Nine weeks versus 1 year adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy: final results of the phase III randomized Short-HER study‡.

Background: Chemotherapy plus 1-year trastuzumab is the standard adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. The efficacy of less extended trastuzumab exposure is under investigation. The short-HER study was aimed to assess the non-inferiority of 9 weeks versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy. Patients and methods: HER2-positive breast cancer patients with node-positive or, if node negative, with at least one risk factor (pT>2 cm, G3, lympho-vascular invasion, Ki-67 > 20%, age ≤35 years, or hormone receptor negativity) were randomly assigned to receive sequential anthracycline-taxane combinations plus 1-year trastuzumab (arm A, long) or plus 9 weeks trastuzumab (arm B, short). This study was designed as a non-inferiority trial with disease-free survival (DFS) as primary end point. A DFS hazard ratio (HR) <1.29 was chosen as the non-inferiority margin. Analyses according to the frequentist and Bayesian approach were planned. Secondary end points included 2-year failure rate and cardiac safety. Results: A total of 1254 patients from 82 centers were randomized (arm A, long: n = 627; arm B, short: n = 626). Five-year DFS is 88% in the long and 85% in the short arm. The HR is 1.13 (90% CI 0.89-1.42), with the upper limit of the CI crossing the non-inferiority margin. According to the Bayesian analysis, the probability that the short arm is non-inferior to the long one is 80%. The 5-year overall survival (OS) is 95.2% in the long and 95.0% in the short arm (HR 1.07, 90% CI 0.74-1.56). Cardiac events are significantly lower in the short arm (risk-ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.22-0.50, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: This study failed to show the non-inferiority of a shorter trastuzumab administration. One-year trastuzumab remains the standard. However, a 9-week administration decreases the risk of severe cardiac toxicity and can be an option for patients with cardiac events during treatment and for those with a low risk of relapse. Trial Registration: EUDRACT number: 2007-004326-25; NCI ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00629278.

Safety and efficacy outcomes with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: New data on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) regarding overall survival and disease progression-related outcomes in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy are presented in a meta-analysis of controlled trials of ESA use (epoetin α, epoetin ß, darbepoetin α, biosimilars). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A literature search identified reports from January 1997 through March 2014. We used company databases for Amgen, Inc., or Janssen studies and published data for other studies. Random-effects odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare results for patients randomized to ESA with those randomized to control. RESULTS: Deaths were reported for 571 of 2346 patients (24%) in the ESA groups and 523 of 2367 patients (22%) in the control groups [OR, 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.40]. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the effects of individual studies and exclusion of one study (BEST) resulted in an OR for death of 1.12 (95% CI 0.94-1.34). In seven studies reporting progression-related end points (N = 4197; ESA n = 2088; control n = 2109), the OR was 1.01 (95% CI 0.87-1.16) for ESA compared with control. CONCLUSIONS: After incorporating recent results of ESA use in patients with breast cancer, risks of survival and progression-free survival remain consistent with previously published data.

Ovarian suppression using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function and fertility of breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized studies.

BACKGROUND: The role of temporary ovarian suppression with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa) in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure (POF) is still controversial. Our meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) investigates whether the use of LHRHa during chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients reduces treatment-related POF rate, increases pregnancy rate, and impacts disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS: A literature search using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, and the proceedings of major conferences, was conducted up to 30 April 2015. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for POF (i.e. POF by study definition, and POF defined as amenorrhea 1 year after chemotherapy completion) and for patients with pregnancy, as well hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI for DFS, were calculated for each trial. Pooled analysis was carried out using the fixed- and random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 12 RCTs were eligible including 1231 breast cancer patients. The use of LHRHa was associated with a significant reduced risk of POF (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.23-0.57; P < 0.001), yet with significant heterogeneity (I(2) = 47.1%, Pheterogeneity = 0.026). In eight studies reporting amenorrhea rates 1 year after chemotherapy completion, the addition of LHRHa reduced the risk of POF (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.73, P < 0.001) without heterogeneity (I(2) = 0.0%, Pheterogeneity = 0.936). In five studies reporting pregnancies, more patients treated with LHRHa achieved pregnancy (33 versus 19 women; OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.02-3.28, P = 0.041; I(2) = 0.0%, Pheterogeneity = 0.629). In three studies reporting DFS, no difference was observed (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.49-2.04, P = 0.939; I(2) = 68.0%, Pheterogeneity = 0.044). CONCLUSION: Temporary ovarian suppression with LHRHa in young breast cancer patients is associated with a reduced risk of chemotherapy-induced POF and seems to increase the pregnancy rate, without an apparent negative consequence on prognosis.

The predictive and prognostic role of single nucleotide gene variants of PD-1 and PD-L1 in patients with advanced melanoma treated with PD-1 inhibitors.

Background: Despite having revolutionized the treatment paradigm for advanced melanoma, not all patients benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. To date, there are no predictive biomarkers for response or the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) to programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors. Our aim was to investigate the predictive and prognostic role of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) of genes involved in the PD-1 axis. Methods: We analysed, in metastatic melanoma patients treated with nivolumab or pembrolizumab, five PD-1 SNVs, namely PD1.3 G>A (rs11568821), PD1.5 C>T (rs2227981), PD1.6 G>A (rs10204525), PD1.7 T>C(rs7421861), PD1.10 C>G (rs5582977) and three programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) SNVs: +8293 C>A (rs2890658), PD-L1 C>T (rs2297136) and PD-L1 G>C (rs4143815). Association of SNV genotypic frequencies with best overall response to PD-1 inhibitors and development of irAEs were estimated through a modified Poisson regression. A Cox regression modelling approach was applied to evaluate the SNV association with OS. Results: A total of 125 patients with advanced melanoma were included in the analysis. A reduction in irAEs risk was observed in patients carrying the PD-L1 +8293 C/A genotype compared with those carrying the C/C genotype (risk ratio = 0.45; 95% CL 0.22-0.93; P = 0.031). A trend for a reduction in irAEs was also observed with the PD1.5 T allele (risk ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence limits 0.48-1.01 versus C allele). None of the SNVs was associated with response to therapy. Finally, a survival benefit was observed in patients harbouring the PD1.7 C/C genotype (hazard ratio = 0.37; 95% confidence limits 0.14-0.96; P = 0.028) in the homozygous model. Conclusions: Our study showed that PD-1.5 and PD-L1 +8293 SNVs may play a role as a predictive biomarker of development of irAEs to PD-1 inhibitors. PD1.7 SNV may also be associated with a reduction of the risk of death, although further translational research is needed to confirm these results.

Neuromuscular and cardiac adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: pooled analysis of individual cases from multiple institutions and literature.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the management of multiple tumors, due to improved efficacy, quality of life, and safety. While most immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are mild and easily managed, in rare cases such events may be life-threatening, especially those affecting the neuromuscular and cardiac system. The management of neuromuscular/cardiac irAEs is not clear due to the lack of consistent data. Therefore, we carried out a pooled analysis of collected cases from selected Italian centers and individual data from published case reports and case series, in order to improve our understanding of these irAEs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected retrospective data from patients treated in six Italian centers with ICIs (programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death-ligand 1 and/or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibitor) for any solid tumor who experienced neuromuscular and/or cardiovascular toxicity. Then, we carried out a search of case reports and series of neuromuscular/cardiac irAEs from ICIs with any solid tumor. RESULTS: This analysis includes cases from Italian institutions (n = 18) and the case reports identified in our systematic literature search (n = 120), for a total of 138 patients. Among these patients, 50 (36.2%) had complete resolution of their neuromuscular/cardiac irAEs, in 21 (15.2%) cases there was a clinical improvement with mild sequelae, and 53 (38.4%) patients died as a result of the irAEs. Factors significantly associated with worse outcomes were early irAE onset, within the first two cycles of ICI (Fisher P < 0.0001), clinical manifestation of both myositis and myocarditis when compared with patients who developed only myositis or myocarditis (chi-square P = 0.0045), and the development of arrhythmia (Fisher P = 0.0070). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest collection of individual cases of immune-related myocarditis/myositis. Early irAE onset, concurrent development of myositis and myocarditis, as well as occurrence of arrhythmias are associated with worse outcomes and should encourage an aggressive immunomodulatory treatment.

Pathological and molecular characteristics distinguishing contralateral metastatic from new primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients have a cumulative lifetime risk of 2%-15% of developing a contralateral metastatic or ex novo primary cancer. From prognostic and therapeutic viewpoints, it is important to differentiate metastatic from second primary. To distinguish these entities, we investigated whether the pattern of X chromosome inactivation could determine whether the two tumors derived from different progenitor cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clonality of bilateral breast cancer was evaluated through the X-inactivation analysis using the human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA) polymorphism and the histopathologic and molecular results were compared. A different or an identical pattern of X inactivation was considered as indicator of a second primary cancer or not informative, respectively. We considered morphological indicators of a new primary cancer the absence of concordance in the histological type or a better histological differentiation. RESULTS: Ten patients with bilateral breast cancer were evaluated. Morphological criteria indicated that eight were second primary, a conclusion confirmed by the X-inactivation analysis. Two cases classified as recurrence according to morphological criteria were classified as second tumor by molecular analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the HUMARA clonality assay can improve the histological parameters in differentiating metastatic cancer from second primary cancer.

Timing of adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen in women with breast cancer: findings from two consecutive trials of Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest-Mammella Intergruppo (GONO-MIG) Group.

BACKGROUND: The timing of adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen (TAM) has been investigated only in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. We analyzed the outcome of both pre- and postmenopausal women who entered two randomized trials (Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest-Mammella Intergruppo studies) on adjuvant chemotherapy and received either concomitant or sequential TAM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who received anthracycline-based regimens and either concomitant or sequential TAM were eligible. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) of death or recurrence for treatment comparisons were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Among the 1096 eligible patients, 507 (46.3%) and 589 (53.7%) received concomitant and sequential TAM, respectively. The median follow-up time was 6.6 years. Ten-year OS was 83% [95% confidence interval (CI) 78-88%] and 80% (95% CI 74-86%) in the concomitant and sequential groups, respectively. Multivariate analyses confirmed no significant difference in the hazard of death (HR = 1.13; 95% CI 0.78-1.64; P = 0.534) and recurrence (HR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.80-1.33; P = 0.88) between the two groups. A decreasing trend (P = 0.015) in HR of death with increasing age was observed indicating, that concomitant therapy might be more effective than sequential therapy in young patients. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no outcome difference between sequential and concomitant chemo-endocrine therapy. The potential advantage of concomitant TAM in young patients needs to be further addressed in prospective trials.

Adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: do the St Gallen recommendations influence clinical practice? Results from the NORA study.

BACKGROUND: The NORA study is a prospective longitudinal cohort study aiming at investigating treatment in patients with early breast cancer. Here, we present the impact of the St Gallen recommendations on clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared adjuvant strategies in patients enrolled in 2000-2002 to those in 2003-2004 to verify the impact of the 2003 St Gallen recommendations. RESULTS: The use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) doubled: 65/629 patients (10.3%) vs 100/458 patients (21.8) (P < 0.0001). Following chemotherapy, AIs were administered in 8.5% of the retrospective cohort and in 15.1% of the prospective one (P < 0.0001). The use of taxanes plus hormones dropped (P = 0.0026), but not when used as single agents. A marked increase was observed in the use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy (46.3% vs 65.2%), mainly three-drug regimens (33.3% vs 46.6%). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the St Gallen recommendations have had a major impact on clinical practice.

Concurrent versus sequential adjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy in hormone-receptor positive early stage breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although in clinical practice adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and endocrine therapy (ET) are administered sequentially in patients with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, the optimal timing, i.e. concurrent or sequential administration, of these treatments has been scarcely investigated. To better clarify this issue we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing these two modalities of administrations in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, Web of Knowledge and the proceedings of the major conferences with no date restriction up to March 2016. The summary risk estimates (pooled hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence intervals [CI]) for DFS and OS were calculated using random effect models (DerSimonian and Laird method). RESULTS: A total of three randomized studies were eligible including 2021 breast cancer patients. Overall, 755 DFS events were observed, 365 in the sequential arm and 390 in the concomitant arm, with a pooled HR of 0.95 (95% CI = 0.76 to 1.18, P = 0.643). No association between timing of treatment and OS was observed (HR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.80 to 1.12, P = 0.529). CONCLUSION: Our pooled analysis showed no association between the timing of administration of adjuvant CT and ET and DFS and OS in breast cancer patients candidates for both adjuvant treatments. Because of the small number of published trials, the lack of data on the timing with modern adjuvant treatments, i.e. taxane-containing CT and aromatase inhibitors, this topic remain still controversial and requires further studies to be clarified.

