Rib Fracture Mortality: Are There Clues in the Core?

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the trauma patient. The primary objective of this study was to determine the relationship of psoas cross sectional area with hospital mortality in patients with rib fractures over the age of 55 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 1223 patients presenting to a Level 1 Trauma Center between 1/1/2002 and 1/31/2019. Psoas cross sectional area was measured using a polygonal tracing tool. Patients were stratified into four quartiles based on sex-specific values. RESULTS: There was increased in-hospital mortality for patients with a lower psoas cross sectional area (10 %, 8%, 6%, and 4%, Q1-Q4 respectively; P=0.021). The logistic regression model determined for every increase in psoas cross sectional area by 1 cm2 the odds of in-hospital mortality decreased by 4%. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality is multifactorial; however, psoas cross sectional area may provide a clue in predicting adverse outcomes after traumatic rib fractures.

Timing and necessity of staging imaging in clinical stage II cutaneous melanoma: Cost-effectiveness and clinical decision analysis.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative imaging in clinical stage II melanoma is not indicated per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines but remains common in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients presenting with cutaneous clinical stage II melanoma from 2007 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A clinical decision analysis with cost data was designed to understand ideal practice patterns in managing stage II melanoma, with pre-versus selective post-operative imaging as the initial decision node. RESULTS: There were 277 subjects included, and 143 underwent preoperative imaging (49.5%). This changed management (i.e. no surgery) in one patient (0.4%). Overall, 16 patients had additional findings on imaging (5.8%). Upfront surgery with selective postoperative imaging was a more cost-effective strategy than routine performance of preoperative imaging, with savings of $1677 per patient. CONCLUSION: Preoperative imaging is a low yield, costly approach for patients with clinical stage II melanoma with minimal impact on the decision to proceed with surgical management.