A multicenter prospective observational study of the conformity of temozolomide prescriptions in France.

CONTEXT: Temozolomide (TMZ) is approved for the treatment of high-grade gliomas such as glioblastoma (GBM) multiforme and refractory anaplastic astrocytoma, but it is also used in indications not mentioned in the summary of product characteristics (SPC). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the conformity of TMZ prescriptions to the French SPC and prescription guidebook. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of all consecutive patients treated with TMZ in 21 French hospitals between September 2006 and February 2007, accounting for 39% of total TMZ consumption in France. The conformity of TMZ prescriptions was evaluated in terms of the indication, dosage, treatment duration, and combination with other treatments, with respect to the SPC and prescription guidebook. RESULTS: We enrolled 831 patients (median age, 56 years) who received a total of 5982 TMZ treatment cycles. TMZ was mainly prescribed to patients with newly diagnosed GBM (384 patients), GBM in progression/relapse (28 patients), or anaplastic astrocytoma in progression/relapse (19 patients). Prescriptions conformed to the SPC in 51.9% of cases and to the prescription guidebook in 91.5% of cases. Global conformity with the SPC, in terms of the dosage, treatment duration, and combination with other treatments, was 62% for newly diagnosed GBM treated with radiotherapy plus TMZ, 72% for TMZ maintenance monotherapy, and 66% for GBM and anaplastic astrocytoma in progression/relapse. CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: In France, routine TMZ prescriptions conform to the SPC and practice guidebook. This is one of the largest studies of drug use in neuro-oncology in terms of the number of patients and cycles analyzed.

Interest to consider re-challenging by cetuximab and platinum containing regimen in recurrent Head and Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The EXTREME protocol is the standard of care for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) in first line. Beyond the first-line except immunotherapy, poor efficacy was reported by second-line chemotherapy. Re-challenge strategies based on a repetition of the first line with platinum and cetuximab regimens might have been an option to consider. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study in order to assess the efficacy of the cetuximab plus platinum doublet-based chemotherapy regimen in patients with R/M HNSCC progressing after at least 3 months of cetuximab maintenance (EXTREME protocol). We complete a retrospective review of all medical records from R/M HNSCC patients treated after 16 weeks with the EXTREME regimen and treated with a re-challenge strategy between January 2010 and December 2014 in our institution (Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France). RESULTS: 33 patients were identified. The re-challenged strategy provided an ORR in 33.3% of cases and a DCR of 69.6% of cases. The median OS and PFS observed from the second line were 11.2 months and 6.5 months for the subset re-challenged by EXTREME or PCC regimens respectively. The response rate between patients with a platin free interval within 3 and 6 months and greater than 6 months were equal. Drugs dose intensity were better with the PCC protocol than the EXTREME regimen used as a rechallenge. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggest re-challenging strategy by these regimens could be considered beyond the first line as an option when the platin free interval is greater than 3 months.