Utility of lateral flow tests in SARS-CoV-2 infection monitorization.

OBJECTIVE: The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial for medical and public health reasons, to allow the best treatment of cases and the best control of the pandemic. Serology testing allows for the detection of asymptomatic infections and 19-COVID cases once the virus has been cleared. We analyzed the usefulness of the SARS-CoV-2 rapid test of Autobio and tried to correlate its pattern with the severity of COVID19 infection. METHODS: We analyzed the accuracy and clinical usefulness of a point-of-care IgM and/or IgG test for SARS-CoV-2 in 35 COVID-19 patients [12 (34.3%) mild-moderate and 23 (65.7%) severe-critical] admitted to a field hospital in Madrid, as well as in 5 controls. RESULTS: The mean time from the first day of symptoms to the antibody test was 28 days (SD: 8.7), similar according to the severity of the disease. All patients with SARS-CoV-2 PCR+ showed the corresponding IgG positivity, while these results were negative in all control individuals. A total of 26 (74%) cases also presented with positive IgM, 19 (83%) were severe-critical cases and 7 (58%) were mild-moderate cases. The IgM response lasted longer in the severe critical cases (mean: 29.7 days; SD: 8.4) compared to the moderate cases (mean: 21.2 days; SD: 2.0).. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid serology tests are useful for the diagnosis of patients with COVID-19 (mainly IgG detection) and may also be correlated with the severity of the infection (based on IgM detection).

[EFQM Model in the hospitals of Madrid Regional Health Service: full self-assessment cycle]. / Modelo EFQM en los hospitales del Servicio Madrileño de Salud: ciclo completo de autoevaluación.

AIM: To analyse a complete cycle of self-assessment using the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) Model in the hospitals of the Madrid Health Service as regards the fundamental concepts of excellence (FCE). METHOD: Descriptive study of the EFQM self-assessments of the entire public hospital sector identifying the methodology and the information on strengths, weaknesses, evidence, RADAR matrix (Results, Approach, Deployment, Assessment and Review), and the related FCEs in the enabling criteria and in the prioritised action plans. RESULTS: The self-assessment was carried out in 85% of the hospitals (29/34), 86% of them required specific training (25/29), with a total of 329 teaching hours and 833 people in training. Multidisciplinary working groups were required in 83% of the hospitals (24/29), with 123 groups and 857 people involved. There were 3,686 strengths and 3,197 weaknesses identified: strengths and weaknesses were 78% (2,869) and 74% (2,355), respectively, for the enabling criteria and 22% (817) and 26% (842), respectively, for the results criteria. The mean score was 404 points with a median of 399. The main FCEs were managing with agility, developing organisational capability, sustaining outstanding results, creating a sustainable future, succeeding through the talent of people, and adding value for customers, with harnessing creativity/innovation and leading with vision, inspiration and integrity being placed in lower positions. A total of 113 action plans were identified for all the hospitals. CONCLUSION: A complete EFQM self-assessment cycle of the entire public hospital sector of a Regional Health Service is provided, linking the analysis and action plans with the FCE of the EFQM Model.