Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 14(3): 200-7, 2005 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15936187

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The best combination of bolus size and lockout interval for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is not known. This study compared a 5-min with a 15-min lockout interval. METHODS: Parturients were randomly assigned to receive PCEA with either a 5-min or a 15-min interval. All had a 15-mL loading dose, continuous background infusion 6 mL/h of 0.125% bupivacaine plus fentanyl 2 mug/mL, PCEA bolus volume 5 mL, maximum hourly dose 26 mL. Visual analogue scores for pain, nausea and pruritus, sensory levels to ice, sacral analgesia, motor power, blood pressure and fetal heart rate were assessed pre-epidural and regularly thereafter until delivery. The numbers of boluses and attempts and patient satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS: 29 patients were assigned to the 5-min group and 31 to the 15-min group, but the 15-min group contained twice as many nulliparous women. Side-effect and complication rates did not differ between groups. VAS pain scores were reduced from a median of 79 in the 15-min group and 82 in the 5-min group to a median of zero 30 min after epidural insertion. Bolus/attempt ratio was 0.88 in the 5-min vs. 0.70 in the 15-min group. The numbers of requests for physician intervention were similar. No differences in pain scores, side-effects, drug use or patient satisfaction were demonstrated. CONCLUSION: The 5-min lockout interval appears the more efficient and has been used safely in our practice for 15,000 parturients, although a larger study is required to confirm the relative efficacy, efficiency and safety of this regimen.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Analgesia Obstétrica , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Adulto , Feminino , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Movimento/efeitos dos fármacos , Medição da Dor , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/epidemiologia , Gravidez
2.
J Clin Eng ; 16(2): 137-44, 1991.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10110257

RESUMO

A patented approach to infrared thermometry based on the use of a standard pyrosensor has resulted in the development of two new infrared tympanic thermometers, one for professional use, the other for home use. Both were tested to evaluate accuracy in the laboratory and to evaluate equivalence to standards, correlation to standards, and precision in human subjects. Accuracy was found to be well within ASTM standards on both models. Mean ear temperatures were 0.2 degrees C below oral and 0.7 degrees C below bladder temperature. Correlations between ear and oral and ear and bladder temperatures were r = .77 to .84. Repeatability in the same ear was very high at r = .95 (left) and .97 (right). Reproducibility between left and right ear ranged from r = .89 to .92.


Assuntos
Raios Infravermelhos , Termômetros/normas , Membrana Timpânica , Desenho de Equipamento , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA