, with marked disruption of the sleep cycle, despite most (82%) having normal total time asleep. Fourteen patients spent longer in stage 1 sleep. Deeper sleep stages were severely attenuated in many subjects (reduced stage 2, n = 18; reduced slow wave sleep, n = 24; reduced rapid eye movement sleep, n = 32). CONCLUSION: Our study provides strong support for clinical guidelines that recommend screening for sleep apnoea syndrome in patients with newly-diagnosed acromegaly. Importantly, however, it highlights shortcomings in commonly recommended screening tools (questionnaires, desaturation index) and demonstrates the added value of polysomnography to allow timely detection of obstructive sleep apnoea and associated sleep cycle disruption.

Real-world experience with 11C-methionine positron emission tomography in the management of acromegaly.

BACKGROUND: L-[methyl-11C]-methionine-positron emission tomography (Met-PET) is a potentially important imaging adjunct in the diagnostic workup of pituitary adenomas, including somatotroph tumors. Met-PET can identify residual or occult disease and make definitive therapies accessible to a subgroup of patients who would otherwise require lifelong medical therapy. However, existing data on its use are still limited to small case series. Here, we report the largest single-center experience (n = 61) in acromegaly. METHODS: A total of 189 cases of acromegaly were referred to our national Met-PET service in the last 12 years. For this analysis, we have reviewed outcomes in those 61 patients managed exclusively by our multidisciplinary team (single center, single surgeon). Referral indications were as follows: indeterminate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; n = 38, 62.3%), occult residual (n = 14, 23.0%), (radio-)surgical planning (n = 6, 9.8%), and occult de novo tumor (n = 3, 4.9%). RESULTS: A total of 33/61 patients (54.1%) underwent PET-guided surgery. Twenty-four of 33 patients (72.7%) achieved complete biochemical remission following (re-)surgery. Insulin-like growth factor 1 levels were reduced to <2 × upper limit of normal (ULN) in 6 of the remaining 9 cases, 3 of whom achieved levels of <1.1 × ULN compared with mean preoperative levels of 2.4 × ULN (SD 0.8) for n = 9. Only 3 patients developed single new hormonal deficits (gonadotropic/thyrotropic insufficiency). There were no neurovascular complications after surgery. CONCLUSION: In patients with persistent/recurrent acromegaly or occult tumors, Met-PET can facilitate further targeted intervention (surgery/radiosurgery). This led to complete remission in most cases (24/33) or significant improvement with comparatively low risk of complications. L-[methyl-11C]-methionine-positron emission tomography should therefore be considered in all patients who are potential candidates for further surgical intervention but present no clear target on MRI.