Adjuvant therapy in stage I carcinoma of the breast: the influence of multigene analyses and molecular phenotyping.

A consensus conference was held in order to provide guidelines for the use of adjuvant therapy in patients with Stage I carcinoma of the breast, using traditional information, such as tumor size, microscopic character, Nottingham index, patient age and co-morbidities, but also incorporating steroid hormone and Her-2-neu data as well as other immunohistochemical markers. The role of the genetic analysis of breast cancer and proprietary gene prognostic signatures was discussed, along with the molecular profiling of breast cancers into several groups that may predict prognosis. These molecular data are not currently sufficiently mature to make them part of decision making algorithms of recommendations for the treatment of individual patients.

Proceedings of the international consensus conference on breast cancer risk, genetics, & risk management, April, 2007.

A consensus conference including thirty experts was held in April, 2007, to discuss risk factors for breast cancer and their management. Four categories of risk were outlined, from breast cancer "average" through "very high" risk, the latter including individuals with high penetrance BRCA1/2 gene mutations. Guidelines for management of patients in each of these categories were discussed, with the major portion of the conference being devoted to individuals with BRCA1/2 mutations. Prevalence of these mutations in the general populations was estimated to be 1 in 250-500 individuals, with an increased prevalence in Ashkenazic Jews and other founder groups. Risk reduction strategies for these individuals include surveillance, with or without chemoprevention drugs, or surgical procedures to remove the organs at risk, i.e., bilateral mastectomy and/or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. These risk reduction strategies were evaluated fully, and recommendations were made for the care of patients in each of the risk categories. These guidelines for patient care were approved by the entire group of experts.

Sentinel node positivity rates with and without frozen section for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is used to detect breast cancer axillary metastases. Some surgeons send the sentinel lymph node (SLN) for intraoperative frozen section (FS) to minimize delayed axillary dissections. There has been concern that FS may discard nodal tissue and thus underdiagnose small metastases. This study examines whether evaluation of SLN by FS increases the false-negative rate of SLNB. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of SLNB from 659 patients was conducted to determine the frequency of node positivity among SLNB subjected to both FS and permanent section (PS) versus PS alone. Statistical analysis was performed by the chi(2) square test, and a logistic regression model was applied to estimate the effect of final node positivity between the two groups. RESULTS: FS was performed in 327 patients and PS was performed in all 659 patients. Among patients undergoing both FS and PS (n = 327), the final node positivity rate was 33.0% compared with 19.6% among patients undergoing PS alone (n = 332). After adjustment for patient age, tumor diameter, grade, and hormone receptor status in a multivariate logistic regression model, there remained an increased likelihood of final node positivity for patients undergoing both procedures relative to PS alone (adjusted odds ratio, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.6; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher rate of SLN positivity in specimens evaluated by both FS and PS. Therefore, evaluating SLN by FS does not underdiagnose small metastases nor produce a higher false-negative rate. Intraoperative FS offers the advantage of less delayed axillary dissections.

Case report: BRCA in the Ashkenazi population: are current testing guidelines too exclusive?

The BRCA1/2 genes account for a significant portion of hereditary breast and ovarian cancers and they are especially prevalent in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. Women who have a mutation can prevent breast and ovarian cancer with surgical intervention. We describe an Ashkenazi Jewish patient who illustrates that current testing criteria are too restrictive, particularly for this population of patients. The patient's sister was diagnosed with breast cancer at age 33; however, she was not a mutation carrier. Based on practice guidelines, the patient was not recommended genetic testing. She subsequently underwent direct-to-consumer (DTC) testing and discovered that she was a mutation carrier. This case demonstrates the need for clinicians to be aware of the higher prevalence of BRCA mutations in the Ashkenazi population. It also exemplifies the need to involve medical professionals, including genetic counselors, in the dissemination of DNA test results.

The presentation of contralateral axillary lymph node metastases from breast carcinoma: a clinical management dilemma.

Metastases to the contralateral axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients are uncommon. Involvement of the contralateral axilla is a manifestation of systemic disease (stage IV) or a regional metastasis from a new occult primary (T0N1, stage II). The uncertain laterality of the cancer responsible for these metastases complicates overall disease staging and is a management dilemma for clinicians. Seven women who developed contralateral axillary metastases (CAM), but did not have evidence of systemic disease were identified. Patient demographics, histopathologic tumor characteristics, treatment and outcome were examined. The median age was 49 years. A family history of breast cancer was present in six (86%). The initial breast cancers were located in all quadrants. They were generally hormone receptor negative, HER-2/neu overexpressing and associated with lymphovascular invasion. There was a median interval of 71 months between initial breast cancer diagnosis and CAM presentation. Surgical management of the CAM included simple excision in one (14%) and axillary lymph node dissection in five (71%). Adjuvant treatment consisted of chemotherapy in seven (100%) and hormonal therapy in one (14%). The median follow-up from the diagnosis of CAM was 35 months and three women were alive without disease, two were alive with disease and two had died of disease. With surgical treatment, there were no axillary recurrences in this series. When patients present with CAM and no evidence of systemic disease or a new primary in the contralateral breast, surgical treatment should be considered for local control and possibly improved relapse-free survival.