First line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer.

In the last 20-30 years the approach to metastatic breast cancer by chemotherapy has been largely studied. Anthracyclines, taxanes and, more recently, capecitabine and gemcitabine represent the breakthrough of treatment. In the next future the combination of chemotherapy and target therapy will be considered more frequently.

Relationship between human mammaglobin mRNA expression in breast cancer tissue and clinico-pathologic features of the tumors.

Human mammaglobin (hMAM) has recently been recognized as a breast associated glycoprotein. Although the biological role of hMAM is unknown, it has been previously reported that hMAM gene expression is a marker of low biological and clinical aggressiveness of breast cancer (BC). In this study, 148 cases of BC tissues were investigated for hMAM mRNA expression by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In order to evaluate its prognostic value, hMAM was correlated with age of patients, type and size of tumor, nodal stage, histologic grade, c-erbB-2 over expression, Ki67 labelling index, estrogen receptor (ER) status and progesterone receptor (PGR) status. Fisher's exact test was used to examine the association between different parameters and hMAM. hMAM was expressed in 138/148 (93%) of BC tissues examined. Among the 10 hMAM negative cases, 8 were invasive ductal carcinomas (microscopically higher G3 grade) and 2 infiltrating lobular carcinomas. We found a significant association (p = 0.020) between absence of hMAM mRNA and G3 histologic grade but not with any other prognostic parameters studied. The present study indicates that lack of hMAM expression is restricted to the BC with G3 grading. Further studies are needed to clarify the biological basis and the clinical significance of our results.

Conventional versus cytokinetic polychemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment in metastatic breast cancer: results of a randomized cooperative trial.

Diethylstilbestrol (DES) can induce a recruitment into the proliferative pool of previously resting breast cancer cells in vivo. In order to verify if estrogenic recruitment could result in a larger tumor cell killing by chemotherapy, 117 patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive CEF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2; epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2; and 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2 on day 1); DES-CEF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 on day 1; DES, 1 mg orally on days 5, 6, and 7; and epidoxorubicin, 60 mg/m2, and 5-fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2, on day 8) every 21 days. No significant difference in objective response rates, survival, or progression-free survival was seen between the two regimens. Patients in the DES-CEF arm experienced a higher complete response (CR) rate (24.1% v 16.1%), which reached statistical significance in the case of soft-tissue metastasis (48% v 27.3%; P less than .05) and estrogen receptor-negative tumors (35.7% v 11.1%; P less than .025). Survival and progression-free survival of patients refractory to treatment were not worsened by estrogenic recruitment. In the subset of patients failing after adjuvant polychemotherapy, DES-CEF unexpectedly induced a significantly longer survival (greater than 802 days v 375 days; P = .029) and progression-free survival (239 days v 192 days; P = .041) than CEF. The DES-CEF regimen was more myelotoxic, and 43.3% of the DES-CEF cycles had to be delayed because of leukopenia in comparison with 11.8% of the CEF cycles (P less than .0001). In conclusion, chemotherapy with estrogenic recruitment was able to induce more CRs in certain subsets of patients and a significant prolongation in survival and progression-free survival of patients failing after adjuvant polychemotherapy. These results have been achieved despite a significantly lower dose intensity of chemotherapy.

Randomized cooperative study of perioperative chemotherapy in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this multicentric randomized trial was to determine whether reducing the interval between surgery and chemotherapy improves the outcome of breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1985 and July 1992, 600 breast cancer patients, clinical stages T1-3A,N0-2,M0 were randomly assigned to a perioperative cycle (PC) of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, epidoxorubicin 60 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 (CEF). Node-negative (N-) patients did not receive any further treatment. Node positive (N+) patients received 11 cycles if previously given PC, or 12 cycles of CEF alternated with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 (CMF). In addition, N+ patients received concomitant or sequential 5-year tamoxifen therapy. RESULTS: At a median follow-up duration of 5.7 years, no significant difference in survival (88% v 84%, P = .3) between the two treatment arms was seen. However, a difference of borderline significance in relapse-free survival (RFS; 76% v 70%, P = .053) was evident. A significant survival advantage for the PC arm was detected only in the estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) patients (P = .003). RFS was significantly improved in N- patients, postmenopausal patients, and ER- patients. Multivariate analyses show that pathologic tumor size, nodal status, receptor status, and treatment (only in ER- patients) are significantly correlated with survival and RFS. PC toxicity did not influence wound healing. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence that PC positively affects relapse rate and survival in some subgroups, namely, ER- patients.

Accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter, randomized phase III study of the Italian Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ouest-Mammella Inter Gruppo Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether an accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) chemotherapy regimen with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) induces a higher activity and efficacy compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage IV breast cancer patients were randomized to receive as first-line chemotherapy either standard CEF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) administered every 21 days (CEF21) or accelerated-intensified CEF (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), epirubicin 80 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) administered every 14 days (HD-CEF14) with the support of G-CSF. Treatment was administered for eight cycles. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were randomized (74 patients on the CEF21 arm and 77 on the HD-CEF14 arm). In both arms, the median number of administered cycles was eight. The dose-intensity actually administered was 93% and 86% of that planned, in CEF21- and HD-CEF14-treated patients, respectively. Compared with the CEF21 arm, the dose-intensity increase in the HD-CEF14 arm was 80%. Both nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities were higher in the HD-CEF14 arm than in the CEF21 arm. During chemotherapy, four deaths occurred in the HD-CEF14 arm. No difference in overall response rate (complete plus partial responses) was observed: 49% and 51% in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.94). A slightly non-statistically significant higher percentage of complete response was observed in the HD-CEF14 arm (20% v 15%). No difference in efficacy was observed. The median time to progression was 14.3 and 12.8 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.69). Median overall survival was 32.7 and 27.2 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.16). CONCLUSION: In metastatic breast cancer patients, an 80% increase in dose-intensity of the CEF regimen, obtained by both acceleration and dose intensification, does not improve the activity and the efficacy compared with a standard dose-intensity CEF regimen.

Multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate cardioprotection of dexrazoxane versus no cardioprotection in women receiving epirubicin chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Dexrazoxane was found effective in reducing doxorubicin cardiotoxicity when given at a dose ratio (dexrazoxane: doxorubicin) of 20:1. Preclinical studies indicated that dexrazoxane at a dose ratio of 10 to 15:1 also protected against epirubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. The main objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of dexrazoxane, given at a dose ratio of 10:1 against epirubicin cardiotoxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-two advanced breast cancer patients were randomized to receive epirubicin-based chemotherapy with or without dexrazoxane. Patients who had previously received adjuvant chemotherapy that contained anthracyclines were treated with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 intravenously (IV), epirubicin 60 mg/m2 IV, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 IV, on day 1 every 3 weeks. The other patients were treated with epirubicin 120 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 3 weeks. Cardiac toxicity was defined as clinical signs of congestive heart failure, a decrease in resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to < or = 45%, or a decrease from baseline resting LVEF of > or = 20 EF units. RESULTS: One hundred sixty patients were evaluated. Cardiotoxicity was recorded in 18 of 78 patients (23.1%) in the control arm and in six of 82 (7.3%) in the dexrazoxone arm. The cumulative probability of developing cardiotoxicity was significantly lower in dexrazoxane-treated patients than in control patients (P = .006; odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence limit [CL], 0.09 to 0.78). Noncardiac toxicity, objective response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were similar in both arms. CONCLUSION: Dexrazoxane given at a dexrazoxane:epirubicin dose ratio of 10:1 protects against epirubicin-induced cardiotoxicity and does not affect the clinical activity and the noncardiac toxicity of epirubicin. The clinical use of dexrazoxane should be recommended in patients whose risk of developing cardiotoxicity could hamper the eventual use and possible benefit of epirubicin.

Hormonotherapy of advanced prostate cancer.

More than two decades of studies on hormonal treatment of Prostate Cancer are briefly reviewed. Recent American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations have pointed the major issues faced in randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses. Androgen ablation remains the mainstay of treatment for advanced stages, while Docetaxel based chemotherapy is becoming the standard in hormonorefractory tumors and targeted therapies are approaching.