Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Methods ; 112: 124-146, 2017 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27663441

RESUMO

Neutrophils and macrophages differentiate from common myeloid progenitors in the bone marrow, where they undergo nuclear morphologic changes during maturation. During this process, both cell types acquire critical innate immune functions that include phagocytosis of pathogens, and for neutrophils the release of nuclear material called nuclear extracellular traps (NETs). Primary cells used to study these functions are typically purified from mature mouse tissues, but bone marrow-derived ex vivo cultures provide more abundant numbers of progenitors and functionally mature cells. Routine analyses of these cells use conventional microscopy and flow cytometry, which present limitations; microscopy is laborious and subjective, whereas flow cytometry lacks spatial resolution. Here we describe methods to generate enriched populations of neutrophils or macrophages from cryopreserved mouse bone marrow cultured ex vivo, and to use imaging flow cytometry that combines the resolution of microscopy with flow cytometry to analyze cells for morphologic features, phagocytosis, and NETosis.


Assuntos
Células da Medula Óssea/imunologia , Armadilhas Extracelulares/diagnóstico por imagem , Citometria de Fluxo/métodos , Citometria por Imagem/métodos , Macrófagos/imunologia , Neutrófilos/imunologia , Animais , Células da Medula Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Células da Medula Óssea/ultraestrutura , Calcimicina/farmacologia , Diferenciação Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Criopreservação , Armadilhas Extracelulares/imunologia , Citometria de Fluxo/instrumentação , Corantes Fluorescentes/química , Citometria por Imagem/instrumentação , Imunidade Inata , Macrófagos/efeitos dos fármacos , Macrófagos/ultraestrutura , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Neutrófilos/efeitos dos fármacos , Neutrófilos/ultraestrutura , Fagocitose , Cultura Primária de Células , Coloração e Rotulagem/métodos , Acetato de Tetradecanoilforbol/farmacologia
2.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 83(11)2017 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28314729

RESUMO

Listeria monocytogenes is of great concern in food processing facilities because it persists in biofilms, facilitating biotransfer. Stainless steel is commonly used for food contact surfaces and transport containers. L. monocytogenes biofilms on stainless steel served as a model system for surface sampling, to test the performance of a sonicating swab in comparison with a standard cotton swab. Swab performance and consistency were determined using total viable counts. Stainless steel coupons sampled with both types of swabs were examined using scanning electron microscopy, to visualize biofilms and surface structures (i.e., polishing grooves and scratches). Laser scanning confocal microscopy was used to image and to quantitate the biofilms remaining after sampling with each swab type. The total viable counts were significantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) with the sonicating swab than with the standard swab in each trial. The sonicating swab was more consistent in cell recovery than was the standard swab, with coefficients of variation ranging from 8.9% to 12.3% and from 7.1% to 37.6%, respectively. Scanning electron microscopic imaging showed that biofilms remained in the polished grooves of the coupons sampled with the standard swab but were noticeably absent with the sonicating swab. Percent area measurements of biofilms remaining on the stainless steel coupons showed significantly (P ≤ 0.05) less biofilm remaining when the sonicating swab was used (median, 1.1%), compared with the standard swab (median, 70.4%). The sonicating swab provided greater recovery of cells, with more consistency, than did the standard swab, and it is employs sonication, suction, and scrubbing.IMPORTANCE Inadequate surface sampling can result in foodborne illness outbreaks from biotransfer, since verification of sanitization protocols relies on surface sampling and recovery of microorganisms for detection and enumeration. Swabbing is a standard method for microbiological sampling of surfaces. Although swabbing offers portability and ease of use, there are limitations, such as high user variability and low recovery rates, which can be attributed to many different causes. This study demonstrates some benefits that a sonicating swab has over a standard swab for removal and collection of microbiological samples from a surface, to provide better verification of surface cleanliness and to help decrease the potential for biotransfer of pathogens into foods.


Assuntos
Biofilmes , Listeria monocytogenes/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas Microbiológicas/métodos , Aço Inoxidável/análise , Aderência Bacteriana , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Listeria monocytogenes/classificação , Listeria monocytogenes/genética , Listeria monocytogenes/fisiologia , Técnicas Microbiológicas/instrumentação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA